Changing Sunlight, Weather & Climate

Richard Willoughby

Summary

This article examines Earth’s position in relationship to the Sun as well as solar activity in high spatial and temporal detail across the globe to better understand how the Sun influences weather and climate change.  Daily sunlight data across latitudes is compared with observed trends to give insight into why the climate changes.

Poleward advection of heat from the Equator is covered in detail and used to understand why more ocean heat is being retained in the high condensing zones of both hemispheres. 

A simple matrix of Earth’s climate zones and annual seasons is shown to provide a coherent basis for comparing seasonal solar changes from period to period and even year-to-year to understand climate trends and seasonal weather shifts.

Introduction

Earth’s orbit around the barycentre of the solar system and the Sun’s movement relative to the barycentre causes a continually evolving geometric relationship between Earth and Sun.  The geometry of the relationship can be reduced to two variables at any point in time – the distance between their respective centres and the declination of Earth’s equatorial plane to the line between Earth and Sun.  These two variables can be used to calculate the solar electro-magnetic radiation (EMR) reaching the top of Earth’s atmosphere (ToA) and its zenith angle at any latitude on Earth for any specified time. 

Distance Earth to Sun

NASA JPL provides daily declination and distance data through the Horizons portal.  Chart 1 shows how the daily distance between Earth and Sun has changed relative to the corresponding day in 1920 for the period 1980 to 2030.

The step every 4 years is a result of the calendar reset on leap years.  The change in distance influences the intensity of the sunlight reaching Earth according to the inverse of the distance squared.    Chart 2 displays how the ToA zenith sunlight changes relative to the corresponding day in 1920 solely due to the changing distance.  The solar constant used for this chart is 1361W/m².

The gradual daily change in solar intensity over the 50 year interval shown in Chart 2 is primarily due to the varying orbit of the Sun while larger and longer term changes are due to the precession of Earth’s orbit around the barycentre of the solar system.  Perihelion occurred on 3rd January 2026 at 147099917km.  Aphelion will occur on 6th July 2026 at 152087757km. 

Declination of Earth Equatorial Plane relative to Line to Sun

Earth’s axis is tilted relative to its orbital plane causing an observer on Earth to see the Sun daily zenith angle change over a yearly cycle.  An observer on the Equator sees the Sun directly overhead on March equinox and September equinox.  The maximum northern tilt of the axis toward the Sun occurs on the June solstice while the maximum southern tilt toward the Sun occurs on the December equinox.

Jupiter’s movement around the solar system is in an orbital plane that is not completely aligned with Earth’s orbital plane.  The consequence of this is that both the Sun and Earth move north and south relative to Earth’s average orbital plane.  This out of plane variation in orbit results in slight variation of solar zenith declination to Earth’s surface to a greater degree than just the axis tilt relative to the line of the Sun in an annual cycle.  Chart 3 shows the variation in daily declination angle from 1980 to 2030 relative to 1920.

Positive value of declination means the peak solar intensity is further north than 1920 for that day of the year and negative value means further south.

Solar Constant

The power output of the Sun is relatively stable but not quite constant.  The power output has some similarity to the frequency of sunspots and sunspots have been used in the past as a proxy for the cyclic change in solar constant.  However a satellite based monitoring program was establish in 2003 and operated to 2019 to provide actual data outside Earth’s atmosphere that was then corrected for Sun-Earth distance to arrive at a measured, distance corrected value for the solar constant.  Chart 4 includes the measured data as well as calculated values from correlation with the Solar magnetic field.  This solar constant data series is known as SATIRE-S.

There is no gold standard for the prediction of solar activity but there is good correlation between solar activity and the variation in the velocity of the Sun relative to its average velocity.  This is the basis for estimating the constant during SC26 that is forecast to peak in 2037 with slightly higher intensity than SC25.

Trends in Solar Intensity across Latitudes

Knowing the Sun-Earth distance, the declination and the solar constant on a daily basis provides sufficient data to hindcast and forecast the average ToA solar intensity for any latitude for any day.  Chart 5 provides an example of the trend in maximum daily average solar intensity at 10N.

Chart 5 is the highest daily average ToA solar intensity for every year at 10N from 1920 to 2040.  In 2025, the peak occurred on 18th April.  There is an upward trend of 0.63W/m²/century.  10N is the latitude with the largest upward trend in maximum daily solar intensity.

Chart 6 shows solar intensity at 80S for day 295 of each year, which is the latitude and day with the greatest upward trend for daily average solar intensity due to its high sensitivity to changes in declination.

 

The warming trend of 6.42W/m²/century is the highest for any specific day of the year and any latitude, which happens to be day 295; usually 22nd October. 

Chart 7 shows the trend in maximum and minimum solar intensity across the latitudes.

The data exhibited in Chart 7 lacks the hemispherical symmetry that is commonly expected of solar/orbit driven changes.  All latitudes have upward trend in minimum solar intensity apart from the polar regions, where the minimum is always zero.  All but the latitudes south of 45S have an upward trend with 10N the highest and well above 10S.   If anyone was looking for a cooling surface temperature trend then the best place would be to look south of 45S per Chart 8.

Chart 8 shows the cooling trend in the Southern Ocean of 1.04C per century; which is consistent with the declining maximum solar intensity.

Chart 9 shows the day of the year for each hemisphere across the latitudes with the highest positive and negative trends.  Both polar regions have higher trends than the tropics with near symmetrical up and down trends in the hemispheres but not quite symmetrical between the hemispheres.  The southern hemisphere polar regions have larger up and down trend than the northern hemisphere.

Trends Driving Changes in Poleward Advection

Heat advection from the tropics to the poles is a significant factor responsible for observed weather, climate and climate change.  The seasonal variation in sunlight is the primary driver of the poleward advection of tropical heat.  Advection is the result of heat being accumulated in the tropical zones of each hemisphere being transported poleward to cooler temperature and polar zones of each hemisphere.  In this example, peak solar intensity at 10N and 10S are taken as representative of tropical heat uptake and minimum solar intensity at 40N and 40S to be representative of the lowest temperature in the temperature zones that creates the thermal imbalance driving advection.  The following three charts, 10, 11 and 12 display the trends in both hemispheres for the maximum solar intensity at 10N and 10S; the minimum solar intensity at 40N and 40S and the difference for both hemispheres.

Aspects of these charts that are worth noting are:

  • All trends are up.
  • The maximum solar intensity at 10S is almost 20W/m² higher than 10N.
  • The minimum solar intensity at 40N is approximately 10W/m² higher than at 40S.
  • The difference in the SH is 30W/m² higher than the difference in the NH.
  • The difference in the NH is trending up almost 3 times faster than the trend in difference in the SH.

Given the baseline differences and trends, it is reasonable to expect that advection in the SH would be higher than the NH and both increasing.  The increasing ocean heat content predominantly in the temperate zones of both hemispheres is consistent with these changes in solar intensity per Chart 13.

The temperate zones over the oceans are net condensation zones.  The increasing precipitation caused by the increasing heat advection is deepening the thermocline and reducing heat loss from the oceans in these regions. 

Surface Temperature Response

The surface temperature across hemispheres and specific locations are highly correlated over any annual cycle; allowing for thermal lag.  Chart 14 provides the thermal response to monthly solar intensity for the respective hemispheres.

Once lagged, the temperature is well correlated with the solar intensity.  However the NH is cooler season-for-season and has a higher response to lower range in solar intensity than the SH.  The NH temperature response would be 1.6 times the response of the SH for the same range in solar intensity. 

Daily temperature readings are also well correlated to daily solar intensity for any selected location as Chart 15 shows for Low Head in northern Tasmania.

Low Head is at latitude 40S and it is noted that the correlation is not as good in the tropics and polar zones because these latitudes often experience  surface temperature controlling processes due to water phase changes that reduce the linearity with solar intensity.

Forecasting Weather & Climate

Being able to hindcast and forecast daily sunlight and trends from past to well into the future provides a sound basis for understanding weather changes from year-to-year and longer term trends.  For example, boreal winter 2025/26 was bound to have above trend snowfall because the NH had above trend solar intensity from March equinox to July solstice but below trend sunlight from September equinox to December solstice per Chart 16.

Compared to 1920, the range in solar intensity from the March equinox to September equinox at 50N increased by 12W/m² – essentially a higher sunlight than average summer followed by a lower sunlight than average winter.  

From Earth’s perspective, the exposure to solar radiation can be classified into six latitudinal zones and four annual phases.  For the purpose of comparison here, the Zones are:

  • Northern Hemisphere: Arctic 60N to 90N, Temperate 30N to 60N, Tropical 0N to 30N
  • Southern Hemisphere: Antarctic 60S to 90S, Temperate 30S to 90S, Tropical 0S to 30S

The annual phases are taken from December Solstice to March Equinox to June Solstice to September Equinox to December Solstice.  The zones and phases can be visualised as a six by four matrix or a six by five matric to include the last phase of the previous year as in Matrix 1.

The values for heating and cooling are area averaged across all latitudes for the respective hemispheres.  The value for advection in each hemisphere is the difference between the heating season and following cooling season.  Hence the reason for the preceding year SH Heating value being included in the matrix.  The NH Advection of 4.35W/m² was above trend.  Monsoon days is the number of days above 425W/m² on an area average basis for the tropical zone.  Oceans reach their sustainable limit of 30C at and above that solar intensity.  Freezing days are based on days 220W/m² and below on an area average basis for the polar regions.  Surface level ice and snow are observed below this solar intensity.

The larger increase in monsoon days in the NH is consistent with the higher upward trend in peak solar intensity at 10N compared with 10S.  However the SH has a higher number of days in monsoon due to the higher solar intensity in the SH.

Matrix 2 provides the changes for 2026 relative to 2025. 

Advection in the NH in 2026 will be lower than in 2025.  However advection in the SH will be higher than 2025 as it follows the higher SH Heating in 2025.  NH will have slightly milder summer compared to 2025 but noted that it is still above the 1980 to 2010 average by 0.81W/m².  

Discussion

Determining the daily ToA solar intensity anywhere over Earth can be derived from three variables – distance, declination and solar constant.  All three can be determined for present, past and future with sufficient precision to be useful for understanding seasonal weather and climate trends.  Observed climate trends are well correlated to seasonal and temporal changes in solar intensity.  Changes in weather from year-to-year are also readily related to the year-to-year changes in solar intensity. 

Increasing global ocean heat retention is the most concrete evidence that Earth is in a warming trend.  Changes in seasonal solar intensity and corresponding increase in poleward advection in both hemispheres readily explain this warming trend.  Increasing poleward advection also explains the increasing snowfall across the NH with 2025/26 winter predicted to have above trend snowfall per Image 1 as an example of heavy snow.  Year 2033 will rival 2025 for NH Heating and NH Advection and year 2037 will have higher NH Heating and higher NH Advection than 2025.

The NH has increasing maximum solar intensity across all latitudes and poleward advection will continue to increase with the difference in area average NH Heating and NH Cooling increasing by 5.1W/m² by 2500 over 1980 level.  By then, advection in the SH will be reducing from present level; down by 0.2W/m² on 1980.  By the year 3000, NH advection will be 7.4W/m² above 1980 level while SH will be 3.7W/m² below 1980 level.  Rising maximum solar intensity in the NH will continue to cause increasing global average temperature even when the maximum intensity across the SH is declining.  This is due to the higher thermal response of the NH compared with the SH.  The NH will only cool again once the ice starts advancing south.  So far only Greenland is showing ice gains at altitude consistent with eventual re-glaciation of the NH.  The central plateau has gained up to 2m this century.

Some observed weather phenomena such as the El Nino/La Nina phases of the Tropical Pacific may be better associated with subtle shifts in sunlight than generally considered.  Chart 17 is an example of exploring this possibility by looking at how convective cells compete across the Tropical North Pacific to cause reversal of trade winds in certain years.  The chart shows the difference in solar intensity at 20N 19 days before the September equinox and 10N 4 days before the equinox compared with the Nino34 index in December. 

If the correlation has predictive value then the next El Nino phase will be established by December 2026.

Conclusion

Rapid human development has occurred during the current interglacial period of the northern hemisphere.  The SH has largely remained glaciated south of 60S.  Historical evidence indicates NH interglacials persist for around 12,000 years, which is half the period of Earth’s orbital precession as shown in Chart 18.  Interglacials of the NH terminate when the peak solar intensity in the NH is increasing because liberating water from the ocean and depositing snow on land is an energy intensive process; requiring some 1400kWh per tonne of ice on land.   So the oceans need to be warm to produce the atmospheric moisture.

The current interglacial has persisted for 9,000 years since sea level was within 20m of the present level.  The peak solar intensity in the NH has been increasing since 1700.  Careful examination of the historical evidence shows that temperature increases and sea level rises within 1000 years of the eventual rapid decline in sea level.  All the current climate trends are consistent with approaching re-glaciation of the NH within the current millennium.  Accumulation of ice at altitude in high latitudes is an early indicator for the eventual ice accumulation down slope and at lower latitudes.  Greenland’s largest and most productive glacier, Jacobshavn, has advanced and thickened over the past decade.

Energy security and hour-to-hour reliability of energy supplies will be vital for survival of human populations north of 40N living through an era of progressively harsher winters in coming decades and centuries.  The boreal winter of 2025/26 had above trend advection that caused record daily and monthly snowfall in numerous locations.  The same conditions of higher than trend summer solar intensity followed by lower than trend winter solar intensity will not be repeated till 2033/34 and will be eclipsed in 2037/38. 

The widely held belief that reducing carbon combustion will create perfect weather is a modern cargo cult perpetrated on poorly educated, gullible populations where they fail to examine and understand the evidence.

.

The Author

Richard Willoughby is a retired electrical engineer having worked in the Australian mining and mineral processing industry for 30 years with roles in large scale operations, corporate R&D and mine development.  A further ten years was spent in the global insurance industry as an engineering risk consultant where he developed an enduring interest in natural catastrophes and changing climate.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
5 6 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
11 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bob Weber
January 26, 2026 10:33 am

“Some observed weather phenomena such as the El Nino/La Nina phases of the Tropical Pacific may be better associated with subtle shifts in sunlight than generally considered.”

Informative work that says changing sunlight changes the climate. Who knew?

Your chart 17 implies sunlight intensity is a leading cause of El Niño, including the recent one where too many skeptics have fallen into believing misinformation like the Hunga-Tonga eruption caused it.

comment image
Well done Rick.

Reply to  Bob Weber
January 26, 2026 11:08 am

Your chart 17 implies sunlight intensity is a leading cause of El Niño, including the recent one where too many skeptics have fallen into believing misinformation like the Hunga-Tonga eruption caused it.”

Who has said that? All anyone has suggested is that HT and El Niño combined led to the recent anomalous temperature spike.

Bob Weber
Reply to  johnesm
January 26, 2026 11:15 am

Someone with your name said this yesterday:

“It was an HT eruption-powered El Niño spike, and is now fading.”

January 26, 2026 10:58 am

WoW! A detailed look at not only the earth, but at the solar system also. Thank you very much for providing this information.

Climate science has been deficient in analyzing climate change because they try to discern changes based upon averages of temperature driven by CO2 and trends based on those averages. Doing so only results in circular logic and confirmation biases.

The sun and orbital mechanics in the solar system provides the heat to warm the earth. Those must be adequately analyzed before proceeding further. Those scientists who rely on a flat earth, multiplying by the albedo, and dividing by 4 are simpletons who refuse to use trigonometry and calculus to do a proper analysis and determination of how the sun/earth changes are the starting point, not CO2.

gyan1
Reply to  Jim Gorman
January 26, 2026 11:13 am

“simpletons who refuse to use trigonometry and calculus to do a proper analysis and determination of how the sun/earth changes are the starting point, not CO2.”

Fools who believe in simplistic TOA calculations that assume the imbalance is due to CO2 while ignoring the complex internal dynamics and measured increases in solar radiation reaching the surface can only be explained by idiocy or fraud.

gyan1
January 26, 2026 11:06 am

The reduction in clouds during the modern warm period has dramatically increased the amount of solar radiation reaching the surface and heating the oceans to depth. It’s scientific fraud to pretend the solar contribution to warming is negligible.

Bob Armstrong
January 26, 2026 11:27 am

Wish I had time . But , I’m noting it in my https://cosy.com/DailyBlog.html as reference .
Jennifer Marohasy has made some interesting comments on the cycle of the moon relative the ecliptic .One thought that occurred to me is that if the Earth were not tilted , both poles would likely be permanently frozen with calculable consequences .

One analysis I’ve yet to see is the annual 4.5c variation from peri- to aphelion in our orbit’s radiative gray body temperature of ~ 278.6k .

January 26, 2026 11:31 am

Thank you RickWill. Very interesting.

“Earth’s orbit around the barycentre of the solar system and the Sun’s movement relative to the barycentre causes a continually evolving geometric relationship between Earth and Sun.”

“There is no gold standard for the prediction of solar activity but there is good correlation between solar activity and the variation in the velocity of the Sun relative to its average velocity.”

Question: The “velocity of the Sun” – is it a varying tangential velocity in an orbit around the barycentre, or is it a rate of change of distance from the Sun to the barycentre?

January 26, 2026 11:45 am

“Jacobshavn, has advanced and thickened”

Isn’t this link out of date? This was a very temporary re-advance (over just a few years) of the glacier but has since resumed its retreat. The temporary slow down of the retreat is dwarfed by the overall retreat, which has accelerated again in recent years. Whatever the main points that the article might present, this particular point is past it’s sell by date. No imminent cooling of the Northern Hemisphere.

Alan
January 26, 2026 11:45 am

There’s not an equinox in December, there’s a solstice.

January 26, 2026 11:51 am

So very many things wrong with the above article, one hardly knows where to begin commenting.

One example, these statements:
“Heat advection from the tropics to the poles is a significant factor responsible for observed weather, climate and climate change. The seasonal variation in sunlight is the primary driver of the poleward advection of tropical heat.”

Since advection is the horizontal transport of atmospheric properties, that above assertion ignores the presence of the large scale atmospheric circulation cells: the Hadley cell, the Ferrel cell, and the Polar cell that are present in both the NH and the SH (see attached figure). These major circulation cells with their vertical circulation components combine with Earth’s rotation (i.e., “Coriolis force”) to produce prevailing surface winds and high altitude jet streams that vary in direction and amplitude by latitude, yet DO NOT provide a uniform transport of heat from the tropics to the poles. Instead, these atmospheric circulation cells provide the means of transferring most of the heat in the atmosphere from the tropics to deep space (radiation) BEFORE that tropical air eventually reaches the polar regions in both hemispheres.

Notably, these major atmospheric circulation cells exist independent of the amount of sunlight falling on Earth year-to-year.

And need I also mention that climate is defined as weather averaged over a specific geographical area of Earth for 30 or more years, not seasonally?

And there is this:
The maximum distance of the Sun’s center-of-mass from the solar system’s center-of-mass (i.e., “barycenter”) is approximately 2.2 times the radius of the Sun, which translates to about 1.5 million kilometers or 0.01 Astronomical Units (AU), varying with the positions of the planets, especially Jupiter. With the Earth having an average distance from the Sun (not the SS barycenter) of about 150 million km, the solar insolation variation associated with that distance-to-barycenter difference would be about ((150 +/- 1.5)/150)^2 = +/- 2%, thus not any significant driver of climate (in comparison, the annual variation in solar insolation of Earth TOA just attributed Earth’s slightly elliptical orbit about the Sun/ SS barycenter cycle is more than three times higher, at about 7%).

Atm_Circulation_Cells