We have news from the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC). They say: The melt is over. And we’ve added 9.4% ice coverage from this time last year. Though it appears NSIDC is attempting to downplay this in their web page announcement today, one can safely say that despite irrational predictions seen earlier this year, we didn’t reach an “ice free north pole” nor a new record low for sea ice extent.
Here is the current sea ice extent graph from NSIDC as of today, notice the upturn, which has been adding ice now for 5 days:
Here is what they have to say about it:
The Arctic sea ice cover appears to have reached its minimum extent for the year, the second-lowest extent recorded since the dawn of the satellite era. While above the record minimum set on September 16, 2007, this year further reinforces the strong negative trend in summertime ice extent observed over the past thirty years. With the minimum behind us, we will continue to analyze ice conditions as we head into the crucial period of the ice growth season during the months to come.
Despite overall cooler summer temperatures, the 2008 minimum extent is only 390,000 square kilometers (150,000 square miles), or 9.4%, more than the record-setting 2007 minimum. The 2008 minimum extent is 15.0% less than the next-lowest minimum extent set in 2005 and 33.1% less than the average minimum extent from 1979 to 2000.
Overlay of 2007 and 2008 at September minimum
The spatial pattern of the 2008 minimum extent was different than that of 2007. This year did not have the substantial ice loss in the central Arctic, north of the Chukchi and East Siberian Seas. However, 2008 showed greater loss in the Beaufort, Laptev, and Greenland Seas.
Unlike last year, this year saw the opening of the Northern Sea Route, the passage through the Arctic Ocean along the coast of Siberia. However, while the shallow Amundsen’s Northwest Passage opened in both years, the deeper Parry’s Channel of the Northwest Passage did not quite open in 2008.
A word of caution on calling the minimum
Determining with certainty when the minimum has occurred is difficult until the melt season has decisively ended. For example, in 2005, the time series began to level out in early September, prompting speculation that we had reached the minimum. However, the sea ice contracted later in the season, again reducing sea ice extent and causing a further drop in the absolute minimum.
We mention this now because the natural variability of the climate system has frequently been known to trick human efforts at forecasting the future. It is still possible that ice extent could fall again, slightly, because of either further melting or a contraction in the area of the pack due to the motion of the ice. However, we have now seen five days of gains in extent. Because of the variability of sea ice at this time of year, the National Snow and Ice Data Center determines the minimum using a five-day running mean value.
Ongoing analysis continues
We will continue to post analysis of sea ice conditions throughout the year, with frequency determined by sea ice conditions. Near-real-time images at upper right will continue to be updated every day.
In addition, NSIDC will issue a formal press release at the beginning of October with full analysis of the possible causes behind this year’s low ice conditions, particularly interesting aspects of the melt season, the set-up going into the important winter growth season ahead, and graphics comparing this year to the long-term record. At that time, we will also know what the monthly average September sea ice extent was in 2008—the measure scientists most often rely on for accurate analysis and comparison over the long-term.
It will be interesting to see what they offer in the October press release. Plus we’ll be watching how much ice we add this winter, and what next year’s melt season will look like. Hopefully we won’t have a new crop of idiots like Lewis Gordon Pugh trying to reach the “ice free north pole” next year.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


That’s so , Mike, but what does it mean? And what does it have to do with sea ice?
It means that a trend is only a trend. It does not follow that the trend will continue until there is no sea ice.
Well sure, it’s only an indicator. You don’t mean to suggest that projections of diminishing sea ice is otherwise a grope in the dark, or that global cooling is upon us?
[…] not come true. In fact, there is 9% more Arctic sea ice that there was at this point last year. Arctic Sea Ice Melt Season Officially Over; ice up over 9% from last year Watts Up With That? It would seem CO2 warming isn’t quite as "relentless" as some folks might like you to […]
More than an indicator it is a record. It is a record only. The predictions of 2008 sea ice extent now seem to have been a “grope in the dark”. The recent records do show global cooling. Is that an indicator? Who knows?
[…] begin van de metingen behalve dan het record van september 2007. In feite we juist stellen dat het zeeijs rondom de noordpool deze zomer 9% is toegenomen ten opzichte van vorig jaar. Dat de metingen niet verder terug gaan dan 1979 wordt steevast […]
[…] not come true. In fact, there is 9% more Arctic sea ice that there was at this point last year. Arctic Sea Ice Melt Season Officially Over; ice up over 9% from last year Watts Up With That? It would seem CO2 warming isn’t quite as "relentless" as some folks might like you to […]
[…] Sea ice extent recovering quickly 9 10 2008 As many readers know, the predictions for record low sea ice minimums in 2008 were not met, and 2008 ended up about 9% higher than in 2007 at the end of the season. See the report here. […]
[…] As many readers know, the predictions for record low sea ice minimums in 2008 were not met, and 2008 ended up about 9% higher than in 2007 at the end of the season. See the report here. […]
When the sun kicks in again, all of the ice on the planet will melt and costal cities will be under water for 10,000 years.
I have no idea what you people are thinking. Bush told NSIDC to fudge that graph before the election so Obama can get the real graph in November and the Feds can spend trillions to replace all of our Coal generation plants.
We can borrow the money from China to pull this off. Once China owns the US, they use us for mining more coal.
yes, that’s it…..
[…] Watch the red line as it progresses. So far we are back to above 2005 levels, and 28.7% (or 24.9% depending on hownyou want to look at it) ahead of last year at this time. That’s quite a jump, basically a 3x gain, since the minimum of 9% over 2007 set on Septemeber 16th. Read about that here. […]
[…] Watch the red line as it progresses. So far we are back to above 2005 levels, and 28.7% (or 24.9% depending on how you want to look at it) ahead of last year at this time. That’s quite a jump, basically a 3x gain, since the minimum of 9% over 2007 set on September 16th. Read about that here. […]
[…] Watch the red line as it progresses. So far we are back to above 2005 levels, and 28.7% (or 24.9% depending on how you want to look at it) ahead of last year at this time. That’s quite a jump, basically a 3x gain, since the minimum of 9% over 2007 set on September 16th. Read about that here. […]
[…] 22 10 2008 Watching sea ice rebound this year has been exciting, more so since a few predictions and expeditions predicated on a record low sea ice this past summer failed […]
[…] arctic sea ice rebound this year has been exciting, more so since a few predictions and expeditions predicated on a record low sea ice this past summer failed miserably. I’ve spent […]
how much ice is left in the arctic?
please answer by tommorow
[…] Oh, and about those polar bears – – Arctic Sea ice, while still below the median, increased in 2008, and went through a rapid period of ice formation this past fall. See Arctic Sea Ice Melt Season Officially Over; ice up over 9% from last year. […]
[…] and it is now going to get colder. There are a variety of people that discuss that the ice caps are re-freezing after having melted which signals that global warming is reversing. Some talk of a local low record […]
[…] Watch the red line as it progresses. So far we are back to above 2005 levels, and 28.7% (or 24.9% depending on how you want to look at it) ahead of last year at this time. That’s quite a jump, basically a 3x gain, since the minimum of 9% over 2007 set on September 16th. Read about that here. […]