India Helps US Repair ‘Green’ Wreckage

by Vijay Jayaraj

For the first time in half a century, the United States will witness the construction of a brand-new oil refinery. Located at the Port of Brownsville, this facility promises to supercharge domestic markets, guarantee national security and trigger billions of dollars in localized economic growth.

President Donald Trump’s refinery masterstroke with India’s Reliance Industries is more than a commercial agreement; it is a political and moral rebuke to the climate industrial complex’s war on affordable energy. And it was possible because Asian energy giants refused to bow before climate alarmism when political elites at the United Nations and elsewhere tried to shut down their businesses.

Why a refinery now?
To understand why America needs an Indian conglomerate to build its first refinery in 50 years, you must look at the crippled state of Western infrastructure.

The United States manages about 132 operating refineries capable of processing 18 million barrels per day. The problem lies in their design. Engineers built these facilities decades ago to digest heavy, sour crude imported from places like Venezuela or Canada. They are entirely unsuited for the massive volumes of light, sweet crude currently exploding from American shale formations.

The fracking revolution handed the United States a profound geopolitical weapon: endless reserves of light shale oil. Yet, environmental litigation and climate alarmism prevented the construction of facilities required to process it. The Brownsville project solves this bottleneck.

Trey Griggs of America First Refining calls it “one of the most important energy infrastructure projects in America today.” Planners expect the site to process 1.2 billion barrels of light shale oil valued at $125 billion. Operating with a 60-million-barrel annual capacity, the facility will utilize a deepwater port to dominate global export distribution.

Why Reliance?

Choosing Reliance Industries for this historic task is the smartest decision the administration could make. Reliance did not succumb to the United Nations’ demands to phase out fossil fuels. They ignored the fearmongering. Instead, they chose to build an advanced energy infrastructure.

Reliance runs the Jamnagar refinery complex in Gujarat on India’s western coast. A supersite that processes up to 1.4 million barrels of crude per day at a single location, Jamnagar is the largest single‑site refining center on the planet.

Jamnagar’s Nelson Complexity Index – a measure of its ability to convert lower quality crude into high‑value products – ranks its refinery far above most advanced facilities in North America and Europe.

In practice, that means Reliance can source over 200 different crude types, including poor‑quality barrels, which many Western plants cannot handle, and transform them into low‑sulfur gasoline, diesel, jet fuel and petrochemical feedstocks

So when Trump says the Brownsville facility will be the “cleanest refinery in the world” and will power global exports while supporting domestic markets, he is drawing on a track record established over decades in India’s coastal refineries.

The U.S. government is not importing an abstract “capacity” from India; it is importing decades of know‑how accumulated in a political culture that did not demonize hydrocarbons.

Pro hydrocarbon ecosystem

While much of Western Europe has treated fossil fuels as a transitional evil to be shrunk as fast as possible, the U.S.–India partnership is moving in the opposite direction. Both India and the current U.S. administration have chosen what can be described as pro‑energy, pro‑people policies instead of appeasing pressure groups that treat hydrocarbons as a moral stain.

President Trump has framed his agenda as “America First” energy dominance, pairing tax and permitting reforms with explicit political support for oil, gas and coal – from drilling to pipelines to refineries.

India’s leadership, for its part, has rejected binding net‑zero timetables and continues to prioritize reliable energy sources, industrial growth and job creation over symbolic emissions targets. Prime Minister Narendra Modi recently celebrated a massive national milestone, calling the production of 1 billion metric tons of coal a profoundly proud moment for the country. Analysts expect India’s annual coal production to surge by 6%-7%.

This open ecosystem — where oil and gas projects can proceed and coal remains part of the mix — has allowed regional champions like Reliance to hone skills in complex refining, logistics and large‑scale project execution.

Asia’s refusal to go along with climate fearmongering has allowed Western countries to now partner with its firms to rebuild energy and manufacturing strength eroded by policies divorced from physical reality.

Originally published in PJ Media on March 31, 2026.

Vijay Jayaraj is a Science and Research Associate at the CO2 Coalition, Fairfax, Virginia. He holds an M.S. in environmental sciences from the University of East Anglia and a postgraduate degree in energy management from Robert Gordon University, both in the U.K., and a bachelor’s in engineering from Anna University, India. He served as a research associate with the Changing Oceans Research Unit at University of British Columbia, Canada

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
5 16 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
62 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
gyan1
April 7, 2026 10:20 am

Sad that we gave up technological advancement to ideological zealots.. How did these clueless idiots come to dominate policy?

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  gyan1
April 7, 2026 10:49 am

They scream the loudest.

Tony Sullivan
Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
April 7, 2026 11:05 am

And the screamers vote for the screamers.

Reply to  gyan1
April 7, 2026 11:30 am

Biden tried to advance renewable tech manufacturing in the US. People voted for trump – now you can have fun going back to the 70s.

Mr.
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
April 7, 2026 12:00 pm

The 1970s ?

What a great time that was to be a free young adult.
The very best of times.

Wish I could do it all again now.
(without all the nanny-state bullshit that’s being inflicted on all of society)

(I’ll just treat my ’70s military service years as an interesting adventure for now. Besides, just about everyone was doing it, not just me.)

Scissor
Reply to  Mr.
April 7, 2026 3:38 pm

We were born to run.

Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
April 7, 2026 1:14 pm

What makes you think we want “renewable tech manufacturing”? You are not paying attention. The 70s are way better than wind mills like centuries ago.

cgh
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
April 7, 2026 2:41 pm

For you and Mr. both, I find it difficult to believe that any intelligent person could issue comments as stupid as MUR. On every single quantifiable basis, so-called renewable generation has failed in its main objectives in every single way.

Except perhaps for extracting taxpayers’ funds for grifters.

Reply to  cgh
April 7, 2026 3:16 pm

You can’t have a rational conversation with irrational people.

Mr.
Reply to  Phil R
April 7, 2026 6:44 pm

Hence my hypothesis that –

rationality / reason and ideology cannot function in the same mind space at the same time

Derg
Reply to  cgh
April 7, 2026 4:16 pm

I am starting to wonder if Charles has a burner account and poses as MyUser? I mean how hard is it to make sh1t up?

Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
April 7, 2026 1:31 pm

Renewables cannot manufacture anything !!

They can’t even be used to replace themselves.

They are more a parasite than anything else.

Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
April 7, 2026 2:45 pm

I would trade modern times for the 70s in a heartbeat for a plugged nickel.

gyan1
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
April 7, 2026 3:11 pm

Biden advanced idiotic inflationary policies that had zero chance of impacting climate but had huge impacts on citizen’s wallets.

They said we were running out of oil in the 70’s.

Ex-KaliforniaKook
Reply to  gyan1
April 7, 2026 10:54 pm

From Canada Action:
Scientists in the U.S. Department of the Interior claimed that peak domestic oil production could occur between 1908 and 1920.

With increasing vehemence, these scientists forecasted that U.S. oil production would see total exhaustion by the 1930s.

For over 125 years, we’ve been on the edge of “peak” oil production, and we’re just four years short of 100 years of total exhaustion.

Unless you read Dave Middleton’s excellent articles here on WUWT. I believe Middleton’s story over “Scientists in the U.S. Department of the Interior”. Of course, those scientists are all dead. I wonder if – like Ehrlich – they believed before their deaths it was “worse than they predicted”?

gyan1
Reply to  Ex-KaliforniaKook
April 8, 2026 11:05 am

Back in the 70’s the government funded a study to determine how much Natural gas reserves there were since they believed we were running out of oil. An exhaustive study that took two years and hundreds of people found that we had 10,000 years worth at what was current rates of consumption. The study never saw the light of day because the government wanted them to change the results to 500 years and they refused. Millions of taxpayer dollars wasted because the truth is not allowed.

Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
April 7, 2026 3:14 pm

I wonder if you actually reread your comments or think them through before you hit “post.” You seem to think that you made some kind of witty and cutting comment but it’s one of the dumbest things I’ve ever read. And yeah, the 70s were great. Wonder if you were around to enjoy them.

mohatdebos
Reply to  Phil R
April 7, 2026 7:53 pm

70s were one of the worst decades from economics perspective — high inflation, high unemployment (so called stagflation) or if you prefer an era of diminished expectations.

Mr.
Reply to  mohatdebos
April 7, 2026 9:06 pm

sounds like you couldn’t click with the chicks?

Reply to  Mr.
April 8, 2026 8:55 am

He has a point.
Jimmy Carter was President 1977 – 1981.
(He should have stuck to peanut farming.)

MarkW
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
April 7, 2026 3:29 pm

Electric cars take us back to the 1890s. Wind and solar power takes us back to the middle ages.

Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
April 7, 2026 3:29 pm

Renewable “tech” manufacturing?LMAO.

If by that you mean advancing “crap that will never supply the energy we need.”

What you support will take countries back to the 1700s.

Reply to  AGW is Not Science
April 8, 2026 8:59 am

Remember Obama making the military spend (I think it was) $134/gallon for “bio-jet fuel”?
All to promote “renewable tech”.

Leon de Boer
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
April 8, 2026 2:27 am

You can’t even sell the great renewable dream in an oil crisis 🙂

In the crisis people didn’t ask politicians how fast can we get into renewables they asked how the idiots managed to not have more strategic oil reserves.

Sorry people are now very aware of what net-zero means and support is at an all time low.

Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
April 9, 2026 8:30 am

The 70’s when California Had 41 refineries (versus 7 today). That was when California exported refined petroleum products to AZ, NV and OR. Thanks to Newsom’s ruinous policies, California’s gasoline diesel and jet fuel are being refined in India, South Korea or Singapore from crude oil from the Staits of Hormuz. These refined products are literally coming from half way around the world shipped by tankers burning bunker C oil.

Somehow the politicians in Sacramento think this situation is preferable to drilling and refining petroleum products in California. The state has lost tens of thousands of high paying jobs while contributing a huge net increase in global pollution. Thanks so much, Gavin.

Reply to  gyan1
April 7, 2026 1:12 pm

They worked hard preaching their “clean and green” religion. And sold it to low IQ politicians.

Keitho
Editor
Reply to  gyan1
April 8, 2026 2:35 am

Because we let them.

Sean Galbally
April 7, 2026 10:30 am

Somebody needs to explain to Harmer Starmer, Red Ed Miliband and John Swinney what an Oil Refinery is before the Uk goes down the plug hole.

cgh
Reply to  Sean Galbally
April 7, 2026 2:47 pm

Much too late for that. Starmer, Miliband et.al. are simply doing what Merkel and Schroeder have already demonstrated. The communists really don’t care how many bodies and lives are sacrificed for Big Brother. All of these idiots are simply treating Orwell’s 1984 as a playbook rather than a grim warning.

April 7, 2026 11:26 am

Meanwhile they build renewables and EVs at home.

Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
April 7, 2026 1:33 pm

Using coal fired power… wind and solar produce very little in China.

And they cannot possible power China’s huge cities at night.

China-energy
Reply to  bnice2000
April 7, 2026 4:34 pm

Bnice:
Exactly.
China uses renewables for at least 5 reasons:
1- make a lot of money selling wind/solar (and batteries) to the West
2- doing #1 employs a lot of Chinese; the CCP needs to keep its citizens docile even if it means building needless domestic wind & solar farms
3- pushing home use of EVs limits China’s dependence on imported FF for transportation since they must import most of the liquid FF
4- #3 helps them geo-strategically if there was ever an embargo [say, over Taiwan]
5- #1 has the added benefit of making China’s major economic & geo-strategic competitors’ electric grids more fragile and dependent on China for the equipment & minerals. A win-win for China.

China is laughing at the West, all the way to the bank!
btw China cares not a bit about climate issues. Any climate alarmist comments are only for the gulible westerners.

Scissor
Reply to  B Zipperer
April 7, 2026 4:48 pm

You’re exactly right.

I was involved in the design of a couple of plants in China, and we had to take out automation so as to employ more people.

Mr.
Reply to  B Zipperer
April 7, 2026 6:48 pm

#6. their own w&s installations are just their sales showrooms to shake down naive Westerner buyers.

Reply to  B Zipperer
April 7, 2026 8:36 pm

3- pushing home use of EVs limits China’s dependence on imported FF for transportation since they must import most of the liquid FF”

But increases its use of COAL. ! 🙂

Dave Andrews
Reply to  B Zipperer
April 8, 2026 7:29 am

China built 50 cities in which no one lives. Over 40 solar power companies have gone bankrupt and over 80,000 jobs in the sector have been lost in 2024-25.

Then you have to wonder just how many wind and solar farms in China are merely keeping the ghost cities company?

MarkW
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
April 7, 2026 3:32 pm

And have to force consumers to use them.

Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
April 7, 2026 3:33 pm

Meanwhile they build electric generation that doesn’t work more often than it does and cars nobody wants at home.

FIFY

Rud Istvan
April 7, 2026 11:29 am

Sounds like a win win. It is true that much of the Gulf refining capacity was built to process heavy sour crude—for example, by adding hydrogenation to ‘lighten’ it. And most US refineries are old. A large new one purpose built for light fracked crude will be a great US addition.

Reply to  Rud Istvan
April 7, 2026 1:15 pm

And it might encourage others to build more- except not in CA of course.

Scissor
Reply to  Rud Istvan
April 7, 2026 3:43 pm
April 7, 2026 11:48 am

Unless the Iran War bombs us into instant Net Zero in the next few days.

Reply to  idbodbi
April 7, 2026 1:17 pm

We will get to see Iran enjoying Net Zero.

Reply to  idbodbi
April 7, 2026 1:35 pm

Iran haven’t got nukes yet.. and that is now off the cards for a long time..

All thanks to Israel and the USA

MarkW
Reply to  idbodbi
April 7, 2026 3:33 pm

Thanks to Trump, Iran has neither the bombs nor the means to deliver them.

Scissor
Reply to  idbodbi
April 7, 2026 4:58 pm
Leon de Boer
Reply to  idbodbi
April 8, 2026 2:32 am

Iran had to call for a truce

You can only take your bravado and propaganda so far but when the B52’s take to the sky you know it’s time to talk.

Apparently the B52s were two hours out from Iran when they made the call as their friendly nations Pakistan and China warned them what was coming their way.

The opening of the Strait immediately was the number one item on the ceasefire agreement … so Trump got what he wanted.

The IRGC seems to be having a little reorganization and significantly the location of the injured current Ayatollah was leaked. That suggests someone in the IRGC wanted him gone.

Going to be an interesting two weeks 🙂

GeorgeInSanDiego
April 7, 2026 11:51 am

If the Democrats gain majorities in the House and the Senate after the midterm elections, I suspect that this refinery will not be built.

Richard Rude
Reply to  GeorgeInSanDiego
April 7, 2026 12:04 pm

The Dems must never be allowed to again govern the USA. Vote GOP this Nov. Even a RINO is better than a Democrat.

Reply to  GeorgeInSanDiego
April 7, 2026 1:20 pm

How could they stop it? I think there’s little chance of the Dems getting back in power for a decade or more.

Nick Stokes
Reply to  GeorgeInSanDiego
April 7, 2026 1:37 pm

If the Democrats gain majorities in the House and the Senate after the midterm elections, I suspect that this refinery will not be built.”

In fact, despite all the Trump fandom here, the project began in 2024, with Democratic Senate and President. Here is the June 2024 annoincement.

GeorgeInSanDiego
Reply to  Nick Stokes
April 7, 2026 2:47 pm

…and it’s been repeatedly delayed since 2019 due to objections raised by organizations like the South Texas Environmental Justice Network.

Nick Stokes
Reply to  GeorgeInSanDiego
April 7, 2026 3:04 pm

But not by Congress.

Derg
Reply to  Nick Stokes
April 7, 2026 4:20 pm

Thus Trump clears the way by doing what he does best….produce results.

MarkW
Reply to  Nick Stokes
April 7, 2026 5:25 pm

The only people more unpopular than Republicans have been the Democrats.

Reply to  MarkW
April 7, 2026 8:34 pm

Net approval of Democrat leaders, by Democrat voters is around the “S” bend…

… according to CNN !!

(This image is of a CNN segment shown by Sky News Australia)

democrat-S-bend
Reply to  Nick Stokes
April 8, 2026 4:53 am

Actually, the Idea first came from Rick Perry 12 years ago.

Held up for 8 years because of Obama and Biden.

April 7, 2026 1:09 pm

I expect that Europe will wise up about ff in another 4-5 years if not sooner. And if they don’t, fine, they’ll have to fend for themselves.

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
April 7, 2026 1:11 pm

oops- wrong place

Bob
April 7, 2026 3:12 pm

Let’s keep moving forward.

GeorgeInSanDiego
Reply to  Bob
April 7, 2026 4:42 pm

“That’s how winning is done!”

Edward Katz
April 7, 2026 5:49 pm

This is highly encouraging news since it reveals there are some jurisdictions worldwide that not only recognize that the demonization of fossil fuels is a scam but also that energy reliance depends on a willingness to take existing resource supplies like fossil fuels and use advanced technologies to make them even more efficient. Meanwhile wind and solar continue to reveal themselves stuck in the mud since even with massive subsidies they can’t provide cheap, reliable and consistent energy sources.