From Science @ NASA.gov Researchers using NASA’s fleet of five THEMIS spacecraft have discovered a form of space weather that packs the punch of an earthquake and plays a key role in sparking bright Northern Lights. They call it “the spacequake.”
A spacequake is a temblor in Earth’s magnetic field. It is felt most strongly in Earth orbit, but is not exclusive to space. The effects can reach all the way down to the surface of Earth itself.
“Magnetic reverberations have been detected at ground stations all around the globe, much like seismic detectors measure a large earthquake,” says THEMIS principal investigator Vassilis Angelopoulos of UCLA.
It’s an apt analogy because “the total energy in a spacequake can rival that of a magnitude 5 or 6 earthquake,” according to Evgeny Panov of the Space Research Institute in Austria. Panov is first author of a paper reporting the results in the April 2010 issue of Geophysical Research Letters (GRL).
In 2007, THEMIS discovered the precursors of spacequakes. The action begins in Earth’s magnetic tail, which is stretched out like a windsock by the million mph solar wind. Sometimes the tail can become so stretched and tension-filled, it snaps back like an over-torqued rubber band. Solar wind plasma trapped in the tail hurtles toward Earth. On more than one occasion, the five THEMIS spacecraft were in the line of fire when these “plasma jets” swept by. Clearly, the jets were going to hit Earth. But what would happen then? The fleet moved closer to the planet to find out.
“Now we know,” says THEMIS project scientist David Sibeck of the Goddard Space Flight Center. “Plasma jets trigger spacequakes.”
According to THEMIS, the jets crash into the geomagnetic field some 30,000 km above Earth’s equator. The impact sets off a rebounding process, in which the incoming plasma actually bounces up and down on the reverberating magnetic field. Researchers call it “repetitive flow rebuffing.” It’s akin to a tennis ball bouncing up and down on a carpeted floor. The first bounce is a big one, followed by bounces of decreasing amplitude as energy is dissipated in the carpet.
“We’ve long suspected that something like this was happening,” says Sibeck. “By observing the process in situ, however, THEMIS has discovered something new and surprising.”
The surprise is plasma vortices, huge whirls of magnetized gas as wide as Earth itself, spinning on the verge of the quaking magnetic field.
“When plasma jets hit the inner magnetosphere, vortices with opposite sense of rotation appear and reappear on either side of the plasma jet,” explains Rumi Nakamura of the Space Research Institute in Austria, a co-author of the study. “We believe the vortices can generate substantial electrical currents in the near-Earth environment.”
Acting together, vortices and spacequakes could have a noticeable effect on Earth. The tails of vortices may funnel particles into Earth’s atmosphere, sparking auroras and making waves of ionization that disturb radio communications and GPS. By tugging on surface magnetic fields, spacequakes generate currents in the very ground we walk on. Ground current surges can have profound consequences, in extreme cases bringing down power grids over a wide area.
After THEMIS discovered the jets and quakes, Joachim Birn of the Los Alamos National Lab in New Mexico conducted a computer simulation of the rebounding process. Lo and behold, vortices appeared in good accord with THEMIS measurements. Moreover, the simulations suggest that the rebounding process can be seen from Earth’s surface in the form of ripples and whirls in auroral displays. Ground stations report just such a phenomenon.
“It’s a complicated process, but it all fits together,” says Sibeck.
The work isn’t finished. “We still have a lot to learn,” he adds. “How big can spacequakes become? How many vortices can swirl around Earth at once–and how do they interact with one another?”
Stay tuned for answers from THEMIS.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
More to add to the energy transfer equasion. Very interesting.
Now that is more like it. NASA money well-spent. Fascinating.
Chris
Norfolk, VA, USA
Wow. Fascinating. I wonder if earth’s magnetic “tail” has ever “broken off” and if so, I wonder what the effects would be as is recreated itself from the magnetic energy of the inner core?
Yes, that’s the NASA we all want, exploring new things in space.
Worth every penny.
It would seem to me that the external effect is actually affecting a torque moment coupled to the magnetic field of the Earth, resulting in a ‘stuttering’ motion of the Earth itself.
“We still have a lot to learn.”
Whoa-ho! What a concept! I thought scientists were supposed to show how important and scientific they were by their hubris. Maybe science isn’t quite dead, after all.
If earth has them then all planets in the solar system must have them.
I wonder if there’s a cumulative effect when planetary alignment occurs?
Suddenly the music of the spheres gets a lot more interesting.
I’m more interested in how the reverberations of the field that result may add energy to the upper atmosphere, as well as how much thermal energy the plasma that reaches the poles adds to the atmosphere. These are energy budget issues that are not included in TSI numbers.
Now imagine those spacequakes around Jupiter (which has a much stronger magnetic field than that of earth’s)…
mikelorrey
I’ve wondered if a mind like Faraday’s became versed in weather and the sun would find obvious electrical relationships that would explain warming and cooling on earth, and weather events, patterns, etc.
The real question is, did NOAA retract their claim to omnipotence because of this discovery? 😉
Very interesting stuff. I have often wondered if magnetism affects the winds on Earth. I bet THEMIS could help answer that question.
No surprise than that the Earth’s magnetic field (GMF) gets shaken by these huge magnetic impacts. The response is most effective in the polar regions where the GMF converges. In return the ocean currents (in particular in the Arctic) respond to these changes and ultimately are reflected in the global temperatures.
http://www.vukcevic.talktalk.net/LFC1.htm
http://www.vukcevic.talktalk.net/feedback.htm
Hmmmm. I wonder if that might also be part of the explanation for this…
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/07/20/graces-warts-new-peer-reviewed-paper-suggests-errors-and-adjustments-may-be-large/
Anyone from the Plasma Physics and Electrical Engineering community care to comment? Anyone knowledable about the Electrical Universe hypotheses care to explain?
Can magnetic fields stretch out and snap like rubber bands? Isn’t there a non mechanical solution for this. Electrical maybe? We have magnetic fields, we have plasma. Would’nt this also neccessitate some electrical currents? We have plasma jets. Are’nt these Birkland currents?
Will be even more interesting when these birds get going. So much we just do not know. Just think how knowledge could have been advanced over the last couple of decades had all those billions wasted on CO2 inspired fuzzy-felt games been spent on something useful like this.
Does nobody else see the giant space spider?
Now, that what I call a sub-woofer!! Move a hole continent (ice-sheet?).
Thanks Anthony for posting, this is the NASA we all want.
WOW! this sounds like one of the “unknowns, we didn’t know that we didn’t know about”
So I wonder how many more unknowns are out there effecting the climate.
mikelorrey says:
July 27, 2010 at 10:51 pm
“I’m more interested in how the reverberations of the field that result may add energy to the upper atmosphere, as well as how much thermal energy the plasma that reaches the poles adds to the atmosphere. These are energy budget issues that are not included in TSI numbers.”
Very little, would be the answer I think. A small fraction of the energy in the event, which is a small fraction of the energy in the solar wind, which is itself a small fraction of the solar energy impinging on the planet. Where it might have a detectable climatic effect is in the production of and separation of ions in the troposphere and stratosphere, affecting cloud formation and precipitation (cf. Svensmark).
“We believe the vortices can generate substantial electrical currents in the near-Earth environment.”
Numbers man, numbers!
tallbloke says: July 28, 2010 at 3:36 am
“We believe the vortices can generate substantial electrical currents in the near-Earth environment.”
Numbers man, numbers!
Estimates from THEMIS, going back to 2007 are (if I remember correctly):
Total current going into magnetosphere is of order of billion of Amps, but as far as the Arctic is concerned it is only fraction of it 0.5 -1 million Amps, with corresponding voltage of 30-50KV.
It would be useful to know more up to date numbers.
eilert says:
July 28, 2010 at 12:16 am
Anyone from the Plasma Physics and Electrical Engineering community care to comment? Anyone knowledable about the Electrical Universe hypotheses care to explain?
Can magnetic fields stretch out and snap like rubber bands? Isn’t there a non mechanical solution for this. Electrical maybe? We have magnetic fields, we have plasma. Would’nt this also neccessitate some electrical currents? We have plasma jets. Are’nt these Birkland currents?
Not to take this too far afield, but back around 1973 or so, I used to subscribe the the McGraw-Hill Electronic & Control Engineer’s book club.
Well, they had a book up for sale which described the use of magnets and explosives to generate EMP’s (ElectroMagnetic Pulses) for the purposes of testing shipboard systems and the like for the USN.
Basically, what they did was take a very powerful ALNICO magnet, and implode it with a powerful explosive, and in the process release the entire energy field of the magnet, creating an EMP.
Needless to say, the book was pulled at the demand of the U.S. government …
So yes: Rubber band magnetic fields are a distinct possibility.
Amino Acids in Meteorites says:
July 27, 2010 at 11:06 pm
mikelorrey
I’ve wondered if a mind like Faraday’s became versed in weather and the sun would find obvious electrical relationships that would explain warming and cooling on earth, and weather events, patterns, etc.
Good Heavens!! Puh-Leeze DO NOT be giving them any more ideas!!!
Geez, next thing you know, they’ll be suggesting that the electrical grid be taken down because —it too— is causing ‘globular warming’!!!
vukcevic says:
July 28, 2010 at 4:12 am
tallbloke says: July 28, 2010 at 3:36 am
“We believe the vortices can generate substantial electrical currents in the near-Earth environment.”
Numbers man, numbers!
Estimates from THEMIS, going back to 2007 are (if I remember correctly):
Total current going into magnetosphere is of order of billion of Amps, but as far as the Arctic is concerned it is only fraction of it 0.5 -1 million Amps, with corresponding voltage of 30-50KV.
It would be useful to know more up to date numbers.
This begins to sound like MagnetoHydroDynamics (MHD) all over again!
http://mysite.du.edu/~jcalvert/phys/mhd.htm
I am a Floridian that grew up in the thunderstorm hot spot that is our states north eastern quadrant. Then, for the last thirty odd years I have lived in the Keys and been a spectator at some wonderful light shows provided by the Gulf Stream…. And there were years spent in northern New Jersey where on one evening I found myself standing in my back yard looking up into an inverted bowl of interlaced lightning. I one thousand one, one thousand twoed a time count of a full uninterrupted minute of pure white light show. I could go on for a very long time like this but I think you get the point. I have also been enchanted by the anecdotal reports of luminous phenomena at the heart of tornadoes.
Our atmosphere is an intensely electrical bit of reality!
So, does anyone really understand the energy flow in this hoo ha? Anybody got a clue about the thermodynamics involved in this electrical aspect of of weather and, potentially, climate? That (think causation) it reaches all the way back to the sun seems a no brainer.
Perhaps everybody already understands this. Perhaps it’s all old hat by now, the science all settled you know, but wouldn’t it be nice if some bright young post doc took aholt of its tail and gave us somethin new to talk about for the next thirty years?