Palin takes a stand in WaPo – blasts cap and trade

from The Washington Post

The ‘Cap And Tax’ Dead End

By Sarah Palin

Tuesday, July 14, 2009

There is no shortage of threats to our economy. America’s unemployment rate recently hit its highest mark in more than 25 years and is expected to continue climbing. Worries are widespread that even when the economy finally rebounds, the recovery won’t bring jobs. Our nation’s debt is unsustainable, and the federal government’s reach into the private sector is unprecedented.

Unfortunately, many in the national media would rather focus on the personality-driven political gossip of the day than on the gravity of these challenges. So, at risk of disappointing the chattering class, let me make clear what is foremost on my mind and where my focus will be:

I am deeply concerned about President Obama’s cap-and-trade energy plan, and I believe it is an enormous threat to our economy. It would undermine our recovery over the short term and would inflict permanent damage.

American prosperity has always been driven by the steady supply of abundant, affordable energy. Particularly in Alaska, we understand the inherent link between energy and prosperity, energy and opportunity, and energy and security. Consequently, many of us in this huge, energy-rich state recognize that the president’s cap-and-trade energy tax would adversely affect every aspect of the U.S. economy.

There is no denying that as the world becomes more industrialized, we need to reform our energy policy and become less dependent on foreign energy sources. But the answer doesn’t lie in making energy scarcer and more expensive! Those who understand the issue know we can meet our energy needs and environmental challenges without destroying America’s economy.

Job losses are so certain under this new cap-and-tax plan that it includes a provision accommodating newly unemployed workers from the resulting dried-up energy sector, to the tune of $4.2 billion over eight years. So much for creating jobs.

In addition to immediately increasing unemployment in the energy sector, even more American jobs will be threatened by the rising cost of doing business under the cap-and-tax plan. For example, the cost of farming will certainly increase, driving down farm incomes while driving up grocery prices. The costs of manufacturing, warehousing and transportation will also increase.

The ironic beauty in this plan? Soon, even the most ardent liberal will understand supply-side economics.

The Americans hit hardest will be those already struggling to make ends meet. As the president eloquently puts it, their electricity bills will “necessarily skyrocket.” So much for not raising taxes on anyone making less than $250,000 a year.

Even Warren Buffett, an ardent Obama supporter, admitted that under the cap-and-tax scheme, “poor people are going to pay a lot more for electricity.”

We must move in a new direction. We are ripe for economic growth and energy independence if we responsibly tap the resources that God created right underfoot on American soil. Just as important, we have more desire and ability to protect the environment than any foreign nation from which we purchase energy today.

In Alaska, we are progressing on the largest private-sector energy project in history. Our 3,000-mile natural gas pipeline will transport hundreds of trillions of cubic feet of our clean natural gas to hungry markets across America. We can safely drill for U.S. oil offshore and in a tiny, 2,000-acre corner of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge if ever given the go-ahead by Washington bureaucrats.

Of course, Alaska is not the sole source of American energy. Many states have abundant coal, whose technology is continuously making it into a cleaner energy source. Westerners literally sit on mountains of oil and gas, and every state can consider the possibility of nuclear energy.

We have an important choice to make. Do we want to control our energy supply and its environmental impact? Or, do we want to outsource it to China, Russia and Saudi Arabia? Make no mistake: President Obama’s plan will result in the latter.

For so many reasons, we can’t afford to kill responsible domestic energy production or clobber every American consumer with higher prices.

Can America produce more of its own energy through strategic investments that protect the environment, revive our economy and secure our nation?

Yes, we can. Just not with Barack Obama’s energy cap-and-tax plan.

The writer, a Republican, is governor of Alaska.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
251 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Big Dipper
July 13, 2009 9:37 pm

Maybe I could vote for her after all.

crosspatch
July 13, 2009 9:41 pm

The left hates her … the Republican establishment hates her, the press hates her … good enough for me!

Justin Sane
July 13, 2009 9:50 pm

Wow, too bad she couldn’t have gotten this speech out about a year ago.
I see the Obama empire lasting one term, then even the Dems will vote Republican to toss them out. Obama is like a super-novae, seen today, gone tomorrow.

David
July 13, 2009 9:51 pm

crosspatch (21:41:55) :
I can count on your vote then.None of those people like me either.

pkatt
July 13, 2009 9:56 pm

🙂 She can come and hang out with us teabagging rednecks anytime. Sarah is Sarah.. many of us respect her as a real human being, a refreshing change from all the corrupt posers in Washington today. Haters of her will trash her family , her looks, just about anything they can to avoid talking about her beliefs or political ideals. Anthony you are very brave for posting that here. The mere mention of her name envokes the nuttys comming out of the woodwork.
All I can say.. I agree entirely.

mkurbo
July 13, 2009 9:57 pm

Agreed crosspatch – less government can also mean that your just not like every other politician and have a completely different perspective on what government can be, should be, etc.
I think she is on a different path… So far, she has my vote !

JeffT
July 13, 2009 9:57 pm

I’d vote for Sarah Palin, and I’m not an American (or Alaskan)

John J
July 13, 2009 10:01 pm

On Election Day 2008 Sarah Palin had more executive experience than the sum of McCain+Biden+Obambi, and yet the state-run media kept telling us how inexperienced she was.
Can we get a do-over?
Palin 2012!

Ron de Haan
July 13, 2009 10:01 pm

We have seen Palin go from a AGW denier to an (modest and reserved but still…) AGW believer within a fortnight when she joined McCain in his hopeless campaign for the White House.
Despite her call “drill baby drill”, the big question is “can we trust her”?
As the UN has already surprised us with the AGW scam and a constant drive for Global governance and control, former US Presidents have been extremely reluctant in signing UN treaties.
They new any UN Treaty would undermine the US power base and feed a corrupt and inefficient bureaucracy.
According to the following publication, Palin has supported Obama’s ambitious UN Treaty Agenda. http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/12742
When the current Canadian Prime Minister Harper was in the heat of his election campaign, he stated that he would role back all climate legislation introduced by the former Government.
Now, comfortably in power, he not only supports the G8 Climate Agenda but also makes a push for Global Governance by the UN.
So, I repeat my question. Can she be trusted?
I think this is a legitimate question we should ask any person aiming at the White House before any vote is cast.
Many of the people who voted for Obama are already fed up with the “change” and out of a job.

John F. Hultquist
July 13, 2009 10:02 pm

I don’t think she should ever run for public office again. Why offer up herself and her family to the proponents of socialism and world government? She should stay in the role she is now in and skewer all the goof balls in government, media, and Hollywood. Sort of like that “whack-a-mole” game. Some of the rest of her time should be used to give speeches for a large fee to the same people. In her spare time she can hunt, fish, enjoy life and family. I think she can do more good in such a role than if she tries to lead. Look at the circus they have in Alaska and what a distraction it is. I think she has chosen an excellent path and can enjoy it. I’ll enjoy watching.

nvw
July 13, 2009 10:04 pm

Ms. Palin is correct on this issue, but as an Alaskan I am not impressed with her leadership and political decision making. When it comes to demonstrating scientific literacy, I prefer my politicians to not believe the Earth was created in seven days.

JDN
July 13, 2009 10:04 pm

Note that unlike the GOP, she refuses to even use phrases like ‘carbon emissions’ and ‘climate change’. How refreshing!

astronmr20
July 13, 2009 10:05 pm

Well-stated essay by Palin.
However, the knee-jerk reaction to her has gone so far into the depths of unpleasantness; so much that she could tell people their house was on fire and they would only say something bad about her rather than even notice the smoke.
It’s “shoot the messenger” x1000.

Molon Labe
July 13, 2009 10:08 pm

“We have seen Palin go from a AGW denier to an (modest and reserved but still…) AGW believer within a fortnight…”
She is a GW believer but an AGW skeptic, as we all are.

Paul R
July 13, 2009 10:08 pm

crosspatch (21:41:55) :
The left hates her … the Republican establishment hates her, the press hates her.
That could be why she’s allowed to state the obvious.

rbateman
July 13, 2009 10:08 pm

A lot of folks thought she was unprepared to lead the nation this election (be as it may she would have been VP).
Couple of years can make a big difference.
I have to agree with her summary.
Cap & Trade will be an astronomical mistake, and a deep self-inflicted wound for which there is no good reason.
You betcha.

Molon Labe
July 13, 2009 10:09 pm

“I prefer my politicians to not believe the Earth was created in seven days.”
[snip] she doesn’t believe that.

Elizabeth
July 13, 2009 10:10 pm

Hmmm… she could just well be shooting herself in the foot with this one.

crosspatch
July 13, 2009 10:14 pm

“the big question is ‘can we trust her’?”
Why hold her to a higher standard than any other politician?

theduke
July 13, 2009 10:14 pm

I like Sarah Palin, but I’m not convinced the “dependence on foreign energy” bugaboo is the right policy button to push. There is no reason to cease buying foreign energy products if their market value is far cheaper than similar domestic products would be. If the West stopped buying energy from the Middle East, the place would turn into a huge killing ground very quickly. We have an important national security interest in maintaining some kind of stability in the Middle East. Oil revenues support political stability and promote economic growth in that region. We don’t want those positive outcomes to be extinguished.
Furthermore, the US buys much of its oil from Mexico and Canada so the claim that we are financing terrorists by buying huge amounts of oil from nations that tolerate, foster or finance terrorism is clearly exaggerated.
Our nation’s domestic oil reserves are best left undeveloped to be relied upon in the case of a catastrophic world crisis, the probability of which is much greater now than it was two years ago.

crosspatch
July 13, 2009 10:15 pm

“, but as an Alaskan I am not impressed with her leadership and political decision making”
It is somewhat amusing that she enjoyed something like an 80% approval rating until she accepted the nomination for vice president.

rbateman
July 13, 2009 10:16 pm

Ron de Haan (22:01:27) :
Given how bad Cap & Trade will damage the US, the GOP is listening to sound reasoning. They are the political opposition to this, and the best hope there is to avoid ensuing calamity.
Can we trust her?
2011 is a long way off.
For now, it’s a fight in the trenches, and we need all the help we can get.

Steve
July 13, 2009 10:17 pm

I can’t think of anything better for Sarah Palin to do than lead, and champion, a Republican rejection of AGW and the destructive left wing movement driving cap and trade policies.
How could the Al Gore Team refuse to debate the Palin Team? After all Palin is supposed to be an ignorant fool?
The left would come unhinged attacking Palin as their centerpiece Global Warming collapses.
There is no human caused global warming and the movement will eventually collapse.

Gene Nemetz
July 13, 2009 10:23 pm

Molon Labe (22:09:05) :
“I prefer my politicians to not believe the Earth was created in seven days.”

I looked in to that issue for myself when it first surfaced.
I found it is a straw man.

Gene Nemetz
July 13, 2009 10:26 pm

Was this her first stump speech for 2012 ?
I remember that Barak Obama was concerned about her before the 08 election. She got in his head.

1 2 3 10