Diesel Drivers Paying Price For Govt Neglect

From NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

By Paul Homewood

Alarm bells have been ringing about the prospect of President Trump banning the export of US diesel supplies, in an attempt to lower prices in the US domestic market. We rely on the US for about a fifth of our diesel.

There is even talk of prices reaching £3.00/litre here.

But we only have ourselves to blame.

Although oil prices have risen substantially this year, diesel prices have gone up much faster than petrol. A year ago, the differential between petrol and diesel was just 8p, now it is 23p.

https://utilhub.co.uk/resources/uk-fuel-prices

The reason for this growing differential is our increasing reliance on imported diesel. We are having to compete for tight supplies on the global market.

Twenty five years ago, in 2001, the UK was a net exporter of diesel. Last year, we imported more than half our supply.

In contrast we are still a net exporter of petrol.

Oil refinery output has, of course, been tumbling for many years:

https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/petroleum-chapter-3-digest-of-united-kingdom-energy-statistics-dukes

In 2001, we had nine major refineries, with capacity of 1.78 mb/d. Now we are left with just four – Fawley, Humber, Pembroke and Stanlow, which have capacity of 1 mb/d.

The reasons for refinery closures are many and varied. But there is one major, underlying problem – the Emissions Trading Scheme.

Kathryn Porter has estimated that it is currently costing the refinery sector more than £200 million a year to purchase carbon allowances. That makes them uncompetitive against imports from countries which do not have carbon taxes.

But the problem is worse than that. Refineries receive free allowances, which help to keep the cost down to £200 million. But these allowances are being phased out over time, meaning the prospect of higher costs in future.

Refineries can also opt to sell their allowances and stop producing – Grangemouth, which shut down its refining operations last year, now operates as an import terminal.

Along with the looming ban on petrol/diesel vehicles, there is little reason why companies should invest money in building new refineries or upgrading existing ones.

And drivers are now paying the price.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
5 2 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
9 Comments
Bruce Cobb
September 29, 2026 2:32 am

“So what if we are destroying our own nation? We are saving the planet! You can thank us later.”

September 29, 2026 2:35 am

Put the same tax on imported fuel and…

Along with the looming ban on petrol/diesel vehicles

…move on to EVs leaving more fuel for sectors that can’t switch.

Analysis: EVs are now nine times cheaper than petrol or diesel to drive in the UK 
https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-evs-are-now-nine-times-cheaper-than-petrol-or-diesel-to-drive-in-the-uk

(Pro tip: don’t have allies that start a stupid war over oil in the middle east)

Why this horrible AI-slop image, though?

Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
September 29, 2026 2:49 am

Is there any substantive, verifiable, empirical, economic logic back of and underneath you comment? Or is it free-floating, just sort of sitting there as an assertion that rests on nothing but ideology?

Reply to  Willy
September 29, 2026 3:00 am

He/she/it can’t help it- he/she/it only made through high school. 🙂

Reply to  Willy
September 29, 2026 3:23 am

He is right about the numbers as far as they go, but one issue is that half of the ICE fuel charges are taxes. Any government can make EV fuel cheaper. But the problem then is, as seen in the UK, that people move to EV. Then they stop paying taz on ICE, which is a large contributor. So the government then imposes a taz per mile driven, or special pricing to refuel, to equalize the tax take, at which point, maybe not right away but in the end, the costs will come back more or less to par. Car charging points get tariffed at different rates, eg, by smart meters.

Other problem is public chargers. Do most or all of your charging at them, and the advantage of EVs becomes negligible.

So is it true? Sort of, temporarily, for some people. There is a segment for whom EVs make perfect sense. Older, with a drive, charging at home, using the car for distances under 100 miles a day locally. They make perfect sense.

You can force people outside this segment to move to them. Its the kind of thing goverrnments are perfectly able to do. But then you will incur another hidden price of doing that, you will change travel patterns across the whole country.

EVs are not yet, and may never become, plug compatible replacements for ICE in most current applications.

You want to look at this intelligently, you have to do more than compare pump prices of gas with domestic electricity prices. That tells you very little.

Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
September 29, 2026 2:59 am

“(Pro tip: don’t have allies that start a stupid war over oil in the middle east)”

Sure, it wouldn’t be so bad if Iran had nukes- and of course they lied that their missiles could only go 2K miles, not the 2.5 or more that could reach much of Europe. After all, they’re nice people. And if they threaten Israel, too bad for those nasty Jews practicing genocide. It’s just a small nation- not important- if it’s destroyed, we need not be bothered by that. /s

Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
September 29, 2026 3:31 am

Why this horrible AI-slop image, though?

What?

The guy on the left is pumping fuel from what looks like the car in the next bay directly into his own car’s cab through the front window.

The guy on the right has apparently attached the hose to his foot or to a hidden hole in the ground.

Perfectly normal behaviour.

September 29, 2026 3:19 am

“(Pro tip: don’t have allies that start a stupid war over oil in the middle east)”

There are numerous problems with this poor slap across the isle. First, which “war over oil in the middle east” are you talking about? Two, if we (America) weren’t your ally, we would still do whatever we do, and it would affect you regardless, which leads to three, why can’t you insulate yourselves from foreign price shocks? Why can’t anyone in the West? Have you considered the impact of excessive regulations, lawsuits, the howls of protest from the green leftists and their robots in government?

Reply to  johnesm
September 29, 2026 3:27 am

Besides if it wasn’t for us, they’d be speaking German. Or Russian. Ungrateful wretches.