Meta Does It Right With Nuclear Power

By Daniel Turner

Meta did something right, and it deserves recognition and replication. 

Recently, the American-owned technology company announced a private partnership with three nuclear firms, Vistra, Terra Power, and Oklo, to expand electricity production supporting their own data center needs and generating surplus power to benefit the regional grid. 

This should happen anywhere data centers are in the discussion. It is what every politician courting the tech communities to build data centers in their city or state must expect going forward, because right now data centers face massive opposition, and no amount of spin will fix it. 

The main concern about data centers is their incredible electricity need. Of course, we all like and use technology, and your average American even fundamentally embraces the patriotic need to “beat China” in the AI race. None of that denies the “affordability” issue, and the frustration of ratepayer who have yet to see a tangible benefit ubiquitous data centers bring to his personal life. To highlight this, let me use the example of a rural Virginia farmer: me. 

For years, Virginia enjoyed bipartisan enthusiasm for data centers. A third of the nation’s data centers are in the Commonwealth, and every politician relishes ribbon cutting photos and self-congratulatory press releases promoting “investment” and “jobs” and “tax revenue.”

What do I see? I see my farm’s electric bill 40% higher than it was in 2020 with a projected 14% increase this year. For all of the historic revenue, my tax burden remains the same (or higher). From my perspective, data centers are a burden. 

There is a general good, and I am happy for all the construction jobs, electricians, cement and steel workers. There is new money for “education.” I can find dozens of statements celebrating essential programs for “mental health” and “nutrition” and whatever else sounds caring. 

None of this benefits me. In fact, it costs me several hundred dollars more per year. I would at least like a thank you. Maybe a fruit basket.

Meta did something right, and it deserves recognition and replication. It did not just announce a plan to build expecting ratepayers would finance it through higher monthly bills. It brought its own money and government coordination to tell the locals things could actually… get better. Imagine that. 

Our elected leaders should be building nuclear power plants (and coal power plants and natural gas power plants) because we are in desperate need of increased baseline power, something Energy Secretary Chris Wright deeply understands and regularly addresses. During recent remarks to Meta, the Secretary mentioned that decades ago, before Meta founder Mark Zuckerberg was even born, he was studying nuclear power in college, and here he is, decades later, helping usher it into reality.

Meta has the money. Vistra, Terra Power, and Oklo have the know-how, and Chris Wright has the humility to let it happen. Government as a willing facilitator to online new energy technologies for the benefit of us all. Imagine that. 

I named my organization Power The Future deliberately. What will power the future?  “God only knows…” to quote The Beach Boys, but one thing which I do know, of which I am certain, the geniuses who will power the future with new technologies and new energy sources are, right now, in need of reliable, affordable, abundant energy, American energy, and if we punish ourselves now by punishing energy, we are not hastening that better tomorrow. We are conscripting ourselves to the status quo. 

AI is likely going to figure out how to power the future, but AI will not happen unless more power comes online fast. Meta did it the right way, and every tech company with data center desires should take note. We may just be simple farmers, but we vote and we fight. You can win us over if you treat us right, and Meta is the first to do so. 

Daniel Turner is the founder and executive director of Power The Future, a national nonprofit organization that advocates for American energy jobs. Contact him at daniel@powerthefuture.com and follow him on Twitter @DanielTurnerPTF

This article was originally published by RealClearEnergy and made available via RealClearWire.

5 5 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Subscribe
Notify of
14 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bryan A
January 15, 2026 2:10 pm

Plain and simple…
With Nuclear, AI is a piece of cake.
With Renewables only, AI is a piece of carp!

Bruce Cobb
Reply to  Bryan A
January 15, 2026 2:54 pm

Sounds fishy to me!

Reply to  Bryan A
January 15, 2026 4:50 pm

In the local river, and iirc, anywhere in NSW, if you catch a carp, it is illegal to throw it back.

You must kill it and bin it.

ResourceGuy
January 15, 2026 2:26 pm

They are also a test case for their peers who are rushing ahead faster than the 49er Gold Rush. The rate of announcements and deals is just incredible.

Richard Mott
January 15, 2026 2:43 pm

25 of your 40% increase is inflation from Biden’s flooding of the money supply. The rest is likely due to state energy policies having more to do with forcing renewables and discouraging inexpensive gas generation. Data centers probably aren’t the driving factors. VA already gets about a third of its electricity from nuclear. What’s needed is to make nuclear cheaper by reforming NEPA, which is what allows “citizen lawsuits” which have been weaponized to cause expensive delays by green activists. The main problem with nuclear now is it takes too long and costs too much, both entirely due to environmental lawfare.

Bryan A
Reply to  Richard Mott
January 15, 2026 2:48 pm

Just make Renewables “Right Priced” by eliminating ALL subsidies as well as “Take or Pay” so they have to charge their actual price.

Reply to  Richard Mott
January 15, 2026 5:01 pm

The FED regulation of the moneysupply is independent of politicians.
That’s why Trump is squawking because Fed wont flood the money supply at his demands

Bob
January 15, 2026 2:55 pm

Very nice Daniel. This only makes sense. Any outfit not just AI that is going to use massive amounts of energy should be made to join in and insure that we all have plenty of energy. Not just outfits that want to connect to the grid but also those who are currently connected to it. That doesn’t mean each outfit must build their own power plant there are likely dozens of investments that can be made to insure plentiful power for your region. One stipulation should be you must invest in a system that will supply your region. If you choose wind or solar that will be your sole source of power so you better be able to operate on intermittent power. Choose wisely the required investment could make you a bunch of money.

January 15, 2026 3:31 pm

From the above article:

“Meta did something right, and it deserves recognition and replication. 
Recently, the American-owned technology company announced a private partnership with three nuclear firms, Vistra, Terra Power, and Oklo, to expand electricity production supporting their own data center needs and generating surplus power to benefit the regional grid.”

“Something right”??? . . . well, that remains to be seen/proven.

Neither Vistra nor Terra Power nor Oklo have built a single nuclear reactor power plant. Vistra has acquired ownership and operates previously built nuclear fission power plants. Terra Power and Okla are known for their individual plans to build and operate new types of nuclear fission power plants (e.g., SMRs, traveling wave reactors, molten-salt reactors, sodium-cooled fast reactors) but have not completed any such construction to date.

There should be alarm bells going off in Meta headquarters for partnering with relatively immature companies having no previous experience with building any nuclear power plants from the ground up to bring such on line to produce industry-scale electricity.

Hmmmm . . . perhaps Meta has an AI bot advising them that such prudence is no longer required in today’s world? Sure, I’ll give it recognition for such thinking.

Zeke
January 15, 2026 3:36 pm

A good article raising the issue of power rates. The energy demands of hyperscale datacenters are not mentioned in this article. Neither are the demands for water cooling.

But it is more than the largest cities in each state.

Another rising cost to consider — the cost of buying personal computers. Companies that have a significant market share in consumer electronics are shifting production to compute — for datacenters.

So jeff bezos thinks you should just compute with the cloud, <b>not own a pc.</b>

That’s water, electricity, and computers. All for a technology which at the moment, it seems, users are more concerned with finding out how to disable it.

Reply to  Zeke
January 15, 2026 5:09 pm

Data centres doent use the same components that are in home or office computers

AI chips could be $5k-10K each

Home computer prices rising because they include simple AI software technology

My annual microsoft license went up recently because they included AI software and its links to the data centres. I was able to disable in my MS account this and get a reduced annual payment

January 15, 2026 5:05 pm

Vistra is the only one with actual nuclear power plants

Terra Power, and Oklo are just working on possible designs with different technology than currently used.
I wish them well but its a long journey

January 15, 2026 5:07 pm

Story tip

Germany appears to be giving up on renewable energy (although they pretend not to)

Construction of new gas-fired power plants is set to begin in Germany this year. To ensure security of electricity supply, the German government plans to tender for new power plant capacity totaling twelve gigawatts in 2026

https://www.tagesschau.de/wirtschaft/energie-neue-gaskraftwerke-100.html

Tom Johnson
Reply to  Zig Zag Wanderer
January 15, 2026 7:40 pm

Did you ever wonder from where Germany will get the gas?