March 23rd, 2009 in Space & Earth / Space Exploration
During periods of peak activity (front three images) sunspots, solar flares and coronal mass ejections are more common, and the sun emits slightly more energy than during periods of low activity (back images). The amount of energy that strikes Earth’s atmosphere — called total solar irradiance (TSI) — fluctuates by about 0.1 percent over the course of the sun’s 11-year cycle, even though the soft X-ray wavelengths shown in this image vary by much greater amounts. Credit: Steele Hill, SOHO, NASA/ESA
(PhysOrg.com) — During the Maunder Minimum, a period of diminished solar activity between 1645 and 1715, sunspots were rare on the face of the sun, sometimes disappearing entirely for months to years. At the same time, Earth experienced a bitter cold period known as the “Little Ice Age.”
Were the events connected? Scientists cannot say for sure, but it’s quite likely. Slowdowns in solar activity — evidenced by reductions in sunspot numbers — are known to coincide with decreases in the amount of energy discharged by the sun. During the Little Ice Age, though, few would have thought to track total solar irradiance (TSI), the amount of solar energy striking Earth’s upper atmosphere. In fact, the scientific instrument needed to make such measurements — a spaceborne radiometer — was still three centuries into the future.
Modern scientists have several tools for studying TSI. Since the 1970s, scientists have relied upon a collection of radiometers on American and European spacecraft to keep a close eye on solar fluctuations from above the atmosphere, which intercepts much of the sun’s radiation. When NASA launches the Glory satellite this fall (no earlier than October 2009), researchers will have a more accurate instrument for measuring TSI than they’ve ever had before.
The Total Irradiance Monitor (TIM) on Glory is more sophisticated, but still related in concept to the very earliest ground-based solar radiometers, which were invented in 1838. Where those radiometers used sunlight to heat water and indicate the intensity of the sun’s brightness at the Earth’s surface, Glory’s TIM instrument will use a black-coated metallic detector to measure how much heat is produced by solar radiation as it reaches the top of the Earth’s atmosphere.
Scientists have compiled a three-decade record of total solar irradiance by patching together data from U.S. and European satellites. Fluctuations in irradiance correspond well with the cycling of sunspots. To ensure continuity, data from Glory’s TIM instrument must overlap with data from an earlier TIM (in red on this plot), which launched in 2003. Credit: Greg Kopp, LASP
Solar bolometers, as this subset of radiometers is called, have been flown on ten previous missions. Nimbus-7, launched in 1978, included one of the first spaceborne bolometers, and progressively more advanced instruments have followed on other NASA, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and European Space Agency missions.In 2003, a first generation TIM instrument went aloft with the Solar Radiation and Climate Experiment (SORCE) satellite. Learning from that instrument, engineers have tweaked the optical and electrical sensors to make the Glory TIM even more capable of measuring the true solar brightness and its fluctuations.
“The Glory TIM should be three times more accurate than SORCE TIM, and about ten times more accurate than earlier instruments,” said Greg Kopp, a physicist at the University of Colorado, Boulder, and leader of the TIM science team.
“There’s no doubt that’s an ambitious goal, but I wouldn’t be surprised if they pull it off,” said Joseph Rice, a physicist at the National Institute of Standards and Technology in Gaithersburg, Md.
Beyond engineering improvements, the Glory irradiance monitor has another advantage: access to the one-of-a-kind TSI Radiometer Facility. Funded by NASA and built by the Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics in Boulder, Colo., the new facility has allowed Kopp’s team to calibrate the instrument in the same configuration and under the same conditions as it will endure in space. In January 2009, the Glory TIM instrument underwent a rigorous battery of tests while being compared to a highly accurate ground-based radiometer.
“This was the first time a TSI instrument has ever been validated end-to-end,” Kopp said. “The improvements in accuracy will make it possible to detect long-term changes in the sun’s output much more quickly.” The data will help scientists say more definitively whether the sun’s output is gradually trending upward or downward, and whether the trend is influencing the pace of climate change.
Existing measurements offer a rough sketch, but they’re not quite accurate enough over decades to centuries to paint a clear picture of whether changes in TSI reflect real changes on the sun or just artifacts of different instrument designs. That’s because the radiometers that have measured TSI so far have all reported values at slightly different levels and have all been calibrated differently, injecting a degree of uncertainty into the record.
The new TIM should be sufficiently accurate to quickly yield definitive data on whether solar irradiance is trending up or down. Modelers estimate that TSI increased roughly 0.08 percent as the Sun exited the Maunder Minimum, which lasted for much of the 1700s. But even if TSI radiometers had been available at the time, the increase in irradiance was so gradual that identifying the trend would have been difficult.
Detecting such subtle changes is where the Glory TIM shines. Prior to SORCE, most TSI instruments had only 0.1 percent accuracy, and could not have reliably detected a 0.08 percent change over a century, Kopp explained. The improved accuracy of the SORCE TIM (0.035 percent) would detect such a change in about 35 years. The Glory TIM, meanwhile, should reduce the time needed to nearly ten years.
Getting TSI right has profound implications for understanding Earth’s climate. Thanks to previous orbiting radiometers, scientists know TSI varies by roughly 0.1 percent through the sun’s 11-year magnetic cycle. Such a variation cannot explain the intensity and speed of the warming trends on Earth during the last century, explained Judith Lean, a solar physicist at the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory in Washington, D.C. But, that’s not to say that the sun has no influence on climate change.
While total solar irradiance changes by 0.1 percent, the change in the intensity of ultraviolet light varies by much larger amounts, scientists have discovered. Research shows such variations in the Sun’s emissions can affect the ozone layer and the way energy moves both vertically and horizontally through the atmosphere.
After examining the historical TSI database, some scientists have suggested that solar irradiance could account for as much as a quarter of recent global warming. But without a continuous and reliable TSI record, Kopp and Lean point out, there will always be room for skeptics to blame global warming entirely on the sun, even when most evidence suggests human activities are the key influence on modern climate changes.
Beyond that, there’s a big “what if” percolating through the scientific community. The 0.1 percent variation in solar irradiance is certainly too subtle to explain all of the recent warming. “But, what if — as many assume — much longer solar cycles are also at work?” said Lean. In that case, it’s not impossible that long-term patterns — proceeding over hundreds or thousands of years — could cause more severe swings in TSI.
Could a modern day Maunder Minimum offset the warming influence of greenhouse gases or even throw us back into another little ice age? “It’s extremely unlikely,” said Lean, “but we won’t know for sure unless we keep up and perfect our measurements.”
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


Hopefully, Glory does not also end up in Antarctic.
Let’s hope it has some variation to monitor.
A sleeping sun gets a bit monotonous.
Come on Sol, give us a sign
Bring it forth and let it shine
Put your hat on and shout hooray
Tell us you’re coming out to play.
speaking of sunlight fluctuations, Mt. Redoubt is rumbling again…
Huge Explosion Rocks Alaska’s Mount Redoubt
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,510718,00.html
and there’s a new report highlighting the importance of atmospheric dust with respect to Atlantic ocean temperatures. for years we’ve been hearing that North Atlantic SST anomalies were the result of AGW…now, maybe that’s not really the case.
http://www.physorg.com/news157296711.html
Anthony — would be great to get Facebook integrated into your posts. Would help “spread the word” bit faster.
-John
I wonder if TSI is connected to climate by first dragging SST’s down then temps. go down with it, SST’s peaked not long after solar max according to the monthly SST data.
If anything, I don’t know if this is connected to a possible massive snowstorm forecast for Wichita starting tomorrow (according to my city paper), and the other one that dumped tons of snow up north less than a week ago, there’s also the big and rare snows the past year as well.
I had a dream around the latter half of fall where I look at the forecast and it said ‘catostrophic snow’ on a day and cold, I had no idea that it could end up coming true, probably won’t be as cold as in the dream, but the truckload of snow part will seem to be.
The part that seems wrong about this picture is that there’s dandelions popping up, plants popping up, trees starting to leaf out, spring coming overall, guess Winter can’t go without a possible grand finale.
The relatively small change in irrandiance does not account for the major changes in weather and climate on the earth. Irradiance is only a small part of the puzzle. There is much more than photons coming out of the sun that affects us and the rest of the solar system.
TSI, whether the trend is influencing the pace of climate change.
!!!!! wow they maybe right sun has an influence. sarc/ off
tallbloke (12:39:41) :
Let’s hope it has some variation to monitor.
A sleeping sun gets a bit monotonous.
Come on Sol, give us a sign
Bring it forth and let it shine
Put your hat on and shout hooray
Tell us you’re coming out to play.
Round and round I go,
the barycenter longing to find and rest,
because the farthest I go
the most furious I become
The Sun
Could a modern day Maunder Minimum offset the warming influence of greenhouse gases or even throw us back into another little ice age? “It’s extremely unlikely,” said Lean, “but we won’t know for sure unless we keep up and perfect our measurements.”
The problem that I have with this perspective is that it does not take into account the wavelength specific absorption and emission of radiation from the sun. We speak all the time about the absorption of infrared radiation from the Earth, caused by the addition of 0.01% of the atmosphere’s CO2 content, but we never discuss the effect of the wide variance in short wave radiation on the absorption and emission of radiation of oxygen (why the sky is blue) or other short wavelength absorbers/emitters.
As a designer of spacecraft solar power systems as well as terrestrial solar power systems, I am aware on a daily basis that the 1364 watts/m2 that is at the top of the atmosphere decreases to less than 1000 watts/m2 at sea level. The difference, over 300 watts/m2 is not absorbed by CO2 to any significant percentage.
The entire physics of the CO2 phenomenon is based upon the increase in kinetic energy of a CO2 molecule due to the absorption of an infrared photon. Why is it that the absorption of a far more energetic photon by oxygen or other visible light absorbers does not overwhelm any CO2 signature?
Secondarily, the USAF has a spacecraft in orbit today, that measures the expansion and contraction of the atmosphere. It has found that in this current extended minimum that the atmosphere has contracted to a greater extent than at any time in the history of the space age (52 years). Why is it that no one is investigating this effect on the overall radiation balance of the atmosphere?
I am asking these things as questions as I would sincerely like to know why these things are not investigated as to their contribution to global climate.
There is an apparent correlation between solar activity anomalies, including Maunder Minimum and planetary resonance of the two major planets of the Solar system.
On the graph numbers are rounded off from 95.88247 and 118.628
http://www.geocities.com/vukcevicu/CycleAnomalies.gif
http://www.vukcevic.co.uk/
I wonder if the spectrum at sea level of TSI varies, because during the big 1998 nino and years afterwards, sun’s radiation as felt by our skin was really aggresive, as UV was supposedly higher. Now it is different.
@RAYQ MCMULLEN
I’m not sure about that. Although Leif tells us that there is not enough change in solar irradiation to explain weather and climate changes, there is no question that factors that seem tiny do have major effects. It is easy to understand warm days and cool nights. On the other hand, if I told you that changes in the angle of incidence of the sun could cause greater than 50 degree F swings in temperature, you might be skeptical if you didn’t know about winter and summer. In short, I’m still open to the possibility that small solar changes could cause major climate variations.
Scott Gibson: “small solar changes could cause major climate variations.”Not forgetting those “heralds of the times to come” as the Snow Owl posted not long ago here at WUWT or the recent appearance of increased numbers of sea bass and flounder fishes on the west coast of SA, which are better than NOAA or any computer model in forecasting cold sea waters.
Are you guys sure there was no sunspot today? My cell phone kept dropping calls…:+)
Dennis Wingo (13:13:36) :
Forget the CO2 BS (Bad Science)
http://www.ilovemycarbondioxide.com
“Secondarily, the USAF has a spacecraft in orbit today, that measures the expansion and contraction of the atmosphere. It has found that in this current extended minimum that the atmosphere has contracted to a greater extent than at any time in the history of the space age (52 years). Why is it that no one is investigating this effect on the overall radiation balance of the atmosphere?”
I have wondered this myself. If the atmosphere is contracting is it also condensing?
More on the blizzard that is supposed to be of ‘historic’ proportions around here (if this is sun related I wouldn’t want to think what would happen if TSI keeps on a downward trend), events like this seem to suddenly be getting more common as sun activity continues to decline.
up to 2 feet of snow forecast for southwestern Kansas, likely including Liberal, Garden City, and Dodge City
http://www.accuweather.com/news-story.asp?article=2
A weather update video and page
http://www.accuweather.com/news-top-headline.asp?partner=accuweather&date=2009-03-26_18:50
Oh, here’s the link to the actual story
http://www.accuweather.com/regional-news-story.asp?region=southwestusnews
Here in Wichita, we could get very close to the biggest snowfall we ever had which is 15 inches, the way things are going and with snow forecasts increasing, I wouldn’t be entirely surprised if we break that.
Unfortunately for the kids here who got their hopes up for a snow day Friday the snow will really start falling AFTER they get home from school.
“While total solar irradiance changes by 0.1 percent, the change in the intensity of ultraviolet light varies by much larger amounts, scientists have discovered. Research shows such variations in the Sun’s emissions can affect the ozone layer and the way energy moves both vertically and horizontally through the atmosphere.”
Cool, finally getting to the real cause of ozone production and destruction as well. Back from the grave, UV-A and UV-B. To the grave with CFCs and the ozone ho;e junk science joke.
P1*V1/T1 = P2*V2/T2
If the volume has contracted, and the pressure hasn’t really changed much (that being determined rather by gravity), then T must change!!
Let me expand upon that statement. The pressure of the atmosphere is determined by the mass of gas in the planetary atmosphere and the planetary mass.
If the atmosphere heats up, it will expand in volume.
We currently see a reduction in the volume of the atmosphere. The mass of the atmosphere and mass of the planet have not changed, so there must be a decrease in the temperature of the atmosphere.
The pressure of the atmosphere, AT THE SURFACE, …
Ohioholic (14:18:08) :
I have wondered this myself. If the atmosphere is contracting is it also condensing?
What do you mean by ‘condensing’? That the Oxygen gas is turning into a blue Oxygen liquid running down the window panes? :~)
And what, pray tell, exactly isthat evidence, aside from a very rough correlation in the 20th century?
/Mr Lynn
For Leif: from above quote “After examining the historical TSI database, some scientists have suggested that solar irradiance could account for as much as a quarter of recent global warming. But without a continuous and reliable TSI record, Kopp and Lean point out, there will always be room for skeptics to blame global warming entirely on the sun, even when most evidence suggests human activities are the key influence on modern climate changes… ect
So… at this stage…looks like its going from “no effect” whatsoever to now possibly 25% and then quote below to “long term changes in TSI” in fact could be 50%, 66% (effect on climate…), LOL
“Beyond that, there’s a big “what if” percolating through the scientific community. The 0.1 percent variation in solar irradiance is certainly too subtle to explain all of the recent warming. “But, what if — as many assume — much longer solar cycles are also at work?” said Lean. In that case, it’s not impossible that long-term patterns — proceeding over hundreds or thousands of years — could cause more severe swings in TSI”.