“The more interesting and potentially controversial result is that our data indicate surface water temperatures during a part of the Medieval Warm Period that are similar to today’s…”
“Although there are significant uncertainties with our own reconstruction, our work raises the idea that perhaps even the Northern Hemisphere temperature reconstructions need to be looked at more closely.”
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution: News Release : New Temperature Reconstruction from Indo-Pacific Warm Pool
The First Word in an Unfolding Story
Media Relations Office
93 Water Street MS #16
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution

A new 2,000 year long reconstruction of sea surface temperatures (SST) from the Indo-Pacific warm pool (IPWP) suggests that temperatures in the region may have been as warm during the Medieval Warm Period as they are today.
The IPWP is the largest body of warm water in the world, and, as a result, it is the largest source of heat and moisture to the global atmosphere, and an important component of the planet’s climate. Climate models suggest that global mean temperatures are particularly sensitive to sea surface temperatures in the IPWP. Understanding the past history of the region is of great importance for placing current warming trends in a global context.
The study is published in the journal Nature.
In a joint project with the Indonesian Ministry of Science and Technology (BPPT), the study’s authors, Delia Oppo, a paleo–oceanographer with the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, and her colleagues Yair Rosenthal of Rutgers State University and Braddock K. Linsley of the University at Albany-State University of New York, collected sediment cores along the continental margin of the Indonesian Seas and used chemical analyses to estimate water past temperatures and date the sediment. The cruise included 13 US and 14 Indonesian scientists.
“This is the first record from the region that has really modern sediments and a record of the last two millennia, allowing us to place recent trends in a larger framework,” notes Oppo.
Global temperature records are predominantly reconstructed from tree rings and ice cores. Very little ocean data are used to generate temperature reconstructions, and very little data from the tropics. “As palaeoclimatologists, we work to generate information from multiple sources to improve confidence in the global temperature reconstructions, and our study contributes to scientists’ efforts towards that goal,” adds Oppo.
Temperature reconstructions suggest that the Northern Hemisphere may have been slightly cooler (by about 0.5 degrees Celsius) during the ‘Medieval Warm Period’ (~AD 800-1300) than during the late-20th century. However, these temperature reconstructions are based on, in large part, data compiled from high latitude or high altitude terrestrial proxy records, such as tree rings and ice cores, from the Northern Hemisphere (NH). Little pre-historical temperature data from tropical regions like the IPWP has been incorporated into these analyses, and the global extent of warm temperatures during this interval is unclear. As a result, conclusions regarding past global temperatures still have some uncertainties.

Oppo comments, “Although there are significant uncertainties with our own reconstruction, our work raises the idea that perhaps even the Northern Hemisphere temperature reconstructions need to be looked at more closely.”
Comparisons
The marine-based IPWP temperature reconstruction is in many ways similar to land temperature reconstructions from the Northern Hemisphere (NH). Major trends observed in NH temperature reconstructions, including the cooling during the Little Ice Age (~1500-1850 AD) and the marked warming during the late twentieth century, are also observed in the IPWP.
“The more interesting and potentially controversial result is that our data indicate surface water temperatures during a part of the Medieval Warm Period that are similar to today’s,” says Oppo. NH temperature reconstructions also suggest that temperatures warmed during this time period between A.D. 1000 and A.D. 1250, but they were not as warm as modern temperatures. Oppo emphasizes, “Our results for this time period are really in stark contrast to the Northern Hemisphere reconstructions.”
Reconstructing Historical Temperatures
Records of water temperature from instruments like thermometers are only available back to the 1850s. In order to reconstruct temperatures over the last 2,000 years, Oppo and her colleagues used a proxy for temperature collected from the skeletons of marine plankton in sediments in the Indo-Pacific Ocean. The ratio of magnesium to calcium in the hard outer shells of the planktonic foraminifera Globigerinoides ruber varies depending on the surface temperature of the water in which it grows. When the phytoplankton dies, it falls to the bottom of the ocean and accumulates in sediments, recording the sea surface temperature in which it lived.
“Marine sediments accumulate slowly in general — approximately 3 cm/yr — which makes it hard to overlap sediment record with instrumental record and compare that record to modern temperature records,” says Oppo. “That’s what is different about this study. The sediment accumulates fast enough in this region to give us enough material to sample and date to modern times.”
The team generated a composite 2000-year record by combining published data from a piston core in the area with the data they collected using a gravity corer and a multi-corer. Tubes on the bottom of the multi-corer collected the most recently deposited sediment, therefore enabling the comparison of sea surface temperature information recorded in the plankton shells to direct measurements from thermometers.
Oppo cautions that the reconstruction contains some uncertainties. Information from three different cores was compiled in order to reconstruct a 2,000-year-long record. In addition sediment data have an inherent uncertainty associated with accurately dating samples. The SST variations they have reconstructed are very small, near the limit of the Mg/Ca dating method. Even in light of these issues, the results from the reconstruction are of fundamental importance to the scientific community.
More Questions to Answer
The overall similarity in trend between the Northern Hemisphere and the IPWP reconstructions suggests that that Indonesian SST is well correlated to global SST and air temperature. On the other hand, the finding that IPWP SSTs seem to have been approximately the same as today in the past, at a time when average Northern Hemisphere temperature appear to have been cooler than today, suggests changes in the coupling between IPWP and Northern Hemisphere or global temperatures have occurred in the past, for reasons that are not yet understood. “This work points in the direction of questions that we have to ask,” Oppo says. “This is only the first word, not the last word.”
The US National Science Foundation and the WHOI Ocean and Climate Change Institute provided funding for this work.
The Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution is a private, independent organization in Falmouth, Mass., dedicated to marine research, engineering, and higher education. Established in 1930 on a recommendation from the National Academy of Sciences, its primary mission is to understand the oceans and their interaction with the Earth as a whole, and to communicate a basic understanding of the oceans’ role in the changing global environment.
h/t to WUWT reader Glenn
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Heh.
I guess this means they don’t want a AGW ‘grant’ cookie?
There are things in life that make one unsure whether to laugh or cry or cheer or beat one’s head on the wall in frustration.
At last one of the major US scientific institutions (as I understand) has discovered that there was a Medieval Warm Period and that it was (no, sorry, MAY have been) as warm as today. Something that historians have known for years.
Read H H Lamb’s book ‘Climate, history and the modern world’.
I suppose we raise one small cheer, do we?
I’ll get this one in early –
DENIERS! How much were you paid by Shell and BP?
Besides, Wood’s Hole is just one insignificant little institute – who ever heard of any important oceanographic work coming from it? Anyway – there are ‘significant uncertainties’, and their findings are well within the error bars for the MWP temperatures defined by Mann and now accepted at the only correct concensus…
I am sure that Mann will try and find some way to discredit this study and its scientists. But that doesn’t erase the fact that more and more are coming out against the AGW dogma with peer-reviewed papers, and emprical data.
You can only “cry wolf” for so long.
A 2006 reconstruction of the IPWP had a similar result:
http://i35.tinypic.com/11rb3ae.jpg
That graph is part of my post on long-term SST reconstructions. And there are others that contradict the hockey stick:
http://bobtisdale.blogspot.com/2008/07/sst-reconstructions.html
Mann’s NINO3 reconstruction, red curve in following graph, contradicts the HS.
http://s5.tinypic.com/20b26p0.jpg
That Mann dataset was part of a post on low frequency ENSO oscillations:
http://bobtisdale.blogspot.com/2009/03/low-frequency-enso-oscillations.html
Whoops – sorry about spellings – I was too angry. in any case, Shell sells petrol in Indonesia, so you can’t believe a word of any research carried out within 500 miles of the place – don’t listen to them…
(falls off chair spluttering…)
Don’t worry Dr. Running says politics are where the action is at in the new climate change minor program at the University of Montana. See: http://www.montanakaimin.com/index.php/news/news_article/um_offers_unprecedented_climate_change_minor_this_semester/3847
Mann oh Mann is Mann ever going to be ticked off
I propose the following reality check on Mann’s (and others) proxy records which purport to show unprecedented modern warming. Mann is claiming that temps have roughly followed his hockey stick over the years, based on tree ring parameters (bigger tree rings = higher temps is the basic relationship I assume?). So if we have unprecedented temperatures recently, we should also have unprecedented tree rings recently. Is this the case? Has this simple verification check been performed? Are trees in large part statistically different now than they ever were before (in the last 1-2 thousand years)? And if so can this be contributed to a temperature signature?
I would love to see how they calibrate tree rings to temperature, and secondly how they decide which ancient tree sample is “good” for temperature analysis and which is bad…
Readers might like to know that Prof. Mann wrote to the London Sunday Telegraph last Sunday defending his position claiming the endorsement of the US Academy of Sciences quoting ‘Academy Affirms Hockey Stick Graph’, Nature, Jan 29, 2006.
I read an interesting paper yesterday:
“Late Holocene glacial and periglacial evolution in the upper Orco Valley, northwestern Italian Alps” by Carlo Giraudi
He says that at two times in the past, 200BC to 100AD and 5740-5600 years BP, soils developed in areas currently devoid of vegetation and with permafrost. Temperatures in those times were likely higher than they are now. He also says that during the 11th and 12th centuries AD, vegetation was able to colonize an area now littered with periglacial debris and void of vegetation. He also says that frost weathering was not active during that period and that the area was likely warmer than now for a long enough duration for it to be colonized by vegetation. This is backed up by pollen studies of an adjacent peat bog (Caramiello et al. 1994) shows increasing temperatures in the 11th-13th centuries
The longest retreat phase of glaciers of the Swiss glaciers was about 2000 years ago correlating with studies by Holzhauser et al. (2005) and Joerin et al. (2006). The glaciers reached their maximum extent of the second half of the Holocene during the LIA.
Most interesting is that climate has apparently become the most unstable of the Holocene over the past few thousand years. More oscillation between warm/cold periods. The MWP shows evidence of warmer temperatures than today but scant rainfall on the glaciers resulting in less overall retreat than today. The period most closely matching today’s combination of precipitation and temperatures is the Roman warm period of roughly 2000 years ago but the glaciers today have so far been reduced to a smaller size than during the RWP.
Actually, all the fossil fuels are not fossilized plant remains. What they are is a race of TNO inhabitants (Sedna is their capital planet) came and sequestered the majority of the Carbon compounds so that the planet could freeze over, and they could colonize. Most are in cyrogenic deep freeze somewhere in Antarctica & Greenland. They do this to wait out the Interglacials. A few remain on Sedna where they check up on Earth every 10,000 yrs. Problem is, man came along and started using fire. So, they sent Gore, Hansen & Mann on a mission from God.
Now you know the rest of the story.
It’s an interesting result. I would like to know how the proxies were calibrated and combined. That’s usually where things go right or wrong in a reconstruction. Most I’ve read are flat wrong mathematically. The various multivariate regressions almost universally suppress the historic signal in comparison to the calibration date range. So every time I read proxy, I think first — what was the proxy data, and second — how was it calibrated and combined.
Off topic–
I’ve got a well written guest post some may like from Dr. Weinstein on space based energy production. It’s a little different from the climate discussion which is actually nice sometimes.
http://noconsensus.wordpress.com/2009/09/02/the-solution-to-future-energy-needs-and-global-pollution/
And my point to posting the above is that glacial advance and retreat is not always related to temperature but can also be related to amounts and nature of precipitation falling on them. If you have colder temperatures but decreased precipitation, or the precipitation falls mainly in the warmer months as rain, you get less growth. Warmer temperatures but less rain or more precipitation in winter months as snow could mean less glacial retreat. The “perfect storm” of warmer temperatures combined with increased precipitation as rain in the warmer months can mean dramatic glacial advance.
That, and to show that the warmer periods in Giraudi’s study seem to correspond to the Woods Hole conclusions. But if the MWP was dryer than today’s warm period, information from such things as tree ring studies and glacial boundaries could lead one to believe it was “cooler” then it actually was at that time. The MWP was apparently warmer but dryer than now according to data on river flooding draining the Swiss Alps.
Do the authors sound more than a little nervous that they won’t be invited back to the next dinner party to anyone else?
Dodgy Geezer (08:56:04) :
I’ll get this one in early –
DENIERS! How much were you paid by Shell and BP?
___________________________________________________
Slightly OT, but I think Beyond Petroleum has much more important things to do than worry about funding skeptics:
http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/bp-finds-a-huge-oil-deposit-in-the-gulf-of-mexico/
I don’t see the typical patented AGW-disclaimer anywhere….
rbateman (09:29:05) :So, they sent Gore, Hansen & Mann on a mission…
You have not mentioned the most important of the four “Horsemen of the Apocalypse”…. But, really, poor of them, I think there are, instead, the Three stooges 🙂
The story presented Mann’s information as “data.” I thought his work was the results of computer modeling showing probabilities, not data. I remember a strong argument against the AGW promoters was their propensity to present computer model results as data.
This is very interesting news, on top of the other items out of NCAR this week that identify much broader impacts of solar variations on the Earth’s climate. Both were highlighted on Science Daily this week. Links:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/07/090716113358.htm
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/08/090827141349.htm
Next I suppose all of this will be tossed aside by the mainstream media in favor of some claim about the Antarctic or Arctic being “overwhelmed” by GHG influences.
Oh, and did anyone else see the article and video, also on Science Daily this week (under “breaking news”), in which a physicist “discovered” that higher CO2 levels now are making plants grow faster? The scientist thought it was “weird”. The article also indicated that it was “unexpected” and “unforeseen”. Really?!?!?! If so, why have commercial greenhouses used elevated CO2 levels to help plants grow for so many years???
Anthony, thanks for highlighting this gem!
Dodgy Geezer (08:56:04) :
I’ll get this one in early -DENIERS!
How much were you paid by Shell and BP?
Besides, Wood’s Hole is just one insignificant little little institute
You forgot to mention: Delia Oppo is a paleo–oceanographer! What do paleo-oceanographers know about climate? You might as well just be reading a blog post from some electrical engineer.
Dodgy Geezer (08:56:04) :
philincalifornia (09:48:23) :
Actually, Shell and BP are heavily invested in renewables, not questioning alarm.
Even Exxon is backing away from questioning this business, to the extent that they ever did. The power of intimidation is striking.
For those who haven’t seen Bishop Hill’s exposé of the Mann Hockey Stick, this is a great summary of the shenanigans that go on behind the scenes of the corrupt climate peer review process: click
Actually, the 2008 Loehle and McCulloch reconstruction includes several tropical and near-tropical proxies, including some sea sediment cores like the one cited. See map on linked page.
But it’s nice to see a new study confirming our results. Perhaps Craig will include it in any update of his 07 study.
It’s unfortunate the new study gives so much prominence to the Mann 2008 reconstruction, instead of just reporting their own results. Perhaps Mann was a Nature referee and insisted on this.
I wonder how this compares with the reconstructions derived from Sargasso Sea cores?
The Vikings of the turn of the millennium would be proud that people have rediscovered why they went to Greenland in 900 AD.