How not to measure temperature, part 88 – Honolulu's Official Temperature ±2

People send me stuff, some days my email explodes. Today I got all sorts of things about Obama and John Holdren and the new NCDC climate spincycle which Steve McIntyre has dubbed Chucky Returns Part IV. That one made me laugh out loud.

Something else that made me laugh today was this well done story (h/t to Andrew Walden) from reporter Tina Chau of KGMB-TV in Honolulu, HI. The NWS spokesman Tom Birchard was clearly flummoxed, and at the end of the interview said exactly what I’ve always said about the ASOS system and measurement of climate data at airports. Comedian George Carlin was right in his “Hippy dippy weatherman routine”: Why do they always give the temperature for the airport? Nobody LIVES there!

“ASOS…placed for aviation purposes…not necessarily for  climate purposes.”

Yet, ASOS weather stations at airports worldwide are in fact used for climate, and are part of the official climate record. In the US alone, there are 64 ASOS stations (that I’ve found so far) in the official USHCN climate record, plus there are hundreds in GHCN worldwide.  In my studies of the USHCN temperature network, I’ve found dozens of such poor siting examples even at non-airports. See my report here (PDF, 4 MB).

Our old friend the ASOS and HO-83 temperature sensors may be up to tricks again in Honolulu. It seems the temperature is a wee bit off and new records are being set by the ASOS weather station at the airport. I’m reminded of the similar situation in Tucson years ago that went on a long time before anybody caught it. I’ve found the HNL station, seen below. It is located at lat/lon 21.32403 -157.939467 There’s more than meets the eye. More after the news story.

Honolulu Airport Weather Station - click for live interactive map view
Honolulu Airport Weather Station - click for live interactive map view

Honolulu Temperature Records Questioned

Written by Tina Chau

The high in Honolulu Monday was 92 degrees. It was the hottest June 15 since the National Weather Service started keeping track and the 8th straight day we’ve broken or tied a record. But was it really that hot?

That’s what the experts at the NWS have been wondering. They settled their suspicions with a trip to the airport to check Honolulu’s official temperature sensor.

“We had one of our technicians visit the site and they did a side-by-side calibration and found the thermometer at the Honolulu International Airport was reading a little warmer than what his caliberation thermometer was reading,” said Tom Birchard, a meteorologist at the NWS.

It was two degrees warmer. There’s some wiggle room with the accuracy of the temperature sensor.

“Which means, if the reading is 90, the thermometer is only accurate to read within about two degrees so it could be anywhere between 88 degrees and 92 degrees.

Which means our records these past eight days may not be records after all.

“If it turns out, after further investigation of the thermometer the data were skewed,” said Birchard, “they could be stricken.”


Now see these ground level photos I’ve found of the HNL ASOS courtesy of NCDC’s photo library of ASOS weather stations.

Not only is there a faulty sensor at HNL, as indicated by the NWS meteorologist in the news story, take a good look at the site photo below.  The HO-83 temperature sensor is the little white mushroom shaped device.

Hygrothermometer
The HO83 ASOS thermohygrometer - the same type used in Honolulu
Honolulu ASOS looking south - click for larger image
Honolulu ASOS looking south - click for larger image

There’s an asphalt access road directly adjacent to the ASOS temperature sensor. Plus a heat generating power transformer, and the requisite air conditioner exhaust for the ILS electronics building.

As we know from common experience, temperatures are almost always warmer near asphalt than natural soil or ground cover. From a scientific perspective we can cite either Yilmaz et al (PDF 2008 ) and the measurements of temperature differences over such surfaces, or we can reference NOAA’s Climate Reference Network Handbook which rates the likely temperature error of such placements.

See the Climate Reference Network Site Handbook (PDF 2002) including explanation of the CRN 1-5 rating system used by surfacestations.org

Honolulu ASOS looking southwest - click for larger image
Honolulu ASOS looking southwest - click for larger image
Honolulu ASOS looking north
Honolulu ASOS looking north - click for larger image

How close is the temperature sensor to the asphalt? I decided to use Google Earth’s measurement tool:

Honolulu ASOS measurement view - click for larger image
Honolulu ASOS measurement view - click for larger image

The answer: 1.6 meters, about 5 feet.

But what’s a little asphalt when the temperature sensor is surrounded by a sea of it at HNL?

Honolulu's ASOS temperature sensor - surrounded by asphalt - click for larger image
Honolulu's ASOS temperature sensor - surrounded by asphalt - click for larger image

The 2 degree temperature error in the ASOS record was only found because it exceeded the June 15th high temperature record for Honolulu. It seemed “odd” enough for somebody to check to be sure.

Honolulu surface temperature record - source NASA GISS
Honolulu Airport GISS surface temperature record plot - source NASA GISS

So the question we have now is, how much of the data in the plot above from NASA GISS is from influences such as urban growth, airport expansion, etc.  I’ve confirmed that GISS uses the Honolulu Airport for climate data since their ID of 425911820000:

GISS_honolulu_numericID
click for larger image

Matches that of the National Climatic Data Center description for Honolulu Airport’s WMO code (91182)

click for larger image
click for larger image

Note the big step change in 1960 in the HNL airport data plot. Hawaii became the 50th US state in 1959. So it would stand to reason that 1960 would be a period of growth at the airport, or perhaps a station move to a warmer location. According to the National Climate Data Center, the ASOS station was installed on February 1st, 1998. Since then, the temperature swings appear to have been larger than in prior years.

But the nearby Honolulu Observatory temperature record doesn’t seem to have much of a trend, though it no longer measures temperature for climate records, a pity:

Honolulu Observatory GISS station plot
Honolulu Observatory GISS surface temperature record plot - click for larger image

When dealing with climate change, it is generally accepted that the amount of temperature rise attributable is about 0.7°C or about 1.3°F. With errors of 2 degrees or more creeping into the climate record due to faulty equipment and poor station placement, are we so certain?

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

81 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
John F. Hultquist
June 16, 2009 10:02 pm

Everyone . . . Please read the comments —
Tom in South Jersey (21:18:48) : and the third paragraph at
E.M.Smith (21:40:35) :
As I’ve read more and more of the “How Not To —” stories I have been wondering if there are any stations that have a sufficiently clean and long record that some sense could be made of the data for climate purposes? Not likely.

Larry
June 16, 2009 10:11 pm

Another great job, Anthony. It made me laugh. Maybe more of the media rubes will start to catch on elsewhere about this stuff.

p.g.sharrow "PG"
June 16, 2009 10:21 pm

If I remember correctly the prevailing wind at the runway is from the west and quite dependable. that would place the thermometer down wind of the building, air conditioner and power transformer as well as the middle of hell ( nearly 2 square miles of pavement and crushed rock) an eratic sensor seems like a small problem that can be fixed.

mark
June 16, 2009 10:28 pm

the christchurch airport in new zealand has the same set up right next to the run way.this is the place wear NIWA takes its readings.

June 16, 2009 10:41 pm

REPLY: Typically it is crushed rock – Anthony
Thanks again, Anthony… Sorry for this question: what kind of rock? The total normal emittancy at environmental temperatures is 0.93 for crushed quartz, 0.9 for calcite and 0.83 for sandstone with 5% calcite.

David Ball
June 16, 2009 10:53 pm

You caught this one and many others. Still, it makes one wonder as to how much faulty data is being used. I can hear a chorus of “statistically insignificant” now. How can +-2 degrees be statistically insignificant when we are only talking about 1 degree of warming? Tell me again how many weather station are out by 2 degrees? I love to hear the numbers, …… 8^]

Evan Jones
Editor
June 16, 2009 11:03 pm

In the US alone, there are 64 airports in the official USHCN climate record,
I do not go by what NOAA designates as “airport”. Their official designations are, to a large degree, for crap. They include sites where there is no airport anywhere near and leave out a bunch, besides.
I went through the gallery and actually looked, and then used Google Earth resources to pin down the few that are not yet surveyed. My count is 72, and all of these are actually in the airports.

Evan Jones
Editor
June 16, 2009 11:09 pm

After looking at that graph, how do I go about laying a bet that the station was moved to the airport in 1960?

Graeme Rodaughan
June 16, 2009 11:25 pm

My apologies for the OT.
Does anyone have any data resources on the Sea Surface Temperature Trends, or “Ocean Warming” Trends?
The question is prompted by the following articles,
http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/what_steve_asked_penny/
and
http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/fielding_gets_no_answer/
Apparently the Australian Government are using Ocean temperatures as the key confirmation of AGW (begs the question of what’s wrong with surface and atmospheric temps), and I would like to know more about this aspect of the AGW Case.

Gerard
June 16, 2009 11:45 pm

Great Job Anthony – someone said it made them laugh, as a scientist it makes me very sad that decisions about our future are being made based on such sloppy science and data. In Australia we have the same sort of politicians basing our future economic security on the same faulty data. In Victoria we have enough cheap brown coal to produce electricity for the next 700 years but it is now considered dirty and bad for the climate so we have carpetbagger developers getting ready to receive taxpayer handouts to build wind farms across some of the most beautiful landscapes in the world such as the Macedon Ranges in central Victoria

David Walton
June 16, 2009 11:47 pm

What a wonderful blog post. It makes me think that some day temperature recording diagnostics placement and calibration may be considered important to NASA climate research.

D. King
June 17, 2009 12:28 am

Great, K-Mart temp sensors. What’s next, wet finger wind
direction?

Espen
June 17, 2009 12:42 am

E.M. Smith: CO2 is measured in a lot of places, e.g. on the South Pole. This page is quite informative: http://www.ferdinand-engelbeen.be/klimaat/co2_measurements.html

bill
June 17, 2009 2:14 am

E.M.Smith (21:17:50) :
So, Hawaii is where we measure co2 at Mauna Loa. And we have from

There are many places that measure CO2. The yearly averaged values are all very similar. The daily/monthly/hourly figures are interesting to look at. As has been discussed on another thread What sucks CO2 out of the atmosphere in July-August.
This plot is on the same scale for CO2 – Ch4 scale is on the right
http://img527.imageshack.us/img527/6153/co2manysitesch4.jpg

bill
June 17, 2009 2:42 am

DR (21:23:54) :
It’s not the temperature that’s important, it’s the anomaly! Everybody knows that…..:)
Bad data + right answer=

To answer the question \”is the planet warming\” this is all that is needed – the difference from a baseline!! I.e. how much is Jan 1st this year different from the average January 1sts over a defined period.
What is important is consistancy of environment. So UHI in a growing city will cause problems as would sudden paving of the area.
Hot transformers/close asphalt/radiating buildings will convect vertically as will exhaust fans from air conditioning. Additional shade should have no effect (the unit must be isolated from solar radiation to be effective anyway).
I have suggested many times that experiments need to be done to see how proximity to such sources changes temperature measurements – but I have seen no results. You shouldn\’t rubbish a reading unless you have quantifiable proof that these sort of heat souces will affect it.
The type of surface under the \”thermometer\” will affect summer to winter variations and minimum temps but providing the surface does not change over the years the max should reflect the GW/GC change. (it should be remembered that if the surface is grass then the heat output of this will change with season. At an unmanned station snow may accumulate, water on the grass will cool, dead summer/autumn grass may be different to spring lush vegetation.

June 17, 2009 2:58 am

Long Term SST Anomalies Surrounding Hawaii (ERSST.v3b) peaked in 1940.
http://i43.tinypic.com/dp8g2s.jpg
Short Term SST Anomalies Surrounding Hawaii have been dropping since 2004, like the rest of the North Pacific.
http://i39.tinypic.com/bea64y.jpg
It’s curious that GISS land surface temperatures don\’t seem to track the SSTs.

FerdinandAkin
June 17, 2009 3:55 am


Tom in South Jersey (21:18:48)
And
E.M.Smith (21:40:35)

Have good points. The atmospheric measuring equipment at airports are put there for aviation safety and efficient operation of aircraft. Data collection for long term weather observation is a side benefit, but it is up to the end users of the collected data to insure its validity for their purposes, not the airport authority who installed the instruments.
It seems rather non-professional for a scientist or academic group to stake the results of their research on data provided by an organization that has no interest in the research. Validation and verification of data is wholly the responsibility of the person doing the research. It makes me wonder about the condition of our society when we are staring at ‘Cap –n- Trade’ based on data that was intended for local use for aircraft safety, but was shoe horned into other applications for which it was not intended.

June 17, 2009 4:07 am

The Honolulu Obs data doesn’t look all that good either. Looks like something significant changed in 1947 to 49.
“steven mosher (21:14:52) :
It’s accuracy is only +-2 degrees but phil Jones, climate scientist, will tell you that if you read this sensor 30 times in a month the error goes down and you can know the monthly average with more precision that the daily temp.”
Averaging multiple data to improve the overall resolution only works if the errors in the data are random or at least balanced, not if there is a bias in one direction or the other.

Tom in Florida
June 17, 2009 4:26 am

Perhaps the best way to get momentum for this kind of reporting is to take this video and show it to one of your local news/weather persons. I would bet that they would be very happy to scoop their competition with a similar report. Enough of these scoops and maybe, just maybe, the whole thing will turn around.

Frances
June 17, 2009 5:13 am

Hi,
I have a couple of questions about your blog:
1) Is it OK with you if I spread some link love and link to your blog? I think my visitors would like your blog.
2) I noticed on your blog that you link to other blogs… do you think its possible for you to link to my blog myairshoes.com?
Please let me know what you think. Thanks for your time.
Frances

June 17, 2009 5:15 am

Just for the sake of perspective, global temperatures over the past ~4,500 years have apparently remained within a +/- 2 degree band (maybe). http://longrangeweather.com/global_temperatures.htm
If that is the case and if the inherent error in the measurement sites used to fabricate [ 🙂 ] the temperature record is +/- 2 degrees (+2/-0 ?), perhaps Mann was correct, at least about the “shaft” of the hockey stick. Too bad about the “blade”.

June 17, 2009 5:18 am

Anthony,
You highlighted the step change in the data around 1960 and it would seem from this link that there was a great deal of development of the airport at that time:
http://hawaii.gov/hnl/airport-information/hnl-1960-1969

jeroen
June 17, 2009 5:34 am

Don’t forget to mention all the Airplanes rushing by with jet engines. Don’t know the effects of that part.

jeroen
June 17, 2009 5:42 am

E.M.Smith (21:25:45) :
Maybe they put the asfalt over there or the building with the a/c and power unit.

Wade
June 17, 2009 5:43 am

This is a joke and a travesty. Official weather stations should use the best equipment available. 2 degree variation is unacceptable. If my thermostat was 2 degrees off, I would be really angry. How much more so should an official station be accurate! In fact, I know of a commercial thermostat that is so efficient that if you breath on it the measured temperature immediately rises and it accurate to 1/10 of a degree. Why do we hold our air conditioners to a higher standard than official weather stations?