Live at 1 PM ET: Four Climate Scientists Break the Alarmist Narrative— The Climate Realism Show#215

The Heartland Institute

.
The Heartland Institute

On this episode of The Climate Realism Show, we’re stitching together four powerful presentations from past International Conferences on Climate Change (ICCC), Heartland Institute’s flagship climate events where scientists, engineers, and policy experts challenge the mainstream climate narrative with hard data.

Segment 1: NASA Engineer Tom Moser Reveals the Truth About Climate Science
Former NASA engineer and space station program director Tom Moser — who held roles including Acting Associate Administrator for Spaceflight, Director of the Space Station Program, and Chief Engineer at the Johnson Space Center — breaks down the correlation between global temperatures and solar irradiance, and exposes the gap between real-world data and the climate models driving public policy.

Segment 2: Implausible Climate Goals For a Non-Existent Emissions Crisis
A hard look at the emissions targets driving global climate policy — and why the “crisis” framing behind them doesn’t hold up to scrutiny.

Segment 3: The Climate Data Changed My Mind
A firsthand account of how digging into the actual climate data — rather than the headlines — led to a fundamental rethink on the climate debate.

Segment 4: Exposed: Corrupted Climate Stations and Solutions You Need to Know
Heartland Senior Fellow Anthony Watts, creator of SurfaceStations.org, lays out his research on U.S. temperature monitoring stations — finding that a large share fail to meet siting standards, casting doubt on the reliability of the official warming record — and what can be done about it.

Watch every episode of The Climate Realism Show live every week, and check out more from The Heartland Institute:

Climate Realism: https://climaterealism.com/

Climate at a Glance: https://climateataglance.com/

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
5 5 votes
Article Rating
13 Comments
September 4, 2026 11:02 am

The “four climate scientists” are not named.

michael fellion
Reply to  Willard
September 4, 2026 11:22 am

The NASA guy is an administrator who apparently has an engineering background. Watts founded this Watts Up years ago I used to use it long before he turned it into a money maker with all the ads. Why not look up the data yourself and decide? Do you need a witch doctor to hold your hand and tell you what is real and not real? There are a number of studies on all the subjects mentioned that one can google. The ones behind paywalls simply need one to pay for them.

Reply to  michael fellion
September 5, 2026 7:19 am

> paywalls

There’s a science hub I will never tell you about.

KevinM
Reply to  Willard
September 4, 2026 7:59 pm

One of the ‘scientists’ is a lawyer and president of a conservative think tank – but I thought he was the best speaker. Anyone who reads here regularly has heard that ‘the Science’ advocated by alarmist narrators was captured by opponents 40+ years ago, but either ‘team’ would be plagued by the same issue: there are darned few good scientists who are also good public speakers.

KevinM
Reply to  KevinM
September 4, 2026 8:02 pm

(and if you could assign one task or the other to such a unicorn… I like my microwave oven better than the US healthcare system).

Reply to  KevinM
September 5, 2026 7:27 am

Deming, Gilbert, Alley, Hayhoe, NG, Marvel – and that’s just a shortlist from the top of my head with equal representation. Team Science has no shortage of talent. Contrary to contrarians, it has a bench.

John Hultquist
Reply to  Willard
September 4, 2026 8:09 pm

Tom Moser
Steve Milloy
Chris Martz
Anthony Watts

Reply to  John Hultquist
September 5, 2026 7:18 am

No wonder they were not named.

September 4, 2026 11:54 am

story tip: Bernie Sanders and Greg Casar introduce bill to pause AI development: https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/news-sanders-casar-introduce-legislation-to-ban-artificial-superintelligence-and-temporarily-pause-advanced-ai-development/

The Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act would permanently ban the development and deployment of superintelligent AI and temporarily pause advanced AI development until a federal regulator has established safety rules. It would also direct the U.S. to pursue international agreements to prevent superintelligence from being developed anywhere in the world.

Main points are

  • Full ban on “AI superintelligence” (whatever that is)
  • Pause advanced AI development
  • Establish a cabinet-level federal agency for oversight
  • Set penalties for violations
Reply to  Tony_G
September 4, 2026 2:15 pm

Bernie’s masters in the CCP at work again !! 🙂

John Hultquist
Reply to  Tony_G
September 4, 2026 8:24 pm

 That train has left the station.
Somewhat related, and a fun story song:
Lew Sully’s (?) To Morrow
I started on a journey just about a week ago
To the little town of Morrow in the state of Ohio.
I never was a traveler and really did not know
That Morrow was the hardest place I’d ever try to go
. . .

Michael Flynn
September 4, 2026 7:14 pm

Using the term “climate scientist” in public should only be allowed if the user wears a dunce’s cap, and has the words “I am gullible and ignorant” tattooed on their forehead.

Climate is the statistics of weather observations.

Any fool can call himself a “climate scientist”, and many do.

Reply to  Michael Flynn
September 5, 2026 7:30 am

Any Mike can call themselves “Michael” after being disinvited everywhere.