Lobbying the Biden DoJ on Behalf of “Climate” Plaintiffs

From Climate Litigation Watch

Following up on this post (and this), Government Accountability & Oversight has obtained a few more items papering the influence of the climate lobby on directing the Biden DoJ’s attention to their plight, at the highest levels (one recipient is now a judge on the D.C. District Court; other responsive emails noting the progress of litigation copied the AG at his Abraham Rose alias email address).

DoJ has not said what number of other responsive records, which it has not yet turned over, exist.

TwitterFacebookLinkedInEmail

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
4.7 6 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
8 Comments
roywspencer
August 31, 2026 2:02 pm

I have no idea what this post is about.

Mr.
Reply to  roywspencer
August 31, 2026 3:06 pm

I take it to be about this –
“the influence of the climate lobby on directing the Biden DoJ’s attention to their plight, at the highest levels”

(But as well, I’d be interested to find out more about the person called “Sparkle” who is one of the recipients of the emails chain, and apparently an attendee at the weekly meetings. Does she also have a booth at the CoP meetings?)

Kevin Kilty
Reply to  Mr.
August 31, 2026 3:31 pm

She was or is a District Court Judge in the District Court of Washington D.C. Nominated by Joe Biden.

Mac
August 31, 2026 2:34 pm

I think what happened is that the climate lobby infiltrated the Biden DOJ to influence people there for the “cause”. And apparently some were and it seems at least one is a judge.
Could be wrong however.

August 31, 2026 4:04 pm

Not new news. Just more proof of bad stuff going on under Biden. A short list in addition to the greenie DoJ corruption:

  1. Afghan withdrawal disaster.
  2. Open southern border disaster.
  3. Green new deal money shovel.
  4. KBJ nomination.
  5. Pardoning drug addict son.
  6. Preemptively pardoning Fauci.
  7. Running for a second term until his debate performance exposed what we suspected during his first..
Tom Halla
August 31, 2026 5:30 pm

The “records” are so redacted, a simple “bugger off, peasant scum” would been as informative,

Bob
August 31, 2026 8:53 pm

The other side is a bad bunch.

Sparta Nova 4
September 1, 2026 5:44 am

This should be addressed to Judicial Watch.
https://www.judicialwatch.org/
They are rather successful in pursuing items of this nature.