Here’s the latest poll from Bloomberg on most important issues facing the country:
Climate change ranks dead last in importance. Source: PollingReport.com
Now compare what the American People think to what Obama thinks in his UN speech today.
The following is the text of Obama’s speech as prepared for delivery today at the UN:
Good morning. I want to thank the Secretary-General for organizing this summit, and all the leaders who are participating. That so many of us are here today is a recognition that the threat from climate change is serious, it is urgent, and it is growing. Our generation’s response to this challenge will be judged by history, for if we fail to meet it — boldly, swiftly, and together — we risk consigning future generations to an irreversible catastrophe.
No nation, however large or small, wealthy or poor, can escape the impact of climate change. Rising sea levels threaten every coastline. More powerful storms and floods threaten every continent. More frequent drought and crop failures breed hunger and conflict in places where hunger and conflict already thrive. On shrinking islands, families are already being forced to flee their homes as climate refugees.
The security and stability of each nation and all peoples — our prosperity, our health, our safety — are in jeopardy. And the time we have to reverse this tide is running out.
And yet, we can reverse it. John F. Kennedy once observed that “Our problems are man-made, therefore they may be solved by man.” It is true that for too many years, mankind has been slow to respond to or even recognize the magnitude of the climate threat. It is true of my own country as well. We recognize that. But this is a new day. It is a new era. And I am proud to say that the United States has done more to promote clean energy and reduce carbon pollution in the last eight months than at any other time in our history.
We’re making our government’s largest ever investment in renewable energy — an investment aimed at doubling the generating capacity from wind and other renewable resources in three years. Across America, entrepreneurs are constructing wind turbines and solar panels and batteries for hybrid cars with the help of loan guarantees and tax credits — projects that are creating new jobs and new industries. We’re investing billions to cut energy waste in our homes, buildings, and appliances — helping American families save money on energy bills in the process. We’ve proposed the very first national policy aimed at both increasing fuel economy and reducing greenhouse gas pollution for all new cars and trucks — a standard that will also save consumers money and our nation oil. We’re moving forward with our nation’s first offshore wind energy projects. We’re investing billions to capture carbon pollution so that we can clean up our coal plants. Just this week, we announced that for the first time ever, we’ll begin tracking how much greenhouse gas pollution is being emitted throughout the country. Later this week, I will work with my colleagues at the G20 to phase out fossil fuel subsidies so that we can better address our climate challenge. And already, we know that the recent drop in overall U.S. emissions is due in part to steps that promote greater efficiency and greater use of renewable energy.
Most importantly, the House of Representatives passed an energy and climate bill in June that would finally make clean energy the profitable kind of energy for American businesses and dramatically reduce greenhouse gas emissions. One committee has already acted on this bill in the Senate and I look forward to engaging with others as we move forward.
Because no one nation can meet this challenge alone, the United States has also engaged more allies and partners in finding a solution than ever before. In April, we convened the first of what have now been six meetings of the Major Economies Forum on Energy and Climate here in the United States. In Trinidad, I proposed an Energy and Climate Partnership for the Americas. We’ve worked through the World Bank to promote renewable energy projects and technologies in the developing world. And we have put climate at the top of our diplomatic agenda when it comes to our relationships with countries from China to Brazil; India to Mexico; Africa to Europe.
Taken together, these steps represent an historic recognition on behalf of the American people and their government. We understand the gravity of the climate threat.
We are determined to act. And we will meet our responsibility to future generations.
But though many of our nations have taken bold actions and share in this determination, we did not come here today to celebrate progress. We came because there is so much more progress to be made. We came because there is so much more work to be done.
It is work that will not be easy. As we head towards Copenhagen, there should be no illusions that the hardest part of our journey is in front of us. We seek sweeping but necessary change in the midst of a global recession, where every nation’s most immediate priority is reviving their economy and putting their people back to work. And so all of us will face doubts and difficulties in our own capitals as we try to reach a lasting solution to the climate challenge.
But difficulty is no excuse for complacency. Unease is no excuse for inaction. And we must not allow the perfect to become the enemy of progress. Each of us must do what we can when we can to grow our economies without endangering our planet — and we must all do it together. We must seize the opportunity to make Copenhagen a significant step forward in the global fight against climate change.
We also cannot allow the old divisions that have characterized the climate debate for so many years to block our progress. Yes, the developed nations that caused much of the damage to our climate over the last century still have a responsibility to lead. And we will continue to do so by investing in renewable energy, promoting greater efficiency, and slashing our emissions to reach the targets we set for 2020 and our long-term goal for 2050.
But those rapidly-growing developing nations that will produce nearly all the growth in global carbon emissions in the decades ahead must do their part as well. Some of these nations have already made great strides with the development and deployment of clean energy. Still, they will need to commit to strong measures at home and agree to stand behind those commitments just as the developed nations must stand behind their own. We cannot meet this challenge unless all the largest emitters of greenhouse gas pollution act together.
There is no other way.
We must also energize our efforts to put other developing nations — especially the poorest and most vulnerable on a path to sustainable growth. These nations do not have the same resources to combat climate change as countries like the United States or China do, but they have the most immediate stake in a solution. For these are the nations that are already living with the unfolding effects of a warming planet — famine and drought; disappearing coastal villages and the conflict that arises from scarce resources. Their future is no longer a choice between a growing economy and a cleaner planet, because their survival depends on both. It will do little good to alleviate poverty if you can no longer harvest your crops or find drinkable water.
That is why we have a responsibility to provide the financial and technical assistance needed to help these nations adapt to the impacts of climate change and pursue low-carbon development.
What we are seeking, after all, is not simply an agreement to limit greenhouse gas emissions. We seek an agreement that will allow all nations to grow and raise living standards without endangering the planet. By developing and disseminating clean technology and sharing our know-how, we can help developing nations leap-frog dirty energy technologies and reduce dangerous emissions.
As we meet here today, the good news is that after too many years of inaction and denial, there is finally widespread recognition of the urgency of the challenge before us. We know what needs to be done. We know that our planet’s future depends on a global commitment to permanently reduce greenhouse gas pollution. We know that if we put the right rules and incentives in place, we will unleash the creative power of our best scientists, engineers, and entrepreneurs to build a better world. And so many nations have already taken the first steps on the journey towards that goal.
But the journey is long. The journey is hard. And we don’t have much time left to make it. It is a journey that will require each of us to persevere through setback, and fight for every inch of progress, even when it comes in fits and starts. So let us begin. For if we are flexible and pragmatic; if we can resolve to work tirelessly in common effort, then we will achieve our common purpose: a world that is safer, cleaner, and healthier than the one we found; and a future that is worthy of our children. Thank you.

On an entirely different tangent, can ANYONE name just one coastal village anywhere in the world which has had to have been abandoned solely because of sea level rise?
There are many thousands of villages in SE Asia built on stilts due to rising sea levels. As far as I am aware they all pre-date WWII and most pre-date the 20th century.
Robert van der Veeke (14:00:42) :
“a world that is safer, cleaner, and healthier than the one we found; and a future that is worthy of our children.”
Do it for those ±30.000 childeren below the age of 5 that will DIE TODAY because they lack that safer, cleaner, and healthier world. So how much time do we have left, 2 years, 5 years or perhaps 10 years? In 10 years time of doing nothing about those problems another 110 million kids under the age 5 will have died because they have no future at all.
How many people will have died of causes directly related to global warming in 10 years time?”
Robert,
Is it not a bloody shame that our Governments have spend over 79 billion dollars to sell the blatant lies about Global Warming and Climate Change?
No child will die from causes directly related to Global Warming.
They will die in the millions from Bio fuel projects, high food prices, energy rationing, corruption, price dumping and the destruction of our economies.
Green Plans, black death!
O/T but there seems to be two new solar Cycle 24 spots appearing, one on the northern hemisphere and one on the southern, both at similar latitudes. There like london buses these spots!
http://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov/data/realtime-images.html
There are so many errors in Mr Hope N’ Change’s speech and I have no doubt it was written by Gore because THAT IS his syntax.
I feel like I’m taking crazy pills. Amazing how a man can lie straight-faced to millions of people and get away with it. Worse, maybe he believes the lie, or even worse, maybe he knows fully that he’s lying. Where are the virtuous leaders? Where is the integrity? We’ve gotta fight these people tooth and nail. The U.S. Government is oppressive and the U.N. is corrupt to the core.
Jerry, I would hope that you eventually realize that “truth” is rarely black or white (no pun intended).
Well, no surprises here. BO is clearly supporting the UN position on this issue.
Any takers on who will be the first president of the soon to be ratified World Government?
It will soon be time for each of us to decide if freedom is worth fighting for.
While her husband spoke about 30.000 children who are are dying from Climate Change Michelle did some shopping:
Obama is not the only one who is “disconnected”.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/17/AR2009091703679_pf.html?=no
The oceans that cover 3/4 of the planet are like a giant battery storing the energy of the Sun. There is an 18 to 24 month lag time before the diminishing effects of solar warming are noticed in the data. Even if the Sun were to dramatically heat up with activity, the effects would not be noticed in the data due to the same lag time.
We could save something closer to 5 million children under 5 who die of diarrhea every year, spend a lot less money, save a lot more lives and do much less damage to the economy.
We could also save another 750,000 children under 5 who die of malaria each year by reversing the prohibition on DDT.
That’s all we need…. another trillion dollar boondoggle (Cap and Trade aka American Clean Energy And Security Act of 2009) and tax bill. Representative John Dingell had it right… it’s a massive tax burden on the American taxpayer.
It may rank next to dead last in importance but this is the most important and game changing piece of legislation ever crafted in modern times and we need to make sure it gets top priority in our attempts to stop it.
If the dems want energy security, just have the Treasury print up a hundred billion dollars, give it to firms, scientists, and physicists, and let them come up with alternate energy sources. There is no reason to ration oil to Americans nor is there any reason for us to send hundreds of billions of dollars per year to developing countries so they can build infrastructure, then take our jobs so they can then sell us things.
I’d be surprised if democrats aren’t working to help the world’s poor. I’d also be surprised if there weren’t any foreign operatives inside the DNC working on behalf of the interests of foreign nations.
Actually, this speech proves my theory.
Dems want, more than anything, to outdo the GOP. The Dems perceived that the last President was stupid and inexperienced. So, they found someone even stupider, and with even less experience.
Brilliant strategy.
Michel is right. What happens to the credibility environmental science when Mother Earth fails to play Obama’s scare game?
In his disconnected brilliance he has previously stated, regarding the cap-and-trade bill: “At a time of great fiscal challenges, this legislation is paid for by the polluters who currently emit the dangerous carbon emissions that contaminate the water we drink and pollute the air we breathe” — so even CO2 carbonation in soda is viewed by obama as dangerous pollution.
Previous polls also show the disconnect. See: http://www.appinsys.com/GlobalWarming/ObamasGovernment.htm
Steven Chu – please read the Wegman Report and then examine the subsequent multiproxy temp. reconstructions and see which of the problems Wegman identified have been eliminated and which have been repeated.
And please clarify what is meant by “carbon pollution” – is this meant to be carbon dioxide?
Science at the top table in politics should not be afraid to speak its name.
Now the UN and AGWers claim that the global recession caused the first significant reduction in CO2 emissions in 40 years.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/22/science/earth/22emissions.html?ref=instapundit
How is it that a reduction in anthropogenic CO2 emissions, a small portion of total emissions, can be significant? It seems more likely that the cooling oceans are the primary cause of any significant reduction in atmospheric CO2.
If you summarise comments so far it is about 99 saying the president has made a mistake and just 2 saying that it is not so.
The 99 miss the key point. Politicians have to take advice. How can they be
expert on anything, let alone a complex scientific topic? The issue is that a good politician knows who to take advice from. If I was president and the issue was climate I would take advice from the American Meteorlogical Society, Physical Society, etc. And what do these groups say? Anthony, your commenters seem to be technical types on the whole. You should encourage commenters to act through their own professional societies to get their views known. Better than ranting against a guy who is just doing his job.
As several have stated previously on this thread and others, it is not about climate or healthcare. It is about a one world government. The only way to bring this about is to destroy the U S economy. Every subject is twisted in order to levy more taxes until almost everyone in the U S will be dependent on the government for something. So let’s not waste our energy trying to educate those that aren’t interested in the truth. Better to keep your muzzle clean and your powder dry.
“That to secure these rights governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, that whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it and to institute new government…..”
I too was amazed a Chu’s speech. Clearly the American People just aren’t as sensible as us sages. How could you people not agree with us, you betters, and we know ideology too!
{Political Rant Mode ON} Truth is, this US government is ideologically driven and not just deaf to the citizenry, not even contemptuopus of it, but blind to vox pop. To them, all opposition is artificial and mercenary; all opposition to the president is racist.
{Political Rant Mode OFF}
BTW Are those two spots near the equator cycle 23? They have odd magnetism.
Joel Shore @12:54:15
In this case, Joel, your leaders are leading you down the garden path.
“Michel is right. What happens to the credibility environmental science when Mother Earth fails to play Obama’s scare game?”
Annsnewfriend,
Thanks
The Sun is making a monkey out of Obama and many others who claim to be intelligent thinkers. No sunspots for them till they learn a lesson they will never forget.
anybody counted the ‘lies’
[hand slaps forehead]
Anthony, to save you the effort, I’ll do this one for you in advance:
{snip}