I wonder how long before flatlining occurs, like last year with the Chicago Climate
Exchange (CCX):
Even the Guardian is covering this “failure” of carbon markets. They write:
The international market in carbon credits has suffered an almost total collapse, with only $1.5bn (£916m) of credits traded last year…
Now that the Kyoto protocol is essentially dead, the economic markets will surely pull life support for carbon trading with no political support in place for emissions reduction. With this report and news coverage, you can hear the traders already running for the exits.
Then there’s this from Reuters – The Europe Union’s carbon market could be flooded with excess pollution permits over the next decade, cutting prices in half and depriving governments of billions in budgeted revenues, EU sources say
Growth in Global Carbon Market Pauses Amid Uncertainty
Press Release No:2011/514/SDN
World Bank Releases 2011 “State and Trends of the Carbon Market” Report
Barcelona, June 1, 2011 – The World Bank’s annual review of the global carbon market shows that 2010 was a watershed year as the market ended five years of robust growth with a slight decline compared to 2009. The State and Trends of the Carbon Market 2011, released today at Carbon Expo in Barcelona, shows that the total value of the global carbon market was estimated to be US$142 billion last year.
The report’s authors noted that several reasons help to explain the decline, including the continuing lack of clarity about the market after 2012 and the loss of political momentum on setting up new cap-and-trade schemes in several developed economies. Some buyers from industrialized countries, which in previous years had reached or surpassed targets, consequently made fewer purchases in 2010. As well, lingering effects of the recession in several industrialized countries led to lower greenhouse gas emissions, easing emissions reduction compliance obligations.
Furthermore, the primary Certified Emission Reductions (CERs) market, which accounts for the bulk of project-based transactions, fell by double digits for a variety of reasons, including lower demand for credits and competition from more predictable assets (Assigned Amount Units and secondary CERs). The CDM market is now at its lowest level since the Kyoto Protocol entered into force in 2005, having dropped by 46% to an estimated US$1.5 billion in new project-based transactions. Similarly, other carbon markets also declined or stayed at their plateau. Nevertheless, cumulatively, primary offset transactions have reached almost US$30 billion since 2005 and are expected to have catalyzed much larger resources, mostly from the private sector.
“The global carbon market is at a crossroads. If we take the wrong turn we risk losing billions of lower cost private investment and new technology solutions in developing countries,” said Andrew Steer, World Bank Special Envoy for Climate Change. “This report sends a message of the need to ensure a stronger, more robust carbon market with clear signals.”
State and Trends of the Carbon Market 2011 shows that, relative to each other, EU Allowances (traded under the EU Emissions Trading Scheme, ETS) remain the largest segment by far, with 84% of the total value of the carbon market. Taking secondary CDM transactions into account, the value of the market driven by the ETS reached 97% of the global market value.
The authors of the report predict that, in the next two years, the difference between gross demand for and the cumulative supply of carbon credits generated under the Kyoto flexibility mechanisms will be slightly less than US$140 million. Virtually all demand will be from European governments. Beyond 2012, although the potential demand for emission reductions could reach 3 billion tons or more, the only substantial and unconditional demand to date comes from Europe, estimated at 1.7 billion tons. The supply available between 2013 and 2020, through existing projects, is seen as sufficient to fill that demand, leaving little incentive for project developers to invest further and create a future supply of emission reductions.
The fall in market value was contrasted with what was generally seen as the successful outcomes of negotiations at the UN climate change conference in Cancun in December which resulted in relatively more positive market sentiment.
Although some opportunities for strengthening regulatory frameworks were missed in industrialized countries, national and local low-carbon initiatives gathered strength and offered hope.
“Carbon market growth halted at a particularly inopportune time: 2010 proved to be the hottest year on record, while global emission levels continued to rise relentlessly,” said Alexandre Kossoy, World Bank Senior Financial Specialist. “At the same time, other national and local low-carbon initiatives have picked up noticeably in both developed and developing economies. Collectively, they offer the possibility overcome regulatory uncertainty and signal that, one way or another, solutions that address the climate challenge will emerge.”
In the face of lagging demand, the World Bank has undertaken a number of initiatives to give confidence to a post-2012 carbon market. The Partnership for Market Readiness, launched in Cancun in December 2010, aims to support the trend of national mitigation efforts using market approaches. A number of the World Bank’s carbon funds and facilities, such as the Carbon Partnership Facility, the second tranche of the Umbrella Carbon Facility, and a new facility for low-income countries currently under development, also respond to future needs by supporting scaled up mitigation and purchasing carbon credits beyond 2012. Furthermore, the Forest Carbon Partnership Facility is supporting REDD+ initiatives which, to date, have not been included under the CDM. The Bank sees carbon markets as an important and versatile tool to provide incentives for a shift to lower carbon development paths.
State and Trends of the Carbon Market 2011 was released at CARBON EXPO 2011, the largest carbon fair in the world with more than 3,000 representatives from governments, private sector and civil society organizations involved in greenhouse gas emission reduction transactions around the world.
For more information on the World Bank’s carbon finance activities and the electronic version of this report, please visit the website: www.carbonfinance.org
what a shame NOT , still although the billions some expected to make out of Carbon trading has not happened ,some have done well out of it, and some well meaning but misguiding people have lost out and are left with what is in effect worth nothing .
It’s all about the bankers. Reminds me of the excellent piece by Jo Nova exposing the carbon fraud: http://joannenova.com.au/2009/02/carbon-credits-another-corrupt-currency/
“The international market in carbon credits has suffered an almost total collapse, with only $1.5bn (£916m) of credits traded last year…”
Let me fix that statement:
“The international socialist ponzi scheme in carbon credits has suffered an almost total collapse, with only $1.5bn (£916m) of grifting last year…”
Probably not long for this world if Lind’s prognostications in Salon come to pass.
http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/05/31/linbd…
Everything you’ve heard about fossil fuels may be wrong
The future of energy is not what you think it is
Are we living at the beginning of the Age of Fossil Fuels, not its final decades? The very thought goes against everything that politicians and the educated public have been taught to believe in the past generation. According to the conventional wisdom, the U.S. and other industrial nations must undertake a rapid and expensive transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy for three reasons: The imminent depletion of fossil fuels, national security and the danger of global warming.
What if the conventional wisdom about the energy future of America and the world has been completely wrong?
As everyone who follows news about energy knows by now, in the last decade the technique of hydraulic fracturing or “fracking,” long used in the oil industry, has evolved to permit energy companies to access reserves of previously-unrecoverable “shale gas” or unconventional natural gas. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, these advances mean there is at least six times as much recoverable natural gas today as there was a decade ago.
—————————————————————————————————–
And the view from the “other side”: http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works/2011/06/…
I had to stop reading the release by the World Bank, for fear of turning into a bureaubot.
According to the article above:
“The authors of the report predict that, in the next two years, the difference between gross demand for and the cumulative supply of carbon credits generated under the Kyoto flexibility mechanisms will be slightly less than US$140 million. Virtually all demand will be from European governments.”
Come on, people, don’t be so joyless. It is a hoot to hear that only European governments are buying this worthless crop, but please let us know the individual actors. I really want to express my joy at knowing just who is foolish enough to continue throwing good taxpayer money after bad. Josh can do cartoons of the individuals sitting in corners wearing dunce caps, or something along those lines.
There seems to be a conflict. The greeners strive for no carbon emissions, no nuclear power, no damming of rivers, no coal plants, no fossil fuel transportation, etc: Thus shutting down all would result in no carbon future whatsoever!
But the reality is the money. Burn lots of carbon based fuel to fuel the carbon trading market. Did I miss something?
Technical tax question. Can the sex poodle take a writeoff from the collapse in value of carbon indulgences?
“Carbon market growth halted at a particularly inopportune time: 2010 proved to be the hottest year on record, while global emission levels continued to rise relentlessly,” said Alexandre Kossoy, World Bank Senior Financial Specialist.
Indeed, the opportunistic should have seen the potential to make a lot of money.
Salon links got messed up: Try these:
http://www.salon.com/news/env/energy/?story=/politics/war_room/2011/05/31/linbd_fossil_fuels
http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works/2011/06/01/response_to_lind/index.html
Theo Goodwin says:
June 2, 2011 at 8:28 am
“……… Josh can do cartoons of the individuals sitting in corners wearing dunce caps, or something along those lines.”
==========================================
Yes, that conjures some hilarious imagery in my mind’s eye.
“…we risk losing billions of lower cost private investment and new technology solutions in developing countries…”
Eh? What we risk is billions foolishly invested in pieces of paper on a market for an artificially constrained resource. Innovation is doing just fine anyway, thanks.
Please someone tell me that the BBC pension fund is in real danger of losing the
8 billion Pounds Sterling that they have invested in Carbon trading.
If storing / reducing carbon is worth $0 then I therefore conclude liberating / oxidizing it must have a net value that is non zero.
Theo Goodwin says:
June 2, 2011 at 8:28 am
“……… Josh can do cartoons of the individuals sitting in corners wearing dunce caps, or something along those lines.”
Here you go.
http://ec.europa.eu/commission_2010-2014/index_en.htm
From the Guardian article:
“”This bodes very badly for the countries we are trying to help,” said Andrew Steer, envoy for climate change at the World Bank. “The [carbon] market is failing us. It has done very good things in the past but it is not delivering what we feel is necessary.”
If the poor performance continued, it would mean increasing greenhouse gas emissions, he predicted. “We are heading for a 3C or 4C world [temperature rise].””
I do hope someone is saving this quote so it can be restated in the same way as Dr Viner’s snow quotes have been.
Where does he get his 3 – 4C temperature rise ideas from?
Is it protecting his own job that he’s really worried about?
Without government mandated carbon limits there is no carbon market.
That is the primary business model of today: buy government regulations to prop up your market, buy government exemptions for your business from regulations, buy government tax breaks, and buy government subsidies. Oh, I forgot, buy government contracts!
We will not get our country back until we outlaw corporate lobbying and corporate financing of campaigns. We call other nations corrupt while they spend billions buying our government.
Gary Krause says:
June 2, 2011 at 8:36 am
the knowledgeable greeners also want the future world with no humans.
the dumb/ignorant ones don’t know that.
The d/i greeners don’t even know that with no technical help ( wheels, electricity, fossil fuels, agriculture etc ):
world population will not be 7Billion,
will not be even 7Million.
There will be more wildebeest and wolves than humans .
Wonderful educational system.
Some days you see a story that just warms the heart….
@Theo Goodwin: Come on, people, don’t be so joyless. It is a hoot to hear that only European governments are buying this worthless crop, but please let us know the individual actors. I really want to express my joy at knowing just who is foolish enough to continue throwing good taxpayer money after bad.
Hey Theo! Don’t rub it in!! I’m one of the poor European taxpayers who are having our hard-earned cash p*ssed up the wall by our splendidly inept and corrupt “betters”. Take pity on us man…
Thank you curiousgeorge for the links. The regulars at salon are frothing at the mouth over the first link. It would be hilarious if it wasn’t so extremely sad.
To the degree that the actual market is allowed to determine pricing, it will tend to zero, or to negative numbers.
Urinating into the hurricane won’t help you:
.
Buh-bye!
Either there are not many greenies left out there or they are not putting their money where their mouths are.
Wishful thinking the former, most likely the latter.
Bet Algore’s customers will be figuring out who madeoff with their money.
Heh. Have a look at the comments. Salon’s progressive readership is going ballistic! They don’t seem to be addressing the issue of the Invisible (Iron) Hand of the market, which will enforce affordable energy, by granting survival to those who use it, and the opposite to those who don’t.
You guys do realize that the people that set this up…
..did not think for one minute that we would actually reduce our emissions, did you?