Washington Post on Natural Gas: No Plan = Best Plan (channeling F. A. Hayek)

From MasterResource

By Robert Bradley Jr.

“Politicians seem to be struggling to deliver on voters’ affordability concerns about housing, health care and more, but natural gas is doing just fine…. No single politician can take credit for this. Maybe that’s why it has worked.”

The editorial board of the Washington Post last month gave a shout out to natural gas. Kudos to the Post for magnifying the obvious.

“Natural gas remains affordable. Here’s how” (September 22, 2026), subtitled “It wasn’t a genius plan by the government,” began:

As the Iran conflict continues to roil energy markets, sending crude oil and gasoline prices higher, there’s one bright spot for American customers: natural gas. For that, they can thank American innovation and free markets.

Continuing:

The reason for the lower prices is not less demand; in fact, demand is expected to continue its years-long rise. It’s not price controls; those were fully repealed in 1993. Enormous supply is what’s keeping costs down. On top of an annual production record expected this year, there is also more natural gas surplus in storage for the coming winter than in any year since 2016. The surplus is expected to last into March.

Turning to the official statistics and analyses from the U.S. Energy Information Administration:

From the late 1970s until around 2007, the United States produced about 20 trillion cubic feet of marketed natural gas each year. Last year, it produced more than double that: 43 trillion cubic feet. What broke this decades-long stagnation? Horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing, made in America.

The U.S., in fact, the article states, “has been the world’s largest natural gas producer since 2009.” Some background is then provided.

The ideas for these technologies are not new. The father of modern horizontal drilling, Martin Cherrington, figured out how to drill 500 feet under a river in California in 1971. An early precursor to fracking was an explosive device patented by Edward Roberts, a Civil War veteran, in 1865. Standard Oil was experimenting with the modern method of injecting a pressurized mixture of liquid and sand into the ground in the 1940s.

The wellhead gas revolution had to overcome Big Green.

These innovations faced strident political backlash. Environmentalists raised sensationalized concerns and urged politicians to ban the practice. They succeeded in scaring politicians in Britain, where there is still almost no fracking, and in some states, such as New York, which bans the practice. Germany touted its transition to renewable energy, to widespread acclaim, while relying on Russian natural gas to actually power its economy.

The editors added: “Fortunately for everyone, President Barack Obama was not convinced by the scaremongering, and fracking was allowed to thrive. The shale gas revolution has now spanned five presidential terms and shows little sign of slowing.”

What is good for the U.S. is good for the world.

While natural gas abundance is an American story, it is not an autarkic one. The U.S. has simultaneously become a much more active participant in global energy markets. The U.S. exported 9 trillion cubic feet of natural gas last year. As recently as 2015, exports were below 2 trillion cubic feet. Having plenty of natural gas to use at home and sell to the rest of the world doesn’t mean imports disappear; the U.S. still imported 3 trillion cubic feet last year.

It’s a win-win:

America’s newly established dominance in the global natural gas market is good for U.S. gas businesses, of course, but it’s also great for the pocketbooks of U.S. consumers. While other countries are paying much more for natural gas due to the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East, Americans have been blissfully unaware. Already accustomed to paying less than Europeans or Asians, the American price for natural gas has stayed flat since the war in Iran began in February.

In conclusion:

Politicians seem to be struggling to deliver on voters’ affordability concerns about housing, health care and more, but natural gas is doing just fine. Rather than trying to manage demand, squeeze trade or pace innovation, the U.S. has achieved natural gas affordability through abundant supply driven by technological progress. No single politician can take credit for this. Maybe that’s why it has worked.

It could not be explained better. Some real history here too. This “head exploding” (remembering the late Joe Romm) editorial is one to be remembered.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
14 Comments
Scissor
October 24, 2026 6:09 am

And that’s why democrats in my state, Colorado, want to ban natural gas.

1966goathead
Reply to  Scissor
October 24, 2026 7:03 am

To counteract the Democrat’s desire to ban natural gas, Amendment 82 on Colorado’s November ballot proposes to enshrine natural gas as a state constitutional right: “Assures consumers and businesses of the right to buy and sell natural gas.” Numerous TV ads are opposing this amendment. Unfortunately, I’ve not seen any ads supporting it, so it may fail.

Scissor
Reply to  1966goathead
October 24, 2026 7:13 am

Yes. I got a mailer supporting the amendment.

Supposedly around 70% of Colorado homes and businesses use natural gas for some form of heating/cooking. I’m hoping that enough people vote for what is in their best interest, though unfortunately people can even be persuaded to commit suicide.

October 24, 2026 6:47 am

Well, the cat is now out of the bag. Look for some politician try to capitalize on the success of natural gas by proposing some legislation that destroy the economics.

strativarius
October 24, 2026 6:53 am

“Politicians seem to be struggling to deliver on voters’ affordability concerns about housing, health care and more”

Not so in the UK, my friends, not so in the UK. Yes, they grudgingly approved the Jackdaw field, but that’s it; no more than that. The manifesto says so. Which in the real world means…

Great Britain is expected to pay some of the highest energy costs in Europe this winter as its reliance on imports to ensure a steady supply is forecast to deepen.
Energy system operators have said the country will have enough gas and electricity to meet demand over the coldest months – in part because of paying higher market prices than neighbouring markets to secure imports.
…
National Gas, which runs Great Britain’s gas networks, set out its forecasts after striking an 11th-hour deal with the owner of a major Belgian pipeline to keep gas flowing into the country this winter by reversing a planned capacity cut. – The Guardian

The real struggle is the over-inflated cost of living – which is dictated by extortionate net zero [sense] energy costs, which in turn are dictated by government net zero [sense] policies.
They know this and yet they press on regardless. 

Reply to  strativarius
October 24, 2026 7:26 am

So sad to see the once Great Britain become a basket case.

strativarius
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
October 24, 2026 7:36 am

Funny thing, back in the early 60s when I was at primary school we were taught basket weaving, among a great many other things.

A skillset I did not expect to need…

Reply to  strativarius
October 24, 2026 7:44 am

The day will come when the UK only has tourism for an industry. Many of you will sit in front of your homes weaving baskets, dressed in rags, while wealthy Chinese tour you neighborhoods and photograph you- so they can go back to China and show everyone the quaint peasants on a tiny island off the coast of Europe.

strativarius
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
October 24, 2026 7:47 am

Tourism is being taxed to death. The government has run out of road. They can’t borrow easily and they are looking for anything they can tax – or tax even further. All to keep the welfare recipients going.

Mayors across England are to be given the power to charge a tourist tax on overnight stays, expected to be around 5%. It would apply to British and foreign visitors alike.

It won’t be 5% for long.

October 24, 2026 7:37 am

Burning NG in a modern furnace or water heater loses about 15% of the energy up the flue.
Converting NG to electricity loses about 65% up the chimney and out the cooling system before it even leaves the plant site.
Dumb!
Natural gas at $6/E6Btu burned in a modern condensing furnace (air) or water heater with 85% efficiency has a net delivered cost of $7/E6Btu.
Electricity at $0.15/kWh and 100% efficiency powering a furnace (air) or water heater has a net delivered cost of about $40/E6Btu.
A heat pump using $0.15/kWh and a COP of 3.5 has a net delivered energy cost of about $12/E6Btu. The colder the weather the lower the COP and higher the net cost.
If some salesman suggests replacing NG w heat pump & does not know this he is uninformed.
If he suggests replacing NG w heat pump & does know this, he is a crook.

A colleague working with me on Comanche 3 start up observed that using natural gas to generate electricity is like using fine scotch to wash your dishes. 

Years ago Federalist black mail aka Clean Power Plan set a composite average goal for the states of about 1,000 lbs CO2/MWh & states were “free” to figure out their generation mix to achieve that.
This ratio can be factored into (lbs CO2/lbs of fuel) & (lbs fuel / MWh). In other words, carbon content of fuel and heat rate.

Coal is mostly carbon so its typical ratio is about 2,250 lbs CO2/MWh. Impossible to reach 1,000.
A simple cycle combustion turbine on natural gas (25% H2) produces a ratio of around 1,200 lbs/MWh.
A combined cycle combustion/steam turbine on natural gas (25% H2) produces a ratio of around 750 lbs/MWh.

Guess why combined cycles were so popular for new generation.

October 24, 2026 7:45 am

Why no AI image at the top of this story?

strativarius
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
October 24, 2026 7:52 am

This is a family website and Anus Insertion is not the sort of thing people want to hear about.

Reply to  strativarius
October 24, 2026 7:58 am

Oh, I thought it was a site for extreme right wing climate denying folks who worship Trump. 🙂

strativarius
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
October 24, 2026 8:06 am

I cannot answer for the orange man – or his diocese. Or those who oppose him.

The US is a long way away. You got your troubles, and we’ve got ours.