German Vilimelis heard about Spain’s solar gold rush from his brother-in-law in 2007.
Across the plains around Lerida, the northeastern Spanish town where they spent weekends, farmers were turning over their fields to photovoltaic panels to capitalize on government solar- energy subsidies. Vilimelis persuaded his father, Jaume, who made a living growing pears on 5 acres (2 hectares) of land in Lerida, to turn over a portion of his farm for the project, Bloomberg Markets reported in its November issue.
Vilimelis, 35, a procurement manager for a consumer goods company, pooled his family savings and mortgaged his apartment to obtain a loan of more than 400,000 euros ($558,500) to cover the investment. Within nine months, the family’s 80-kilowatt generation unit — 500 solar panels on seven racks angled toward the sun — was feeding power into the national grid.
Solar investors such as Vilimelis were lured by a 2007 law passed by the government of Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero that guaranteed producers a so-called solar tariff of as much as 44 cents per kilowatt-hour for their electricity for 25 years — more than 10 times the 2007 average wholesale price of about 4 cents per kilowatt-hour paid to mainstream energy suppliers.
Thanks to the incentives, the family met the monthly cost of the loan and even earned a small profit. Once the debt was paid off in 2018, Vilimelis looked forward to making even more money during the 15 additional years of subsidies guaranteed under Spanish law.
‘You Feel Cheated’
Now Vilimelis and more than 50,000 other Spanish solar entrepreneurs face financial disaster as the policy makers contemplate cutting the price guarantees that attracted their investment in the first place.
“You feel cheated,” he says. “We put our money in on the basis of a law.”
Zapatero introduced the subsidies three years ago as part of an effort to cut his country’s dependence on fossil fuels. At the time, he promised that the investment in renewable energy would create manufacturing jobs and that Spain could sell its panels to nations seeking to reduce carbon emissions.
Yet by failing to control the program’s cost, Zapatero saddled Spain with at least 126 billion euros of obligations to renewable-energy investors. The spending didn’t achieve the government’s aim of creating green jobs, because Spanish investors imported most of their panels from overseas when domestic manufacturers couldn’t meet short-term demand.
Stark Lesson
Spain stands as a lesson to other aspiring green-energy nations, including China and the U.S., by showing how difficult it is to build an alternative energy industry even with billions of euros in subsidies, says Ramon de la Sota, a private investor in Spanish photovoltaic panels and a former General Electric Co. executive.
“The government totally overshot with the tariff,” de la Sota says. “Now they have a huge bill to pay — but where’s the technology, where’s the know-how, where’s the value?”
U.S. President Barack Obama highlighted solar energy as part of his plan to create green jobs this month with a decision to install photovoltaic panels on the roof of the White House. The government also approved the first large-scale solar-power projects on public land. Dublin-based utility NTR Plc and Chevron Corp. will build plants in California generating enough electricity between them to power about 600,000 homes.
Sun Surplus
At first glance, Spain appears to be the perfect incubator for a solar-energy revolution. Thanks to its location in southern Europe, the country’s land mass receives 900,000 terawatt-hours ofirradiation from the sun each year, according to the European Commission — more than 3,000 times the power used annually by its citizens. In contrast, Germany, Europe’s largest economy, receives less than half that amount of irradiation. (A terawatt-hour streams enough power to run 1 billion washing machines for 60 minutes.)
The challenge for Spain was to transform that free resource into an industry that made economic sense and attracted investors. The first problem lawmakers encountered was price. Solar power, like wind and other renewable-energy sources, can’t yet compete on price against electricity generated from natural gas or coal.
Power from the most-efficient photovoltaic plants costs utilities about $275 per megawatt-hour to produce compared with about $60 for a coal-fired plant, according to Bloomberg New Energy Finance. The cost of electricity from coal is held down in part by a plentiful supply of the mineral from established mines.
Miscalculation
Spanish policy makers reasoned that generous subsidies would help the country meet its goal of 400 megawatts of installed solar power by 2010 as well as spur the development of a manufacturing industry.
The feed-in tariff proved too successful in luring investors. By the end of 2007, solar installations had exceeded the government’s target, three years early, and the following year, investors pumped 16.4 billion euros into Spain’s solar industry, quintupling power capacity to 3,500 megawatts from 700 megawatts.
“They underestimated the technology — how cheaply panels could be installed and how quickly they could be installed,” says Jenny Chase, Zurich-based chief solar analyst at New Energy Finance. “When you have 40 megawatts of photovoltaic panels, you don’t think that if you get it wrong, you’ll end up with 3,500 megawatts.”
Ah yes… useful power that helps keeps the lights burning at night…. errr…
Being from Portugal, and knowing Spain, I can guarantee all of you that we’re in for a big bubble explosion… Fortunately, we have in Portugal little solar power, when compared to Spain. But we have a lot of wind, perceptually bigger than Spain. So, we’re in it together.
It won’t take too much time…
Ecotretas
Solar photovoltaic power has a dirty little secret. It’s Energy Returned on Energy Invested is 0.48. Solar photovoltaic power is unsustainable.
Wind Power is worse at 0.29. First question to ask any proposed wind power project developer is: What’s the EROEI? If they won’t tell you, they have something to hide.
“Spanish policy makers reasoned that generous subsidies would help the country meet its goal of 400 megawatts of installed solar power by 2010 as well as spur the development of a manufacturing industry.”
I wonder how that manufacturing industry is coming along?
The studies I read, say 2 jobs lost for each “green” job created.
Sounds like just what the United States needs….;-}
California is actually smarter than someone else – Spain in this case. California offers fixed-dollar rebates to individuals and small businesses to install photovoltaic (PV) power, with a fixed fund. When the fund runs out annually, installations are no longer reviewed for the subsidy. Therefore, the cost can’t go out of control.
I bought 200 W of PV power, but it doesn’t meet the state requirements for rebate. My PV power is at a remote site that would otherwise need a gasoline powered generator. PV was the best economic and cleanest choice for that special case.
Well…., pls read:
http://juandemariana.org/pdf/090327-employment-public-aid-renewable.pdf
and [if you dare..] look at this video from Norway:
http://www1.nrk.no/nett-tv/klipp/193197
(min 5 MB bw)
http://www1.nrk.no/nett-tv/klipp/282395
(min 0,5 MB bw)
Best/TJ
One really should teach exponential functions in school.
The lies about jobs all sound very familiar: in 1999 the green-spin machine and people like the British Wind Energy Association were claiming something like “45,000 jobs in the UK if we” .. spent billions upon billions on glorified wind chimes.
And did those jobs happen? I personally warned the current minister of Energy that the wind jobs were not going to materialise and I was proved right!
Yet, we set up a renewable energy scheme to pay over a billion a year to support wind energy, when we had no windmill manufacturers (over 10kw) and they specifically prevented subsidy from hydro – when most of the hydro equipment was built in the UK.
Who was pulling the wool over whose eyes?
Cancel the subsidy and let solar power get paid the bulk market rate.
Spain wins. Free lunch investors lose.
I think this proves what a wonderful manager government is.
Small government = small blunders, but do we really know this?
The reason the panels cost so much is that they take amazing amounts of energy to produce. The panels shown in the photo are either pure crystalline or polycrystalline silicon. The process for making them requires many levels of energy intensive procedures necessary to first form a gaseous silicon feedstock, such as trichlorosilane, and then to furnace decompose the feestock into pure silicon.
As of now, there is no process for producing photovoltaic devices which is both highly efficient at energy production and has a low process energy to construct.
In simple terms, if these produced more energy than it took to make them, they would cost less.
If you use more energy to produce them than they will ever deliver, then they are net CO2 producers, whatever these green scheme believers say…
Is it permitted to say, “We told you so.”?
Too much money chasing a dream which collapsed.
Sympathy for Spain? Zero.
Sympathy for the money-grubbers who are now going bust? Also zero.
Without insane amounts of subsidy solar power simply cannot work. It might be OK for tiny applications such as battery chargers but for anything on an industrial scale it does not work.
Here in NSW, Australia, the government’s feed in tariff is 60 cents per kWh. Guaranteed until 2016. It is in the statute books as well. I’ve got panels on my roof to take advantage of the government payments. The panels will be paid back in 3 years.
The problem, however, is the cost to the community and especially those who cannot afford to take up the government’s offer. These schemes, coupled with the failure to invest in infrastructure over the last 20 years now means that the whole community is paying huge amounts for electricity to fund the deployment of these panels and the modernisation of the network.
On top of that, the Labor Party and Greens still want to overlay a price on carbon. Apparently, the workers in this socialist paradise, are not suffering enough for the climate by paying bills that are increasing at inexcess of 20% per year.
Let me see. You get this great idea. Then you collectivize the risks and privatize the rewards. The tax payer, ah that is me, gets it in the usual place. Unfortunately when this happens, the promised associated pleasure seems to be missing. Do I see this one correctly or perhaps I am confused the facts?
I am unclear what the core issue is here. Did the Spanish government not budget for the payouts they promised? Did they not put a cap on their target (sorry, but the program is full now)? Do they now have too much electricity?
It is amazing how the main stream media here in California and elsewhere in the U.S. simply ignore these clearly demonstrated renewable energy economic disasters and continue to push for the same government tax subsidized renewable energy programs in our country and state. The environmental extremists are bringing economic disaster to the world with their phony save the planet mantra.
I’ve held that the time has come to sell green power stocks short. The bubble’s
about to burst…
If it hasn’t gone “pop” already…
If something looks too good to be true, it generally is.
A man growing pears in his own orchard is reduced to near bankruptcy by green policies as in this example is ironic. A government instigating those policies is negligent.
People have forgotten a very old lesson.
What the Government gives, the Government can take again.
There will be more victims, also in the USA like these Climate Skeptics:
http://community.nytimes.com/comments/www.nytimes.com/2010/10/19/science/earth/19fossil.html?sort=oldest&offset=2&scp=2&sq=skeptics%20wind%20solar&st=cse
Oh course, the Chinese are laughing all the way to the bank.
Again.
They have the worlds largest manufacturing capacity of solar panels. Does any Eurpean country SERIOUSLY think they can make cheaper?
Likewise anyone else sprinkling the solar pixie dust story. The only jobs in solar are offshore.
Oh yeah – wanna know how much margin there is in selling solar panels?
The guy who sells them to you is making well north of 25% margin. There’s lots of money in solar panels. Selling them.
Hey, now I understan’ ‘dos big nummburs.
Sheesh.
Sorry to nitpick, but the in title ‘Founder’ should be ‘Flounder’?
[Reply: Either one works. ~dbs, WUWT spelling gestapo.]
“You feel cheated,” he says. “We put our money in on the basis of a law.”
Unfortunately, unlike the Laws of Physics, the Laws of Man are not conservative, and are done by the whim of the weakminded and foolish.
Will the dunderheads in DC see this as a precautionary tale ?
I had to laugh at the report of the solar energy getting fed back into the Spanish grid at night. When someone thought to investigate, they found people running diesel generators and making a profit on the subsidy payment. Clever, eh?