Obama's disconnect with America on the climate issue

Here’s the latest poll from Bloomberg on most important issues facing the country:

Bloomberg_poll_092209

Climate change ranks dead last in importance. Source: PollingReport.com

Now compare what the American People think to what Obama thinks in his UN speech today.

The following is the text of Obama’s speech as prepared for delivery today at the UN:

Good morning. I want to thank the Secretary-General for organizing this summit, and all the leaders who are participating. That so many of us are here today is a recognition that the threat from climate change is serious, it is urgent, and it is growing. Our generation’s response to this challenge will be judged by history, for if we fail to meet it — boldly, swiftly, and together — we risk consigning future generations to an irreversible catastrophe.

No nation, however large or small, wealthy or poor, can escape the impact of climate change. Rising sea levels threaten every coastline. More powerful storms and floods threaten every continent. More frequent drought and crop failures breed hunger and conflict in places where hunger and conflict already thrive. On shrinking islands, families are already being forced to flee their homes as climate refugees.

The security and stability of each nation and all peoples — our prosperity, our health, our safety — are in jeopardy. And the time we have to reverse this tide is running out.

And yet, we can reverse it. John F. Kennedy once observed that “Our problems are man-made, therefore they may be solved by man.” It is true that for too many years, mankind has been slow to respond to or even recognize the magnitude of the climate threat. It is true of my own country as well. We recognize that. But this is a new day. It is a new era. And I am proud to say that the United States has done more to promote clean energy and reduce carbon pollution in the last eight months than at any other time in our history.

We’re making our government’s largest ever investment in renewable energy — an investment aimed at doubling the generating capacity from wind and other renewable resources in three years. Across America, entrepreneurs are constructing wind turbines and solar panels and batteries for hybrid cars with the help of loan guarantees and tax credits — projects that are creating new jobs and new industries. We’re investing billions to cut energy waste in our homes, buildings, and appliances — helping American families save money on energy bills in the process. We’ve proposed the very first national policy aimed at both increasing fuel economy and reducing greenhouse gas pollution for all new cars and trucks — a standard that will also save consumers money and our nation oil. We’re moving forward with our nation’s first offshore wind energy projects. We’re investing billions to capture carbon pollution so that we can clean up our coal plants. Just this week, we announced that for the first time ever, we’ll begin tracking how much greenhouse gas pollution is being emitted throughout the country. Later this week, I will work with my colleagues at the G20 to phase out fossil fuel subsidies so that we can better address our climate challenge. And already, we know that the recent drop in overall U.S. emissions is due in part to steps that promote greater efficiency and greater use of renewable energy.

Most importantly, the House of Representatives passed an energy and climate bill in June that would finally make clean energy the profitable kind of energy for American businesses and dramatically reduce greenhouse gas emissions. One committee has already acted on this bill in the Senate and I look forward to engaging with others as we move forward.

Because no one nation can meet this challenge alone, the United States has also engaged more allies and partners in finding a solution than ever before. In April, we convened the first of what have now been six meetings of the Major Economies Forum on Energy and Climate here in the United States. In Trinidad, I proposed an Energy and Climate Partnership for the Americas. We’ve worked through the World Bank to promote renewable energy projects and technologies in the developing world. And we have put climate at the top of our diplomatic agenda when it comes to our relationships with countries from China to Brazil; India to Mexico; Africa to Europe.

Taken together, these steps represent an historic recognition on behalf of the American people and their government. We understand the gravity of the climate threat.

We are determined to act. And we will meet our responsibility to future generations.

But though many of our nations have taken bold actions and share in this determination, we did not come here today to celebrate progress. We came because there is so much more progress to be made. We came because there is so much more work to be done.

It is work that will not be easy. As we head towards Copenhagen, there should be no illusions that the hardest part of our journey is in front of us. We seek sweeping but necessary change in the midst of a global recession, where every nation’s most immediate priority is reviving their economy and putting their people back to work. And so all of us will face doubts and difficulties in our own capitals as we try to reach a lasting solution to the climate challenge.

But difficulty is no excuse for complacency. Unease is no excuse for inaction. And we must not allow the perfect to become the enemy of progress. Each of us must do what we can when we can to grow our economies without endangering our planet — and we must all do it together. We must seize the opportunity to make Copenhagen a significant step forward in the global fight against climate change.

We also cannot allow the old divisions that have characterized the climate debate for so many years to block our progress. Yes, the developed nations that caused much of the damage to our climate over the last century still have a responsibility to lead. And we will continue to do so by investing in renewable energy, promoting greater efficiency, and slashing our emissions to reach the targets we set for 2020 and our long-term goal for 2050.

But those rapidly-growing developing nations that will produce nearly all the growth in global carbon emissions in the decades ahead must do their part as well. Some of these nations have already made great strides with the development and deployment of clean energy. Still, they will need to commit to strong measures at home and agree to stand behind those commitments just as the developed nations must stand behind their own. We cannot meet this challenge unless all the largest emitters of greenhouse gas pollution act together.

There is no other way.

We must also energize our efforts to put other developing nations — especially the poorest and most vulnerable on a path to sustainable growth. These nations do not have the same resources to combat climate change as countries like the United States or China do, but they have the most immediate stake in a solution. For these are the nations that are already living with the unfolding effects of a warming planet — famine and drought; disappearing coastal villages and the conflict that arises from scarce resources. Their future is no longer a choice between a growing economy and a cleaner planet, because their survival depends on both. It will do little good to alleviate poverty if you can no longer harvest your crops or find drinkable water.

That is why we have a responsibility to provide the financial and technical assistance needed to help these nations adapt to the impacts of climate change and pursue low-carbon development.

What we are seeking, after all, is not simply an agreement to limit greenhouse gas emissions. We seek an agreement that will allow all nations to grow and raise living standards without endangering the planet. By developing and disseminating clean technology and sharing our know-how, we can help developing nations leap-frog dirty energy technologies and reduce dangerous emissions.

As we meet here today, the good news is that after too many years of inaction and denial, there is finally widespread recognition of the urgency of the challenge before us. We know what needs to be done. We know that our planet’s future depends on a global commitment to permanently reduce greenhouse gas pollution. We know that if we put the right rules and incentives in place, we will unleash the creative power of our best scientists, engineers, and entrepreneurs to build a better world. And so many nations have already taken the first steps on the journey towards that goal.

But the journey is long. The journey is hard. And we don’t have much time left to make it. It is a journey that will require each of us to persevere through setback, and fight for every inch of progress, even when it comes in fits and starts. So let us begin. For if we are flexible and pragmatic; if we can resolve to work tirelessly in common effort, then we will achieve our common purpose: a world that is safer, cleaner, and healthier than the one we found; and a future that is worthy of our children. Thank you.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
196 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mr Lynn
September 22, 2009 1:07 pm

“Carbon pollution”!!
One abject falsehood after another, and at the root of it all:
“Carbon pollution”!
Time to shout from the rooftops,
“CO2 IS GOOD FOR PLANTS, GOOD FOR THE EARTH, AND GOOD FOR YOU!”
/Mr Lynn

John Silver
September 22, 2009 1:09 pm

A second civil war brewing, eh?

Manfred
September 22, 2009 1:13 pm

“everybody wants to be useful”
(quote Thomas the Tank Engine)

Neo
September 22, 2009 1:16 pm

With the Dot.Com bust, the subprime/real-estate bust, “Cap and Trade” is the next big scam. Hold on to your wallets.

Pofarmer
September 22, 2009 1:18 pm

Is Barack Hussein possibly jumping a shark here?
EVERYTHING can’t be a catastrophe caused by somebody else.

myrick
September 22, 2009 1:22 pm

So he truly has the arrogance to think that we can “control” the climate. Or need to.

MartinGAtkins
September 22, 2009 1:22 pm

And already, we know that the recent drop in overall U.S. emissions is due in part to steps that promote greater efficiency and greater use of renewable energy.
Earth to Obama….. It’s the economy stupid.

Stephen Brown
September 22, 2009 1:24 pm

“And already, we know that the recent drop in overall U.S. emissions is due in part to steps that promote greater efficiency and greater use of renewable energy.”
And it’s a very SMALL part. Almost all of the reduction in what are smeared as ’emissions’ comes from factories and businesses which have shut up shop and closed because of the awful state of the economy.
On an entirely different tangent, can ANYONE name just one coastal village anywhere in the world which has had to have been abandoned solely because of sea level rise?

Stoic
September 22, 2009 1:24 pm

Mr Obama, you are a great man but you have been very poorly advised. Carbon dioxide is not pollution. It is essential to life.

Don B
September 22, 2009 1:25 pm

President Obama failed to state that one of the most horrific dangers of climate change is that Oregon could be invaded by tamarisk. 🙂
http://www.oregonlive.com/environment/index.ssf/2009/09/climate_change_could_mean_more.html

whitty
September 22, 2009 1:27 pm

“Rising sea levels threaten every coastline. More powerful storms and floods threaten every continent. More frequent drought and crop failures breed hunger and conflict in places where hunger and conflict already thrive. On shrinking islands, families are already being forced to flee their homes as climate refugees.”
Uhm, examples, please? Oh, it’s those “model predictions?” Fine then.
Gotta love the self-loathing liberals.

September 22, 2009 1:31 pm

>We’re making our government’s largest ever investment in renewable energy — an investment aimed at doubling the generating capacity from wind and other renewable resources in three years.<
Last time I checked, 2 x 0 = 0
Well, it is a close analogy. Wind and solar power account for 0.00167 of the energy needs of the USA (one sixth of one percent per Keith Rattie, CEO of Questar Corp.). Doesn't amount to a hill of beans considering energy demands in the USA were increasing at 1-2% a year prior to the current recession.

September 22, 2009 1:32 pm

No, you can´t .

Ron de Haan
September 22, 2009 1:33 pm

Health and Climate Bill, onslaught of oppression!
Nice to hear that from an US politician.
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/59759-rohrabacher-health-and-climate-bills-threaten-onslaught-of-oppression

Jeff in Ctown (Canada)
September 22, 2009 1:33 pm

Propaganda!
I hope he fails to pass his green laws, because Canada (is just going to follow his lead.

Richard deSousa
September 22, 2009 1:34 pm

Stupid speech. It will be even stupider when Washington DC and the entire N.E. gets snow bound this entire winter. With those volcanoes erupting in Kamkatcha and Alaska, it’s coming.

Retired Engineer
September 22, 2009 1:36 pm

Bad Science! (and other snippable thoughts)

Don B
September 22, 2009 1:40 pm

I should have explained the joke, about “Oregon could be invaded by tamarisk,” (13:25:49) which is salt cedar, which thrives in drought conditions. Contrary to some claims, the Pacific Northwest snowpack has been growing in recent years.
http://www.iceagenow.com/Pacific_Northwest_Snow_Pack-the_True_Story.htm
Obama will never hear about increasing snowpacks from the people he has appointed to shield him from these inconvenient truths.

H.R.
September 22, 2009 1:41 pm

“[…] We know that our planet’s future depends on a global commitment to permanently reduce greenhouse gas pollution. […]”
Who’s “we”? Did the President have a mouse in his pocket?
From the polls there doesn’t seem to be a lot of “we” out there.

L
September 22, 2009 1:45 pm

Mr. O’s rapidly growing probiscis is becoming a threat to other people’s eyes!

Mike T
September 22, 2009 1:45 pm

The problem with the public having such little interest in Climate Change is that the politicians can get away with doing almost anything they like and that same public wont realise how they are being fleeced from all angles. Lack of interest means lack of knowledge – no listening to any discussion or arguments against government proposals.

September 22, 2009 1:46 pm

“The journey is hard. And we don’t have much time left to make it.”
Is that the “journey” to end global warming? Or is it the “journey” to end climate change?
If he’s talking about ending global warming, we already ran out of time 5-10 years ago when the globe stopped warming… But we’ll get another shot at ending global warming when the PDO switches positive again in about 25-30 years.
If he’s talking about ending climate change, his delusions of grandeur syndrome has worsened.

TERRY46
September 22, 2009 1:49 pm

Now this makes since of importance.Dead last and were going to spent billions with a CAPITAL B. on something that is nothing more than A cycle.Where is the outrage .When Presient Bush was in the White House all we heard was how we could use the money being spent on the war in Iraq to help the people in the U.S. Now Obama is spending it faster than they can print it and were still in Iraq and were going to send more troops,40000, to AfghanIstan and the media says nothing.I thought Obama was going to bring the troops home???

JC
September 22, 2009 1:50 pm

The final sentence says it all.
“and a future that is worthy of our children.”
Whenever a politician says it’s “for the children” grab your wallet and run for cover.

Dr A Burns
September 22, 2009 1:51 pm

Climate change is a wonderful issue for politicians because it can be used to gain support from both greenies, industry and the public simply by a new tax system.
New taxes are politically expedient for politicians. For example, the ignorant Australian masses even voted in a new government when we were promised a new tax … the GST (Goods and Services). The masses are easily convinced without having to rely on science or logic. The best motivator of all, is to use fear.
Australia has lost 70% of its natural vegetation by deforestation and land clearing. It is the world’s leader in species loss. However addressing these critical issues is politically difficult. It is far easier for politicians to divert attention to nonsensical issues such as AGW … and to promise us more taxes, that will do nothing for the environment.