MAGNITUDE AND RATE OF CLIMATE CHANGES
Guest post by Dr. Don J. Easterbrook,
Dept. of Geology, Western Washington University
The GISP2 Greenland ice core has proven to be a great source of climatic data from the geologic past. Ancient temperatures can be measured using oxygen isotopes in the ice and ages can be determined from annual dust accumulation layers in the ice. The oxygen isotope ratios of thousands of ice core samples were measured by Minze Stuiver and Peter Grootes at the University of Washington (1993, 1999) and these data have become a world standard.
The ratio of 18O to 16O depends on the temperature at the time snow crystals formed, which were later transformed into glacial ice. Ocean volume may also play a role in δ18O values, but δ18O serves as a good proxy for temperature. The oxygen isotopic composition of a sample is expressed as a departure of the 18O/16O ratio from an arbitrary standard
δ18O =
(18O/16O)sample ‒ (18O/16O) x 103
____________________________________
(18O/16O)standard
where δ18O is the of ratio 18O/16O expressed in per mil (0/00) units.
The age of each sample is accurately known from annual dust layers in the ice core. The top of the core is 1987.
The δ18O data clearly show remarkable swings in climate over the past 100,000 years. In just the past 500 years, Greenland warming/cooling temperatures fluctuated back and forth about 40 times, with changes every 25-30 years (27 years on the average). None of these changes could have been caused by changes in atmospheric CO2 because they predate the large CO2 emissions that began about 1945. Nor can the warming of 1915 to 1945 be related to CO2, because it pre-dates the soaring emissions after 1945. Thirty years of global cooling (1945 to 1977) occurred during the big post-1945 increase in CO2.
But what about the magnitude and rates of climates change? How do past temperature oscillations compare with recent global warming (1977-1998) or with warming periods over the past millennia. The answer to the question of magnitude and rates of climate change can be found in the δ18O and borehole temperature data.
Temperature changes in the GISP2 core over the past 25,000 years are shown in Figure 1 (from Cuffy and Clow, 1997). The temperature curve in Figure 1 is a portion of their original curve. I’ve added color to make it easier to read. The horizontal axis is time and the vertical axis is temperature based on the ice core δ18O and borehole temperature data. Details are discussed in their paper. Places where the curve becomes nearly vertical signify times of very rapid temperature change. Keep in mind that these are temperatures in Greenland, not global temperatures. However, correlation of the ice core temperatures with world-wide glacial fluctuations and correlation of modern Greenland temperatures with global temperatures confirms that the ice core record does indeed follow global temperature trends and is an excellent proxy for global changes. For example, the portions of the curve from about 25,000 to 15,000 represent the last Ice Age (the Pleistocene) when huge ice sheets thousands of feet thick covered North America, northern Europe, and northern Russia and alpine glaciers readvanced far downvalley.
So let’s see just how the magnitude and rates of change of modern global warming/cooling compare to warming/cooling events over the past 25,000 years. We can compare the warming and cooling in the past century to approximate 100 year periods in the past 25,000 years. The scale of the curve doesn’t allow enough accuracy to pick out exactly 100 year episodes directly from the curve, but that can be done from the annual dust layers in ice core data. Thus, not all of the periods noted here are exactly 100 years. Some are slightly more, some are slightly less, but they are close enough to allow comparison of magnitude and rates with the past century.
Temperature changes recorded in the GISP2 ice core from the Greenland Ice Sheet (Figure 1) (Cuffy and Clow, 1997) show that the global warming experienced during the past century pales into insignificance when compared to the magnitude of profound climate reversals over the past 25,000 years. In addition, small temperature changes of up to a degree or so, similar to those observed in the 20th century record, occur persistently throughout the ancient climate record.
Figure 1. Greenland temperatures over the past 25,000 years recorded in the GISP 2 ice core. Strong, abrupt warming is shown by nearly vertical rise of temperatures, strong cooling by nearly vertical drop of temperatures (Modified from Cuffy and Clow, 1997).
Figure 2 shows comparisons of the largest magnitudes of warming/cooling events per century over the past 25,000 years. At least three warming events were 20 to 24 times the magnitude of warming over the past century and four were 6 to 9 times the magnitude of warming over the past century. The magnitude of the only modern warming which might possibly have been caused by CO2. (1978-1998) is insignificant compared to the earlier periods of warming.
Figure 2. Magnitudes of the largest warming/cooling events over the past 25,000 years. Temperatures on the vertical axis are rise or fall of temperatures in about a century. Each column represents the rise or fall of temperature shown on Figure 1. Event number 1 is about 24,000years ago and event number 15 is about 11,000 years old. The sudden warming about 15,000 years ago caused massive melting of these ice sheets at an unprecedented rate. The abrupt cooling that occurred from 12,700 to 11,500 years ago is known as the Younger Dryas cold period, which was responsible for readvance of the ice sheets and alpine glaciers. The end of the Younger Dryas cold period warmed by 9°F ( 5°C) over 30-40 years and as much as 14°F (8°C) over 40 years.
Magnitude and rate of abrupt climate changes
Some of the more remarkable sudden climatic warming periods are shown listed below (refer also to Figure 1). Numbers correspond to the temperature curves on Figure 5.
1. About 24,000 years ago, while the world was still in the grip of the last Ice Age and huge continental glaciers covered large areas, a sudden warming of about 20°F occurred. Shortly thereafter, temperatures dropped abruptly about 11°F. Temperatures then remained cold for several thousand years but oscillated between about 5°F warmer and cooler.
2. About 15,000 years ago, a sudden, intense, climatic warming of about 21°F (~12° C;) caused dramatic melting of the large ice sheets that covered Canada and the northern U.S., all of Scandinavia, and much of northern Europe and Russia.
3. A few centuries later, temperatures again plummeted about 20° F (~11°C) and glaciers readvanced.
4. About 14,000 years ago, global temperatures once again rose rapidly, about 8° F (~4.5°C), and glaciers receded.
4. About 13,400 years ago, global temperatures plunged again, about 14° F (~8°C) and glaciers readvanced.
5. About 13,200 years ago, global temperatures increased rapidly, 9° F (~5°C), and glaciers receded.
6. 12,700 yrs ago global temperatures plunged sharply, 14° F (~8°C) and a 1300 year cold period, the Younger Dryas, began.
7. After 1300 years of cold climate, global temperatures rose sharply, about 21° F (~12° C), 11,500 years ago, marking the end of the Younger Dryas cold period and the end of the Pleistocene Ice Age.
Early Holocene climate changes
8,200 years ago, the post-Ice Age interglacial warm period was interrupted by a sudden global cooling that lasted for a few centuries (Fig. 3). During this time, alpine glaciers advanced and built moraines. The warming that followed the cool period was also abrupt. Neither the abrupt climatic cooling nor the warming that followed was preceded by atmospheric CO2 changes.
Figure 3. The 8200 year B.P. sudden climate change, recorded in oxygen isotope ratios in the GISP2 ice core, lasted about 200 years.
Late Holocene climate changes
750 B.C. to 200 B.C. cool period
Prior to the founding of the Roman Empire, Egyptians records show a cool climatic period from about 750 to 450 B.C. and the Romans wrote that the Tiber River froze and snow remained on the ground for long periods (Singer and Avery, 2007).
The Roman warm period (200 B.C. to 600 A.D.)
After 100 B.C., Romans wrote of grapes and olives growing farther north in Italy than had been previously possible and of little snow or ice (Singer and Avery, 2007).
The Dark Ages cool period (440 A.D. to 900 A.D.)
The Dark Ages were characterized by marked cooling. A particularly puzzling event apparently occurred in 540 A.D. when tree rings suggest greatly retarded growth, the sun appeared dimmed for more than a year, temperatures dropped in Ireland, Great Britain, Siberia, North and South America, fruit didn’t ripen, and snow fell in the summer in southern Europe (Baillie in Singer and Avery, 2007). In 800 A.D., the Black Sea froze and in 829 A.D. the Nile River froze (Oliver, 1973).
The Medieval Warm Period (900 A.D. to 1300 A.D.)
The Medieval Warm Period (MWP) was a time of warm climate from about 900–1300 AD when global temperatures were apparently somewhat warmer than at present. Its effects were particularly evident in Europe where grain crops flourished, alpine tree lines rose, many new cities arose, and the population more than doubled. The Vikings took advantage of the climatic amelioration to colonize Greenland, and wine grapes were grown as far north as England where growing grapes is now not feasible and about 500 km north of present vineyards in France and Germany. Grapes are presently grown in Germany up to elevations of about 560 meters, but from about 1100 to 1300 A.D., vineyards extended up to 780 meters, implying temperatures warmer by about 1.0 to 1.4° C (Oliver, 1973, Tkachuck, 1983). Wheat and oats were grown around Trondheim, Norway, suggesting climates about one degree C warmer than present (Fagan, 2007).
The Vikings colonized southern Greenland in 985 AD during the Medieval Warm Period when milder climates allowed favorable open-ocean conditions for navigation and fishing. This was “close to the maximum Medieval warming recorded in the GISP2 ice core at 975 AD (Stuiver et al., 1995).
Elsewhere in the world, prolonged droughts affected the southwestern United States and Alaska warmed. Sediments in Lake Nakatsuna in central Japan record warmer temperatures. Sea surface temperatures in the Sargasso Sea were approximately 1°C warmer than today and the climate in equatorial east Africa was drier from 1000–1270 AD. An ice core from the eastern Antarctic Peninsula shows warmer temperatures during this period.
The Little Ice Age (1300 A.D. to the 20th century)
At the end of the Medieval Warm Period, ~1230 AD, temperatures dropped ~4°C (~7° F) in ~20 years and the cold period that followed is known as the Little Ice Age. The colder climate that ensued for several centuries was devastating (see e.g., Grove, 1988, 2004; Singer and Avery, 2007; Fagan, 2000). Temperatures of the cold winters and cool, rainy summers were too low for growing of cereal crops, resulting in widespread famine and disease. When temperatures declined during the 30–year cool period from the late 1940’s to 1977, some climatologists and meteorologists predicted a return to a new Little Ice Age.
Glaciers expanded worldwide (see e.g., Grove, 1988, 2004; Singer and Avery, 2007). Glaciers in Greenland advanced and pack-ice extended southward in the North Atlantic in the 13th century. The population of Europe had become dependent on cereal grains as a food supply during the Medieval Warm Period and when the colder climate, early snows, violent storms, and recurrent flooding swept Europe, massive crop failures occurred. Three years of torrential rains that began in 1315 led to the Great Famine of 1315-1317. The Thames River in London froze over, the growing season was significantly shortened, crops failed repeatedly, and wine production dropped sharply (Fagan, 2000; Singer and Avery, 2007).
Winters during the Little Ice Age were bitterly cold in many parts of the world. Advance of glaciers in the Swiss Alps in the mid–17th century gradually encroached on farms and buried entire villages. The Thames River and canals and rivers of the Netherlands frequently froze over during the winter. New York Harbor froze in the winter of 1780 and people could walk from Manhattan to Staten Island. Sea ice surrounding Iceland extended for miles in every direction, closing many harbors. The population of Iceland decreased by half and the Viking colonies in Greenland died out in the 1400s because they could no longer grow enough food there. In parts of China, warm weather crops that had been grown for centuries were abandoned. In North America, early European settlers experienced exceptionally severe winters.
Significance of previous global climate changes
If CO2 is indeed the cause of global warming, then global temperatures should mirror the rise in CO2. For the past 1000 years, atmospheric CO2 levels remained fairly constant at about 280 ppm (parts per million). Atmospheric CO2 concentrations began to rise during the industrial revolution early in the 20th century but did not exceed about 300 ppm. The climatic warming that occurred between about 1915 and 1945 was not accompanied by significant rise in CO2. In 1945, CO2 emission began to rise sharply and by 1980 atmospheric CO2. had risen to just under 340 ppm. During this time, however, global temperatures fell about 0.9°F (0.5° C) in the Northern Hemisphere and about 0.4°F (0.2° C) globally. Global temperatures suddenly reversed during the Great Climate Shift of 1977 when the Pacific Ocean switched from its cool mode to its warm mode with no change in the rate of CO2 increase. The 1977–1998 warm cycle ended in 1999 and a new cool cycle began. If CO2 is the cause of global warming, why did temperatures rise for 30 years (1915-1945) with no significant increase in CO2? Why did temperatures fall for 30 years (1945-1977) while CO2 was sharply accelerating? Logic dictates that this anomalous cooling cycle during accelerating CO2 levels must mean either (1) rising CO2 is not the cause of global warming or (2) some process other than rising CO2 is capable of strongly overriding its effect on global atmospheric warming.
Temperature patterns since the Little Ice Age (~1300 to 1860 A.D.) show a very similar pattern; 25–30 year–long periods of alternating warm and cool temperatures during overall warming from the Little Ice Age low. These temperature fluctuations took place well before any significant effect of anthropogenic atmospheric CO2.
Conclusions
Temperature changes recorded in the GISP2 ice core from the Greenland Ice Sheet show that the magnitude of global warming experienced during the past century is insignificant compared to the magnitude of the profound natural climate reversals over the past 25,000 years, which preceded any significant rise of atmospheric CO2. If so many much more intense periods of warming occurred naturally in the past without increase in CO2, why should the mere coincidence of a small period of low magnitude warming this century be blamed on CO2?
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.



I presume the question in the conclusion is rhetorical. The real answer is that it shouldn’t be. The actual answer is quite different and very sad.
This is a really excellent post, and puts our current warming into a historical perspective. It is a quirk of history that we are now in a warming period instead of a cooling period.
The only “thing” which has changed through the course of time is the conscience of man. We are, we create, we consume, therefore, we induce change. We have too many people studying small insignificant problems/we don’t have enough large problems to solve.
Understanding change/impact is one thing, assuming the sky is falling before understanding the problems in general is another.
Looks like another great work which won’t see enough sunlight…
Which is too bad because I really like the climatic tie-ins to actual and recorded history.
I seem to have heard this before.
Doomsday called off.
http://s446.photobucket.com/albums/qq187/bobclive/?action=view¤t=greenlandicecoretemps.mp4
I enjoyed the article, thanks. But this will come as news to the English wine industry – the south of England currently has many vineyards.
“If so many much more intense periods of warming occurred naturally in the past without increase in CO2, why should the mere coincidence of a small period of low magnitude warming this century be blamed on CO2?”
There’s no scientifically testable scientific answer to that question, Doc. I suspect it has to do with human gullibility and desire for certainty. Promoters of warming based on anthropogenic CO2 exploit that gullibility and desire.
Perfect.
Why no graph for the Late Holocene period? You seem to switch from real data to historical prose.
Many thanks for that. Not that it will make any difference to the true believers in Anthropogenic Global Warming for whom ‘science’ is always on their side.
Isn’t it a stretch to present Greenland ice cap temperature as global temperature?
It’s also interesting to see the 10Be data from GISP2. I’m going to try to insert the image here (ripped quickly from XL). And I’ll have the link below that if the image doesn’t show up. The x axis is years (0 is today). The Y axis is 10^3 10Be/g of ice.
http://knxu.com/~pix/10Be_Greenland_ice_core.gif
You can see the Younger Dryas signal here. It is not clearly seen in the antarctic cores. Also, the LIA 10Be values are very low compared to those from the Ice Age. I don’t see how a ‘quiet’ sun could be the only modulator of GCRs. It seems more likely the GCR flux is variable outside the control of the sun. Which also suggests the Milankovic cycles are not the whole story.
Very interesting piece. When taking ice cores, what process is used to delineate/differentiate the oxygen content of individual “layers” to break out estimates of the years that they represent? How thick (or thin) a “slice” of an ice core can be assayed in any given sample and how are variations in thickness/deposition over time accounted for? Given the various warm spikes that occurred over time, what measures can be taken to ensure that melting (not to mention shearing and other physical effects) don’t compromise the dating of the analytical measurements.
Signed,
– An inquiring (and presently ignorant) mind
@GregL
Bingo
GregL says:
January 24, 2011 at 10:26 am
Isn’t it a stretch to present Greenland ice cap temperature as global temperature?
Are you copmparing that with this.
We found that although the Gaspe series begins in 1404, up until 1421, it is based on only one tree.
http://www.junkscience.com/jan05/lone_gaspe_cedar.html
Where were the Greenland ‘Greenies’ eons ago? The scientific consensus of that day would have dictated the ‘correct’ human inputs and outputs, and the tropical paradise of Greenland could have been preserved.
Great post, thanks
I think that the most northerly place in England where wines is produced from grapevines is Lincoln or so we were told.I hate to think how those vines have fared in the recent cold weather.I planted a grape vine myself and it flourished It produced a large amount of grapes over several years. The height above sea level though as mentioned in this post is probably important but I think that the grape vine is more hardy then some people think particularly those from Germany.
GregL says:
January 24, 2011 at 10:26 am
Isn’t it a stretch to present Greenland ice cap temperature as global temperature?
_______________
Please define “global temperature” as precisely as you can and how to measure it.
Also, please provide the reasoning as to why temperature changes in Greenland would be significantly different than in other parts of the world and whether those changes would be more or less dramatic than elsewhere.
The reiteration of recorded history, IMHO, is much more convincing than a sampling of ice.
Dr. Easterbrook, how does one differentiate the H2O that had froze, then melted, then froze again several more times, from the more simple H20 that maybe only refroze a couple of times? Does melting and refreezing change the isotope configuration? And doesn’t particulate move through ice? I don’t mean to be a wet blanket, but its hard for me to wrap my head around the dating and the isotope ratio stuff. That said, if it is consistent with recorded history, then it would be a powerful correlation. Thanks for the posting!
Don,
I’m having a hard time trying to understand how Oxygen transmutes from one atomic weight to another just based on Temperature. Are they measuring actual atmospheric O2 trapped in the ice along with the trapped CO2 ? Or are they measuring the Oxygen in the H2O molecules of the ice itself and what about the Oxygen in the entrapped CO2. I would think they could get C18O16O, along with C18O2, or C16O2, and then there’s the H2 or D2 or maybe HD in the water.
I really don’t understand how Temperature can affect the atomic weight of an atom species.
I have to disagree with the concept that Greenland ice cores can be a valid proxy on their own for global temperature. While it may be a good indicator, the full picture can only be seen with an attendant show of comparable antarctic ice cores. Maybe I’m arguing for what will result in only a degree of accuracy, but I believe it better to withstand opposition.
What happens on both poles, not just one, is a better perspective of the globe as a whole.
Dr Easterbrook – in 2001 you wrote “If the cycles continue as in the past, the current warm cycle should end in the next few years, and global warming should abate, rather than increase, in the coming decades.” http://gsa.confex.com/gsa/2001AM/finalprogram/abstract_28039.htm
Bearing in mind that 2010 has tied for the warmest year on record with 1998 (See http://www.drroyspencer.com/2011/01/dec-2010-uah-global-temperature-update-0-18-deg-c/), can you please explain when you expect this global cooling to begin?
Don Penman 10:53am
Many years ago I lived in the South of France, but some distance from the sea. Hard frosts were common in the winter, but the vines didn’t mind. I was told that the vines are quite hardy to frost but what is crucial is the amount of warmth and sunshine they get in summer to produce the necessary sugars. So cold winters are ok but cool summers mean you don’t get much wine.
And….kind of political question: what does come next?
How accurate is ice core record dating? From the article, one could assume that dust layers are used to indicate annual boundaries. Is it not possible that ice layers might not be formed for decades, centuries, or millenia during warmer periods? If so, there would appear to be large jumps in global temperature. Is a secondary method like carbon dating used to verify core age?