World agricultural output continues to rise, despite dire predictions of decline

clip_image002

Guest essay by Steve Goreham

Originally published in The Washington Times

The year 2013 has been a great year for global agriculture. Record world production of rice and healthy production of wheat and corn produced strong harvests across the world. These gains were achieved despite continuing predictions that world agricultural output is headed for a decline.

The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) reports that world rice harvests for 2012/2013 were a record 469 million metric tons. Corn and wheat harvests were also strong, following record harvests for both grains during the 2011/2012 season. The USDA is now projecting world record harvests for corn, wheat, and rice for 2013/2014.

See this graph:

clip_image004

These numbers cap a 50-year trend of remarkable growth in world grain production. Since 1960, global wheat and rice production has tripled, and corn production is almost five times higher.

For decades, doomsayers predicted that food production would fail to keep up with the needs of humanity. In 1972, Donella Meadows and others of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology published The Limits to Growth, which asked the question, “Do these rather dismal statistics mean that the limits of food production on the earth have already been reached?” Paul Ehrlich wrote in The End of Affluence in 1974, “Due to a combination of ignorance, greed and callousness, a situation has been created that could lead to a billion or more people starving to death.”

But Norman Borlaug’s development of disease-resistant, high-yield strains of wheat and rice had already revolutionized twentieth century agriculture. A few years before Meadows and Ehrlich warned about coming famines, Borlaug’s wheat and rice were introduced into Latin America and Asia with astounding results. Mexico’s wheat production soared six-fold by 1970 from levels in the 1940s. India’s wheat production jumped from a huge deficit in 1965 to a surplus only five years later.

Food production continues to grow faster than population. Data from the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations shows a 30 percent gain in the per capita agricultural production index from 1980 to 2010. World citizens have access to more grain, meat, dairy products, and fruits and vegetables. Even fish production is climbing with large gains in aquaculture fish farming.

The increased availability of food reduced the undernourished portion of the world’s population from 18.6 percent in 1990 to 12.5 percent in 2010, according to the FAO. A total of 868 million people are still classified as undernourished.

Today’s leading agriculture alarmists are proponents of the ideology of Climatism, the belief that man-made greenhouse gases are destroying Earth’s climate. Earlier this month, a leaked draft report from Working Group II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change predicted that man-made climate change would reduce global agricultural production yields by up to two percent per decade throughout the twenty-first century.

Lester Brown’s Earth Policy Institute has long been a predictor of agricultural collapse. His website states, “…climate change is heightening the likelihood of weather extremes, like heat waves, droughts, and flooding, that can so easily decimate harvests.” Even the USDA warns that man-made climate change threatens US agriculture.

Yet, one must wonder when the climate-damaging effects on agriculture will appear. The IPCC states that 1983-2012 was likely the warmest 30-year period in the Northern Hemisphere of the last 1,400 years. Certainly we should have seen some negative agricultural impact by now?

Maybe rising agricultural production is like rising polar bear populations―the decline begins tomorrow.

Steve Goreham is Executive Director of the Climate Science Coalition of America and author of the book The Mad, Mad, Mad World of Climatism: Mankind and Climate Change Mania.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

94 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Truthseeker
November 26, 2013 8:21 pm

This is the benefit of a warming world with rising CO2 concentrations. If the climate cools, things can go badly very quickly. The only thing that would help in a cooling climate is more CO2.

Janice Moore
November 26, 2013 8:36 pm

Fine post, Mr. Goreham.
And many of us will soon be using some of this bounty to celebrate!!
!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!*!
HAPPY CHANNUKAH, EVERYONE!
The holiday that celebrates the fact God does miracles.

***********************************************
And on Thursday, we Americans (wherever we are – you can count on it!)
will celebrate the miracle that is our beloved country, “the Land of the Free.”
To celebrate Freedom in Science, some quotes from one of the finest Jews to ever grace our shores, Albert Einstein, who possessed what distinguishes the great from the merely accomplished:
humility.
The amazing thing about Albert Einstein was not his intellect;
it was the fact that
someone that intelligent
also had
a loving heart.
And his heart was the key to his genius.
The brain is the means to knowledge,
but the heart is the source of wisdom.

*****************************************
Thanksgiving. The day we give thanks to God for all our blessings.
And among the most treasured is: our “sweet land of liberty… .”
I love my country so MUCH!!
A prayer of gratitude written by another gifted Jewish immigrant, Irving Berlin,
“God, Bless America”

“We hold these truths to be self-evident… .”
HAPPY THANKSGIVING, EVERYONE!
********************************************
And, thanking God for you, A-th-y, and for this fine site dedicated to truth.

Mohatdebos
November 26, 2013 8:42 pm

I would encourage readers to think about Karl Marx’ lament that American workers had become too prosperous to support communism. Prosperity is the greatest threat to green central planning, AKA sustainable development. Thus, advocates of green central planning have to keep coming up with doomsday scenarios. Otherwise, they will never be able to convince people to give up there freedoms.

Bob Diaz
November 26, 2013 8:54 pm

I’m sure a lot of factors come into play for increased food production, but it would be interesting to see how much came from increased CO2. As a wild guess, I’ll say maybe only a slight amount and it’s due to other factors, but it would be fun to know how much form CO2.

John F. Hultquist
November 26, 2013 9:11 pm

It has been a long time since I took Econ 101 but I think there were graphs about price, supply, and demand. At about the same time as the class, the USSR seemed to be having trouble producing wheat. The reasons for that, I think, were covered in the 2nd semester class. It’s Thanksgiving Time. I’ll drink to everyone that has ever grown a food plant. Go farmers!

RoHa
November 26, 2013 9:11 pm

Whoo hoo! More corn to make ethanol!

Peter Jones
November 26, 2013 9:35 pm

I think that the rising CO2 curve should have been co-plotted.

ferdberple
November 26, 2013 9:40 pm

The increased availability of food reduced the undernourished portion of the world’s population from 18.6 percent in 1990 to 12.5 percent in 2010
=========================
50 years ago we had huge problems feeding 3 billion people. today we feed 7 billion with much less hunger and starvation. An accomplishment that many believed impossible 50 years ago. 50 years ago we had huge problems worldwide. In many respects much more serious than today. We had out pessimists, our prophets of doom. And yet we muddled through and prospered.
Isn’t it time to throw aside the Al Gore’s of the world, the prophets of doom that prey on people’s fears. The “wrong stuff” that said it was impossible. The “right stuff” made it happen.

RACookPE1978
Editor
November 26, 2013 9:48 pm

Today’s increased levels of CO2 have increased the chlorophyll production rate of ALL green plants (plankton, algae, earth-bound, or sea-bound) by various amounts – the increase depends on the plants type, but averages between 12% and 23% HIGHER productivity of food, fuel, fodder for farming, forests, forage, and foliage.
And, best of all, this extra CO2 is “free” for all plants to grow. No fertilizers needed!

GeeJam
November 26, 2013 9:57 pm

Nice post but ? . . . can we please put this into perspective. Last year, Global Warming Alarmists sensationalised the fact that “during the last 40 years, CO2 levels have increased from 314 parts per million to 400 parts per million.
314 parts per million is 0.0314% of our atmosphere.
400 parts per million is 0.040% of our atmosphere.
An insignificant increase of just 0.0086%
I do not believe for one minute that increased global agricultural yield has got anything to do with an incy wincy increase in CO2. There are a huge amount of other reasons to take into account (improved transport, machinery, irrigation, fertilisation, bulk-storage, etc.).
Oh, and Happy Thanksgiving Janice. xx
[0.040 percent? Or 0.400 percent, right? Mod]

conscious1
November 26, 2013 9:57 pm

Human innovation has lead to more efficient use of natural resources and more abundance of everything. Linear extrapolations of short term trends always fail to account for human’s ability to adapt and overcome challenges.

dp
November 26, 2013 10:07 pm

I’m going to go out on a limb here and suggest some of the reason for greater grain production is increased demand because for the first time in human history our machines are consuming nearly as much food as humans are. And they seem to get fed even if people don’t. I would never have thought it possible my Buick could be better fed than the people of the Sudan. I don’t know that the demand for this is all that great, but the unintended consequence of government mandates are what they are.

November 26, 2013 10:28 pm

RoHa says:
November 26, 2013 at 9:11 pm
Whoo hoo! More corn to make ethanol!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
dp;
I would never have thought it possible my Buick could be better fed than the people of the Sudan.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Genius, isn’t it? Governments used to be roundly criticized for subsidizing farmers by paying them to not grow food. Now they instead subsidize them by paying them to grow food, and simply burning it afterward. A quantum leap in perception management.

GeeJam
November 26, 2013 10:33 pm

Sorry Mod, left a zero out. Well spotted. Should be:
314 parts per million is 0.0314% of our atmosphere.
400 parts per million is 0.040% of our atmosphere.
An insignificant increase of just 0.0086%

Nick Stokes
November 26, 2013 10:37 pm

“Earlier this month, a leaked draft report from Working Group II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change predicted that man-made climate change would reduce global agricultural production yields by up to two percent per decade throughout the twenty-first century.”
What they actually said was:
” With or without adaptation, climate change will reduce median yields by 0 to 2% per decade for the rest of the century, as compared to a baseline without climate change. These projected impacts will occur in the context of rising crop demand, projected to increase by about 14% per decade until 2050. See Figure SPM.7 for a summary of projected changes in crop yields over the 21st century.”
Fig 7 shows equally divided between rise and fall for 2010 to 2029, but the range of anticipated rises are much greater than the falls.

November 26, 2013 10:41 pm

This was a very informative post. I was surprised by the fact that 868 million people are still classified as being undernourished. I wasn’t expecting the number to be that high. I would also like to know how much of the increased food production came from CO2.
mysmalltownroots.wordpress.com

John Law
November 26, 2013 10:46 pm

This does not suit the Marxist/ Common Purpose agenda at all. Prosperity, plenty, what will the bureaucrats do?

November 26, 2013 11:10 pm

Nick Stokes;
With or without adaptation, climate change will reduce median yields by 0 to 2% per decade for the rest of the century, as compared to a baseline without climate change.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Clever wording. So if adaptation results in a 4% increase, they can say yeah, but without climate change it would have been a 6% increase.
They’ll still be wrong though because they didn’t include crops production from areas of the world where we have no data. All the need to do is apply that kriging method to interpolate crop data for those areas, and we’ll discover that we’re growing even more food than we thought.

Brian H
November 26, 2013 11:11 pm

RoHa says:
November 26, 2013 at 9:11 pm
Whoo hoo! More corn to make ethanol!

The bootleggers’ revenge.

November 26, 2013 11:22 pm

Whilst this maybe true, one shouldn’t forget that despite that 80% of the worlds population lives at a subsistence level. So it may be very well so ‘we’ can feed 7 billion or more, that doesn’t mean those people live a humane live by any standard. Also by no stretch of the imagination is it ever possible to even up their living standards to the lowest level of the western world now. Let alone if indeed the population mounts to 12 billion.
Dry statistics hide a lot of suffering

lemiere jacques
November 26, 2013 11:26 pm

Doom will come tomorrow for sure, as long you don’t understand tomorrow literally .

Janice Moore
November 26, 2013 11:32 pm

Dear Gee Jam,
Thanks! (and for caring enough to say so)
Well, (blush) I don’t even know you so, I’m afraid this All American woman can’t bring herself to “xx” you back (“xoxo” = “hugs and kisses” to me). But, I send you a hearty handshake!
Gratefully,
Janice

November 26, 2013 11:33 pm

Happy combination Hanukkah/Thanks Giving!
Have a turkey with gefilte fish stuffing!
/sarc

lemiere jacques
November 26, 2013 11:36 pm

and here
http://www.stanford.edu/group/CCB/cgi-bin/ccb/content/paul-r-ehrlich
“He has also been a pioneer in alerting the public to the problems of overpopulation, and in raising issues of population, resources, and the environment as matters of public policy”…
so who was malthus…?
Is n ‘t it a lie? or any living american can claim ” i am a pioneer”.

Zeke
November 26, 2013 11:49 pm

And here is a wonderful bit of news regarding a growing middle class. “According to McKinsey’s Global Population Report prepared for the UN in 2012, by the year 2030, in just over 16 years, there will be 2.2 billion more middle class consumers in the world than now, with 1.7 billion of that additional number being in Asia. We are talking here of lifting close to a quarter of the world’s population from the tyranny of poverty, through economic growth, in the short space of less than 20 years.
It is hard to conceive of a more exciting prospect; one that should engage policy makers to ensure that it comes to fruition.” Former PM John Howard
– See more at: http://www.cfact.org/2013/11/18/australias-john-howard-one-religion-is-enough/#sthash.NyyfyDFY.dpuf

1 2 3 4
Verified by MonsterInsights