Nepal Wants a $5 Billion Climate Handout from UN for a Himalayan Bedrock Collapse

From Legal Insurrection

Nepal’s request should be rejected unless the U.N. would likewise fund U.S. recovery from a San Andreas earthquake or Cascadia tsunami.

Posted by Leslie Eastman 

The death toll from the Himalayan landslide and subsequent flash flood in Nepal and an adjacent region in China continues to rise, and thousands are still missing.

The death toll following the massive flash flooding along the Nepal-Tibet border climbed on Wednesday to 1,114 in Nepal, officials said, as the country’s leader said his government would begin to shift its focus toward “rehabilitation.”

The Nepali government’s estimate for the missing remained at 3,916, the National Disaster Management Authority said in an update posted on social media at 9 a.m. local time.

The U.S. State Department said on Tuesday it was tracking around 75 Americans who were unaccounted for across the Nepal-Tibet cross-border region. Fourteen Americans had made their way to safety, the department said.

Earlier this week, I noted that it is premature and politically opportunistic to attribute this disaster to climate change since the immediate trigger remains under investigation and no formal attribution study has been completed. I reviewed the Himalaya’s long-running tectonic activity, steep terrain, monsoon dynamics, avalanches, and glacier-bed processes that offer more plausible explanations, while acknowledging a regional scientific body says it is too early to determine climate change’s role in this specific event.

Back in 2025, I reported that President Donald Trump rescinded $4 billion in outstanding U.S. pledges to a United Nations Green Climate Fund (an initiative supposedly designed to help struggling nations adapt to the rapidly changing world). With that move, Trump halted the transfer of wealth from American taxpayers to politically-connected bureaucrats and the climate cultist minions.

It’s a good thing he did. A Nepali politician is already knocking on the United Nations’ door asking for a climate-handout.

Putting the cost of recovery at $5 billion, a senior Nepali official said his country had requested urgent financial help from the United Nations’ special fund for climate-disaster recovery.

The official, Maheshwar Dhakal, the climate change chief in the Ministry of Agriculture, Forest and Environment, explicitly asserted that human-caused climate had been a factor in last week’s horrific glacial collapse and flooding. In an interview on Monday he framed the event as an inequity in which decades of greenhouse-gas emissions from richer nations are harming vulnerable countries like his that can’t cope.

“Those who have contributed the least are suffering the most,” said Mr. Dhakal, who shared a letter his government sent to the fund’s board and that echoed that language.

It was a version of this argument, used for years at international climate conferences, that persuaded negotiators to agree to the special U.N. climate fund in 2023, after years of talks.

As it turns out, I was right to focus heavily on the geology of the Himalayas in my earlier piece. The root cause of that landslide was weak bedrock that took the overlaying glacier with it.

Geomorphologists Kristen Cook and Dan Shugar said initial images from Nepal were obscured by clouds and dust from the debris, so they could only see that part of a glacier had broken off from Langtang Lirung peak, near the border with Tibet. In clearer images from Thursday, they said they could see that the bedrock underneath the glacier had collapsed, taking the massive chunk of ice down with it and sending boulders and ice into the valley.

“It shows the whole area without anything hidden, and we could see that, yes, it looked like there was not only this glacier that had failed, but a much larger chunk of the bedrock of the mountainside itself that had given way,” said Shugar, associate professor at the University of Calgary. “You have this big bedrock failure that took part of the glacier with it.”

Dr. Matthew M. Wielicki, Director of the US Global Change Research Program, says this information changes the story.

That distinction matters. This was fundamentally a geologic mass-failure event involving bedrock, which then mobilized ice, rock, sediment, and water downstream… not simply a glacier spontaneously collapsing because of warming.

Tectonic forces along colliding plate boundaries can substantially weaken rock, creating dense networks of fractures that leave slopes far more vulnerable to failure. This fact helps explain why landslides can be so frequent and destructive in active plate collision zones….like the Himalayas.

The Nepal landslide was an Earth-caused disaster.

Nepal’s request should be rejected unless the United Nations is prepared to apply the same standard consistently, such as providing the United States with climate-recovery money after a catastrophic San Andreas Fault earthquake or a Cascadia Subduction Zone rupture and tsunami.

The Earth does not need climate change to produce earthquakes, landslides, and tsunamis, and turning every natural disaster into a climate-money shakedown is neither science nor justice.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
5 13 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
47 Comments
Edward Katz
September 7, 2026 2:14 pm

This is precisely what this site and other climate realists predicted; namely, that the alarmists would never let a catastrophe go to waste without attributing at least some cause of it to manmade climate change. The fact that WUWT just ran an excellent comprehensive explanation of the causes of the event a few days ago was bypassed by the those. who preferred to ignore ignored plate tectonics and the failure to keep habitations out of potential disaster zones. Why look for a logical explanation when climate events and fossil fuel consumption can always be fallen back on, especially when there’s the chance of wringing some money out of the situation.

Tom Halla
Reply to  Edward Katz
September 7, 2026 2:35 pm

Or have strict, and strictly enforced building codes. This is just another shakedown.

1saveenergy
Reply to  Tom Halla
September 7, 2026 4:43 pm

You’ve seen the videos … Do you really think anything, even with “strict, and strictly enforced building codes” would survive a wall of water like that ??

They need $5 billion to have a basic recovery (the USA is spending that every 30 days killing people in a needless war with Iran. )
https://www.iranwarcosttracker.online/
The cost of the Ukraine war for Russia is estimated at €250 billion per year

Claiming it’s climate change is a shakedown, but asking for help with a natural disaster is a reasonable request.

Mr.
Reply to  1saveenergy
September 7, 2026 5:32 pm

 “asking for help with a natural disaster is a reasonable request”

Yes, yes it is.

And it’s also reasonable to hit up the UN to come up with the help $$$$s on the basis of 1/193rd of the total cost from each member nation.

I.E. – the USA or any other country should not be responsible to stump up the $$$s that any of the other 193 “proud member” countries can’t find.

(if they have to borrow their 1/193rd share, well that’s what the World Bank is for, isn’t it? https://www.worldbank.org/ext/en/home )

Reply to  1saveenergy
September 7, 2026 6:58 pm

“. . . the USA is spending that every 30 days killing people in a needless war with Iran . . .”

Needless” . . . obviously the US President, his Cabinet and his Department of War Secretary should have consulted with you, given your expertise in this area. /sarc

Reply to  ToldYouSo
September 8, 2026 12:47 am

They should have consulted anyone with expertise (or a brain). Both are in short supply in the current administration.

1saveenergy
Reply to  ToldYouSo
September 8, 2026 1:46 am

Yes, maybe he should have … or the 72% who oppose the war, instead of the sycophants he’s surrounded himself with.

Trump proved he was a loser by allowing the USA to be suckered into a war it can’t win by Netanyahu ( who is a master manipulator ), just to massage his ego, trying to prove he’s as strong a man as Putin, whom he admires.

Interesting that Trump felt the need to change the Department of Defence to the Department of War.

He’s a petulant child in a man’s world; God help America.!!

Reply to  1saveenergy
September 8, 2026 7:56 am

“. . . the USA to be suckered into a war it can’t win . . .”

CAREFUL, your “expertise” is showing through, again.

Would the current war that “can’t be won” be kinda like the Korean War that US didn’t win, the Vietnam War that the US didn’t win, the 1990-1991 Gulf War that the US didn’t win (on its own), the lengthy 2001-2021 War in Afghanistan that the US didn’t win, or the lengthy 2003-2011 Iraq War that the US really didn’t “win”?

Whether or not the US was “suckered into” each of these wars or entered them voluntarily can be debated by historians, as if that really matters at all in the end.

1saveenergy
Reply to  ToldYouSo
September 8, 2026 12:32 pm

Of the last 81 yrs since the end of WW2, the USA has been at war with someone for 78 of them … & the arms industry has made a fortune.

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  1saveenergy
September 7, 2026 7:07 pm

Americans are the most charitable people in the world on an annual basis.

Total giving (individuals, foundations, bequests, corporations): $617.2 billion
Individual giving alone: $394.2 billion

Nepal will get money, but it will go through organizations like the Red Cross, not the totally corrupt UN.

Reply to  Jeff Alberts
September 8, 2026 12:52 am

Is someone who earns 100 and gives 10 more or less charitable then someone who earns 1000000 and gives 20?

https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/most-charitable-countries

Gregg Eshelman
Reply to  1saveenergy
September 7, 2026 8:20 pm

Strictly enforced building codes to not build in valley bottoms subject to landslides like this would prevent loss of life and property.

Denis
Reply to  1saveenergy
September 7, 2026 8:58 pm

Part of a building code is where not to build. Yes, I do think with building codes that prohibit building on clearly established flood planes would help.

Tom Halla
Reply to  1saveenergy
September 7, 2026 11:29 pm

There was a more general statement about avoiding tectonic zones in general .

Reply to  Edward Katz
September 7, 2026 4:54 pm

South China Morning Post got the headline right:

Nepal’s US$2.5 billion flood bill puts UN climate fund to its biggest test yet

Nepal has petitioned the UN Loss and Damage Fund to ‘respond rapidly, directly and effectively’ after its worst natural disaster in decades.

David Wojick
Reply to  jonesingforozone
September 8, 2026 12:31 pm

Greta gets a good “reparations” quote. Still in the game.

“We desperately need climate reparations,” global environmental activist Greta Thunberg wrote in a social media post demanding climate justice for Nepal. “Stop calling it aid. Stop calling it generosity. What is owed to Nepal is climate debt: money that is due because of harm that was caused. Not a gift that so-called developed countries get to decide whether or how much to give.”

mleskovarsocalrrcom
September 7, 2026 2:35 pm

Just another “victim” needing a transfer of wealth from successful Western countries. That’s the Socialist/Marxist playbook ….. target the perceived downtrodden as recipients to share the wealth of successful Capitalistic countries.

Reply to  mleskovarsocalrrcom
September 8, 2026 1:04 am

The succesful capitalistic countries:

  1. Start with some colonialism
  2. Build wealth on slavery and plantation economies
  3. Profit from cheap labour in global supply chains
  4. Profit from cheap immigrant labour. Often caused by wars they wage
  5. Overthrow foreign governments to gain access to their ressources


Profit!

It’s true that a lot of wealth was built on the back of workers in their own countries to be exploited by the capitalist class, though.

Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
September 8, 2026 4:26 am

All of those things are done by governments or cronies in league with government, no matter who controls the capital. Communist nations exhibit them without any hope of betterment for the masses, who are kept in a constant state of virtual slavery.

Free markets, on the other hand, offer opportunity to anyone who actively participates, and nothing has enhanced that opportunity more than the advent of cheap, reliable energy from fossil fuels. That is what took the creation of wealth off the backs of many.

Socialists, and anyone else who promotes big government, also promote all of the things you list.

There is nothing wrong with profit. There is always something wrong with government since that entity exists only to serve itself and always attracts the worst sort of people.

Reply to  Mark Whitney
September 8, 2026 4:41 am

If we just ignore that money and means of production are market power and both can be inherited that leads to a concentration of power in a small elite not unlikely in aristocratic systems – the “free market” is great. And we can blame everything on the “evil government” completly ignore that just that money bought government decisions.
Or buys you a culture war discrediting science and academia – as can be seen with right wing parties. Which – oh wonder – favour this mystical unrestrained “free market”.
Except when there’s competition. Then tariffs and import bans please!

Sweet Old Bob
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
September 8, 2026 5:23 am

Whine about China some more ….

makes you feel morally superior ?

September 7, 2026 2:37 pm

Of course Nepal tried this. Asking for money that isn’t there, for a reason that isn’t true. “Nice try”

Reply to  Rud Istvan
September 7, 2026 3:13 pm

They should have an African prince send the $5 billion request letter on their behalf.

At least that approach catches a sucker on rare occasions.

September 7, 2026 3:08 pm

US$5bn for the Nepalis?
Sounds reasonable.
Here’s how our Legal System might deal with it:
(1.) The Falling Rock came from Tibet. Monsoon came up from Burma. So sue them first.
(2.) Tibet & Burma are P.R.C.-Occupied, which is boring channels all thru the Range. The case moves to Hong Kong.
(3.) The P.R.C. points to the Dalai-Lama as culprit. His followers may have prayed for a good rainy season.
(4.) The Holy-Lama Corp., LLC, puts up his places-of-business, in India & Atlanta, as collateral.
(5.) The Courts-of-Justice in Georgia & Bharat pursue a reckoning with all due speed, cf. the Mann-v-Steyn libel suit.
(6.) By ~ 2,035 A.D., the Nepalis finally get a hearing.
Good News: The case will be kicked up to a UN Tribunal at its new headquarters on Fiji.
And Good Luck!

Reply to  Whetten Robert L
September 7, 2026 3:35 pm

Even if the $5B is paid.. only a small fraction of it will end up where it is needed. !

Featherbedding for bureaucrats.!!

Scarecrow Repair
Reply to  bnice2000
September 7, 2026 4:27 pm

That IS where it is needed. I hope you don’t think featherbedding bureaucrats come free of charge.

Bob
September 7, 2026 3:36 pm

One of the dangers of being a generous and helpful person or nation is those who are ready to take advantage of you.

September 7, 2026 3:50 pm

Now we know why Nepal wants to blame it all on “Climate Change”.
The Governments want more than what other Nations and charities are willing to contribute.
They welcome that. But the Government thinks they are “entitled” to more CASH.

mleskovarsocalrrcom
Reply to  Gunga Din
September 8, 2026 8:08 am

They were told that being a victim they are entitled to other people’s money. Who wouldn’t ask for free money? The UN/IPCC quangos push the “climate reparations” narrative because all their other attempts to fleece successful countries have failed.

ResourceGuy
September 7, 2026 4:12 pm

Make it $20 billion when it’s other people’s money and there are bonus points for armwaving. That’s in addition to the admin fees.

SxyxS
September 7, 2026 4:16 pm

We all should be grateful to man made Co2 –
before climate change existed there were no floods, no droughts, no famines, no collapsing bedrocks.Nothing ever happened as time itself did not exist – only an endless present where the climate was always right.(TM -E.A.Blair)

But then the first fossil fuel molecule appeared and pushed the present right away over the edge.
And everything went downhil since then – not only bedrocks and scientific integrity.
The start of the space-time consensus itself.
The big bank that created a whole new universe of grifting
and sent endless waves of catastrophies to punish mankind.
And the more catastrophies, emergencies and Chaos happened, the less people died from natural desasters, the less famines we got – and the global population and food production kept on rising and rising throughout the neverending apocalypse.
It got so bad that governments from all around the world started to wage wars on energy production, farmers and fertilizers to save humanity and in 2026 refineries joined in and started to burn in Australia,Mexico, Romania,India, the USA and, to incorporate Africa for the first time from the get go, DEI drones attacked some plants in Lybia and Egypt.

And those governments too poor to wage wars?
They started to ask for climate compensation :
the disadvantaged countries of color were hit so hard during the crisis that they suffered a never seen before record in population growth.
Nepals population doubled since the start of of the climate crisis and its GDP went up by almost 2000 % since 1981
and the ever drowning Maldives trippled It’s population while the GDP went up almost 20000%(hard to believe) during the same timeframe and on top its landmass also increased as result of the ever accellerating sea level rise
+ a massive increase in average life expectancy.

All this “suffering” happened during the darkest era of mankind and only handouts can ease the pain and reduce the number of kalergi-climate-refugees caused by ever increasing living standards in poor countries.

John Hultquist
September 7, 2026 4:18 pm

 $5 Billion? Why not Renminbi, or -> ¥33.55 billion CNY

I wonder if they used an abacus to so quickly calculate this nice large round number.
I also wonder what the abacus would arrive at for a full accounting of a Cascadia Subduction Zone rupture and tsunami.

ResourceGuy
September 7, 2026 4:21 pm

A few billions for landslides, a few billion for urban land subsidence, a few more billions for exhausted fresh water supplies, and a few billion more for drought and floods makes for a busy UN tax revenue hunt. Who will come to aid America in a debt crunch?

Scarecrow Repair
September 7, 2026 4:25 pm

Obviously global warming is melting mountain peaks, and everyone knows glaciers won’t stick to hot rocks.

Damn this is easy.

Reply to  Scarecrow Repair
September 7, 2026 4:42 pm

Umm… not sure that is correct 😉

… rocks under metres of glacier are never going to get “hot”, unless from volcanic or geothermal action

Scarecrow Repair
Reply to  bnice2000
September 7, 2026 5:46 pm

Umm… I think you need to recalibrate your sense of humor.

Reply to  Scarecrow Repair
September 7, 2026 9:07 pm

Hey.. I did say . “umm..” in recognition of your comment !

And put a wink at the end. 😉

September 7, 2026 4:28 pm

I’ve been waiting for this headline ever since the country’s leader mentioned global warming shortly after this horrible tragedy.

Reply to  duck
September 7, 2026 4:43 pm

All part of the great big CON-sensus.

Phillip Chalmers
September 7, 2026 4:39 pm

“Never give a sucker an even break” is rat-cunning amongst the third-world hucksters.

September 7, 2026 6:42 pm

Hey, here an alternate suggestion: instead of giving a $5 billion USD cash handout to Nepal, just have the UN do an ” emergency” switch of the venue for its 2027 COP from Addis Ababa, Ethiopia to a Nepalese town near Gyirong Port, on the China-Nepal border.

WUWT readers may know this location (aka Nepal’s Rasuwagadhi border point) better for it’s five-story border crossing building. The building’s surveillance video went viral internationally because it showed that building, with people walking about on its grounds, being totally engulfed by a huge wave of rushing water.

See the video at this link: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/xKtsZbbas9o , with the water surge visible at about 26 seconds into the video (near the end).

Doing this will enable all COP attendees to witness first hand how some of the poorer people in the world live and are subjected to “climate change” (hah!), although they will have to forego the champagne, five-star meals and lavish entertainment expected at Addis Ababa.

The change of venue would serve all COP attendees well (as in reality check), and Nepal would certainly welcome the UN-COP spending some money for local hotel rooming and rice meals. /sarc

Jeff Alberts
September 7, 2026 6:54 pm

You know, if the glaciers were actually melting, they wouldn’t have giant overhangs like this one.

Reply to  Jeff Alberts
September 7, 2026 8:00 pm

If melting, they would weigh less, thus put less pressure on the underlying rock. Makes me think that some local seismic event may have triggered the landslide.

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  B Zipperer
September 7, 2026 10:06 pm

Could have even been an even months earlier. Slow shifting would continue for sometime.

Rod Evans
September 8, 2026 12:59 am

Maybe someone could point out to the Nepalese claimants, the UN has no money of its own. It can ask for donations from members but that is the limit of it.
We need to support Nepal in all possible ways that enable the affected valley to return to some form of normality. I do not see what role the UN has beyond a coordinating agency? Unfortunately its past history and activities suggest it may not be ideal at handling that.
The scale and speed of the destruction captured on thousands of film clips now common place in modern phone habits shows just how awesomely powerful nature is and we have no means of controlling it. Building settlements in vulnerable areas is not a good idea.
California should take note.

Reply to  Rod Evans
September 8, 2026 8:15 am

The US is, and has been, known internationally for being among the top nations to voluntarily send, free of charge, massive emergency relief food and rescue personnel to areas that have suffered a recent major catastrophe/disaster. I’m sure this has the case in Nepal-China, although early press reporting stated that Nepal initially declined foreign relief aid for their flood-impacted areas.

A Web search says that “The United States has pledged over $3.6 million in humanitarian aid to Nepal following the catastrophic August 2026 glacial collapse and floods.” This was not in response to any demand from the Nepalese government or from the UN. It is very likely to be only the first increment of total US relief funding to follow.

Also, there are the uncounted $millions (in cash and goods) that individual US citizens have already freely donated to relief organizations serving Nepal in their recovery from this natural disaster.

If US relief money were to pass through the hands of the UN bureaucracy, I seriously doubt 70% would end up being used for its intended purpose.

WeedKiller
September 8, 2026 2:35 am

Substantial economical aid should be provided to help Nepal get back on its feet but not for any other reason than humanitarian.