Golden eagles need new law to protect them from wind turbines

From CFACT

By David Wojick

With a seven-foot wingspan. the golden eagle is the flying monarch of the range. Primarily a western bird, they frequently feed on range rodents making them useful as well as majestic. But wind turbines are taking an ever-increasing toll. A 2025 study — “Estimated golden eagle mortality from wind turbines in the western United States” — estimates that the number killed by wind turbines doubled from 2013 to 2024. A major tagging study in Wyoming by biologist Mike Lockhart found that spinning wind turbine blades killed more golden eagles than all other human causes combined. The range states from Texas to North Dakota together have over 50,000 operating wind turbines with many more coming.

There is a huge loophole in the law when it comes to wind machines killing eagles, and Congress needs to close it. Wind turbines can legally kill other birds, but eagles have special protection under the federal Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. On paper, a wind facility has to have a permit to kill an eagle, but, as things stand now, it is far cheaper to pay the fine for killing an eagle without a permit than it is to get a permit. So, a lot of wind facilities are simply not getting permits. Thus, the eagles are not getting the protections the permits call for.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) enforces the Eagle Protection Act. They recently fined two wind facilities for killing an eagle without having a permit. In each case, the fine was around $15,000. This is much less than it costs to get and operate under a permit.

To begin with, the permit application fees start around $26,000 for a simple facility, much more for complex ones. But the permits also include a number of relatively expensive activities which adds a lot to the cost. These include surveying the area slated for wind towers so as to avoid eagle nesting sites. It also includes ongoing monitoring and reporting kills, which can be used to modify turbine operations to reduce the kill rate.

In fact, there are in development eagle detection systems that will be able to automatically shut down wind turbines when eagles approach them. These technologies will be standard permit conditions. They should dramatically reduce the golden eagle kill rate. Since permits must be renewed every five years, they can be retrofitted to existing facilities as well.

So, it is likely that the cost of having a permit is at least ten times the fine for killing an eagle without one, perhaps much greater. And you only get fined if FWS finds out about the kill. Clearly there is a tremendous incentive for wind facilities to not get permits, and there is presently no law saying they have to get one in order to operate. This is the loophole that must be closed.

The Eagle Protection Act should be amended to require that all commercial wind power facilities must have eagle-kill permits as a regulatory condition of their operation. It would be a simple matter to make having an eagle-kill permit a federal requirement for operating a commercial wind power facility. Small home windmills need not be covered, nor would wind powered water pumps, etc. We are talking about the huge wind farms presently dotting the range, with many more coming. It is time to take saving golden eagles seriously.

Another factor that Congress should correct is the secrecy that presently surrounds the killing of eagles by wind turbines. Wind facilities with permits presently patrol and report every dead eagle they find, but FWS refuses to disclose this data. Researchers could use this data to improve Eagle protection measures. Moreover, the public has a right to know how and where eagles are being killed.

Congress must amend the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act so it actually protects golden eagles from wind turbines. Every proposed wind farm presently must be approved by the Federal Aviation Administration before it can be built. Adding a permit to kill eagles would not be a big step, and it would help protect the eagles.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
5 8 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
24 Comments
Norman Baillie
June 20, 2026 2:41 pm

This issue has been on the table for well over a decade and zero has been done, and its not just Eagles. Migration routes with wind turbines are killing zones both onshore and offshore.

David Wojick
Reply to  Norman Baillie
June 20, 2026 5:09 pm

Wind turbines actually get bogus permits to kill eagles so it is all perfectly legal. In fact according to the permits for every golden eagle killed 1.2 are saved from electrocution so wind killing is good for the eagles. On paper it increases their population. Of course it is a hoax, invented under Obama.
See https://www.cfact.org/2025/06/29/cfact-report-feds-fail-to-offset-wind-turbine-eagle-kills/

Bryan A
June 20, 2026 2:44 pm

Perhaps they should face closure of any and every turbine which “Takes” any eagle and doesn’t have proper permits. Of course proving the “Take” could prove problematic. It might require cameras mounted viewing every turbine and monitored by an unintended third party.

David Wojick
Reply to  Bryan A
June 20, 2026 5:10 pm

That would be a good addition to a law saying they must have a permit to operate. Then add a whistle blower reward program.

June 20, 2026 2:44 pm

I agree wholeheartedly, and have commented on this issue before. The golden eagle/wind turbine situation is much more dire than for bald eagles.

Baldies are common around my Wisconsin dairy farm, because they mainly hunt fish and so stick close to the Wisconsin River only about 2 miles away. No windmills near the river valley—all are on ridge tops at least 10 miles away— uglyfying the otherwise beautiful rural SW Wisconsin “Uplands”. The drive from my farm into Iowa County seat Dodgeville (Land’s End world HQ) now passes dozens of the big useless things.
An old electric utility dam just a few miles east of my dairy farm is the top US baldy bird watching spot outside Alaska. The dam means the river never freezes up for a few miles below it, and all the baldies know to hunt fish there in winter. Especially since the baitfish rich reservoir water means the river’s walleye congregate below the dam also. Sometimes there can be over a thousand baldies roosting there a day in Jan-Feb. The closest town, Prairie du Chien, throws a multi day bald eagle festival every first week of February.

Unfortunately for the golden eagles, we seem to have developed a ‘do nothing’ congress. They cannot even get the Save America Act passed (voter ID required in federal elections, and no trans in women’s sports) despite it polling over 80% favorable across party lines. 47 has had to call Congress bluff by saying if you want ‘section 702’ renewed, attach Save America and I will sign it, else not. So both are now stalled. Pathetic.

David Wojick
Reply to  Rud Istvan
June 20, 2026 5:14 pm

Yes the bald Eagle population is estimated at around 350,000 but Goldens just 30,000 or so. Plus the best wind is on the western plains which is where most Goldens live.

June 20, 2026 4:27 pm

I thinking we need a method to warn the eagles of the presence of a wind turbine. Suppose we put on top of the nacelle a large amber blinking warning light. Would the eagles then learn to avoid the area around the blinking light?

Are the eagles sensitive to ultrasound? If they are, we could install an ultrasound transmitter on the nacelle with sufficient audio power to scare the eagles away.

David Wojick
Reply to  Harold Pierce
June 20, 2026 5:21 pm

There is research on this issue but I have not looked closely at it.

Reply to  David Wojick
June 21, 2026 12:30 pm

Overnight I came up with another plan to keep the eagles away. On the nacelle we place a large replica of a bear or mountain lion. We still need the blinking warning light to keep the bats away a night.

Reply to  Harold Pierce
June 21, 2026 2:49 pm

…….

Gemini_Generated_Image_dpuyt3dpuyt3dpuy
Reply to  Charles Rotter
June 21, 2026 6:36 pm

Way cool! However, the bear could be a little smaller. Who is the artist Shweb?

NB: If you click on the image, it will expand and become clear. Click on the “X” in the circle to contract the image and return to Comments.

Mike Larkin
Reply to  Harold Pierce
June 20, 2026 5:41 pm

Subsonics around wind turbines are already bad enough, adding extraneous noise at the other end of the range would just make things worse

Reply to  Mike Larkin
June 21, 2026 12:33 pm

Bad idea. Ultrasound would probably disrupt the bat’s echo location system.

June 20, 2026 4:59 pm

Time for this one:

comment image

Reply to  Steve Case
June 20, 2026 5:30 pm

A few days ago Gunga Din suggested a song be written.
Uh yeah maybe stealing a well known opus would suffice:

     Where have all the eagles gone?
     Long time passing
     Where have all the eagles gone?
     Long time ago
     Where have all the eagles gone?
     Sliced by wind mills, every one
     Oh, when will they ever learn?
     Oh, when will they ever learn?

     Where have all the brown bats gone?
     Long time passing
     Where have all the brown bats gone?
     Long time ago
     Where have all the brown bats gone?
     Chopped by wind mills every one
     Oh, when will they ever learn?
     Oh, when will they ever learn?

     Where have all the wright whales gone?
     Long time passing
     Where have all the wright whales gone?
     Long time ago . . . 

comment image

Reply to  Steve Case
June 22, 2026 7:52 am

Excellent!

claysanborn
June 20, 2026 7:51 pm

Related… You’ll all remember this one: “Rare bird last seen in Britain 22 years ago reappears – only to be killed by wind turbine in front of a horrified crowd of birdwatchers”https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-2350267/Rare-bird-white-throated-needletail-killed-wind-turbine-crowd-twitchers.html

George Thompson
Reply to  claysanborn
June 21, 2026 5:43 am

And it made not a bit of difference to the greeniewhacks or the Gov., right? Same problem here in the states with the eagles. It’s a serious felony, for example, for a citizen to kill a Baldy and the Gov. will cheerfully prosecute, but the bird-choppers are exempt, and as for the Goldies…tough luck birdies…why nobody has sued under any environmental protection act or endangered species act is beyond me. And let’s not even consider the other birdies and bats slaughter.

Allen Pettee
June 20, 2026 9:11 pm

I saw a beautiful Golden Eagle flying along the southwest shore of Yellowstone Lake on a trip to Yellowstone NP last month. And nary a windmill in sight….

trafamadore
June 21, 2026 7:07 am

A major tagging study in Wyoming by biologist Mike Lockhart found that spinning wind turbine blades killed more golden eagles than all other human causes combined.”

But where are the data? If you go to WyoFile you get an article about Lockhart but no data. And I can’t find it on line. Anyone have a link?

What I can find is a study by the USGS (https://www.usgs.gov/data/usgs-national-wildlife-health-center-necropsy-and-contaminant-results-bald-and-golden-eagles) that has in its abstract,Trauma, electrocution, and lead poisoning were the 3 leading causes of death, affecting 51%, 21%, and 20% of eagles, respectively.” In another study, I think by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.2544?af=R), say that, “leading forms of take over all age classes were shooting (~670 per year), collisions (~611), electrocutions (~506), and poisoning (~427).” In in a subset of the collision data where they detail the kind of collision, the numbers are pretty low  (N = 16; five with vehicles, two with wind turbines, two with power lines, one with a train, and six undetermined). (BTW, I didn’t realize the high percentage of illegal shooting.)

In any case, there is nothing to support the claims that “spinning wind turbine blades killed more golden eagles than all other human causes combined”.

George Thompson
Reply to  trafamadore
June 21, 2026 7:25 am

What you’re peddling here is commonly known as a “crock of s..t”. Your supposed numbers have already been proven to be-um-, in a word: wrong. To expand on this, consider the sources of your so-called information and consider their bias and CYA approaches. The data is there, cupcake, so look harder.

Reply to  trafamadore
June 21, 2026 2:50 pm

Bit late, but I archived the study you seek while previously commenting some months ago about golden eagles. And for 73 more studies of the same general ilk, go to the bibliography of the Wyoming Golden Eagle Working Group, all easily available on line. Wyoming has more golden eagles than any other state, and unfortunately is also a target for big wind farms. Hence the Working Group.

2hotel9
June 21, 2026 2:41 pm

Nothing has to be amended, all that has to happen is existing laws be enforced on wind operators, and HARSHLY, just as has been done to everyone else since the laws were emplaced by Congress. Nothing needs changed.

June 22, 2026 8:00 am

Another factor that Congress should correct is the secrecy that presently surrounds the killing of eagles by wind turbines. Wind facilities with permits presently patrol and report every dead eagle they find, but FWS refuses to disclose this data.”

Anthony got some action with his Surface Station project. Volunteers took pictures of various sites.
Perhaps something similar could be done here? Volunteers videoing various wind turbine kills and sending them into a central location. Then count and publicize the number of kills with the evidence to back it up?