People send me stuff, some days my email explodes. Today I got all sorts of things about Obama and John Holdren and the new NCDC climate spincycle which Steve McIntyre has dubbed Chucky Returns Part IV. That one made me laugh out loud.
Something else that made me laugh today was this well done story (h/t to Andrew Walden) from reporter Tina Chau of KGMB-TV in Honolulu, HI. The NWS spokesman Tom Birchard was clearly flummoxed, and at the end of the interview said exactly what I’ve always said about the ASOS system and measurement of climate data at airports. Comedian George Carlin was right in his “Hippy dippy weatherman routine”: Why do they always give the temperature for the airport? Nobody LIVES there!
“ASOS…placed for aviation purposes…not necessarily for climate purposes.”
Yet, ASOS weather stations at airports worldwide are in fact used for climate, and are part of the official climate record. In the US alone, there are 64 ASOS stations (that I’ve found so far) in the official USHCN climate record, plus there are hundreds in GHCN worldwide. In my studies of the USHCN temperature network, I’ve found dozens of such poor siting examples even at non-airports. See my report here (PDF, 4 MB).
Our old friend the ASOS and HO-83 temperature sensors may be up to tricks again in Honolulu. It seems the temperature is a wee bit off and new records are being set by the ASOS weather station at the airport. I’m reminded of the similar situation in Tucson years ago that went on a long time before anybody caught it. I’ve found the HNL station, seen below. It is located at lat/lon 21.32403 -157.939467 There’s more than meets the eye. More after the news story.

Honolulu Temperature Records Questioned
Written by Tina Chau
The high in Honolulu Monday was 92 degrees. It was the hottest June 15 since the National Weather Service started keeping track and the 8th straight day we’ve broken or tied a record. But was it really that hot?
That’s what the experts at the NWS have been wondering. They settled their suspicions with a trip to the airport to check Honolulu’s official temperature sensor.
“We had one of our technicians visit the site and they did a side-by-side calibration and found the thermometer at the Honolulu International Airport was reading a little warmer than what his caliberation thermometer was reading,” said Tom Birchard, a meteorologist at the NWS.
It was two degrees warmer. There’s some wiggle room with the accuracy of the temperature sensor.
“Which means, if the reading is 90, the thermometer is only accurate to read within about two degrees so it could be anywhere between 88 degrees and 92 degrees.
Which means our records these past eight days may not be records after all.
“If it turns out, after further investigation of the thermometer the data were skewed,” said Birchard, “they could be stricken.”
Now see these ground level photos I’ve found of the HNL ASOS courtesy of NCDC’s photo library of ASOS weather stations.
Not only is there a faulty sensor at HNL, as indicated by the NWS meteorologist in the news story, take a good look at the site photo below. The HO-83 temperature sensor is the little white mushroom shaped device.


There’s an asphalt access road directly adjacent to the ASOS temperature sensor. Plus a heat generating power transformer, and the requisite air conditioner exhaust for the ILS electronics building.
As we know from common experience, temperatures are almost always warmer near asphalt than natural soil or ground cover. From a scientific perspective we can cite either Yilmaz et al (PDF 2008 ) and the measurements of temperature differences over such surfaces, or we can reference NOAA’s Climate Reference Network Handbook which rates the likely temperature error of such placements.
See the Climate Reference Network Site Handbook (PDF 2002) including explanation of the CRN 1-5 rating system used by surfacestations.org


How close is the temperature sensor to the asphalt? I decided to use Google Earth’s measurement tool:

The answer: 1.6 meters, about 5 feet.
But what’s a little asphalt when the temperature sensor is surrounded by a sea of it at HNL?

The 2 degree temperature error in the ASOS record was only found because it exceeded the June 15th high temperature record for Honolulu. It seemed “odd” enough for somebody to check to be sure.

So the question we have now is, how much of the data in the plot above from NASA GISS is from influences such as urban growth, airport expansion, etc. I’ve confirmed that GISS uses the Honolulu Airport for climate data since their ID of 425911820000:

Matches that of the National Climatic Data Center description for Honolulu Airport’s WMO code (91182)

Note the big step change in 1960 in the HNL airport data plot. Hawaii became the 50th US state in 1959. So it would stand to reason that 1960 would be a period of growth at the airport, or perhaps a station move to a warmer location. According to the National Climate Data Center, the ASOS station was installed on February 1st, 1998. Since then, the temperature swings appear to have been larger than in prior years.
But the nearby Honolulu Observatory temperature record doesn’t seem to have much of a trend, though it no longer measures temperature for climate records, a pity:

When dealing with climate change, it is generally accepted that the amount of temperature rise attributable is about 0.7°C or about 1.3°F. With errors of 2 degrees or more creeping into the climate record due to faulty equipment and poor station placement, are we so certain?
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Wow… People are waking up and understanding that all is not as it appears…
HA, only 2 degrees hot? I’ve been there several times, I am quite amazed that it is only hot by 2 degrees. That airport is like sanding in the center of hell. Surrounded by lava rock and asphalt. I cannot believe they would even remotely consider placing a temperature gauge anywhere near there.
sorry .. should be: “standing in the center of hell” .. although, sanding in hell is not a bad analogy either .. 😉
And certainly exhaust gasses from all the jets taking off and landing wouldn’t have ANY affect on the temperature readings in the surrounding area. LOL!!!
But of course if you have a large number of sample points, their individual quality doesn’t matter, right? Isn’t that how science gets “settled”?
It would be useful to have reliable data before taking bold and decisive steps towards crippling the economy of the developed world.
//Irony off//
Considering that so many “records” and official measurements are made at airports, one must wonder about the relatively localized effects, even for things like precipitation when there are strong thermals after a sunny day. Temperature may be just the tip of the iceberg.
Apologies for asking here: I would like to submit a guest post for consideration, but I have failed to find a mechanism to do that here. Please contact me!
And, of course, since GIStemp can smear a temperature over 1500 km around, who knows how much “ocean” was warmed by the same sensor…
I’ve often wondered if in these poorly sited urban stations there might not be an additional stacking effect that should be considered. If the UHI is raising the ambient temperature of the general locale, might not the individual heat island effects of a poorly sited station be providing a stronger amplification that the siting protocols do not seem to consider?
It would be very interesting to find out what happened at the site in the late ’50s that suddenly temperatures increased dramatically thereafter. Aren’t there any clues here?
Is there any record of the sequence of construction at the airport? When was the runway asphalted for example? I would hazard a guess and say that there was major construction in the early 1960s.
This is very off-topic, and my intention was to have the moderator delete this message after it is forwarded to Anthony.
Anthony,
Here’s a story in my local paper, The Oregonian. It’s about Jack Capell who was one of the first TV meteorologists in town. He just passed away at 86.
Anyway, the really interesting part of the story is the adventure that Capell experienced forecasting the 1962 Columbus Day storm – which is the storm that all other storms are compared to in the Northwest. It is a must read. It shows just how far we’ve come technology wise. I’m sure you’re aware of the advances from personal experience, but still, this is a good story.
http://blog.oregonlive.com/weather/2009/06/jack_capell_the_forecaster_who.html
An excerpt:
+- 2 Degrees. Wow.
That’s what I would call a very bad make of thermometer or one busted piece of equipment.
I would think that for all the money they spend on that equipment they could at least equal what you can buy in the store (nearest 0.1 degree F).
Now I do know from attending a USFS fire station sensor replacement (lifted from another site that was malfunctioning….budget problems) that some sensors are encased in a rather hefty chunk of metal pipe. The tech at the site told me they were state of the art, replacing the platinum wire thing, something about a gizmo that oscillates rapidly.
Anyway, the handheld unit used to check on the offending station read 3 degrees cooler than the heavy-metal encased sensor. Attached by a very stout metal arm to a very hot aluminum pole. All that metal. Fine for worst case fire weather. Fine for recording the temp of the runways. Bad for reporting to the local weather forecast. Great input for your rapidly warming globe models.
Look at the bright side: If your house forecloses and you have to live under a freeway overpass, you’ll know how hot it will be 10 feet away. And if you decide to make a tarmac your home, you’re all set.
Has anyone else had the honor of holding the great wad of metal that passes for an official temperature sensor? Are any of them plastic encased? Do some of them use the platinum wire method (pre-calibrated by length)? Are they mostly the fancy bifurcating special formula kind that go haywire on a regular basis?
Just curious.
Anthony don’t forget that Parker’s study on UHI used largely ASOS stations.
It’s accuracy is only +-2 degrees but phil Jones, climate scientist, will tell you that if you read this sensor 30 times in a month the error goes down and you can know the monthly average with more precision that the daily temp.
Tangential:
So, Hawaii is where we measure co2 at Mauna Loa. And we have from:
http://www.andhawaii.com/hawaii/big-island/volcano/index.html
“The Kilauea Volcano is mostly located within the boundaries of Hawaii Volcanoes National Park, on the southeastern flank of Mauna Loa (mountain and volcano) in the Puna and Kau districts of the Big Island of Hawaii. It covers over 13% of the Big Island.”
And from:
http://www.seablogger.com/?cat=22 we have:
Kilauea Chiasmus
volcanoes by seablogger
The summit eruption of Kilauea began in March, 2008, with the explosive opening of a vent in Halema’uma’u crater. Over the months, collapse by collapse, explosion by explosion, the vent has grown to a great funnel, hundreds of meters deep, with lava sometimes churning at the bottom.
Kilauea’s east rift eruption, which began in 1983, may finally shut down before much longer. For months SO2 release from the Pu’u O’o vent has been decreasing, while release at Halema’uma’u has remained rather steady, despite short-term fluctuations. Now in the daily status report I learn that summit SO2 release exceeds that of the east rift for the first time.
Now, maybe I’m a bit slow… But I was on The Big Island about 30 years ago and there was no volcanic activity. I was really bummed because I wanted to see some lava, and there was none. Not too long after leaving a small bit of volcanic action started. Eventually it grew (even swallowing the volcano visitor center I’d gone to). Now it seems, from the above posting, that things are pretty well active and have been for a while.
So tell me again exactly how they manage to make clean measurements of CO2 when they have massive volcanic emissions going on, increasing relatively steadily over time? How did they go from near zero volcanism to a yawning crater with lava pool and keep a calibrated zero?
ASOS observations at airports are important for such things as calculating density altitude so that pilots can determine take off performance of their aircraft, amongst other things. Planes won’t perform as well on hot humid days as they will on a cool dry day. In some extreme cases, certain aircraft may not be able to take off from airports with a high density altitude and shorter runways. This is especially true in smaller aircraft, but will apply to air transport aircraft as the pilot determines accelerate stop distances, weight and balance with baggage and fuel requirements etc. I would say it’s important to know what the temperature near the runway is and it would be best to err on the high side than the low side so that performance calculations are conservative. Naturally this is not helpful for climate and probably never should have been used as such in the first place.
If we go back far enough in aviation history you will find most airports being named “field,” and as such were really were open grass fields. It wasn’t until the approach of WWII and the advent of aircraft the size of the DC-3 and larger that they began to pave over the airfields with asphalt and concrete.
I believe the first place that the term “airport” was used was at Bader Field in Atlantic City, which is now closed. Ironic since it was known as Bader Field and not Bader Airport.
It’s not the temperature that’s important, it’s the anomaly! Everybody knows that…..:)
Bad data + right answer= ?
Kirk W. Hanneman (20:44:34) : It would be very interesting to find out what happened at the site in the late ’50s that suddenly temperatures increased dramatically thereafter. Aren’t there any clues here?
My guess would be the onset of the jet age…
I propose that the temperature sensor be moved to a more suitable location, perhaps in one of the islands active volcanoes.
http://www.nws.noaa.gov/asos/pdfs/aum-toc.pdf
Please, crack down on the section 1.4 on “Quality Control”. 😉
In passing, the temperature reported by the official weather station at MIA is almost always around 1.2 °C above or below our records. I suspect the technicians make some adjustments from time to time. Unfortunately, MIA is no more an unrestricted airport; it’s a private development which belongs to OMA, so I think they wouldn’t grant me permission for taking some photos of their weather station.
REPLY: No need. See http://www4.ncdc.noaa.gov/cgi-win/wwcgi.dll?wwDI~StnPhoto~20004250~a~225
Another high quality station in a high quality network.
Right.
Your tax dollars at … work(?)
At this point, some overpaid wonk steps forward to explain how difficult a job they face, blah, blah, blah…
This would all be amusing if it were not for the fact that legislators are preparing draconian measures to slay the imaginative dragon of global warming. But, instead of the dragon we will be the ones who get slaughtered in the “end” where we keep the pocketbook.
You know, I’ve been all “up in their grill” over the reporting of fractional degree anomalies from whole degree F data records, now this guy is saying it’s a 2 degree “wiggle room” error band? SHEESH! Even the Whole Degree Place has error in it? And we’re supposed to be frantic about movement in the 1/10 degree well into the error band?
Isn’t there a mathematician somewhere in NOAA or NASA that can tell them that just doesn’t work? How in the world did they ever get a PhD in anything (heck, even a Masters) and not have mastery of error bands and precision…
BTW, the ASOS gear at airports is NOT poorly placed. It is being poorly used. Any aircraft taking off or landing will be limited in the load they can carry by the “density altitude” that is determined by the actual altitude, the barometric pressure, and the temperature at the runway. So these sensors are ideally placed for aviation use. Not so much for climatology…
It’s like using your BBQ to heat your garage. Yeah, it’s better than nothing, but not what it was intended for, and not really very good at it… It would be much better to put it back in the yard and put a steak or chicken on it…
REPLY: No need. See http://www4.ncdc.noaa.gov/cgi-win/wwcgi.dll?wwDI~StnPhoto~20004250~a~225
Wow! Is there any station has passed undetectable under your scrutiny? Thank you!
I wonder what that white area just under the station is. Could it be a pebbles bed or sand?
REPLY: Typically it is crushed rock – Anthony