The Waxman-Markey pre-vote count – where you can help

OK folks, time to engage in our rights of citizenship. You know what to do. Phones and email contact info at the bottom. – Anthony

UPDATE2: test vote passes narrowly, 7 votes needed to defeat this bill – Anthony

UPDATE: C-SPAN1 is covering this live, there is a live media streaming page which you can access here:

http://www.c-span.org/Watch/C-SPAN_wm.aspx

CSPAN also has live phone in. Phone in your comments: (202)585-3885 , -3886, -3887

http://legalplanet.files.wordpress.com/2009/05/waxman-and-markey.jpg
Waxman and Markey

From GreenHell blog the Waxman-Markey pre-vote count…

Waxman-markey pre-liminary head-count as of Thursday afternoon (courtesy Myron Ebell):

218 needed to win…

Yes

Yes = 175

Leaning Yes = 35

TOTAL = 210

Undecided = 20

No

No = 190

Leaning No = 14

TOTAL = 204

Undecided or Won’t Say:

Kirkpatrick Az

Boyd Fla

Brown Fla

Bishop Ga

R Kirk Ill

Foster Ill

Donnelly Ind

R Jones NC

McIntyre NC

R Frelinghuysen NJ

Tonko NY

Arcuri NY

Space Ohio (he voted for it in committee)

Carney Penna.

Davis Tenn

Al Green Tex

Jackson Lee Tex

Ortiz Tex

Eddie Bernice Johnson Tex

Kind Wisc

Leaning Yes:

Mitchell Az

Cardoza Calif

Costa Calif

Baca Calif

R Castle Del

Grayson Fla

Meek Fla

Kozmas Fla

Abercrombie Hi

Bean Ill

R Cao La

Kratovil Md

R Ehlers Mich

Kildee Mich

Schauer Mich

Peters Mich

Clay Mo

Skelton Mo

Thompson Miss

Shuler NC

Adler NJ

Lance NJ

Meeks NY

McMahon NY

Murphy NY

R McHugh NY

Maffei NY

Driehaus Ohio

Fudge Ohio

Kilroy Ohio

Cooper Tenn

Edwards Tex

Rodriguez Tex

Nye Va

Kagan Wisc

Leaning No:

Salazar Colo

Marshall Ga

Boswell Iowa

Minnick Idaho

Halvorson Ill

Etheridge NC

Kissell NC

Massa NY

Kaptur Ohio

Boccieri Ohio

R Gerlach Penna

Hinojosa Tex

Mollohan WV

Rahall WV

U.S. readers can use this link…

http://www.usa.gov/Contact/Elected.shtml

…to contact their representative and senators regarding the Waxman-Markey bill.

The link makes it very easy to send an email or make a phone call.

Use the US Representatives link after clicking on the link above since this vote will occur in the House of Representatives.

A one or two sentence email, or a one minute call is all that is necessary. Just mention that you’re a constituent of the Representative or Senator, that it’s a bad bill, and ask him/her to please vote against it.

Elected folks keep score. They have their staffs keep a tally of pro and con calls, letters and emails. If they hear from enough people, it can make a difference.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

315 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
TomVonk
June 26, 2009 2:46 am

As a European deep in the Kyoto madness since years I have already seen the VERY visible impacts on the European economy (f.ex the increasing decoupling of the purchase power evolutions from the rest of the world , increasing delocalisation trends , exploding energy prices) .
I was glad that at least the Bush administration stood as a dam against the folly .
Now with Obama it seems that the dam is beginning to get a beating from the radicals , enviro fanatics and technological society haters too .
I hope for the sake of you in the US and of all of us elsewhere that this bill doesn’t pass .
It is not 1 mail that you should do but 10 and ask all your friends and relatives to do the same .
ACT NOW !

June 26, 2009 2:51 am

Why are you people all over this issue?
Don’t you realise that both Michael jackson AND Farrah Fawcett have just shuffled off this overheating mortal coil !!!11!!!1one!!!!1!!!

smallz79
June 26, 2009 3:05 am

OT, but will WUWT do a tribute page for Michael Jackson? Very sad day he was soo young. This is crazy. I feel for his family and friends..

Konrad
June 26, 2009 3:10 am

Mick (02:18:48)
And that question should be – “Did you actually read all of the proposed legislation before voting?” It would be valuable to the US political process to have a record of who voted in favour as well as a record of who actually checked what they were voting for. My work always requires me to check the figures, the qualifications and previous record of the supplier of said figures is never an excuse for not independently verifying data.

Richard Heg
June 26, 2009 4:02 am

More political madness this time from the UK Gordon Brown wants to use money from development aid to fight global warming.
“Brown proposes £60bn climate fund ”
“Money could be raised from selling carbon permits and from existing development aid budgets, although he said contributions from the latter should be limited. ”
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/8120432.stm

Dodgy Geezer
June 26, 2009 4:43 am

I remember the completely counter-productive attempt by the UK Left-wing Guardian newspaper to influence the last US presidential election. Their last-ditch project to get foreigners to personally contact US voters and beg for a Kerry victory was probably the thing that got Bush in…
So perhaps any Chinese, Iranian or North Korean readers should be encouraged to contact US voters and argue for the US to stuff its economy/strike> save the world…..

Mike O
June 26, 2009 5:10 am

Called my representative this morning. He’s leaning “Yes”.

Sean P
June 26, 2009 5:53 am

“No question now, what had happened to the faces of the pigs. The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which.”
– George Orwell, Animal Farm, Ch. 10

Mark
June 26, 2009 6:03 am

My rep is voting no. I wish I could call the other ones listed above that are in other states and districts.

Frank K.
June 26, 2009 6:05 am

Does anyone remember what was happening last year at this very time? That’s right – oil was well over $100/bbl. And what were the liberals in congress (and by extension the MSM) screaming about? High gas prices! High oil prices! Inflation! Greedy oil companies! Greedy speculators! The world was coming to and end…
I still remember the flyer that my liberal NH representative (Paul Hodes) sent to his constituents, telling us that he was, among other things, going to have Congress “sue OPEC to bring down gas prices”!! I’m still waiting for that one…
Now, fast-forward 12 months – we now have Congress attempting to make gas expensive again, this time under the guise of “fixing the climate”. So gas will be at $4+/gal again – the difference this time is that *** congress *** will be getting your money rather than those greedy oil companies and speculators!

Michael Ronayne
June 26, 2009 6:08 am

It may well come down to the “Useless Idiots” (AKA Republican Senators and a few Blue Dog Democrat Senators) having enough backbone and votes to filibuster in the Senate. The parliamentary trick there is to vote YES for closure, where a super-majority is required, and then vote NO on the final legislation which is a simple 50% plus one majority up-down vote. That way they can tell the folks back home they voted NO when in fact they voted YES. Any Senator voting YES for closure effectively voted YES for Cap-and-Tax. But first the House of Representatives!
Michael Ronayne
Nutley, NJ

June 26, 2009 6:08 am

Another good article here;
http://blog.heritage.org/2009/06/26/morning-bell-waxman-markey-bill-is-an-energy-tax-that-doesnt-work/
Quote “There’s one thing the Waxman-Markey cap and trade bill doesn’t do: Work. All of the above-mentioned costs accrue in the first 25 years of a 90-year program that, as calculated by climatologists, will lower temperatures by only hundredths of a degree Celsius in 2050 and no more than two-tenths of a degree Celsius at the end of the century. In the name of saving the planet for future generations, Waxman-Markey does not sound like a great deal: Millions of lost jobs, trillions of lost income, 50-90 percent higher energy prices, and stunning increases in the national debt, all for undetectable changes in world temperature. Who’s buying that?”

Kath
June 26, 2009 6:15 am

From the Wall Street Journal:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124588837560750781.html
“Even as Democrats have promised that this cap-and-trade legislation won’t pinch wallets, behind the scenes they’ve acknowledged the energy price tsunami that is coming. During the brief few days in which the bill was debated in the House Energy Committee, Republicans offered three amendments: one to suspend the program if gas hit $5 a gallon; one to suspend the program if electricity prices rose 10% over 2009; and one to suspend the program if unemployment rates hit 15%. Democrats defeated all of them.”

June 26, 2009 6:21 am

Quote;
Calzada says Spain’s torrential spending — no other nation has so aggressively supported production of electricity from renewable sources — on wind farms and other forms of alternative energy has indeed created jobs. But Calzada’s report concludes that they often are temporary and have received $752,000 to $800,000 each in subsidies — wind industry jobs cost even more, $1.4 million each. And each new job entails the loss of 2.2 other jobs that are either lost or not created in other industries because of the political allocation — sub-optimum in terms of economic efficiency — of capital.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/24/AR2009062403012_pf.html

Tom in Florida
June 26, 2009 6:25 am

The die hard leftists in this country, including many elected officials, do not care about protecting the Earth, the climate or anything else. Their plan is to destroy enough of the US economy so that millions more will be dependent on the government for their very existence. That will assure that those same officials will be reelected by simply promising to take care of everyone. If you hand out government checks to enough people for a long enough time the recipients will truly believe that they couldn’t get by in this cruel world alone without “help”. First take their money, then take their guns, then take their freedoms.

Matt A
June 26, 2009 6:25 am

I emailed my rep and I am going to call now. This is it people. Now or never…

Retired Engineer
June 26, 2009 6:36 am

If the CEI report of the EPA quashing dissent is true, it might nudge a few of the fence sitters. It might also mean the EPA will impose regulations regardless of what Congress does. The president has said he wants it, no matter where it comes from.
“Interesting” times?
(an economic Depression could be “interesting” …)

Allen63
June 26, 2009 6:36 am

While my Representative will probably vote FOR the bill, I have politely requested he vote NO. I very briefly stated my scientific qualifications and personal reasoning (I assume this will have little impact).

Mr Lynn
June 26, 2009 6:38 am

My Congressman is Ed Malarky. Sigh.
REPLY: Let him know anyway, can’t hurt. – Anthony

OK, I attempted to e-mail him via the form on his website. Got a 404 error.
So I faxed a letter to his office:

26Jun09
The Honorable Edward Markey
2108 Rayburn House Office Building,
District of Columbia 20515-2107
Fax: (202) 226-0092
Dear Representative Markey:
I am one of your constituents.
Are you aware that the EPA has suppressed a study based on peer-reviewed data that shows conclusively that the IPCC conclusions are false?
See here:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/06/25/online-global-warming-study-censored-by-epa/
Here is the suppressed report:
http://cei.org/cei_files/fm/active/0/DOC062509-004.pdf
Are you aware that the climate has been cooling since 2000, even though CO2 increased?
There is NO NEED for the Cap and Trade bill that you sponsored. It will have terrible effects on the American economy and people.
I urge you to rescind your support of this egregious legislation. If you can walk away from it today, that will turn the tide and you will be accounted a patriot and a courageous man.
Yours sincerely,

Fat lot of good it’ll do, but at least his staff will know there’s one lonely soul in this godforsaken one-party town and state that doesn’t approve of the Congressman.
/Mr Lynn

SOYLENT GREEN
June 26, 2009 6:39 am

More Skullduggery:
Waxman dumped a 300-page amendment into this atrocity at the crack of dawn.
Part of it appears to be aimed at states–like AZ.–who are voting to outlaw Global Warming restrictions. Think anyone will delay the vote or even read this additional nonsense?
Not bloody likely.

June 26, 2009 6:40 am

I’m surprised Mark Kirk is still undecided. I know Mark and have had meetings with him in the past. I’ll be calling him in DC and visiting his office this morning in an attempt to get him to vote against this nonsense.

June 26, 2009 6:47 am

Anthony:
I called the office of R Jones (NC). They said they will definately be voting NO, so you can update the above tally.

Glen Blackburn
June 26, 2009 6:49 am

I contacted Rep. Allen Boyds office in Tallahassee Fl. and was told that the phone and email volume is so high that they are keeping a daily tally. Almost all is running against.

Shawn Whelan
June 26, 2009 6:53 am

The Dems are saying they have the votes to push this through.
This will chase the rest of the industry overseas.
What sort of idiot would invest their money in US industry?
The final nail in the coffin provided by the California Dems.
At this point I will enjoy it when California goes bankrupt.

June 26, 2009 6:57 am

I contacted Rep. Minnick of Idaho’s first district. He is in the leaning yes column. The person answering his phone in the DC office assured me he will vote no. I hope this is true.

Verified by MonsterInsights