The Hydrogen Highway Ends in a Traffic Jam

Charles Rotter California’s hydrogen car experiment has entered a phase where the gap between expectation and experience is no longer subtle. Drivers in Los Angeles recently waited in long lines to refuel. Some stations were offline. Others limited how much hydrogen could be dispensed. A network that exists comfortably in official counts became, under pressure, a small cluster of functioning pumps. NBC Los Angeles described the situation in plain terms:

“Drivers are dealing with long lines… som...

This post is currently for VIP and Premium Subscribers Only.

After 30 days it will be available to all users.

You can bookmark it and read in 30 days or

To read it it now, you can sign up by clicking here.

Subscribe
Notify of
12 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
April 10, 2026 3:08 pm

Driver: “Fill ‘er up!”

Attendant: “Here you go – two molecules of H2. For pedants and Democrat politicians, that counts as full.”

April 10, 2026 3:29 pm

Hydrogen powered vehicles never made any sense at all. Likely just tax dollars being laundered through this scam to their friends.
So far the only alternative that makes sense outside of gasoline vehicles, is using electricity from natural gas turbines to power our industries and hybrid gas and/or electric cars. We literally waste/burn off the excess natural gas from producing Oil and auto fuel.

John Hultquist
April 10, 2026 7:02 pm

No one is surprised. Right. Right?

April 10, 2026 7:21 pm

There were reportedly 5-6 hour wait times in queues for EV charging on the Easter weekend on the NSW coast.

April 11, 2026 12:28 am

The debate about cars often misses a basic point. People cite the many ways in which hydrogen or EV cars are inferior for current applications of ICE ones. They are usually right – refuel times are one of the key aspects. However, they miss something.

Governments can, and in many jurisdictions will, still go ahead and force a transition to EVs. Or indeed hydrogen. The thing that will then give is the application.

So you argue that long journeys become either much longer or even impractical. Yes, but that does not mean you will not have an EV. It means that if you want a car it will be an EV, and you will not make those long journeys. Similarly, you live in a city with no off-road parking and public charging points are insecure and expensive. Yes, but if you want a car in the city you will put up with that. This will lead to lower car ownership. Yes, and your government is fine with that. Similarly battery safety. Maybe they will be banned from underground parking. Yes, just means you will not be able to use them as you do now, so you will not drive to those places.

You have to turn it around to see what is coming. What is coming is a change in social and economic behavior, driven by the change from ICE to EV. Your government is not interested in whether you can carry on as before, or in whether it costs you more, or whether you like it.

Take the UK as an example. They are not going to repeal the Climate Change Act in the next four years, the move to EVs is going to happen, whatever the electorate thinks or wants. Starmer is going to stay in office, Miliband likewise. Or maybe Miliband will become Prime Minister. But the UK in 2030 is going to feel rather different than the UK today or a few years back.

Being unable to deliver reliable power, its going to move everyone to smart meters and variable rate electricity cost, so you will only use power when the weather gives plenty of it. You will drive an EV which will be charged either at expensive public charge points or at an expensive smart meter rate. Maybe that means you’ll change your mind about car ownership or use. That is fine.

Look at the former Soviet Union for an example. They had no power to make any changes, so they adapted to the requirements. Or Afghanistan – a recent piece in a UK paper about some visiting women records their surprise at being able to walk around casually outside. Governments possessed by the Net Zero mania will basically tell you to shut up and adjust. And you will have no choice.

Amazon is about to brick its old Kindles. You don’t like it? They are not interested in your feelings, live with it. That is just how it is,

Reply to  michel
April 11, 2026 1:43 am

Up to a point you are right. And Evs are not bad for intra urban or suburban use,

But when things go too far, especially if they do not in some other country, you start to jostle the politicians

Politicians mistakenly think that once elected they have supreme power.

But it ain’t so. Even in Russia or Iran leaders can be toppled.

Reply to  michel
April 11, 2026 7:19 am

“They are not interested in your feelings, live with it. That is just how it is,”

Of course the French Revolution, the American Revolution, WWI, WWII, and a host of citizen-led revolutions in other countries over just the last 100 years—such as Portugal (1974), Iran (1979), the Philippines (1986), Romania (1989), and Tunisia (2011)—show that governments should fear the citizens just as much as some citizens in various nations fear their rulers.

April 11, 2026 1:38 am

Only two ‘eco’ technologies have ever made sense
Electric cars for short haul use for suburban homes with two cars and off street parking, and heat pumps for homes with sufficiently good grid connections and access to cheap nuclear power.
The rest have always been pie in the sky.

oeman50
April 11, 2026 5:10 am

And the previous U.S. administration put out rule to require power plants to be powered by hydrogen. Just one such plant takes much more H2 than thousands of cars. Early tests had to be cut short because they ran out of H2.

Oh, and BTW, that H2 was supposed to be GREEN H2. Good luck with getting that.

Reply to  oeman50
April 11, 2026 7:31 am

From https://afdc.energy.gov/fuels/hydrogen-production ;

Natural Gas Reforming/Gasification: Synthesis gas—a mixture of hydrogen, carbon monoxide, and a small amount of carbon dioxide—is created by reacting natural gas with high-temperature steam. The carbon monoxide is reacted with water to produce additional hydrogen. This method is the cheapest, most efficient, and most common {for producing hydrogen}. Natural gas reforming using steam accounts for the majority of hydrogen produced in the United States annually.”
(my bold emphasis added)

Once again, one just can’t escape the economics and practicality of using fossil fuels to meet the energy needs of the US world.

W U
April 12, 2026 9:59 am

This post is currently for VIP and Premium Subscribers Only and only ten comments!!!

Mr Watts is getting greedy.

Sparta Nova 4
April 13, 2026 12:40 pm

I do not see the No Smoking sign.

Hindenburg, anyone?