Desktop Sized Atom Smasher Demonstrated

From the “E.O. Lawrence would be jealous department”  and the University of Texas Austin comes this bit of interesting news (h/t to “View From the Solent”). Full disclosure, I made a cyclotron myself and went to the National Science Fair with it in 1975. It was about the size of desk, and I powered its magnet system with my dad’s DC welder. I got about 2 MeV out of it. – Anthony

Particle Accelerator That Can Fit on a Tabletop Opens New Chapter for Science Research

AUSTIN, Texas — laser plasma acceleratorPhysicists at The University of Texas at Austin have built a tabletop particle accelerator that can generate energies and speeds previously reached only by major facilities that are hundreds of meters long and cost hundreds of millions of dollars to build.

“We have accelerated about half a billion electrons to 2 gigaelectronvolts over a distance of about 1 inch,” said Mike Downer, professor of physics in the College of Natural Sciences. “Until now that degree of energy and focus has required a conventional accelerator that stretches more than the length of two football fields. It’s a downsizing of a factor of approximately 10,000.”

The results, which were published this week in Nature Communications, mark a major milestone in the advance toward the day when multi-gigaelectronvolt (GeV) laser plasma accelerators are standard equipment in research laboratories around the world.

Downer said he expects 10 GeV accelerators of a few inches in length to be developed within the next few years, and he believes 20 GeV accelerators of similar size could be developed within a decade.

Downer said that the electrons from the current 2 GeV accelerator can be converted into “hard” X-rays as bright as those from large-scale facilities. He believes that with further refinement they could even drive an X-ray free electron laser, the brightest X-ray source currently available to science.

A tabletop X-ray laser would be transformative for chemists and biologists, who could use the bright X-rays to study the molecular basis of matter and life with atomic precision, and femtosecond time resolution, without traveling to a large national facility.

“The X-rays we’ll be able to produce are of femtosecond duration, which is the time scale on which molecules vibrate and the fastest chemical reactions take place,” said Downer. “They will have the energy and brightness to enable us to see, for example, the atomic structure of single protein molecules in a living sample.”

To generate the energetic electrons capable of producing these X-rays, Downer and his colleagues employed an acceleration method known as laser-plasma acceleration. It involves firing a brief but intensely powerful laser pulse into a puff of gas.

“To a layman it looks like low technology,” said Downer. “All you do is make a little puff of gas with the right density and profile. The laser pulse comes in. It ionizes that gas and makes the plasma, but it also imprints structure in it. It separates electrons from the ion background and creates these enormous internal space-charge fields. Then the charged particles emerge right out of the plasma, get trapped in those fields, which are racing along at nearly the speed of light with that laser pulse, and accelerate in them.”

laser plasma accelerator - vacuum chamber interior

The interior of the vacuum chamber in which the acceleration occurs. The laser beam arrives from the right. The gas cell, within which the acceleration of electrons occurs, is in the center of the chamber. The actual acceleration occurs over a distance of about an inch.

Downer compared it to what would happen if you threw a motorboat into a lake with its engines churning. The boat (the laser) makes a splash, then creates a wave as it moves through the lake at high speed. During that initial splash some droplets (charged particles) break off, get caught up in the wave and accelerate by surfing on it.

“At the other end of the lake they get thrown off into the environment at incredibly high speeds,” said Downer. “That’s our 2 GeV electron beam.”

Former UT Austin physicist Toshiki Tajima and the late UCLA physicist John Dawson conceived the idea of laser-plasma acceleration in the late 1970s. Scientists have been experimenting with this concept since the early 1990s, but they’ve been limited by the power of their lasers. As a result the field had been stuck at a maximum energy of about 1 GeV for years.

Downer and his colleagues were able to use the Texas Petawatt Laser, one of the most powerful lasers in the world, to push past this barrier. In particular the petawatt laser enabled them to use gases that are much less dense than those used in previous experiments.

“At a lower density, that laser pulse can travel faster through the gas,” said Downer. “But with the earlier generations of lasers, when the density got too low, there wasn’t enough of a splash to inject electrons into the accelerator, so you got nothing out. This is where the petawatt laser comes in. When it enters low density plasma, it can make a bigger splash.”

Downer said that now that he and his team have demonstrated the workability of the 2 GeV accelerator, it should be only a matter of time until 10 GeV accelerators are built. That threshold is significant because 10 GeV devices would be able to do the X-ray analyses that biologists and chemists want.

“I don’t think a major breakthrough is required to get there,” he said. “If we can just keep the funding in place for the next few years, all of this is going to happen. Companies are now selling petawatt lasers commercially, and as we get better at doing this, companies will come into being to make 10 GeV accelerator modules. Then the end users, the chemists and biologists, will come in, and that will lead to more innovations and discoveries.”

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

56 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
June 21, 2013 4:21 pm

If we can just keep the funding in place for the next few years …

That always seems to appear in press releases of this sort.

DocMartyn
June 21, 2013 4:28 pm

Back in 1995 I was a judge for a Canadian, plus some US and Porto Rican, High School science projects. The winner, by a length, was a spotty 18 year old kid who build a cyclotron out of stuff he got from a recycling yard. That was about the size of a dining room table.

hunter
June 21, 2013 4:31 pm

This is going to be a big deal.

cedarhill
June 21, 2013 4:47 pm

The Texax laser takes up about 1,500 sq. ft. in a clean room. At over 30 feet, it’d be hard to put that on most “desktops”. However, even with the room-size laser — wow!
The CERN contraption hits around 14 TeV. Is it feasible to construct these in parallel similar to what’s done in computer systems? And they could do it cheaper than the 5+ billion $US. Even it you’d have to take over an entire building at CalTech…

CJohnson
June 21, 2013 4:57 pm

Well “table top” is a bit misleading, its being driven by a petawatt laser. Admittedly, 1500 square foot room is an improvement but thats the size of a house last I checked.
http://texaspetawatt.ph.utexas.edu/overview.php

June 21, 2013 4:57 pm

The next big high energy physics project is the International Linear Collider ILC. Now I wonder whether this new desk-top electron pulse source will leap-frog the currently planned machine.
For those who have been made cynical by climate science, other fields of science remain generally uncorrupted. And they do take up-front money.

magicjava
June 21, 2013 5:04 pm

Off Topic:
I’m looking for papers on the topic of plasma recombination. Specifically, I’m looking for papers covering the spectrum of radiation that occurs during plasma recombination, and papers covering plasma recombination occuring in space.
Thanks in in advance for any help provided.

DirkH
June 21, 2013 5:21 pm

Could this have implications for
a) medical applications – proton beam therapy for tumors?
b) Focus Fusion research?
Anyone know about it?

June 21, 2013 5:46 pm

What are they using for shielding? Last time I was in even a megavolt facility the walls were many feet of concrete. The large free-electron laser facility near my house is underground for the same reason. Of course if the flux is small enough it may not be an issue.

Jeff
June 21, 2013 5:51 pm

I have a grammatical comment, Anthony: I believe you would have used your dad’s DC welder to power “its” magnet system, not “it’s” magnet system.
Always on the lookout for typos…
REPLY: Fixed

pat
June 21, 2013 6:01 pm

quite amusing, as expected:
VIDEO 3’25”: 21 June: Bloomberg: Climate Change by the Numbers
London School of Economics Bob Ward discusses climate change with Erik Schatzker on Bloomberg Television’s “Market Makers.”
http://www.bloomberg.com/video/climate-change-by-the-numbers-zz7RhAzLQJiI6plMghVQaQ.html

June 21, 2013 6:03 pm

The thing that impressed me about this post was:
“Full disclosure, I made a cyclotron myself and went to the National Science Fair with it in 1975”
I knew I was in the company of someone special here.

rogerknights
June 21, 2013 6:54 pm

A tabletop X-ray laser would be transformative for chemists and biologists, who could use the bright X-rays to study the molecular basis of matter and life with atomic precision, and femtosecond time resolution, without traveling to a large national facility.

Improved instrumentation has been a major but unheralded contributor to the advancement of science.

Latitude
June 21, 2013 7:00 pm

ever read something you know nothing about….
…and still think it’s way cool?
🙂

June 21, 2013 7:09 pm

They must have been accelerating CO2. After all, what can’t it do? /sarc
Seriously, if this holds up, what came from the first battery?
(But I don’t think the developers of the battery had Government assistance.)

ExWarmist
June 21, 2013 7:36 pm

I’m waiting for the backpack version.
“Just don’t cross the streams…”

david moon
June 21, 2013 7:45 pm

I tried a cloud chamber as a high school project. It wasn’t very impressive since you have to wait for a cosmic ray to come through. And then the result is not that visible.

anna v
June 21, 2013 8:59 pm

Well, high energy physics is my field after all, and I should commenton whether it could replace the LHC and ILC. .
This is what I have, together with my general knowledge of lasers:
Laser-plasma accelerators of only a centimetre’s length have produced nearly monoenergetic electron bunches with energy as high as 1 GeV. Scaling these compact accelerators to multi-gigaelectronvolt energy would open the prospect of building X-ray free-electron lasers and linear colliders hundreds of times smaller than conventional facilities, but the 1 GeV barrier has so far proven insurmountable. Here, by applying new petawatt laser technology, we produce electron bunches with a spectrum prominently peaked at 2 GeV with only a few per cent energy spread and unprecedented sub-milliradian divergence. Petawatt pulses inject ambient plasma electrons into the laser-driven accelerator at much lower density than was previously possible, thereby overcoming the principal physical barriers to multi-gigaelectronvolt acceleration: dephasing between laser-driven wake and accelerating electrons and laser pulse erosion. Simulations indicate that with improvements in the laser-pulse focus quality, acceleration to nearly 10 GeV should be possible with the available pulse energy.
My answer is : most probably it cannot replace conventional accelerators for the study of elementary particles. This phrase is the crux:
Petawatt pulses inject ambient plasma electrons into the laser-driven accelerator at much lower density than was previously possible, thereby overcoming the principal physical barriers to multi-gigaelectronvolt acceleration
We have to wait for a publication and (for me) a free copy before I can be definite, but accelerators are so large for two reasons, the first one being that the acceleration uses magnetic fields in the case of LHC, electric fields in the case of ILC and the energy scales with the magnitude of the fields, which, at the moment, cannot be created at small scales with these techniques. The second component is the large flux needed in the beams since the interaction cross sections are in femptobarns. I would need numbers to be sure in my statement,instead of communications.
It is an important break through for the sciences that need accelerators for X-rays etc, but not for the study of elementary particles at the moment. It might be though that some bright young researcher could use the principle in an ingenious way for the use of particle physics.

June 21, 2013 9:10 pm

“If we can just keep the funding in place for the next few years…”
—————————————
Just claim that you can use it to model man-made global warming – you’ll get your bux.

F. Ross
June 21, 2013 9:12 pm

“If we can just keep the funding in place for the next few years, …

In my opinion developments like this deserve funding, unlike some other fields of endeavor one might name… like CAGW

OssQss
June 21, 2013 9:20 pm

“and I powered its magnet system with my dad’s DC welder. I got about 2 MeV out of it. – Anthony”
_________________________________________________________________
Ok, you are formally labeled a geek. We have the data now to prove it!
It is all good>
Try to find the original video of this though youtube. Controlled by Google, who says what about climate? LOL!
I could not do it>

dp
June 21, 2013 9:22 pm

“…Then the end users, the chemists and biologists, will come in, and that will lead to more innovations and discoveries.”

I’d toss terrorists and junk yard governments into the “end user” group. Might as well add NSA too. Somebody somewhere is already working on weaponizing this.

Janice Moore
June 21, 2013 9:54 pm

Hey, Code Tech! Are you anywhere near the SEVERE flooding in the Calgary area? Check in and let us know you’re okay!
All you Alberta, and Saskatchewan, Canada WUWT folks — take care. You are being prayed for.

Fred
June 21, 2013 9:55 pm

“It’s a downsizing of a factor of approximately 10,000.”
After you’ve downsized something by a factor of one haven’t you got down to zero? Reducing something by 100 percent leave nothing.

Janice Moore
June 21, 2013 9:58 pm

AS IF I could be ANYTHING but off topic on a thread like this. LOL.
Well, I CAN say, that it does, indeed, show that you, Anthony, are one cool dude. You were already cool in my book. You just moved into the super-cool category.

1 2 3