The Waxman-Markey pre-vote count – where you can help

OK folks, time to engage in our rights of citizenship. You know what to do. Phones and email contact info at the bottom. – Anthony

UPDATE2: test vote passes narrowly, 7 votes needed to defeat this bill – Anthony

UPDATE: C-SPAN1 is covering this live, there is a live media streaming page which you can access here:

http://www.c-span.org/Watch/C-SPAN_wm.aspx

CSPAN also has live phone in. Phone in your comments: (202)585-3885 , -3886, -3887

http://legalplanet.files.wordpress.com/2009/05/waxman-and-markey.jpg
Waxman and Markey

From GreenHell blog the Waxman-Markey pre-vote count…

Waxman-markey pre-liminary head-count as of Thursday afternoon (courtesy Myron Ebell):

218 needed to win…

Yes

Yes = 175

Leaning Yes = 35

TOTAL = 210

Undecided = 20

No

No = 190

Leaning No = 14

TOTAL = 204

Undecided or Won’t Say:

Kirkpatrick Az

Boyd Fla

Brown Fla

Bishop Ga

R Kirk Ill

Foster Ill

Donnelly Ind

R Jones NC

McIntyre NC

R Frelinghuysen NJ

Tonko NY

Arcuri NY

Space Ohio (he voted for it in committee)

Carney Penna.

Davis Tenn

Al Green Tex

Jackson Lee Tex

Ortiz Tex

Eddie Bernice Johnson Tex

Kind Wisc

Leaning Yes:

Mitchell Az

Cardoza Calif

Costa Calif

Baca Calif

R Castle Del

Grayson Fla

Meek Fla

Kozmas Fla

Abercrombie Hi

Bean Ill

R Cao La

Kratovil Md

R Ehlers Mich

Kildee Mich

Schauer Mich

Peters Mich

Clay Mo

Skelton Mo

Thompson Miss

Shuler NC

Adler NJ

Lance NJ

Meeks NY

McMahon NY

Murphy NY

R McHugh NY

Maffei NY

Driehaus Ohio

Fudge Ohio

Kilroy Ohio

Cooper Tenn

Edwards Tex

Rodriguez Tex

Nye Va

Kagan Wisc

Leaning No:

Salazar Colo

Marshall Ga

Boswell Iowa

Minnick Idaho

Halvorson Ill

Etheridge NC

Kissell NC

Massa NY

Kaptur Ohio

Boccieri Ohio

R Gerlach Penna

Hinojosa Tex

Mollohan WV

Rahall WV

U.S. readers can use this link…

http://www.usa.gov/Contact/Elected.shtml

…to contact their representative and senators regarding the Waxman-Markey bill.

The link makes it very easy to send an email or make a phone call.

Use the US Representatives link after clicking on the link above since this vote will occur in the House of Representatives.

A one or two sentence email, or a one minute call is all that is necessary. Just mention that you’re a constituent of the Representative or Senator, that it’s a bad bill, and ask him/her to please vote against it.

Elected folks keep score. They have their staffs keep a tally of pro and con calls, letters and emails. If they hear from enough people, it can make a difference.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

315 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
June 26, 2009 2:36 pm

Ray (14:28:17) :
No worries the ACES Bill being debated also has a massive International Climate Action Fund for transfers to third world in order to meet the UN requirements that are due out of Copenhagen in December.
Insanity loves company.

Milwaukee Bob
June 26, 2009 2:38 pm

Yes, we’ve called and our Congressman (Bilirakis) is voting no and the one to the south of us (Castor) of course! is voting yes. She is Pelosi’s little darling. And were calling others, and no I haven’t given up hope, but when I get down I have to write – – something frivolous. So to the tune of “Thanks for the memory” and with profound apologies to Mr. America himself, Bob Hope, (and our English friends) this for all those who vote for the bill –
Thanks for the tomfoolery,
Co2 was not the curse, there are things very much worse,
Including the money, that soon will stuff your purse,
How brazen your vote.
Thanks for the tomfoolery,
Your care for us is past, I knew it wouldn’t last,
Your hunger for power, is obviously very vast,
How retched you are.
Many of us had high hopes, and, many of us had no hopes,
Now we know it was all up to dopes,
In scorn of sense, much harm done.
So, thanks for the tomfoolery,
We will not forget, on this you can surely bet,
You think you put one over, on others and this vet,
How foolish, you are.

John G. Bell
June 26, 2009 2:39 pm

Re: smallz79 (13:54:02) :
“Rep Joe Barton just mentioned the EPA scandal in his closing remarks!!!!”
Yes, I was impressed. You don’t expect much out of Republicans these days. Sort of a dead-man-walking party. But he pretty well nailed the close. It is easier when the facts are on your side! Where is a Lincoln when you need him? You need to convince people who disregard facts in addition to those that abide by them.

Chris
June 26, 2009 2:48 pm

Congress didn’t listen to the country on TARP. They aren’t listing to us on this.
Are we coming to this:
Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable. -John F. Kennedy, In a speech at the White House, 1962

Chris
June 26, 2009 2:50 pm

I suppose the line in the sand is different for everyone.

Editor
June 26, 2009 2:50 pm

That site for contacting elected officials is down. Possibly being jammed by people who dont want the publics voice heard against this bill.

P Walker
June 26, 2009 2:53 pm

They just tried to shut Boehner up and failed . Almost cocktail time – thank goodness .

hotrod
June 26, 2009 2:57 pm

Rep John Boehner, is taking advantage of a “custom of the house” that the remarks of the leaders of the two sides of the house are heard even though their remarks exceed the official time available.
He is forcing that issue to go through the 300 page amendment which was added at 03:09 in the morning page by page. He was Challenged by Rep Robert Waxman, and the Chairwomen supported Boehner.
In effect we have a one man filibuster that is forcing the House to “read” this amendment before they vote.
Brilliant parliamentary move!
Larry

June 26, 2009 2:58 pm

And some Boehner fireworks!
Fingers crossed!

neill
June 26, 2009 2:58 pm

Boehner is reading selections out of the 300+ page amendment that popped into the record at 3:09 am, this am!
Hilarious!!
He’s making Waxman, Markey et al look like complete fools.

Aron
June 26, 2009 3:03 pm

Ray, all
If you read this BBC article closely it includes the implicit threat that countries who accept western money will be allowed to follow their own (this is laughable) development path. Those who don’t will have agendas imposed on them.
“Lord Stern, who wrote a climate change report for the government in 2008, said Mr Brown’s initiative was “timely” but countries getting money should be able to follow their own development agendas and not have them imposed.”
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8120432.stm
So if you’re a poor nation, collect your welfare payments and follow the agenda (be frugal, don’t develop, use a single windmill to power your whole population) set out for you. If you wish to snub the west’s aid and develop your economy using middle eastern oil, for example, then get ready for your leaders to be disposed of.
That’s elitism, imperialism and the welfare system for you right there.

gt
June 26, 2009 3:05 pm

Adding a 300+ page amendment 12 hours before the vote is already ridiculous. Amazing that seems to be standard practice in Congress. Democracy? How about Demo-crazy.

Bill P
June 26, 2009 3:06 pm

Boehner, at 4:00:
Like watching a dentist drilling out the rot with his drill. It’s unbearable.
This turkey is going to pass, and we’ll all get to examine its fine print over the next three years.

pkatt
June 26, 2009 3:09 pm

Whats worse is that there are whole parts that arent even in the bill yet. space has been reserved for them. How can they vote on something that isnt even complete?

BUCK036
June 26, 2009 3:10 pm

God Bless John Boehner, and his closing remarks on the 300 page 3:09 AM Admend. attached to the “GOOFY” Bill, to be voted on.. He is doing a great job, as I type

Jeremy
June 26, 2009 3:10 pm

energy efficient mortgages? disgusting.

AKD
June 26, 2009 3:11 pm

From the Minority Leader’s website:
What You May Not Know About Speaker Pelosi’s National Energy Tax
More Mandates, More Regulations, and More Costs Than Ever Before

Washington, Jun 26 – Speaker Pelosi’s national energy tax is going to raise electricity prices, increase gasoline prices, and ship American jobs overseas to countries like China and India. This, we know.
It would be a bureaucratic nightmare overseen by a confusing web of government agencies that would take and redistribute trillions of dollars from family budgets and workers payrolls. This, we also know. Even Agriculture Committee Chairman Collin Peterson (D-MN) admitted in the Washington Post this morning that: “The truth is, nobody knows for sure how this is going to work.” How encouraging.
But what don’t we know? Here are some facts you may not know about Speaker Pelosi’s national energy tax:
Homebuyers Beware. Trying to save up for a new home? You may have to save up a little longer for your purchase. The Democrats’ bill would dramatically increase new home costs by mandating California’s expensive new building codes for the entire nation. Immediately upon enactment, the Democrats’ bill would demand a 30 percent increase in energy efficiency for new construction. A couple of years later, the Democrats’ bill would require an additional 50 percent improvement. These numbers were chosen with no concern for cost to consumers or feasibility in implementation.
Homebuilders Beware. The Democrats’ bill imposes new mandatory regulations and civil penalties for homebuilders. If your state refuses to accept the stringent and costly California building codes, the federal government may assess penalties. And don’t get too comfortable with the new mandatory regulations because the Democrats’ bill allows for “consensus-based” codes to supplant those outlined in the bill. So, as soon as you’ve invested your hard-earned money to comply with the bill’s mandates, the rug could get pulled from underneath you. Translation? You’ll pony up more and more money.
Home Sellers Beware. Having a hard time selling your home? Here’s one more hurdle to jump: all homes sales are conditioned upon an energy audit and a new energy rating assessment and energy labeling program for your home that’s outlined in the Democrats’ bill. And if you thought you could improve your property with a fresh coat of paint and some granite counters? Think again! Now your home will be subjected to a new energy rating assessment and energy labeling program that will penalize you for older windows, original fixtures, and dated appliances. So the Democrats’ bill would bring down the value of your home!
New Lights No Matter the Cost. As early as 2012, the Democrats’ bill eliminates all existing lighting technology used in many outdoor lighting fleets (parking lots, stadiums, secured facilities like power plants and factories). Just as an example, switching to the mandated technology in the bill will cost one small utility about $30 million in annual revenue. So you now have to comply with the new mandates for new lighting? Hold the phone. It is not clear that a feasible alternative technology is available for every existing lighting application – regardless of cost – which could force some businesses to close.
The consequences of Speaker Pelosi’s national energy tax for families and small businesses are real. It will drive up energy costs, send millions of jobs to countries like China and India, and place an especially heavy burden on rural America. There is a better way. House Republicans have proposed the American Energy Act, legislation that represents the fastest route to a cleaner environment, lower energy costs, and more American jobs. The legislation would:
Increase environmentally-safe energy production on remote lands and far off our shores;
Promote the use of alternative fuels that will reduce carbon emissions, such as nuclear, clean-coal, and renewable energy technologies;
and Encourage increased efficiencies and cutting edge technologies to maximize America’s energy potential.
Today’s vote on Speaker Pelosi’s ill-advised national energy tax will have consequences for every American. It is a bad deal for America. And the American people will remember how their Members of Congress vote.

That’s some crazy stuff if true, or even partly true.

3x2
June 26, 2009 3:13 pm

Re: California – Isn’t the “controller” looking at paying state creditors in IOU’s soon? Look on the bright side though, if this bill passes the entire US will be running on IOU’s. Bud, can you lend me some electricity ’till IOU day?
Reading the EPA document earlier reminded me of a question I had but hadn’t got around to asking. If you pop over here to the NOAA CO2 trend, where exactly is the current economic slump? If the current one isn’t there in the CO2 record then just exactly how long and deep does a global slump have to be before it shows up in the CO2 trend?

P Walker
June 26, 2009 3:14 pm

Just hearing what is in the amendment turns my stomach . I wish the whole country were watching this .

Bill P
June 26, 2009 3:17 pm

Every one of the authors of these pork barrel projects should be named.

June 26, 2009 3:20 pm

Bill P:
I hope the “rational” supporters are quietly sneaking out the back door as Boehner exposes the hubris/waste inherent in only the additional 300 pages. Great theater… I wish I was on long hike.
Keep the faith!

Editor
June 26, 2009 3:20 pm

I am growing more and more horrified as I hear Burton speak of all the crap thats in this bill. IMHO the entire GOP needs to walk out of congress and leave it in a rump state so its unable to do anything. Time for the second civil war.

Jim
June 26, 2009 3:23 pm

Squidly – one of mine is leaning yes. I emailed and told him I would do everything in my power to ensure he did not get re-elected if he votes yes for this abomination.

Evan Jones
Editor
June 26, 2009 3:23 pm

Pamela:
Welcome to the wilderness. I am sorry it comes to this, really, I am.
But it beats a house of marked cards. And it’s to your credit. They did not, do not, deserve your faith.

AKD
June 26, 2009 3:24 pm

Hmm…I lost CSPAN. He was just getting to the exciting part…

1 7 8 9 10 11 13