From the University of Copenhagen press release.
![]() |
||||
Will all of the ice on Greenland melt and flow out into the sea, bringing about a colossal rise in ocean levels on Earth, as the global temperature rises? The key concern is how stable the ice cap actually is and new Danish research from the Niels Bohr Institute at the University of Copenhagen can now show the evolution of the ice sheet 11,700 years back in time – all the way back to the start of our current warm period. The results are published in the journal Nature.
Numerous drillings have been made through both Greenland’s ice sheet and small ice caps near the coast. By analysing every single annual layer in the kilometres long ice cores researchers can get detailed information about the climate of the past. But now the Danish researcher Bo Vinther and colleagues from the Centre for Ice and Climate at the Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, in collaboration with researchers from Canada, France and Russia, have found an entirely new way of interpreting the information from the ice core drillings.
“Ice cores from different drillings show different climate histories. This could be because they were drilled at very different places on and near Greenland, but it could also be due to changes in the elevation of the ice sheet, because the elevation itself causes different temperatures” explains Bo Vinther about the theory.
Today the ice sheet is more than three kilometres thick at its highest point and thinning out towards the coast. Four of the drillings analysed are from the central ice sheet, while two of the drillings are from small ice caps outside of the ice sheet itself, at Renland on the east coast and Agassiz which lies just off of the northwest coast of Greenland in Canada.
![]() |
||||
Small ice caps show the standard
The small ice caps are stable and have not changed in elevation, and even though they lie very far apart from each other on either side of the central ice sheet, they show the same climate history. This means that one can use the small ice caps climate history as a standard reference for the others.
Bo Vinther explains, that the four drillings through the ice sheet would have had the same climate history if there had not been changes in elevation throughout the course of time. It is known that for every 100 meter increase in elevation, there is a 0.6 per mille decrease in the level of the oxygen isotope Oxygen-18, which indicates the temperature in the air. So if there is a difference of 1.2 per mille, the elevation has changed by 200 meters.
By comparing the Oxygen-18 content in all of the annual layers from the four drillings through the ice sheet with the Oxygen-18 content of the same annual layers in the small ice caps, Bo Vinther has calculated the elevation course through 11,700 years.
Temperature sensitive ice sheet
Just after the ice age the elevation of the ice sheet rose slightly. This is because when the climate transitions from ice age to warm age, there is a rapid increase in precipitation. But at the same time, the areas lying near the coast begin to decrease in size, because the ice is melting at the edge. When the ice melts at the edge, it slowly causes the entire ice sheet to ‘collapse’ and become lower.
The calculations show that in the course of about 3,000 years the elevation changed and became up to 600 meters lower in the coastal areas. But in the middle it was a slow process, where the elevation decreased around 150 meters in the course of around 6,000 years. It then stabilised.
The elevations that were found with the help of the Oxygen-18 measurements from the ice cores are checked with other methods, for example, by measuring the air content, which is also dependent upon the elevation.
The new results show the evolution of elevation of the ice sheet throughout 11,700 years and they show that the ice sheet is very sensitive to the temperature. The results can be used to make new calculations for models predicting future consequences of climate changes.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


bill (03:53:29) :
Hmmm! So how come even the edge cores show 11000 years of data. Where does the MWP figure in this – didn’t the ice melt since it was so sensitive to heat?
with
tty (07:22:04) :
The ice cores aren’t from the edges, that would be useless since the ice there comes from somewhere else, you don’t know where.
As in all real estate, it’s location – location – location.
Lots of independently varying variablkes changing – or, more properly, NOT assumed to be independently changing.
All these calculations are dropping back to relative O18/O16 levels in the sampled ice cores, right?
O18/O16 varies according to elevation above sea level. Fine. IF the O18 production remains the same (no cosmic radiation changes over that period of time? No change in cosmic ray shielding? Solar radiation over time? )
Then he flip-flops and assumes that the change in O18 production is “related to temperature”, but then determines the changes in Greenland glacier top-of-ice elevation BY the changes in O18 production rate over time, which is apparently therefore related to both elevation of the top-of-ice AND to the temperature of deposition. (Or is he assuming that top-of-ice elevation IS due to changes in temperature only? Clearly not so: He says that top-of-ice changes because precipitation increasing as the Ice Ages end (and glaciers melt, but then these particular glaciers DIDN’T melt at the ends of the various ice ages over the last 120,000 years. So top-of-ice changes due to precipitation when glacier melt – but these didn’t melt; but they change O18 levels due to elevation changes, but these didn’t change; but then nothing else changed to affect O18 production.)
I don’t buy his theory.
Not when B-17’s get buried under 300 feet of ice and snow in 50 years. But here he is relating 120,000 years of glacier deposits to changing O18 levels, accurate to 600 foot changes in elevation of the ice.