Using old NASA imagery to look at Antarctic Ice in the 1960’s

What Lunar Orbiter 1 saw as it looked back at Earth on August 23, 1966. Climate studies of Earth will benefit by a look back in time thanks to decades old view from the Moon. Credit: LOIRP/NASA

From Space.com: Old Moon Images Get Modern Makeover

WOODLANDS, Texas — Think of it as a space age twist to that adage: Something old, something new…something borrowed, something blue.

Back in 1966 and 1967, NASA hurled a series of Lunar Orbiter spacecraft to the moon. Each of the five orbiters were dispatched to map the landscape in high-resolution and assist in charting where best to set down Apollo moonwalkers and open up the lunar surface to expanded human operations.

Imagery gleaned from the Lunar Orbiters over 40 years ago is now getting a 21st century makeover thanks to the Lunar Orbiter Image Recovery Project (LOIRP).

By gathering the vintage hardware to playback the imagery, and then upgrading it to digital standards, researchers have yielded a strikingly fresh look at the old moon. Furthermore, LOIRP’s efforts may also lead to retrieving and beefing up video from the first human landing on the moon by Apollo 11 astronauts in July 1969.

Digital domain

Dennis Wingo, LOIRP’s team leader, detailed the group’s work in progress during last week’s 40th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference.

Teamed with SpaceRef.com, LOIRP’s saga is one of acquiring the last surviving Ampex FR-900 machinery that can play analog image data from the Lunar Orbiter spacecraft. Wingo noted that the work is backed by NASA’s Exploration Systems Mission Directorate, the space agency’s Innovative Partnership Program, along with private organizations, making it possible to overhaul old equipment, digitally upgrade and clean-up the imagery via software.

LOIRP is located at NASA’s Ames Research Center at Moffett Field, Calif. There, project members are taking the analog data, converting it into digital form and reconstructing the images.

By moving them into the digital domain, Wingo said, the photos now offer a higher dynamic range and resolution than the original pictures, he added.

“We’re going to be releasing these to the whole world,” Wingo said.

Use of the refreshed images, contrasted to what NASA’s upcoming Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) mission is slated to produce, has an immediate scientific benefit. That is, what is the frequency of impacts on the Moon’s already substantially crater-pocked surface?

“We’ll be able to get crater counts,” Wingo told SPACE.com. “LRO imagery of the same terrain imaged decades ago will provide a crater count over the last 40 years.”

Frozen in time

There’s also a more down to Earth output thanks to LOIRP scientists.

They have used a Lunar Orbiter 1 image of the Earth for climate studies, basically a snapshot frozen in time that shows the edge of the Antarctic ice pack on August 23, 1966.

The team is working with the National Snow and Ice Data Center in Boulder, Colorado to correlate their images of the Earth with old NASA Nimbus 1 and Nimbus 2 spacecraft imagery that flew at about the same time — in the mid-1960s — as the Lunar Orbiter 1. Nimbus satellites were meteorological research and development spacecraft.

Wingo said that the original Nimbus images may have been recorded on an Ampex FR-900 – so by processing the original Nimbus tapes there is a very good chance that they can provide NASA with polar ice pack data from ten years earlier.

Lessons learned

One treasure hunt outing by LOIRP may lead to finding what some term as “lost” Apollo 11 slow scan tapes, Wingo said.

“We don’t think they are lost. People have been looking for the wrong tapes,” he said, explaining that they were recorded on Ampex FR-900 equipment — not on another type of recorder as previously thought.

Wingo said those Apollo tapes are stored at the Federal Records Center, labeled and ready for a look see.

“We think for the 40th anniversary of Apollo we may be able to get the original slow scan tapes,” Wingo said. If so, the hope is to recover them and give the public a higher-quality, never-before-seen view of human exploration of the Moon.

There is a lesson learned output from LOIRP.

In the beginning, very few people thought this could be done…but now they have seen the results,” Wingo said.

It is not enough to have 100 year recording medium, Wingo explains. Without the retention of the specific era equipment that images are archived on, it will be impossible for future generations to recover older NASA or other satellite data, he advised.

This is a general issue, not specific to the Lunar Orbiter program. The retention of critical hardware should be a requirement for flight efforts. The original historic Apollo 11 slow scan images have been lost due to inattention to this critical detail, Wingo concluded.

(h/t to Gary Boden)

UPDATE: Dennis Wingo responded in comments, and offers this LA Times story on the real trials and tribulations of this project.

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-lunar22-2009mar22,0,931431.story

We owe Mr. Wingo and his team, and especially Nancy Evans, a debt of gratitude for preserving space history against the odds. – Anthony

 

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

114 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
April 1, 2009 11:40 am

Scott in Minnesota (10:11:57) :
That kind of alkaline method for paper it is of recent invention, but the best papers ever made were not from direct cellulose from trees but from used cotton clothes (so with fibers included), these papers used potassium resinate (abietinate) and natural aluminum ammonium sulphate (the mineral known as “Tshernigite¨). Now it is commonly used not alum (the product of a reaction between a salt of metal having a valence of 3 with a salt of a metal having a valence of 1) but the simple aluminum sulphate.

Pierre Gosselin
April 1, 2009 11:46 am

Looking at the vital stats, Hadows core body temperature looks to be awfully low. Houston, they have a problem!
http://www.catlinarcticsurvey.com/live_from_the_ice.aspx

Pierre Gosselin
April 1, 2009 11:48 am

Less than 35°C is already moderate hypothermia.
The guy is headed for big trouble.

Reply to  Pierre Gosselin
April 1, 2009 12:02 pm

Pierre

Less than 35°C is already moderate hypothermia.

I doubt that sensor reading is accurate. I’ve noticed they fluctuate all over the place.

April 1, 2009 11:50 am

About the Catlin expedition: Al the magnificent, the one to blame as the originator of this drama, should go there with all his parafernalia, and rescue them, or send his disciple to do it.

anna v
April 1, 2009 11:53 am

pyromancer76 (10:45:57) :
Anna V, when I used your links, I saw the oceans get colder from Jan to Mar, not warmer.

And so they should. It is end of March /April (equinox) when it stops growing. Have a look at the plot on the right of this blog that shows the last ten years of ice growth and retreat.

Jack Green
April 1, 2009 12:04 pm

Regarding the Catlin Expedition: As soon as summer arrives and all the ice melts they plan on boarding a cruise ship and just sailing over the top and back home.
Just kidding. This ice extent using old classified military data might be very helpful in pushing the data back 10 years or more. I wonder if we have any U2 overflight data as well? That might push it back even more.

Jørgen F.
April 1, 2009 12:08 pm

Ross,
“Just curious, does the bolded/italic phrase mean that the tapes were never viewed when originally made, or that they were just never released to the general public?”
Of course they were looked at! By Walt D. & von Braun, sometime during 1968 :0)

G Alston
April 1, 2009 12:29 pm

Allen63 — By the way, to add to my above post, the optical diffraction in the lens system must also be accounted for in the analysis. This is a function of the specific physical lens system used.
I used to make realtime optical based meas equipment to the early 90’s used in semiconductor mfg. We found that optical linearity was also a factor, as well as specific magnification (just because a lens is marked at 100x doesn’t mean every one is exactly 100x.) We would also have a linearity correction that corrected for the slight bow effect you get from a flat sensor. A feature would seem slightly larger on the left side of the image field than the center, and so on.
As you say it’s not as simple as getting hold of a picture and counting pixels and such.
On the other hand you probably could adjust a bit for linearity by measuring between known map points if there were enough on the image, so you wouldn’t necessarily have to have the original lensing data.

April 1, 2009 12:35 pm
April 1, 2009 12:39 pm

From the NASA article….the obligatory pro-AGW junk…
These changes are not enough to reverse the course of global warming, the agency stated, but there are some other, noticeable side-effects: Earth’s upper atmosphere is heated less by the sun and it is therefore less “puffed up.”
But,
Other records set in 2008:
A 50-year low in solar wind pressure: Measurements by the Ulysses spacecraft reveal a 20 percent drop in solar wind pressure since the mid-1990s — the lowest point since such measurements began in the 1960s. The solar wind helps keep galactic cosmic rays out of the inner solar system. With the solar wind flagging, more cosmic rays are permitted to enter, resulting in increased health hazards for astronauts. Weaker solar wind also means fewer geomagnetic storms and auroras on Earth.
A 55-year low in solar radio emissions that might — or might not — indicate weakness in the sun’s global magnetic field.
A 12-year low in solar irradiance: Several NASA spacecraft find the sun’s brightness has dropped by 0.02% percent at visible wavelengths and a whopping 6 percent at extreme UV wavelengths since the solar minimum of 1996.

deadwood
April 1, 2009 12:44 pm
Mark T
April 1, 2009 12:56 pm

deadwood (12:44:10) :
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2009/04/farewell-to-our-readers/

They really don’t get it, do they? Science is never settled, never. Even if the alarmists are right, it won’t be “settled.” Neither will it be if they are wrong. Period. Their silly joke assumes the skeptic side is working for their own consensus. They simply don’t understand that the point is not to find a consensus, but to show that consensus a) does not exist one way or another and b) it would not matter if it did.
I would not expect much better from Schmidt or Mann, however.
Mark

sean
April 1, 2009 1:59 pm

I do hope the new digital masters are uncompressed and in a very simple format. Digital memory is cheap and getting cheaper. Reproducing a 2009 codec in 2049 is likely to problematic.
Also remember the BBC Doomsday project. Input from a million Brits on two laser disks was lost due to player issues. Then one of two disks was recreated, only to be lost again! So the best defense is many faithful copies in many different hands. Organisations and even states come an go.

Admin
April 1, 2009 1:59 pm

Ross:
Dennis Wingo is very interested. Please reply to my email asking permission to send him your email address ~ charles the moderator aka jeez

Ross
April 1, 2009 2:21 pm

Charles aka jeez – permission granted to give Mr. Wingo my email address.
Reply: Done. I may have also found him an additional source of parts ~ charles the moderator

Dennis Wingo
April 1, 2009 2:30 pm

“Just curious, does the bolded/italic phrase mean that the tapes were never viewed when originally made, or that they were just never released to the general public?”
The original analog tapes were viewed, at least a very small percentage of them. The filmsets were used to get into the general vicinity of where they wanted to land (the landing ellipses). Then they went to the biggest supercomputer that NASA Had (A Univac 1100 with 256k! of usable RAM), and created digitized “chits” which were 800 x 800 samples at 6 bit depth. These were used to look for boulders at the landing site. As far as we have been able to determine, these digitized images were never saved.
I read one document where they estimated that to just digitize the Lunar Orbiter 1 images would take 30,000 1200 bpi tapes!!
So they just did not think about it then and it is really on today that storage has gotten cheap enough and desktop computers powerful enough, to do this without costing $-8 figure numbers.

Ross
April 1, 2009 2:42 pm

Dennis Wingo (14:30:30) :
Thanks for the response; it will be very interesting to see how much “un-mined gold” you can recover from the tapes.
Hope to see future post here [or elsewhere] with your results.

David L. Hagen
April 1, 2009 2:45 pm
D. King
April 1, 2009 2:47 pm

Dennis Wingo (21:01:41) :
Wow Dennis! You and your team are my new heroes.
I have worked with Ampex and Saber tape drives with
head speeds that made body armor seem appropriate!
I was wondering if it would be possible to build a magnetic
array using disk drive heads, A to D the data and demodulate
using software?
Thanks again for all your hard work!
Dave

April 1, 2009 2:55 pm

Whatever you do, Mr Wingo, please don’t resuscitate 8-track players. Thank you.

Les Francis
April 1, 2009 3:46 pm

Slightly O.T. All those taking memorial shots of their infants and other personal events with digital cameras. Go and buy a film point and shoot and take some parallel shots with it. Keep the negatives carefully. They will still be usable in 50 years.
You will be lucky to find anything that will read current digital codes in twenty years – especially digital RAW – (shoot Jpeg.)
As regards filmsets from the early missions. Film had and still has a far better dynamic resolution than digital. Digital enhancement evolves continuously and will better interrupt what is on the original analogue film.

3x2
April 1, 2009 3:52 pm

(…) They were indeed beasts, and used compressed air to spin the turbine connected to the quad rotary head
(…) It is amazing that we were able to send men to the moon and back with the technology of the 1960’s.

Just thinking that my N95 could have formed the core of a 60’s satellite. I was reading this thread while eyeing up 250 MSPS A/D converters over at TI. At 7x7x1 (mm) do you think they will interfere with the compressed air lines?

A.Syme
April 1, 2009 5:10 pm

A high school friend of mine back in the late 50’s did a science fair project making mica paper. His dad was a chemist for 3M company, so I’m sure his dad supplied the idea and material. He would heat up mica and grind it into a pulp that would result in a white paper like substance. I don’t think 3M ever tried to produce it commercially but it would be a good media for a 1000 year document.

Tim Channon
April 1, 2009 5:11 pm

Any of you crazy enough to actually want to download and work on that image using a home computer, here is how.
The largest problem is the software. The image is 37,134×16,200 at 16 bit greyscale, a tad larger than most home monitors. The earth part is quite small, ~250M using the same .tiff
The National Gallery / Southampton University / Imperial College have created something called VIPS (or NIP2) which is designed to handle large images (such as digitised old masters), larger than available memory, can even work over networks. (yes I have actually loaded the image, best bet is crop out the earth part and save to file, then work on that)
It can do a lot but is not like Photoshop. Been described as a spreadsheet for images. Can do some very unusual things, if you can work out how to drive it.
“The GUI aims to be about half-way between Photoshop and Excel. It is very bad at retouching photographs, but very handy for the many other imaging tasks that programs like Photoshop get used for.”
Cross platform, Unix, Mac, XP. Don’t know if Vista is ok and the Windows version is less stable. Very useful piece of software to know about.
http://www.vips.ecs.soton.ac.uk/index.php?title=VIPS
Be warned, you might be disappointed, is not a casual image.
Reply: Gimp opens the image just fine although it does have to convert the image from 16 bits per channel to 8 bits per channel which, except for the most serious scientist should not be a problem. Open source and free, and it has a much more Photoshop like interface. It does take a minute or so to load the image on my desktop, a dual core XP machine with 3Gb RAM. ~ charles the moderator.

April 1, 2009 5:13 pm

Superb! Former AMPEX VR5000, VR7100 and VR7500 ‘user’ and technical support (head replacemant/alignment on down) person from early in my carreer in the early-mid 70’s! http://www.lionlamb.us/quad/ampex1.html
A walk along memory lane on the techniques used in these old beasts can be found here:
http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/12/13/a-portable-color-recorder/?Qwd=./RadioElectronics/3-1967/vtr&Qif=vtr_1.jpg&Qiv=thumbs&Qis=XL#qdig
For those wishing to overdose I recommend: http://www.labguysworld.com/Cat_Ampex.htm
PS. LabVIEW and a fast A/D card (maybe used in a full PXI chassis w/the appropriately fast controller) would make a more than suitable ‘demodulator’ if the support/creation of the real hardware proves too time consuming; LabVIEW Signal Processing Toolkit might also prove useful (full disclosure: not a salesman, just a user of said product). Google: LabVIEW demodulation http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4GPEA_enUS309US309&q=LabVIEW+demodulation+