Title of new report from the Institute of Food and Resource Economics of the University of Copenhagen: Earth on Fire
Hmmm. “E a r t h o n f i r e”. Should be easy to prove. Let’s have a look at the numbers.
Ignition temperature of paper: 451 °F or 233°C
(Source: Ray Bradbury. * see comments)
Average temperature of the earth: 61.43 °F or 16.37 °C
(Source: National Climatic Data Center July 2009 report – adding 20th century average plus July anomaly)
Yep, spontaneous surface ignition is possible at any moment in your area. Tune to CNN for official global fire emergency news. /sarc
Note the polar bear image on the front cover. Old habits die hard. – Anthony
from Eurekalert
New questions in the climate change debate — essential ethical and philosophical perspectives
Researchers from within the fields of science, the arts and theology add new perspectives to the climate change debate with the book ‘Earth on Fire — Climate Change from a Philosophical and Ethical Perspective,’ now available as an open-access book
![]() |
||||
The book aims to show how climate change raises not only a number of questions which can be answered within the scientific domain, but also many issues of a more universal nature based on philosophical, political, ethical and religious views on the world is and how it should be. What is “good “?
The earth is on fire. So we need to both act fast and think carefully about what we are doing. The ethical questions that climate change raises may be new in their global character but behind them are still the well-known, basic universal questions such as what is “being good”, what should we do and who should we consider, how should we prioritise our efforts in a situation where there are more challenges than solutions, and how do we structure the debate of climate change issues so that everybody is heard and the best arguments gain acceptance.
Lifestyle changes are necessary
Associate Professor at Centre for Bioethics and Risk Assessment at LIFE – Faculty of Life Sciences at University of Copenhagen, Mickey Gjerris is one of the editors of the book. He says about our new situation:
“Countering climate change requires large changes to our lifestyle. Ethical thinking offers an opportunity to understand nature in a way which means that we should not only interpret these changes as a sacrifice we have to make but, rather, as an opportunity to establish a relationship to nature where protection of it is seen as a opportunity for man’s further development.”
Science as an integrated part of society
The authors of the book hope that it will contribute to researchers reflecting on the underlying values for discussion.
“It is important to understand that science is an integrated part of society and not an outside factor that can provide an independent description of what is happening while we are politically deciding what should be done”
“Today there is a tendency to lament the politicization of climate change research and to pretend that other researchers have an underlying agenda while you pride yourself on being firmly based on the objective foundation of science. But we all have an agenda, and the debating climate will gain by us recognising this”, says Mickey Gjerris.
Free English online version
The English online version of “Earth on Fire- Climate change from a philosophical and ethical perspective”, Edited by Mickey Gjerris, Christian Gamborg, Jørgen E. Olesen, Jakob Wolf, is free for all to use www.earthonfire.foi.dk. All the authors ask is that readers will share the existence of the book with their colleagues and fellow students so that as many as possible might benefit from it.
The book, which was published in a Danish printed version earlier this year, consists of seven chapters which show how the climate changes are rooted in our scientific, philosophical, political, ethical and religious understanding of the world, and concludes with three cases where the climate debate issues are discussed: CO2 trading, GM crops and biofuels. The cases are addressed by experts who have played a prominent role in the public debate of these topics.
“Earth on Fire – Climate change from a philosophical and ethical perspective” can be downloaded from this page: www.earthonfire.foi.dk where you can also read about the various chapters and authors of the book.
For more information, please contact Associate Professor Mickey Gjerris, LIFE -Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen on tel.: +45 35 28 21 65, mobile: + 45 25 37 03 85 or by e-mail:mgj@life.ku.dk
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

I have a suggestion for another title; “Pants on Fire!”
I’m pretty sure that paper ignites at around 450 F, not 450 C
Not that it matters, since we’re still nowhere close, but I thought I’d bring it up.
Mark B,
a fan of Ray Bradbury’s Farhenheit 451??
I think I remember a book called Fahrenheit 451…
That picture of a bear playing on a small chunk of ice looks familiar. Isn’t that one from the series showing bears playing?
In 12th-century England weather prediction was considered a crime punishable by death. In some ways, it seems, people had more common sense in Middle Ages.
Modern savage drives a car, watches TV news, listens to some hogwash iPod music, and pushes meaningless papers around from 9 am to 5 pm in cubicle of some useless institution; none of these things, however, make a human being less ignorant or more honorable than an Egyptian slave or a medieval serf.
Yeah, I thought I’d seen it here.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/06/27/warmists-deny-copenhagen-access-to-polar-bear-scientist/
So who gets to decide what is science, and who gets to live like kings, while the rest of us pay the price of ‘lifestlyle changes’?
This is how I read thier solution to save the Earth: Go back to the the Medieval Times.
We’ll defend our homeland with sticks and stones.
I think that was the premise of the title ‘Fahrenheit 451’.
===================================
My only comment on all this is…
Why is ‘natural’ always good?
Cyanide & ammonia are ‘natural’ I wouldn’t advise ingestion of either.
DaveE.
Yep, the ignition temperature of paper is not nearly that hot. C an F are mixed up. Things like this are not good for your article,
REPLY: Typo fixed, A
Isn’t it 451F, like in the title of the movie? I guess they are right, the Earth will be on fire, one day, due to the Sun expanding and consuming all the inner planets or by a large asteroid strike and not as a result of not changing our lifestyle (CO2 emissions etc).
REPLY: Typo fixed- A
I wonder if the book deals with the ethical question of Lies and Exaggeration.
A little prep for the November foregone-conclusion summit.
Fahrenheit 451
Ray Bradbury wrote Fahrenheit 451 and I thought it was names that was because that was the temperature that ignited a book.
Fahrenheit 451 Looks like 451 people beat me to it.
“”” Mark B (17:57:44) :
I’m pretty sure that paper ignites at around 450 F, not 450 C “””
I’m pretty sure it says 450 F up above too, so you may be right.
George
Hey, anybody know off hand at just what temperature paper ignites? I hate to go looking for it when there is so much expertise at hand.
======================================
“It is important to understand that science is an integrated part of society and not an outside factor that can provide an independent description of what is happening while we are politically deciding what should be done.”
That’s the whole problem with much of climate science, it fails to be “… an independent description of what is happening… “. It is politicized, and that is unfortunate.
My aren’t we a snippy bunch today! 🙂
This is setting Denmark up to have a Hale winter for sure,that and the UN conference…
Huh, just when Oregon State University says we could be heading in to another ice age…
I Agree.
Lifestyle changes are necessary.
If we all go around in drag, it will surely help the feather boa industry.
Wait a minute – where do all those poor feathers come from?