Reprinted here by request from Harold Ambler – Anthony
What follows is an open letter to the Salon writer Peter Dizikes, who recently published an article about a new book by NASA scientist Gavin Schmidt on climate change.

The water level of Lake Powell, like that of all reservoirs in the American West, has fluctuated since the day it was dammed.
Dear Mr. Dizikes:
I recently saw your overview of Gavin Schmidt’s new book as well as your interview with him on Salon.
I was surprised to see that you consider the effects of manmade global warming to be “oddly invisible.” Having studied the subject for a couple of years now, while performing my own research, it has been my observation that newspapers, magazines, and television news sources show images of supposed manmade climate change on a daily basis. Such images include: floods, polar bears, glacial calving, etc. If anything, images of global warming might be said to saturate western media.
As with so many other products generated by the AGW industry, Schmidt’s book Climate Change: Picturing the Science is part of an ongoing effort to frighten the credulous. Its messages include: weather will kill you, our moment on Earth is unique, climate did not used to change.
Had you wanted to fulfill the responsibilities of an objective and hard-hitting journalist, you might have asked Schmidt about the image of Lake Powell on his book’s cover book. Now, of course, we are all told never to judge a book by its cover – but this is a visual book that demands to be judged on visual terms. There are a lot of people, unfortunately, who don’t know enough about the facts to perform this kind of analysis themselves. Failing to do so for them is a pity.
Were you aware, may I ask, of the controversial nature of the damming of the Colorado River that led to Lake Powell? Environmentalists were and are appalled by this particular dam. It has changed an important piece of the American natural landscape. But, like all manmade dams on Earth, it has changing water levels. Dammed lakes in the American west are particularly prone to fluctuating water levels, within single years, year to year, and on the decadal level. Water use varies as well, although it can be counted on to slowly increase. Using an image of lowered water level on Lake Powell, which is a reservoir, sitting in a desert, to indicate anything about climate change is perverse. I would even go to far as to call it anti-science.
The assumption that industrial production of co2 has altered precipitation patterns is exactly that, an assumption. Further, what you are going to find, in the next decade, is that global temperatures are going to remain flat (as they have since 1998) and/or start to decline. What you are also going to find is that science writers in the American media establishment are going to peel off, one by one, from the AGW heterodoxy.
Group-think has affected many societies negatively, and it has not disappeared during our own time. The fact that neither Mr. Schmidt’s editor, nor his publisher, nor you, nor the photographer, nor Mr. Schmidt himself would stop to reflect on the oddity of this cover is enough to give one pause.
Sincerely yours,
Harold Ambler
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Odd.
The liberals/democrats/national socialists/extremists who DO control the world’s economies, energy production and food production and distribution DO say things with extremism, hatred, and filtered by rigorous censorship of ABCNNBCBS news and ALL the world’s publicity.
Yes, those (politcally-funded) organizations hold an extremist AGW view, but tens of thousands of their actual members do NOT hold the same view. The MEMBERS, however, have been locked out of the decision process and the voting – like at the IPCC and the World Congress – where trillions are at stake in taxes.
Joel Shore says:
Well, Gavin’s point and mine in a nutshell is that any scientific theory will have at any given time several areas where there are puzzles…i.e., some data that doesn’t seem to agree with the theory and so forth. To say that the theory is disproven because of this is silly. What it means is that one has to look more carefully at the data and the theory and try to understand what is going on.
Well then Joel, the scientific theory that climate change is simply a natural phenomenon (which is in fact the default theory) does indeed have several areas where there are puzzles…i.e., some data that doesn’t seem to agree with the theory. But, to say that the default theory of naturally-driven climate change is disproven because of this is silly. What it simply means is that one has to look more carefully at the data and the theory and try to understand what is going on.
Meanwhile, can we please put a halt to all of the alarmism, the hype, and the rush to demonize an entirely beneficial gas, passing legislation against it and spending $trillions? That’s all we ask. Is that so much?
Dave Wendt (19:49:18) : said:
…the warmists seem very eager to leap on any random occurrence of drought as validation of their theory, and, aside from sea level rise and melting icecaps, drought is the propaganda image of choice for projecting fearful consequences of CO2.
……
Oliver Ramsay (08:07:51) : …The image of the steer skull in the desert is a proven classic; why wouldn’t they want to claim it as their own?
—
It is an image that comes quickly to mind:
Warm weather -> hotter climates -> drier and less rain -> deserts -> we all die.
Deserts -> less rain -> salt and bad soil -> we all die.
It is a natural image of doom and death: very carefully promoted.
OT:
Climate Progess blacklisted me for this comment….
I’m not a dem or a repub, but the dems are in control of the WH and Congress. SO you will get all the LEGISLATION that you want. Have fun being run by the GOV.!! GOV MOTORS, GOV HEALTH CARE, GOV BANKING, GOV SHIPPING, GOV RETIREMENT, GOV SUBSIDIES TO FARMERS, OIL COMPANIES, ALT ENERGY CO’s., ETC…..THE LIST NEVER ENDS. In 2020, IMHO, we won’t be talking about global warming, we will be talking about a bankrupt United States. As the saying goes, so goes California, so goes the U.S.
By the way, in California. We have hundreds of wind mills littering our hills that don’t work. They look ugly in our beautiful hills. Lots and lots of dead birds too!!!!!!!!
REPLY: CAPS never works well, it labels it as “SHOUTING”. Try editing and resubmitting. – Anthony
GOOD LUCK!!!
Thanks!
Done and resubmitted….we will see what happens…..
Just noticed today that Lake Powell has recovered half the water level it lost between 1999 and 2004. Guess that drop wasn’t forever after all.
So was it global warming or just people downstream sucking all the water out to keep their lawns green?
Reply: Duncan! I didn’t notice you posting here before. But now I see you’ve been hanging out. Give me a call at home. ~ charles the moderator aka jeez
(for those confused as to how I spot a friend from a first name, I recognize the email address).