![Hand%2BWaving[1]](http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/hand2bwaving1.jpg?w=206&resize=206%2C300)
Well not exactly #37, but it sure seems like it with all the handwaving we’ve seen lately.
So far, we’ve heard from Climate Science that ‘the pause’ was caused by:
Too much aerosols from volcanoes, ENSO patterns, missing heat that went to the deep ocean, ocean cooling, low solar activity, inappropriately dealt with weather stations in the Arctic, and stadium waves, to name a few. So much for consensus.
Now, it’s trade winds going too fast that are causing abnormal cooling in the Pacific. A new paper from the University of New South Wales says that once the winds return to normal speed, well, look out, the heat is on.
One thing for certain, even though the media is going predictably berserkers over this paper, the paper clearly illustrates that natural variation has been in control, not CO2. So much for control knobs.
Pacific trade winds stall global surface warming — for now
The strongest trade winds have driven more of the heat from global warming into the oceans; but when those winds slow, that heat will rapidly return to the atmosphere causing an abrupt rise in global average temperatures.

Heat stored in the western Pacific Ocean caused by an unprecedented strengthening of the equatorial trade winds appears to be largely responsible for the hiatus in surface warming observed over the past 13 years.
New research published today in the journal Nature Climate Change indicates that the dramatic acceleration in winds has invigorated the circulation of the Pacific Ocean, causing more heat to be taken out of the atmosphere and transferred into the subsurface ocean, while bringing cooler waters to the surface.
“Scientists have long suspected that extra ocean heat uptake has slowed the rise of global average temperatures, but the mechanism behind the hiatus remained unclear” said Professor Matthew England, lead author of the study and a Chief Investigator at the ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate System Science.
“But the heat uptake is by no means permanent: when the trade wind strength returns to normal – as it inevitably will – our research suggests heat will quickly accumulate in the atmosphere. So global temperatures look set to rise rapidly out of the hiatus, returning to the levels projected within as little as a decade.”

The strengthening of the Pacific trade winds began during the 1990s and continues today. Previously, no climate models have incorporated a trade wind strengthening of the magnitude observed, and these models failed to capture the hiatus in warming. Once the trade winds were added by the researchers, the global average temperatures very closely resembled the observations during the hiatus.
“The winds lead to extra ocean heat uptake, which stalled warming of the atmosphere. Accounting for this wind intensification in model projections produces a hiatus in global warming that is in striking agreement with observations,” Prof England said.

Credit: For articles on this paper only. Credit: Nature Climate Change. Recent intensification of wind-driven circulation in the Pacific and the ongoing warming hiatus. Prof Matthew H England et al.
“Unfortunately, however, when the hiatus ends, global warming looks set to be rapid.”
The impact of the trade winds on global average temperatures is caused by the winds forcing heat to accumulate below surface of the Western Pacific Ocean.
“This pumping of heat into the ocean is not very deep, however, and once the winds abate, heat is returned rapidly to the atmosphere” England explains.
“Climate scientists have long understood that global average temperatures don’t rise in a continual upward trajectory, instead warming in a series of abrupt steps in between periods with more-or-less steady temperatures. Our work helps explain how this occurs,” said Prof England.
“We should be very clear: the current hiatus offers no comfort – we are just seeing another pause in warming before the next inevitable rise in global temperatures.”
###
The paper:
Recent intensification of wind-driven circulation in the Pacific and the ongoing warming hiatus
Matthew H. England, Shayne McGregor, Paul Spence, Gerald A. Meehl, Axel Timmermann, Wenju Cai, Alex Sen Gupta, Michael J. McPhaden, Ariaan Purich& Agus Santoso
Nature Climate Change (2014) doi:10.1038/nclimate2106
Abstract
Despite ongoing increases in atmospheric greenhouse gases, the Earth’s global average surface air temperature has remained more or less steady since 2001. A variety of mechanisms have been proposed to account for this slowdown in surface warming. A key component of the global hiatus that has been identified is cool eastern Pacific sea surface temperature, but it is unclear how the ocean has remained relatively cool there in spite of ongoing increases in radiative forcing. Here we show that a pronounced strengthening in Pacific trade winds over the past two decades—unprecedented in observations/reanalysis data and not captured by climate models—is sufficient to account for the cooling of the tropical Pacific and a substantial slowdown in surface warming through increased subsurface ocean heat uptake. The extra uptake has come about through increased subduction in the Pacific shallow overturning cells, enhancing heat convergence in the equatorial thermocline. At the same time, the accelerated trade winds have increased equatorial upwelling in the central and eastern Pacific, lowering sea surface temperature there, which drives further cooling in other regions. The net effect of these anomalous winds is a cooling in the 2012 global average surface air temperature of 0.1–0.2 °C, which can account for much of the hiatus in surface warming observed since 2001. This hiatus could persist for much of the present decade if the trade wind trends continue, however rapid warming is expected to resume once the anomalous wind trends abate.
http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nclimate2106.html
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Geez … so what was it that made the trade winds strengthen?
Is this perhaps some sort of negative feedback mechanism in action?
Anyway where is the catastrof? When it starts? 2090? I’m dead then and my children too. Sarc= Zombies eat me up before that. You have to believe, This has nothing to do with money, believe me. NO it’s not religion it’s science believe me.
There is no scientific basis for the claim that short term correlations manifest into long term correlations. In other words, its just as likely trade winds weaken because of a lack of warming, rather than the other way around. Why bother?
Oh God, this paper is crap. I could dissect it sentence by sentence because there are problems everywhere but Bob Tisdale is the best man for that. Bob, over to you.
You can just imagine the conversation at the start of this work ‘ OK guys, the great one Trenberth has decreed that the heat must have gone into the deep ocean. So we have to find a way of getting there without it being detectable at the surface. Brain storm. I’ve got it. Strong winds. There aren’t any, where? In the Pacific ! Yeh trade winds. But aren’t they part of the Niña/o process. Yeh but no-one will notice. It has to be^part of this ” it will resume again même” Yeh that’ll work.
Ah yes, I think I have it now … once again we introduce a NEW component to the ‘models’, a component conveniently overlooked until now, sort of a fail safe, in case the agenda needs one, and poof, the projections are back on track. Trade winds DATA, we don’t need no stinking data ! Oh, and please ignore SST’s and the reclusive El Nino’s that are supposed to be ravaging the Western Pacific tropics.
Yep, this time, our ‘work’ is finished here …
…. and …. how is it we are usually told there is no hiatus ….. until someone comes up with an explanation for it, then suddenly it does exist…
Now that`s one way wacky explanation…
OMG, in the last minute I found ten dollars, if this keeps up I’ll be a bazillionaire in no time!
Whooaa!
So what appears to be happening, is there are many different climate mechanisms which appear to be offsetting, or regulating, the climate. Rather like a thermostat. The atmosphere warms, then cools, then warms… and so on. as it has always done. CO2 is not setting the climate into a tailspin, there is no tipping point being reached. The climate is accepting our carbon dioxide input and adjusting accordingly.
It looks as though one of the authors, Matthew England, used to deny the plateau.
http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/why_did_matthew_england_deny_the_warming_pause_he_now_concedes/
Interesting.
They keep telling us that any up-tick in temperatures must be from CO2 released by mankind — and only by mankind — but that the lack of increase or any decrease in temperatures (God forbid!) must be due to natural causes. Come on guys, the average person will see through this double standard if you keep that sort of thing going.
Stronger winds accelerate evaporation which is a net cooling process.
That is how air dryers work.
How do stronger winds ‘push’ more energy into the water past the evaporating layer ?
It says that when the trade winds return to normal the heat will come out of the ocean and warm the atmosphere.
No, no no. How many more times? The heat in the oceans is at a lower temperature than it was when in the atmosphere. Heat cannot spontaneously flow from a low to a higher temperature. This is not only a violation of the first law of thermodynamics, but goes against common sense. This heat cannot any longer come out of the ocean and warm the atmosphere.
Prof England says “This pumping of heat into the ocean is not very deep“. So, is it covered by the Argo floats? The ones that show no ocean warming. Or is it deeper, below the range of the Argo floats, as Kevin Trenberth claimed? That surely does not warrant description as “not very deep”. Let’s face it, Prof England et al don’t know whether the trade winds have had an effect, they don’t know where if anywhere it ‘blew’ the heat, the heat hasn’t shown up on any thermometers, and they haven’t actually looked for it anywhere. What they are saying is that the models have generated a lot of heat which hasn’t shown up anywhere in the real world, so, if the models are correct, the heat must have gone somewhere where there aren’t any thermometers. The only place they can think of where there aren’t any thermometers is the deep ocean, but winds can’t blow heat all the way down there so maybe a vague clause like “not very deep” can fudge them out of their dilemma. They still aren’t ready to concede the obvious – that the models are wrong and the heat doesn’t exist.
Warmist acquaintances do not let an opportunity pass to violently scream at me that the world is not only still heating up but that each and every year is hotter than the previous one. According to them, any paper that speaks of a “pause” is financed by Big Oil and written by deniers. I submit to their 95% infallible wisdom.
This is Matthew England at his worst (best).
The man is not an idiot, therefore I’d have to conclude that he is being less than honest,
IF THE TRADE WINDS ARE STRONGER, THERE SHOULD BE MORE RAIN FALLING IN SE AUSTRALIA. Instead the east coast is suffering another drought.
And if the trade winds are stronger, the Southern Oscillation Index should be well into the positive territory. It isn’t and it hasn’t been for some time now.
How on Earth did this piece of crap pass review?
AFAIK the ARGO buoys haven’t detected this “missing heat” below the surface of the Eastern Pacific…unless of course the trade winds have somehow converted it into “stealth heat”, or “dark energy”. But if it’s still stealth heat when it “inevitably” surfaces, how will we detect it? 🙂
I find it interesting that, spurred on by the need to “explain the pause”, people are suddenly finding all these “new” aspects of natural variation with as much, or more, control over temperatures than CO2 has.
Yet, only a few years ago, they were assuring us that “it must be CO2 because we’ve accounted for natural variation”.
Its also a little worrying to see that they’re now looking to extend the possible “pause” indefinitely with words such as “in as little as a decade”. So this paper can be used to square away level, or even dropping, temperatures until the mid 2020’s at least.
Vince Causey Feb 10 1:13am says “It says that when the trade winds return to normal the heat will come out of the ocean and warm the atmosphere.
No, no no. How many more times? The heat in the oceans is at a lower temperature than it was when in the atmosphere. Heat cannot spontaneously flow from a low to a higher temperature …“.
Actually, Vince, they used to say that, but they have learned from the mauling they got as a result. If you check carefully what they say now, it is “when the trade wind strength returns to normal – as it inevitably will – our research suggests heat will quickly accumulate in the atmosphere“. Note that they are no longer saying that the heat will come out of the ocean.
I like how every team cherry-picks a different one of the countless processes the models don’t simulate in an attempt to bend the projections downward by just the right amount. What happens if we include, oh I don’t know, all of the missing processes?
It seems that the team have discovered ENSO, as I caught an interview about a month ago when a CSIRO spokesman on local television mentioned that the heat will return when El Nino returns, the present pause being a temporary La Nina pattern.
Lo and behold this thought bubble appears in a paper; do they get together to discuss strategy ?
They are desperate to explain the pause, but there is a lot of cold water out there.
My theory is that the pause in global warming is caused by – global warming! After all, it causes everything else, doesn’t it?
Don’t you just love the title “Centre of Excellence for Climate System Science”. Does this mean all other centres where they do climate science are of poor quality? No need to answer the question.
Ahh, so we ARE going to broil after all…..Thank The Good Lord for his sweet mercies…
Phew…..
Was getting worried there for a second….
Ken Hall says:
February 10, 2014 at 1:03 am
So what appears to be happening, is there are many different climate mechanisms which appear to be offsetting, or regulating, the climate. Rather like a thermostat. The atmosphere warms, then cools, then warms… and so on. as it has always done. CO2 is not setting the climate into a tailspin, there is no tipping point being reached. The climate is accepting our carbon dioxide input and adjusting accordingly.
———————————————————————————————————
yep, that akes a lot of logical sense. Or you can try the Party Line version of the same:
“There are many different climate mechanisms which appear to be exactly offsetting the CO2 warming by pure fluke. There is no regulatory mechanism involved, just all these thousands of processes of things that happen to be occurring by pure random chance at the right time, and the right magnitude, to exactly counteract the expected warming at the moment”
Personally, if they believe in those odds, I’d suggest they should be buying lottery tickets right now.