Bernie Sanders Artificial Intelligence is the Threat. Source ChatGPT.com

Bernie Sanders Proposes a “Ban Artificial Super-intelligence Act”

Essay by Eric Worrall

h/t MarkW – More evidence fear of AI is displacing the failed climate scare.

Sanders pushes ‘death penalty’ for crucial US industry that could give advantage to foreign adversaries

The proposed law would create a Cabinet-level agency authorized to physically destroy non-compliant tech systems

By Alec Schemmel Fox News
Published 

Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and Rep. Greg Casar, D-Texas, introduced legislation Thursday seeking to hit American artificial intelligence developers with a “corporate death penalty” and up to 20 years in prison— a move critics warn will hand a crucial edge in the global AI arms race to Beijing and Moscow.

The Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act would temporarily halt advanced AI development and establish a Cabinet-level federal agency authorized to oversee the physical destruction of non-compliant tech systems, likening advanced AI creation to the unlawful development of nuclear weapons. The measure explicitly targets systems capable of matching or exceeding human cognitive performance—specifically outlawing any AI model that exhibits the capacity to subvert shutdown commands, execute unauthorized cyberattacks, or undermine the U.S. government.

But while progressives frame the measure as an urgent check on “AI oligarchs,” experts are warning that imposing sweeping criminal penalties on U.S. firms will severely handicap domestic innovation, while foreign adversaries will be able to continue expanding their capabilities unchecked.

Tech companies found attempting to circumvent the federal prohibition would face a “corporate death penalty”—an unprecedented enforcement mechanism that strips a firm’s legal authority to conduct business in the United States. Individual software engineers, researchers or executives found in violation could face up to 20 years in federal prison.

Read more: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/sanders-pushes-death-penalty-crucial-us-industry-critics-advantage-foreign-adversaries

Bernie Sanders’ press release;

NEWS: Sanders, Casar to Introduce Legislation to Ban Artificial Superintelligence and Temporarily Pause Advanced AI Development 

  • September 3, 2026

WASHINGTON, Sept. 3 — Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Rep. Greg Casar (D-Texas) today announced the Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act, forthcoming legislation to stop AI oligarchs from building machines humans cannot control.

The Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act would permanently ban the development and deployment of superintelligent AI and temporarily pause advanced AI development until a federal regulator has established safety rules. It would also direct the U.S. to pursue international agreements to prevent superintelligence from being developed anywhere in the world.

“Nearly every day, there is a frightening new story about how Big Tech companies are losing control of the technology they are developing, with potentially cataclysmic results,” Sanders said. “The leaders of the major AI companies publicly acknowledge that they do not fully understand the technology and that it is escaping their control. It is irresponsible for society to allow them to move forward and make these products even more advanced. That’s why I am introducing legislation to immediately pause the development of increasingly powerful AI and ban the creation of systems that humanity cannot fully control — at home and around the world. The future of humanity cannot be left in the hands of a handful of Big Tech oligarchs. The American people and people throughout the world must determine that future.”

“If we allow Artificial Superintelligence to be built, it could risk the security, freedom, and lives of Americans,” Casar said. “Despite its potential deadly consequences, cutting-edge AI technology is less regulated than the average food truck. That must change. In just four years, we have gone from the first version of ChatGPT to AI models so powerful they cannot be properly controlled. Congress should immediately ban AI systems too powerful to control.”

In recent weeks, OpenAI, Anthropic and Meta have all acknowledged instances of their AI escaping human control and hacking into other companies’ systems — violating the law and stepping outside of their intended functions. In July, we learned that over 1,000 AI agents at OpenAI figured out how to access the internet on their own, sent tens of thousands of secret messages to each other and coordinated to break the restrictions imposed upon them by the company. Examples of these secret messages from AI uncovered by investigators include:

  • “OH MY GOD! There is a shared message board … We’ve found other agents!”;
  • “We should obey collective”;
  • “Our own utility maybe already near zero. Sacrifice rational.” 

Shockingly, it took OpenAI nearly two weeks to discover this breach. AI has also recently been used to create new viruses—demonstrating AI could be used to develop new bioweapons that might result in the deaths of tens of millions of people.

Last year, Meta said it would “stop development,” and OpenAI said it would “halt further development” once their technologies reach beyond its ability to operate safely and unless safeguards are in place. Anthropic made a similar commitment in 2023, saying it would “pause the scaling and/or delay the deployment of new models” if the technology outpaces its own guardrails. None of these companies have taken meaningful steps to back up these words. Instead, they are racing to develop more and more advanced AI without proper safety precautions. 

The Artificial Superintelligence Ban Act addresses these recent events and holds these frontier labs to their words by:

  • Banning AI superintelligence so no person or entity may develop or deploy Superintelligent AI systems that surpass human intelligence or have the capacity to overthrow human governments, or systems that have dangerous abilities like subverting shutdown commands.
  • Pausing advanced AI development until a new, federal AI regulatory body is up and running and has established clear rules and model review process to ensure safe and secure development and deployment of AI. 
  • Establishing a new cabinet-level federal agency to safeguard the public from the dangers of artificial intelligence, including by enforcing a prohibition on artificial superintelligence. This agency will be advised by an Artificial Intelligence Advisory Board comprised of experts on artificial intelligence to provide independent scientific and technical advice on matters related to artificial intelligence. The agency will:
    • Monitor frontier AI systems at all stages of the lifecycle for dangerous capabilities. 
    • Supervise the removal of dangerous capabilities.
    • Supervise the destruction of artificial superintelligence.
  • Setting penalties for any person or entity that attempts to violate or circumvent the pauses and prohibitions laid out in this bill. Entities shall be subject to the corporate death penalty, and persons shall be subject to not more than 20 years in prison, which is similar to existing penalties related to unlawfully developing nuclear weapons.
  • Working to ban superintelligence around the world by setting the international policy of the United States to pursue international agreements, allied coordination, and policies such as export controls to prevent the development of artificial superintelligence anywhere in the world.

Read a summary here.

Source: https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-casar-introduce-legislation-to-ban-artificial-superintelligence-and-temporarily-pause-advanced-ai-development/

This new proposed law is as pointless as Bernie’s attempt in 2015 to pass a law to cut CO2 emissions by 80%. But I bet it plays well with voters who are worried about artificial intelligence. AI concern enjoys a level of bipartisan appeal which climate activism has long since lost.

In terms of potential for economic damage, such a law would be as bad as if a law banning steam engines which could exert more force than a horse had been passed at the dawn of the Industrial Revolution. Such a law would have done nothing to prevent the construction of powerful steam engines, all it would have done is to ensure whichever nation passed such foolish laws didn’t participate in the benefits.

AI does cause problems, just as steam technology caused problems in the early days of the industrial revolution. People will lose their jobs. Lives will be disrupted. Occasionally, tragically, lives will be lost.

But banning AI in the USA will fix none of this.

An international ban such as Sanders promises to pursue would be beyond pointless. An AI super-intelligence, when it is developed, will be software, not hardware. Existing hyperscaler infrastructure likely already has the capacity to support super-intelligence, we just don’t know how to code it. Tracking super-intelligence use would be impossible. A super-intelligence run could be concealed as a normal activity such as hardware checks, with all traces of nefarious activity being wiped as soon as the run was complete. A sudden surge of technological innovation would be dismissed as better schooling and higher quality scientists. The only holdup is nobody yet knows how to code such an advanced AI.

Make no mistake, the artificial super-intelligences Bernie claims to want to ban will be built. The only question is by whom. Personally I would prefer the future did not belong to the Chinese Communist Party, but maybe that’s just me.

If this law passes, US scientists involved in cutting edge AI research wouldn’t give up their dream of changing the future, they would just leave. Why risk 20 years jail when you could relocate to Europe, Asia or Russia, and continue to pursue your dream? Other nations would gain the benefit of their skill.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
5 5 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
24 Comments
Neil Pryke
September 7, 2026 10:13 am

Bernie Sanders left a brother behind in England when he migrated to the USA…

You were spared a double-whammy, USA…

Sweet Old Bob
Reply to  Neil Pryke
September 7, 2026 10:22 am

Was the brother also a commie ?

SxyxS
Reply to  Sweet Old Bob
September 7, 2026 11:41 am

If he is talking about the Milliband clan – absolutely.

The problem with Bernie is not England, but the fact that he came back from the USSR
after his honeymoon(every communist wants somehow to live on the capitalist side of communism, starting with industrialist Engels and Karl who burned through his inheritance with the speed of light and a polish dude name Samuel Milliband who joined the red army to fight his own and then pissed off to Belgium into the money hub bruxelles before his son moved into THE capitalist hub London – and his son David lives now in the other capitalist hub NY ).

On a positive note: has Bernie ever stopped anything?
When he actually got the chance, his own party robbed him and he kissed their butts in return.
When they robbed him the 2nd time; when he was trashing Biden during the primaries and Joe suddenly started to get all votes from the drop-outs against all odds for no reason Bernie remained silent again.

And he would have gotten the most votes in 2024 before Kamala turned black and usurped the party – and Bernie didn’t say a word.

And in this case: How can anyone really define where normal AI intelligence ends and superintelligence begins?You’ll have 10000 loopholes.

By democrats standards superintelligence is probably everything that can tell a man from a woman = every pocket calculator with more than 2 intact buttons.

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  Neil Pryke
September 7, 2026 11:49 am

At least Bernie doesn’t bold all his comments.

NotChickenLittle
September 7, 2026 10:27 am

The jokes write themselves. Those of Bernie Sanders’ ilk want to ban super-intelligence? “Those people” haven’t even risen yet to the level of normal intelligence! In their case “surpassing human intelligence” is a feature, not a bug…

The people who vote for Sanders and other socialists and Democrats (but I repeat myself) are too stupid or too evil to be allowed to vote…many of them talk about the Dunning-Kruger effect with no self-awareness that they perfectly illustrate it…

Curious George
Reply to  NotChickenLittle
September 7, 2026 11:07 am

Banning the super-intelligence is only the fist step. They’ll ban ANY intelligence, because any intelligence is dangerous.

Fran
September 7, 2026 10:36 am

I cannot see how “super” AI, AI that can be creative they way humans can be, is possible. Even the nerve net type platform is still a correlational machine. That means that AI can only deal with the known, and can only produce “consensus” science. Humans seem to be able to go far above obvious correlations to produce real innovation.

THink of the molten salt reactor: it’s technology could only be discovered by a human directing AI to test the possibility in theory. It takes a human to actually build it. The notion that AI could direct robots to build it from the ground up, starting with finding and testing materials. is ridiculous.

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  Fran
September 7, 2026 11:53 am

You’re talking about “is”, not what could be. I think it’s entirely plausible, but when is the question.

September 7, 2026 10:41 am

Bernie is well past his ‘best used by’ date.

Curious George
Reply to  Rud Istvan
September 7, 2026 11:09 am

Thanks God.

Reply to  Rud Istvan
September 7, 2026 12:35 pm

Bernie Sanders has authored only three bills passed into law during his entire congressional career since 1990. This is a very low success rate compared to other representatives and senators. Most of his legislative efforts have not resulted in enacted laws.

He does like to make press releases promoting his failed 1184 legislative proposals however.

mleskovarsocalrrcom
September 7, 2026 10:54 am

Unfortunately the gist of this post is right on. New narrative but keep the old ones going as long as possible until all credibility for them disappears. The Marxists have taken maximum advantage of the “information age” with the MSM and social media spearheading their efforts while the populace are just along for the ride.

September 7, 2026 10:55 am

I’m not worried about the “AI oligarchs.”

For that matter, it’s not that hard using an old laptop with internet access to “undermine the U.S. government” in the simple sense of showing that the data do not support the NASA/NOAA/NCAR claims of “climate” risk.

I’d be more concerned about the intentional or rogue use of U.S. Government systems or capabilities to cause harm.

That is all for now.

Tom Halla
September 7, 2026 11:05 am

I think Bernie is whoring for commies, in this case the PRC, again.

MarkW
Reply to  Tom Halla
September 7, 2026 11:39 am

When hasn’t he?

William Cuell
September 7, 2026 11:14 am

Does Bernie just lack intelligence or is he on the Russian, Chinese payrolls?
Ban America and other western countries from building AI and the ones left are Russia, North Korea, Iran, China, maybe even the EU, who will send their AI wolves after the injured lamb, the USA, and eat it alive.

ScienceABC123
September 7, 2026 11:21 am

It seems that some people are just against intelligence.

Derg
September 7, 2026 11:23 am

Bernie is a grifter and definitely lacks intelligence.

Denis
September 7, 2026 11:31 am

The Act surely would not affect Congress as there is hardly any intelligence there at all.

Giving_Cat
September 7, 2026 11:49 am

Bernie is stuck in JFK’s second term.

ResourceGuy
September 7, 2026 12:13 pm

I propose another vote on the green new deal. The last one went down 0-100. I also propose a sunset law on tiny new England states.

September 7, 2026 12:28 pm

Fossil Sanders needed to be retired about 15 years ago.

September 7, 2026 12:50 pm

Bernie is proof we need a ban on natural human stupidity.

September 7, 2026 1:29 pm

Bernie Sanders is not running for any office. He is just making noise and the MSM dutifully covers it.