A note from Richard Lindzen on statistically significant warming

Yesterday, in response to the thread on “3 of 4 global metrics show nearly flat temperature anomaly in the last decade” I got a short note from MIT’s Richard Lindzen along with a graph. I asked if I could post it, and he graciously agreed:

Look at the attached.  There has been no warming since 1997 and no

statistically significant warming since 1995.  Why bother with the

arguments about an El Nino anomaly in 1998?  (Incidentally, the red

fuzz represents the error ‘bars’.)

Best wishes,

Dick

==================================================

  Richard S. Lindzen

  Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Atmospheric Sciences

  MIT Cambridge, MA 02139 USA

 hadtemp9307-520.jpg

Graph: HadCRUT 1993-2007  – click for larger image

The man has a point.

I appreciate the note, Dr. Lindzen.


Sponsored IT training links:

Download the latest 312-50 questions for practice and pass your 642-611 and 70-450 exam on first attempt.


0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

54 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
January 28, 2009 4:55 am

[…] a continued lack of warming; a failed attempt to revive the discredited “Hockey Stick“; inconvenient developments and studies regarding rising CO2; the Spotless Sun; Clouds; Antarctica; the Arctic; Greenland’s […]

January 30, 2009 5:00 pm

[…] bad (like last year), cold temperatures hit record levels, and global mean surface temperature has not continued upward — despite continued increases in that demonized "greenhouse" gas, carbon dioxide — the panic […]

February 12, 2009 5:00 pm

[…] is adrift in the same leaky skiff that their fellow alarmists are trying to survive in. After the anomalously heated year of 1998 (thanks, El Nino) groups like CCS and their fellow environmental activist groups sought big […]

Michael
February 14, 2009 1:10 am

Please show more graphs with truncated time-frames, and spuriously cherry-picked time years. [snip]
Forget the science, when a bit of hand-waving and a tricky graph can do so much more.
“No statistically significant rise since 1995” eh? But then isn’t that ALREADY statistically significantly higher than the reference period? And isn’t the trend upwards since then? So why the need to be a cheerleader for the intellectually bankrupt?
Good luck with your next website.
Reply: Keep digging, there’s gold in them thar posts ~ charles the moderator.

Verified by MonsterInsights