Data Centers Start to Drive Residential Electricity Bills Down

By Paul Steidler

Several major electric utilities have recently announced that their residential customers will have lower electric bills because of major investments in new power plants and the electric grid, enabled by data centers.

Data centers generally need electricity 24/7 and are willing to pay whatever is necessary to ensure reliable power is always available. That enables more plants to be built and revitalizes our aging transmission grid.

On May 27, the Georgia Public Service Commission (PSC) approved a plan to lower rates by approximately $50 per year for the typical residential customer. Total annual savings will be approximately $285 million.

This follows the Georgia PSC’s adoption of a measure in January 2025 that allows for large customers, i.e., data centers, to “be billed using terms and conditions beyond those used for standard customers to address risks associated with these large load users.” It allows contract lengths of up to 15 years and ensures data centers will pay for “upstream generation, transmission, and distribution.”

On March 5, Entergy announced, “approximately $5 billion in total savings for 2.3 million customers in Arkansas, Louisiana, and Mississippi because of data center customer agreements in those states.” The savings are over the next 20 years.

Entergy also said the data centers were responsible for “approximately $47 billion in total new investment for communities, thousands of high-tech jobs, millions of dollars in new tax revenues,” and many other benefits.

On February 24, American Electric Power’s Indiana Michigan Power (I&M) company announced it would be filing to reduce base rates, the largest portion of most of its 600,000 customers’ bills, this summer.

“The rate decrease is made possible by the load growth and increased revenue it is experiencing from large customers including data centers,” I&M said in the above press release. Details will be in the formal filing when it is submitted this summer.

Blaming data centers for higher electricity costs is a classic case of scapegoating and does not withstand mathematical and regulatory scrutiny, as a May 2026 study from the renowned consulting firm Energy + Environmental Economics found.

Factors such as the composition of the state’s fuel supply, the condition of its grid, and related tax and regulatory policies on electricity all affect pricing. Tried-and-true cost allocations based on well-established economic models are also difficult to follow.

According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the two states with the highest number of data centers, which together account for 25% of the country’s total, have lower residential electric costs than the national average. For March 2025, the latest period for which statistics are available, Virginia’s rates were 8.1% lower and Texas’s were 11.7% ower.

There has been a disturbing and abnormal historical trend for the past five years, measured through May 2026: residential electricity rates have risen faster than core prices in the Consumer Price Index (CPI). During that time, electric rates are up 40% while the CPI is up 24.5%, or 63% more than other inflation. Historically, electric rates, like computing power, fall as they become more widely used, as more than 100 years of pricing information shows.

The American public is justifiably frustrated by abnormally high electrical bills, which contribute to affordability challenges. And while data centers did not cause this, it is easy and not surprising to blame them, as their growth has significantly expanded in the past two years.

The responsible regulatory actions in Georgia, Indiana, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Arkansas show that when the proceeds of major new customers are put towards new capacity, that is, more plants and improved transmission, everyone wins, especially consumers. 

This article was originally published by RealClearEnergy and made available via RealClearWire.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
4.7 15 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
38 Comments
June 25, 2026 2:18 am

On May 27, the Georgia Public Service Commission (PSC) approved a plan to
lower rates by approximately $50 per year for the typical residential customer.
_______________________________________________________________________________________

14¢ per day!

Reply to  Steve Case
June 25, 2026 7:55 am

Hey, it’s only a plan . . . not reality.

Intelligent Dasein
June 25, 2026 2:29 am

It sounds like the idea here is to make the data center buy down a portion of residential electricity bills after allowing them to lock into a long-term, high-load contract.

This isn’t exactly “driving” rates down. It’s just bundling them down. And this for some of the most highly leveraged, unprofitable companies in history.

June 25, 2026 2:44 am

I conducted a small experiment to determine how much space the hard drives would require for data centres alone, from 2026 to 2025. I then calculated the amount of electricity required to power all these data centres by 2050. The cube floating over Manhattan represents only the volume of hard drives, not the space in which they are housed. 

The elephant in the room is whether those energy requirements will be feasible by 2050. This is hypothetical, but it’s a fun experiment.

Data-Centers
Reply to  Raymond Inauen
June 25, 2026 3:11 am

comment image

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
June 25, 2026 5:53 am

You just trashed all of the climate models, etc.

Congratulations on your moment of sanity.

Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
June 25, 2026 6:56 am

Even if, renewables and EVs (or better public transport) are still the best way forward.

strativarius
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
June 25, 2026 7:08 am

Even if you trashed the models – and you did – you want to carry on headbanging to spite everybody else. Is that what you call being radical?

Tell me, where did you go to school?

Reply to  strativarius
June 25, 2026 7:13 am

LSE maybe?

strativarius
Reply to  Oldseadog
June 25, 2026 7:16 am

Loses Sanity Easily

Derg
Reply to  strativarius
June 25, 2026 11:18 am

Username went to a learing center in MN

MarkW
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
June 25, 2026 11:34 am

The claim that someday, public transportation will be good, has been shouted for well over a century.
We are still waiting.
The fact remains, whenever people are given a choice between public and personal transportation, they always choose personal transportation.
Which of course is why the left decides that they should no longer be allowed to have a choice.

Leon de Boer
Reply to  Raymond Inauen
June 25, 2026 7:17 am

You have forgotten Kryders law which has been holding

It posits that the density of information stored on disk drives is increasing exponentially, doubling approximately every 18 months it’s had started to flatten out but this year ticked up again

Record holder today is Kioxia LC9 Series 245TB in a 2.5 inch drive form factor

comment image?width=1080&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=fe0e5f2b13e484f1c7f5652bdc80597462d08e02

Reply to  Leon de Boer
June 25, 2026 8:31 am

Uhhhh . . . the Kioxia LC9 Series 245TB is a Solid State Drive (SSD), not a mechanical disk drive.

Kryder’s Law observes that the density of information on magnetic hard drives increases exponentially, roughly doubling every 12 to 18 months. 

MarkW
Reply to  ToldYouSo
June 25, 2026 11:39 am

Another factor is the number of physical disks in a drive.
Adding a second disk doubles the amount of data the drive can hold but has a fairly minor increase in size and power requirements.
Ditto for a third, a fourth, and so on. Yes there is a limit, but I don’t know where it might be, or if it would change with technology changes.

I would assume that disk drives that are designed for data centers would be different from a drive designed for a desktop or laptop.

Reply to  Raymond Inauen
June 25, 2026 8:10 am

Suggest you you look into technology that long ago surpassed the density-capacity to store information on mechanical “hard drives”, such as EPROM (aka “solid state”) memory.

Solid state memory requires orders-of-magnitude less energy per GB in-out compared to that of any hard drive.

Also suggest you look into the many orders-of-magnitude greater information storage density and read-write speed predicted for future DNA-like storage and access to stored information.

MarkW
Reply to  ToldYouSo
June 25, 2026 11:42 am

Solid state drives are also faster. The downside is that they are still more expensive. Though I expect the difference to continue to drop as the number of SSD units continues to grow.

Mike Larkin
June 25, 2026 2:55 am

The reason electricity prices have increased beyond the CPI is governments mandating ever more expensive ruinables.

The more ruinables you add to the grid the higher the price of electricity.

This is, of course, completely contradictory to the bleating of the warmenistas who are forever telling us that solar and wind are the cheapest electricity around because they ignore the upstream and downstream cost plus the fact that you need to have another source of generation running constantly for when the sun don’t shine and the wind don’t blow.

Reply to  Mike Larkin
June 25, 2026 6:02 am

BINGO!

Reply to  Mike Larkin
June 25, 2026 6:41 am

Exactly right.

Windmills and industrial Solar are the problem, not the solution.

June 25, 2026 3:46 am

“… thousands of high-tech jobs …”

Sure, Microsoft and Facebook/Meta made the same promise when the wanted to build datacenters in Sweden some years ago. What happened? The number of employed stopped at a two digit number and for the electricity, they only pay a fraction of what regular people and companies can dream of. Not to forget, building the DCs was a solution to bypass the GDPR in EU …

Curious George
Reply to  SasjaL
June 25, 2026 9:16 am

So, did they keep the promise, or not?

Derg
June 25, 2026 3:53 am

Data Centers are a great use case for solar and wind plus battery. C’mon lefty’s show us cheap power by running a data center without the grid. Private investment must be rolling in.

Reply to  Derg
June 25, 2026 10:07 am

LOL/sarc?

Reply to  Derg
June 25, 2026 10:07 am

Beautiful…

Dave Andrews
Reply to  Derg
June 26, 2026 6:47 am

“Orders for new natural gas fired power plants surged to 130GW in 2025, a 25 year high, with US data centre demand a major factor”

IEA ‘World Energy Investment 2026’ (May 2026)

strativarius
June 25, 2026 5:40 am

Whenever I see a headline like: “Data Centers Start to Drive Residential Electricity Bills Down” I get a wave of unimaginable anger knowing that the opposite here in the UK is true. Data centres? Very much a climate evil…
Datacentres are growing target of global climate-related legal cases, report findsYou know who…
Run them on free wind and solar…

…cases were not necessarily about stopping development but about avoiding locking in more dependence on fossil fuels.

This is the modern world. AI and data centres are not going to go away – well, in the UK they probably will for pretty obvious reasons – energy costs through the roof and a business hostile environment.

If you have items to flog…

Retail giants join UK government drive to boost ‘plug-in’ balcony solar panels Yes, them again

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  strativarius
June 25, 2026 6:00 am

First link was news. Surprise that that was.

Second link was advertisement and advocacy. No surprise.

Sparta Nova 4
June 25, 2026 5:52 am

Here we go again. Confusing the social justice warriors with the facts. 🙂

June 25, 2026 6:13 am

Data Centers Start to Drive Residential Electricity Bills Down

Complete flim-flam…just like replacing your Honda generator in your RV with a nuclear power plant will reduce your electricity bills

June 25, 2026 7:53 am

Phrases observed in the above article and its title:

“start to drive”

“major electric utilities have recently announced”

— “approved a plan”

— “total annual savings will be”

— “adoption of a measure”

— “Entergy announced, ‘approximately $5 billion in total savings for 2.3 million customers’ . . . The savings are over the next 20 years”

— “American Electric Power’s Indiana Michigan Power (I&M) company announced it would be filing to reduce base rates”

And then too the above article presents this sleight-of-hand logic:
“According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the two states with the highest number of data centers, which together account for 25% of the country’s total, have lower residential electric costs than the national average.”
Well, is that the direct result of data centers being built and operating in those states OR INSTEAD (and much more likely) the result of companies choosing to locate data centers in those states that currently have the cheapest electricity in the US?

So many promises yet to be demonstrated, yet to fulfilled.

Please get back to me when electricity rates for residential customers can actually be shown to have been reduced as the direct result of adding electricity generation capacity for data centers in any given state.

Kevin Kilty
June 25, 2026 7:58 am

Yes, better utilization of assets can lead to lower utility bills per customer. In theory. Yet, the reality is that many data centers are controlled by entities that are, let’s say “woke”, and promise to use renewable energy. They know this isn’t possible, but to make good on their promise they insist on RECs equal to their load. This will drive more construction of renewable energy plants despite their use of gas turbine generation to realize 24/7 operation.

We are seeing the expansion of battery storage systems backed up by wind/solar plants out here in the West for exactly this purpose. Or maybe its wind/solar backed up by battery storage. It doesn’t matter. There are forces in play to dedicate excessive capital expenditures into generation and tyransmission, with payments for those expenditures accruing to taxpayer subsidies, or rate increases, or perhaps other even more opaque methods of payment extraction.

Data centers may not even be the really big problem, which I believe will be the pressure to electrify everything — transportation, industrial heat, heat for residential and commercial buildings, with attendant capital expenditures in generation, transmission and distribution.

Allen Pettee
June 25, 2026 8:05 am

Maybe in Georgia, but certainly not in New York State.

June 25, 2026 10:13 am

A little incentive to BUILD WHAT WORKS, as opposed to the stupid government policies encouraging building of what DOESN’T WORK, and just like that electricity prices start moving in the right direction.

WHO could have imagined that?!

Cue Nick to invoke Liars’ Claims Of Efficiency to claim how wind and solar are “cheap,” if only you ignore most of its costs.

June 25, 2026 10:15 am

If the hyperscalers did this right, it could be a chance for a major PR coup. Dedicate plans and/or form a consortium to upgrade the grid and build out generation. Maybe build out 125% of the capacity they will need. Do this in a way contractually with the utilities that materially lowers residential costs and publicize the hell out of it.

ResourceGuy
June 25, 2026 12:35 pm

Hypothically, if a small utility in the US like an electric co-op needed to replace an aging natural gas fired plant it could do so in collaboration with a data center developer and lower the cost to rate payers compared to other alternatives. That assumes the data center partner built most of the new plant and shared with the utility. The electric co-op also has a special borrowing facility dating back to the start of rural electrification in the 1940s. Larger investor owned utilities like Entergy could do the same but share less with rate payers.

Giving_Cat
June 25, 2026 5:40 pm

Okay. So a new customer demands far lower rates and more draw and more reliability so as a consequence the providers costs go down and they generously offer to share this with existing captive customers.

Riiiight.

Bob
June 25, 2026 5:43 pm

This makes sense. If renewables were truly cheaper the same thing would have happened but they aren’t so it didn’t.