I like this study from the NSF, because they did hands-on empirical measurements and experiments to make the determination – Anthony
Sunlit Snow Triggers Atmospheric Cleaning, Ozone Depletion in the Arctic
Finding is related to snow atop sea ice, adding a new dimension to scientific concerns about loss of Arctic ice

Kerri Pratt conducts a snow-chamber experiment near Barrow, Alaska.
April 19, 2013
National Science Foundation-funded researchers at Purdue University have discovered that sunlit snow is the major source of atmospheric bromine in the Arctic, the key to unique chemical reactions that purge pollutants and destroy ozone.
The new research also indicates that the surface snowpack above Arctic sea ice plays a previously unappreciated role in the bromine cycle and that loss of sea ice, which been occurring at an increasingly rapid pace in recent years, could have extremely disruptive effects in the balance of atmospheric chemistry in high latitudes.
The team’s findings suggest the rapidly changing Arctic climate–where surface temperatures are rising three times faster than the global average–could dramatically change its atmospheric chemistry, said Paul Shepson, an NSF-funded researcher who led the research team. The experiments were conducted by Kerri Pratt, a postdoctoral researcher funded by the Division of Polar Programs in NSF’s Geosciences Directorate.
“We are racing to understand exactly what happens in the Arctic and how it affects the planet because it is a delicate balance when it comes to an atmosphere that is hospitable to human life,” said Shepson, who also is a founding member of the Purdue Climate Change Research Center. “The composition of the atmosphere determines air temperatures, weather patterns and is responsible for chemical reactions that clean the air of pollutants.”
A paper detailing the results of the research, some of which was funded by NSF and some by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, was recently published online at Nature Geoscience.
Ozone in the lower atmosphere behaves differently from the stratospheric ozone involved in the planet’s protective ozone layer. This lower atmosphere ozone is a greenhouse gas that is toxic to humans and plants, but it also is an essential cleaning agent of the atmosphere.
Interactions between sunlight, ozone and water vapor create an “oxidizing agent” that scrubs the atmosphere of most of the pollutants human activity releases into it, Shepson said.
Temperatures at the poles are too cold for the existence of much water vapor and in the Arctic this cleaning process appears instead to rely on reactions on frozen surfaces involving molecular bromine, a halogen gas derived from sea salt.
This gaseous bromine reacts with and destroys atmospheric ozone. This aspect of the bromine chemistry works so efficiently in the Arctic that ozone is often entirely depleted from the atmosphere above sea ice in the spring, Shepson noted.
“This is just a part of atmospheric ozone chemistry that we don’t understand very well, and this unique Arctic chemistry teaches us about the potential role of bromine in other parts of the planet,” he said. “Bromine chemistry mediates the amount of ozone, but it is dependent on snow and sea ice, which means climate change may have important feedbacks with ozone chemistry.”
While it was known that there is more atmospheric bromine in polar regions, the specific source of the natural gaseous bromine has remained in question for several decades, said Pratt, a Polar Programs-funded postdoctoral fellow and lead author of the paper.
“We thought that the fastest and best way to understand what is happening in the Arctic was to go there and do the experiments right where the chemistry is happening,” Pratt said.
She and Purdue graduate student Kyle Custard performed the experiments in -45 to -34 Celsius (-50 to -30 Fahrenheit) wind chills near Barrow, Alaska. The team examined first-year sea ice, salty icicles and snow and found that the source of the bromine gas was the top surface snow above both sea ice and tundra.
“Sea ice had been thought to be the source of the gaseous bromine,” she said. “We had an ‘of course!’ moment when we realized it was the snow on top of the sea ice. The snow is what is in direct contact with the atmosphere. Sea ice is critical to the process, though. Without it, the snow would fall into the ocean, and this chemistry wouldn’t take place. This is among the reasons why the loss of sea ice in the Arctic will directly impact atmospheric chemistry.”
The team also discovered that sunlight triggered the release of bromine gas from the snow and the presence of ozone increased the production of bromine gas.
“Salts from the ocean and acids from a layer of smog called Arctic haze meet on the frozen surface of the snow, and this unique chemistry occurs,” Pratt said. “It is the interface of the snow and atmosphere that is the key.”
A series of chemical reactions that quickly multiplies the amount of bromine gas present, called the “bromine explosion,” is known to occur in the atmosphere. The team suggests this also occurs in the spaces between the snow crystals and wind then releases the bromine gas up into the air above the snow.
The team performed 10 experiments with snow and ice samples contained in a “snow chamber,” a box constructed of aluminum with a special coating to prevent surface reactions and a clear acrylic top. Clean air with and without ozone was allowed to flow through the chamber and experiments were performed in darkness and in natural sunlight.
The team also measured the levels of bromine monoxide, a compound formed from the reaction of bromine atoms with ozone, through flights of the Purdue Airborne Laboratory for Atmospheric Research.
Shepson is the pilot of this specially equipped aircraft, which he and air operations technical specialist Brian Stirm flew from Indiana to Barrow for these experiments. They found the compound was most prevalent over snow-covered first-year sea ice and tundra, consistent with their snow chamber experiments.
The experiments were performed from March to April 2012 and were part of NASA’s Bromine, Ozone and Mercury Experiment, or BROMEX. The goal of the study is to understand the implications of Arctic sea ice reduction on tropospheric chemistry.
Shepson’s group next plans to perform laboratory studies to test the proposed reaction mechanisms and to return to Barrow to perform more snow chamber experiments.
In addition, Shepson is co-leading a team using ice-tethered buoys to measure carbon dioxide, ozone and bromine monoxide across the Arctic Ocean, and Pratt is working with scientists from the University of Washington to examine the chemistry of snow from across the Arctic Ocean.
“In the Arctic, climate change is happening at an accelerated pace,” Pratt said. “A big question is what will happen to atmospheric composition in the Arctic as the temperatures rise and snow and ice decline even further?”
-NSF-
Does this have any linkage with ozone holes over the poles? If so, the size of the holes should be correlated with the amount of ice.
Lets see – during the solar maximum in the latter 20th century, there was more sunlight than normal due to reduced cosmic ray flux seeding clouds, which means there would have been more more sunlight striking polar ice, which would have released more bromine, which would have depleted more ozone, leading to a hole in the ozone layer above the largest body of ice, Antarctica.
Nah that explanation would never fly – it doesn’t include the obligatory dose of human guilt.
All very good but a bit late I think. Our fridges and autos are now filled with ‘ozone friendly’ gases that can explode and burn which it now seems were never needed in the first place.
-45 degrees wind chill.
Even Mr. Custard must have found it no trifling matter.
Wow. A hypothesis that has only been around for 50 years.
(There were only two hypothesis given credence in the 60’s. Reflection and magnetism that i am aware of. Of course everything I know came from Popular Scientist until 8th Grade).
“This gaseous bromine reacts with and destroys atmospheric ozone. This aspect of the bromine chemistry works so efficiently in the Arctic that ozone is often entirely depleted from the atmosphere above sea ice in the spring, Shepson noted.”
“The experiments were performed from March to April 2012 and were part of NASA’s Bromine, Ozone and Mercury Experiment, or BROMEX. The goal of the study is to understand the implications of Arctic sea ice reduction on tropospheric chemistry.”
Even in years with maximum depletion of sea ice in the Arctic the ice has returned to wall to wall coverage by the following March. The above quotes would suggest that the phenomenon has done its work by the end of April. The minimum sea ice occurs at mid September when sunlight is also near minimum and is about to go to zero. So until someone suggests that the Arctic Ocean won’t refreeze over the course of the winter I don’t suspect that there will be a real problem with this phenomenon for a while. Anthony, I do share your admiration for them at least using an empirical scientific approach to attempting to solve this question. I just wish they could refrain from ladening their PR with the usual doom mongering, but that’s probably too much to hope for nowadays.
Brown 25?
QUOTE ““We are racing to understand exactly what happens in the Arctic and how it affects the planet because it is a delicate balance when it comes to an atmosphere that is hospitable to human life,— This lower atmosphere ozone is a greenhouse gas that is toxic to humans and plants”/QUOTE
hmmm that’s interesting, golly gosh how did life survive the 4 preceding major Ice Ages & man the last ice age?
We have this sentence:
“Temperatures at the poles are too cold for the existence of much water vapor”
And then this:
“A big question is what will happen to atmospheric composition in the Arctic as the temperatures rise and snow and ice decline even further?”
If temperature rises in the arctic then the atmosphere there can hold more moisture? Also, the first sentence is a static view of air temperature and moisture content. The Arctic is an open system surrounded on all sides by somewhere that is warmer. Any air brought in from somewhere outside the arctic will also bring it’s moisture which I assume is where most of the arctic snow comes from.
What is happening to stratospheric ozone at present? I have noticed in our recent very brief sunny interlude in our late 2013 spring, that several people including myself went red / brown quite quickly after a few minutes or hours in the sunlight. A purely anecdotal observation but is there any thinning of ozone in the NH?
Interesting, yes. Anything to do with CAGW? Not much. Arctic sea ice and snow have decreased and increased in prior years, so in this sense, there is not much to get excited about.
They ask: “. . . what will happen to atmospheric composition in the Arctic as the temperatures rise . . .”
rise
What can rise can fall. They will need more funding and as the young folks take positions at other institutions they will need new labs, student support, travel expenses, and so on.
It is a shame the US wasted so much money on Fisker, Solyndra, Ener1, A123 Systems . . .
Interesting stuff.
I would love to be a fly on the wall in 200 years time when they’re all laughing about how we chucked billions down the drain in the equivalent of trying to do something about the flatness of the earth.
I also couldn’t help but smile at this modest little quote:-
“We are racing to understand exactly what happens in the Arctic and how it affects the planet because it is a delicate balance when it comes to an atmosphere that is hospitable to human life,” said Shepson.
Read: Yes, we really are saving the world. Just like Superman does. Gotta dash now, I have the human race to rescue.
“she said. “We had an ‘of course!’ moment”
I prefer scientists to use ‘eureka’. In psychology it’s called an aha moment.
And why do I get a feeling that the snow chamber is supposed to be further away from the building? 😉
I seem to recall that the ozone hole over the Antarctic was very much larger just in the past year or three. Wondering if it couldn’t be related to the huge increase in sea ice / accumulation of snow, both on sea ice and the continent?
If more real scientists used, “Eureka!” in its original, legendary context (running nekkid from the bathtub) they’d get more MSM attention. Oh wait…maybe not, depending. In any case, it would be better than that ‘F*ck for the Environment’ idiocy was. I didn’t bother visiting the link to learn more.
The team’s findings suggest the rapidly changing Arctic climate–where surface temperatures are rising three times faster than the global average
It is so because Arctic is ‘warmed’ by the North Atlantic currents, after considering the thermal capacity of water and its temperature rise of 0.4C with absolute value in vicinity of 0C, it is no surprise that the Arctic athmospheric temperatures above it would rise, let’s say from –n degrees C to –n+1.2 degrees C.
In the Arctic, climate change is happening at an accelerated pace,” Pratt said. “A big question is what will happen to atmospheric composition in the Arctic as the temperatures rise and snow and ice decline even further?”
No fear, the North Atlantic SST, is at its plateau, and by all accounts (even of those of the arch warmista such as Mann and Hansen) the AMO is about to turn down, if even temporarily.
The Arctic Ocean temperature will fall, and consequently it is expected that atmospheric temperatures above it would fall back too.
“National Science Foundation-funded researchers at Purdue University have discovered that sunlit snow is the major source of atmospheric bromine in the Arctic, the key to unique chemical reactions that purge pollutants and destroy ozone.”
So during those periods in our planet’s history when there was no ice or snow at the poles, the pollutants from all those dinosaur SUVs must have been stifling! 🙂
Further thought: While they don’t actually state it, are they suggesting that we ‘must’ do something about the ‘warming’ Arctic, in order to keep the ozone hole intact? Because the loss of it would ‘harm’ us?
Relevant here are two papers by Prof Lu (Univ of Waterloo) on the subject of the interaction between GCR’s and bromine and the quantity of ozone in the polar atmosphere.
The first is:
http://www.science.uwaterloo.ca/~qblu/Lu-2009PRL.pdf
There was a follow up paper in 2010.
As the natural sources of bromine dwarf the human ones, it may have been a bit over-zealous to ban CFC’s because of their putative strength or influence. Bromine-based insecticides have also been banned because ‘bromine was implicated in the destruction of the ozone layer’. Bromine is definitely involved in the destruction of ozone and cosmic rays are effective enhancers of this (entirely natural) process. The major source of atmospheric bromine, just like mercury, is the ocean. Next thing you know, it will be found that CO2 has the same source. Won’t that be a surprise.
The connection to a ‘warming Arctic’ is a bit tenuous. First it says that the Arctic is warming ‘three times’ faster than the rest of the planet, a plant which is not warming at all. What exactly is the denominator in that ratio? I thought the warming Arctic was the cause of increased snowfall. Using the novel idea of actually looking at temperatures, it is easily shown that the air temperature in the Arctic is not higher in summer than it has been. “Warming” has been from less-frigging-cold winter temperatures, strongly influenced by warm water incursions. In other words, business as usual.
Next, this effect (bromine release) is not entirely dependent on ‘sea ice’ or snow upon it but I won’t quibble. The omission of the GRC connection is much more important that some error about the totality of the bromine cycle. What is really clear is that the ozone hole is naturally caused, involves the same culprit bromine as previous studies showed, that sunlight has a strong influence, and that the ozone hole will always be there to a greater or lesser extent for reasons that have nothing to do with human industrial activity.
Let’s get to reality.When is this winter going to end? I’m freezing!
According to the Law of the Conservation of Matter, all the bromine on earth is now and ever has been. Thus, whatever comes out of the snow and enters into compounds is still there, and in future reactions will revisit earlier forms of its existence. Nothing to worry about. It is impressive, nonetheless, that these people from Purdue, a great university in my former home state, actually went to Barrow and conducted experiments; encouraging! Not models!
Why race?
We do not know if Arctic ice will continue its decline instead of returning to the up part of the cycle. My guess, given zero news of declining ice formation this winter, is that ice is returning to greater cover. This summer will show whether ice is returning.
Good to see a real experiment and not a model in sight.
““We thought that the fastest and best way to understand what is happening in the Arctic was to go there and do the experiments right where the chemistry is happening,” Pratt said.”
Wastefully eccentric thinking by climate modeler “logic” no doubt.
What is the origin of the Bromine in the snow and how did it get there?