Norway Avoids ‘Green’ Energy Quicksand

By Vijay Jayaraj

While the rest of Europe shivers under the self-imposed austerity of net zero mandates, Norway in the frozen north is keeping the lights on and the bank vaults full as it avoids the “green” ideological quicksand that has defined the continent’s energy policy.

Despite pressures to decarbonize, Norway has increased efforts to exploit oil and natural gas reserves. The crown jewel of this fossil fuel renaissance is the Johan Castberg field. Located in the Barents Sea, 100 kilometers north of the 20-year-old Snøhvit natural gas field, Johan Castberg is expected to be a beast of a producer – 450 million–650 million barrels over 30 years, with a peak daily capacity of 220,000 barrels.

And the investments don’t stop there. The Norwegian government – ignoring wailing of the United Nations – has initiated plans for its 26th round of oil and gas licensing. Targeted will be “frontier areas” – little-explored regions that can reward high risk with massive returns. While the U.K. suffocates its North Sea industry with windfall taxes and regulatory hostility, Norway is effectively saying, “If you won’t drill, we will.”

Companies operating on the Norwegian continental shelf plan to pour about $25 billion into oil and natural gas projects in 2026. Almost $2 billion higher than a previous estimate because of rising development costs, the commitment signals determination to keep production climbing.

Since autumn 2024, the price of ongoing development has swelled by 17%, which is consistent with a rising trajectory that had Norway overtake Russia in 2022 as Europe’s principal supplier of natural gas.

Despite the country’s embrace of fossil fuels, “greens” enthusiasts often point to Norwegians’ widespread adoption of electric vehicles as a model for other countries. However, as is often the case, the pretense of a “green” utopia is promoted through a deception.

The gleaming EVs filling the streets of Oslo are subsidized by the government’s oil revenue.

The Norwegian sovereign wealth fund – known as the Government Pension Fund Global – is the largest of its kind in the world. As of November, its assets were valued at over $2 trillion. On paper, that is $340,000 for every Norwegian.

It is a delicious irony that the climate activists’ favorite “model” nation is funded by the very substance they despise. Every time Norwegians plug in an EV, they are effectively accepting a handout from drillers at Johan Castberg. The “green” lifestyle is a luxury purchased with petrodollars.

Norway is not without its problems. The country’s substantial electricity exports to the EU become toxic, as the continent uses Norway as a crutch to compensate for the failure of its own wind and solar investments.

Norwegian households, accustomed to decades of low energy prices from abundant hydropower, have been adversely affected by flexible pricing contracts that link their electricity costs to the high prices of European markets. Oslo – along with Stockholm and Helsinki – is tiring of mainland Europe treating the Nordic grid as a dumping ground for the costs of EU’s star-crossed love affair with so-called renewable energy.

Nonetheless, Norway is better off than European Union countries. Not being a member of the EU, Norway has been able to maintain energy sovereignty and out of the net zero suicide pact gripping EU capitals.

Free of the European Union’s authoritarian energy directives has turned into the greatest blessing Norway never asked for. While the EU suffers through “managed decline” in the name of climate salvation, Norway stands apart – enjoying relative wealth and secure energy supplies while watching the spectacle of a continent that chose ideology over arithmetic.

Among the foreign countries in which Gregory Wrightstone’s “Inconvenient Facts: The science that Al Gore doesn’t want you to know” received wide distribution was Norway. (A Norwegian language version is available.)

Europe built its “green” cathedral on the shifting sands of a cult. Norway built its future on rocks that happen to float in black gold.

This commentary was first published by American Greatness on December 14, 2025.

Vijay Jayaraj is a Science and Research Associate at the CO2 Coalition, Fairfax, Virginia. He holds an M.S. in environmental sciences from the University of East Anglia and a postgraduate degree in energy management from Robert Gordon University, both in the U.K., and a bachelor’s in engineering from Anna University, India.

5 21 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

91 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
gyan1
December 15, 2025 6:15 pm

Proud of my Norwegian heritage. We are an independent lot. They have their share of woke idiots but sanity prevails there.

Derg
Reply to  gyan1
December 15, 2025 6:56 pm

Most of those Scandinavians that migrated to MN long ago are bat shit crazy now. They keep re-electing Gov Walz who is a moron. He and fraud are synonymous.

gyan1
Reply to  Derg
December 15, 2025 7:34 pm

Woke idiocy is a mind virus that prevents the infected from having a clue as to how anything works in the real world. The DNC must have wanted Trump to win to go hard left like they did. Hard to believe they could be that stupid but Democrats never cease to amaze me at the level of ignorance they embrace.

Tom Johnson
Reply to  Derg
December 15, 2025 7:36 pm

As the great grandson of one of those emigrants, with whom I share the same name, I’ll take a bit of an issue with you. It’s the Minneapolis- St. Paul metro area where most of the batshit crazy voters reside, not the whole state. Unfortunately, the population of the rest of the state is too low to compensate. I’ll agree there are some blue areas there, too.

Derg
Reply to  Tom Johnson
December 16, 2025 3:24 am

Agree

Reply to  Tom Johnson
December 16, 2025 9:16 am

It is the imposed Somalians who should be returned to Somalia where they can be of the most value.

Reply to  Derg
December 16, 2025 6:26 am

I am a proud US Army veteran, served in West Germany during the 1950s

For decades he promoted himself with stolen valor, claiming he was a master sergeant, whereas he was only a sergeant. He claimed he served in Iraq, but he never appeared in Iraq.

In other words, he posed as a fraud.

Shame on the Minnesotans, who elected him and Biden to illegally bring in super-corrupt Somalis to steal blind the US.

Reply to  wilpost
December 16, 2025 8:22 am

Luxury Cars, Private Villas And Stacks Of Cash: How Somali Fraudsters “Spent” Medicaid Money
https://willempost.substack.com/p/luxury-cars-private-villas-and-stacks?r=1n3sit&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&triedRedirect=true

In echoes of Minneapolis, whistleblower says Maine company bilked tens of millions of Medicaid dollars

https://willempost.substack.com/p/in-echoes-of-minneapolis-whistleblower?utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&utm_medium=web&triedRedirect=true

Minnesota: ‘Nearly Every’ Somali Household with Children Is on Welfare

https://willempost.substack.com/p/minnesota-nearly-every-somali-household?r=1n3sit&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&triedRedirect=true

Reply to  wilpost
December 16, 2025 4:23 pm

All the payments should be stopped dead until all the missing money is retrieved.

Reply to  bnice2000
December 17, 2025 5:36 am

Start praying

December 15, 2025 7:01 pm

North country boy here. The Scandinavians are a hardy bunch. Grew up around those Norwegian bachelor farmers. The Swedes went off the rails a bit, but I did marry one. The Finns (I’m one) have kept the Russian Bear at bay so good on them. . Even have a Dane or two in the family tree.

Erik Magnuson
Reply to  rocdoctom
December 15, 2025 7:43 pm

Even have a Dane or two in the family tree.

I promise not to hold that against you….

Tom Johnson
Reply to  rocdoctom
December 15, 2025 7:49 pm

My dad grew up in one of those central MN farming towns. It had a population less than200. It contained two churches, one for the Swedes and one for the Norwegians. dad always said that there was no way they could ever consolidate. the Norwegians sung 2 hymns and the Swedes sung 3, making no way for any compromise.

Reply to  rocdoctom
December 16, 2025 4:23 am

Gustaf Mannerheim is one of my heroes. Love the Finn’s and glad you’re on our side.

Reply to  David Kamakaris
December 16, 2025 8:41 am

Some History

Sweden, Finland, Russia

The Kingdom of Sweden controlled Finland for over 600 years, from the 12th century until 1809.
The Finnish war 1808-1809: Sweden lost the war against Russia, resulting in the Treaty of Fredrikshamn in 1809.
Sweden ceded Finland to Russia.

Russia named Finland the Grand Duchy of Finland, made it a part of the Czarist Russia
Finland declared independence in 1917.  

Finland invaded Russia in 1918, 1921 and in 1941 in a formal alliance with the Nazi Germany.

Finland fought two major wars with the Soviet Union: The Winter War (1939-1940), a Soviet invasion that ended with Finland ceding territory, and The Continuation War (1941-1944), where Finland, allied with Nazi Germany, aimed to regain lost land.

Sweden, officially neutral, but leaning towards Nazi Germany, provided significant material aid, and 8900 military volunteers, and a small, but effective air unit, F19, with about two dozen aircraft to Finland during the Winter War

Finland signed an Armistice Agreement on September 19, 1944, ending the Continuation War, which imposed harsh terms, including:

1) War reparations (300 million gold dollars),
2) Territorial concessions, 
3) Allowing a Soviet Control Commission in Helsinki, setting Finland on a path of neutrality known as “Finlandization” during the Cold War. 

Finland became a NATO member in 2022

Reply to  wilpost
December 16, 2025 1:44 pm

Then there is this: Finnish sniper Simo Häyhä killed at least 500 enemy troops during the Winter War — earning him the nickname the “White Death.” And he used a rifle with iron sights.

Reply to  rocdoctom
December 17, 2025 5:00 pm

Great book.👍

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  rocdoctom
December 16, 2025 6:26 am

“Even have a Dane or two in the family tree.”

If that is a Great Dane, then curiosity abounds. 🙂

Nick Stokes
December 15, 2025 7:38 pm

tiring of mainland Europe treating the Nordic grid as a dumping ground for the costs of EU’s star-crossed love affair with so-called renewable energy”

This is a bizarre sob story that takes hold here. Poor Norwegians, forced to accept high prices from those rascally southerners.

Well, they aren’t forced, of course. But it is a very profitable and sensible trade. In 2023, Norway exported $2.74B and imported $715M of electricity. That sounds like a big net outflow, but it also reflects how the deal really works. Norway exports when the price is high – and imports when the price is low (wind is blowing). Then they are saving their water for when the price goes up again. The net flow of MWh is much closer to balance than the money difference suggests.

Chris Hanley
Reply to  Nick Stokes
December 15, 2025 8:57 pm

But it is a very profitable and sensible trade

Not according to Norwegians ‘“It’s an absolutely sh*t situation,” said Norway’s energy minister Terje Aasland …
…The two ruling parties in Norway are pledging to campaign to cut the two power interconnectors that link the country with Denmark, when they come up for renewal in 2026’
(Euronews 13 Dec 2024).

The undersea cable connections to Norway are critical to both UK and Germany energy systems because their weather-dependent utility power systems don’t work 🤔 .

Reply to  Chris Hanley
December 16, 2025 6:42 am

There also are two big connections from the Netherlands to Norway
The UK and Germany are the big culprits

Reply to  Nick Stokes
December 15, 2025 9:07 pm

So instead of cheap home grown electricity all the time, they get huge fluctuations in price when wind and solar in the EU don’t work.

Sounds like typical Greenie FAILURE to me. !

Australia could have had cheap home grown electricity all the time too, if they had started replacing their coal fired power plants a decade or so ago.

Leon de Boer
Reply to  Nick Stokes
December 15, 2025 10:49 pm

So come on Nick you waded in … explain why both parties are going to terminate the interconnectors and there is a vow no new ones.

The 2025 September election was hung and saw a strong anti-interconnector sentiment.
Even the Conservative Party, traditionally pro-integration, shifted to neutrality on renewing the Denmark cables.

A simple search will give you the answer.

Reply to  Leon de Boer
December 16, 2025 9:09 am

internet search?? Nick don’t need no steenkin’ internet search.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Nick Stokes
December 16, 2025 6:28 am

2023 is old news.

Reply to  Nick Stokes
December 16, 2025 6:39 am

The UK, Denmark, Germany, etc., were using the southern Norwegian grid as a battery, which caused fluctuation in wholesale prices, and draining of water reservoirs due to overproduction when wind and solar were low in Europe.

Big complains by Norwegians caused the government to fall, and the next government to do something about it.

Now no electricity from Europe is accepted, when reservoirs are at certain levels to ensure Norway has enough electricity at all times.

Norway uses phase-changing transformers for that purpose.

Canada does the same with US electricity

Reply to  wilpost
December 16, 2025 4:45 pm

Norway has two grids, that are poorly connected.
The southern grid is where most people live. It is most affected by being connected to the UK and Germany.
The northern grid is hardly affected.

Nick Stokes
Reply to  wilpost
December 16, 2025 5:17 pm

Big complains by Norwegians caused the government to fall, and the next government to do something about it.”

Just not true. The Labor government did not fall, Mr Støre has been Prime Minister continuously since 2021. Mr Aasland has been minister for Energy since 2022. And the interconnectors are still carrying power.

Reply to  Nick Stokes
December 16, 2025 9:22 am

Norway is able to supply power to Norway. The EU will have to fend for itself. Norway has the good sense to cut the power to ‘those who cannot add’ to their south.

December 15, 2025 11:06 pm

2/3rd of housholds use heat pumps
Most new cars sold are EVs
Almost 10% from their energy comes from Wind and Solar, aims for 30GW of Wind by 2040
Aims to be carbon neutral by 2030
They start to establish zero emission zones in cities and the 15-minute-city idea seems to get traction there too.
Develop electric planes for their short daily flights to their islands
They have around 100 electric ferries in operation
Invests in CCS, Hydrogen
Signed the Paris agreement

The truth is they invest their fossil fuel money to prepare for a post fossil fuel world.

Even the UAE are trying to diversify and get away from oil. Only the US is moving backwards.

Chris Hanley
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
December 15, 2025 11:36 pm

Most domestic heat pumps in Norway are air-to-air better known elsewhere as reverse-cycle air conditioners.

Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
December 16, 2025 12:00 am

Basically all Norway’s energy comes from HYDRO.

Very little electricity or energy is derived from wind or solar

Why would they destroy their wonderful scenery with stupid ugly and environmentally polluting wind turbines.

Norway-energy
Reply to  bnice2000
December 16, 2025 6:53 am

Norway gets 90% from big reservoir hydro, 10% from west coast wind

Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
December 16, 2025 12:01 am

and EVERYTHING is paid for from the proceeds of OIL and GAS.

Reply to  bnice2000
December 16, 2025 6:53 am

DOMESTIC OIL AND GAS

Reply to  bnice2000
December 16, 2025 9:25 am

The Norwegians have a LOT of oil and gas to support their virtue signalling. A question is what to do about the recent “immigrants”.

Reply to  whsmith@wustl.edu
December 16, 2025 1:27 pm

Recent?
They have been coming in droves from all over for at least 40 years, unvetted, uneducated, unskilled, wanting Shariah law, sucking from all sorts of government programs that are financed with revenues from oil and gas.

It is totally unsafe to walk the streets in East Oslo in the evening, or to park your car there.

When you come back at least your wheels are missing. The cops do not even interfere, as otherwise there would be riots.

Reply to  wilpost
December 16, 2025 2:28 pm

Recent to me. The last time I was in Norway was over 40 years ago. Olje pengar was new then. In Sweden, 40 years ago, it was Greek immigrants. How pleasant those few people seem today. The Norwegian government is incapable of changing directions and dealing with (to them) a non-problem.
Get elites like this M-A out of office. It is the only way.

norwegian-saying-let-poor-suffer-it-is-worth-it
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
December 16, 2025 12:29 am

There will never be a post fossil fuel world. The US has about enough coal to last for 500 years. The Russians have discovered many billion barrels of oil in the Antarctic.

Reply to  Harold Pierce
December 16, 2025 6:59 am

Hundreds of billions of barrels of oil on the arctic shelf north of Russia. Very hard to produce.

China, the US and Europe would love to steal it, except Russia has all these nuclear bombs

Also, there is a similar quantity of coal that is much harder to produce, unless it can be liquified in situ.

Richard Rude
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
December 16, 2025 12:32 am

You are directionally confused.

Derg
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
December 16, 2025 3:27 am

That was funny…my guess is you typed this on your post fossil fuel phone.

oeman50
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
December 16, 2025 4:57 am

How are they going to be able to be carbon neutral in 4 years? Does that include transportation?

Reply to  oeman50
December 16, 2025 9:27 am

The fact is Norwegians have purchased a lot of PEVs, AND ICEs. They can afford both.

Leon de Boer
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
December 16, 2025 5:04 am

I don’t think investors believe your story
https://www.xe.com/en-au/currencycharts/?from=NOK&to=USD&view=5Y
It’s worse over 10 years

Pretty sure that says USA is doing better than Norway 🙂

Reply to  Leon de Boer
December 16, 2025 6:37 am

By that metric the EU is doing better than the USA.

Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
December 16, 2025 6:50 am

My one brother in law has 2 1000 ft deep wells for his whole house heat pump system.
The government paid 50% of the $120,000 cost.

My other brother in law lives in an apartment building entirely on ground source heat pumps.
He has a Mercedes EV, $125,000, already for 5 years, of which the government provided 50% subsidies

Reply to  wilpost
December 16, 2025 9:15 am

Dang, it would be nice to be rich enough to afford government subsidies.

Reply to  Phil R
December 16, 2025 1:29 pm

The subsidies go to everyone who plays the low-CO2 hoax

Reply to  wilpost
December 16, 2025 3:50 pm

And to those who can afford what’s being subsidized. My sister was the beneficiary of the old cash-for-clunkers scam. She got a new car, which she was already looking for anyway, and got the gov. to pay $7,500 (I think at the time) towards her car. I got squat because we were broke and raising kids.

Reply to  Phil R
December 17, 2025 9:01 am

It pays to keep your pants zipped up!

Reply to  wilpost
December 16, 2025 9:31 am

Subsidy, subsidy, subsidy! Your brother-in-law is a wealthy subsidized man! You and I know from where the money for subsidies comes -oil and gas. Ground-source heat pumps are essential in Norway. Air-source heat pumps freeze up in a cold day.

Reply to  whsmith@wustl.edu
December 16, 2025 1:32 pm

They are multi-millionaires, but there are many of such people in Norway.
Starting salary for a diploma engineer is about $125,000/y

Reply to  wilpost
December 16, 2025 2:36 pm

A wealthy, small, mono-culture country can afford all the welfare it wants – until millions flood across the border demanding full welfare, but not the culture. Where do you expect that ends up?

Reply to  whsmith@wustl.edu
December 16, 2025 4:52 pm

Thirty years ago, I told my wife’s family, you will regret these inflows. They smiled.

They do not smile anymore. After another twenty years of multiplying, they will be where the UK, France and Germany are now.

Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
December 16, 2025 9:12 am

Only the US is moving backwards forwards.

Fixed it for you.

Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
December 22, 2025 7:17 am

They also lead the oil producing world in saving up for oil and gas asset retirement. We already have Trumpian YUGE trash cans in the FSU, Venezuela, and the US, with little/no cash put back for remediation. Even the UK is deficient here. And a world wide history (lead by the US) of skipping out on these obligations with M&A’s to tiny successor companies, delay because the obligations are in massive, legacy fields, regime changes, letting “Too Big To Fail” companies skate on their “reputations”, and so on.

Only Norway is truly facing it’s responsibilities..

December 16, 2025 4:51 am

Every Scandinavian I’ve met speaks better English than most Americans. That impresses me.

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
December 16, 2025 6:50 am

When I lived in Iceland it was common for Icelanders to speak up to 5 languages. Icelandic, English, Norwegian, Danish, and German. I think everyone there spoke at least two.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
December 16, 2025 8:40 am

How many Americans actually speak English, given the preponderance of what was once called “cyber speak” with short cuts and such to minimize key strokes.

Let me put it this way:

ur rite

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
December 16, 2025 8:58 am

This is the kind of “English” uttered by a SNAP/EBT “mom”, and there are tens of millions like her sucking tax dollars.

Revelations of an “EBT/SNAP mom”, from X

If y’all was really smart you’d understand “kids is the biggest hustle out there”. 
I don’t clock into no job, 
I let Uncle Sam and baby daddies cut me a check every month. 5 kids = 5 bags. 
Food stamps, free rent, free healthcare, and child support on top of that. 
My bills paid before I even wake up. 
Everybody keep asking why I had 5 kids at age 26, because every single one come with a check attached. 
My life secured, while y’all stressing over 9 to 5s. 
Don’t be mad at me, be mad at you ain’t catch on to the hustle.

Reply to  wilpost
December 16, 2025 9:31 am

Of course we don’t know- or do we- that that comment on X is real and not just a put down of people who get help from society. Not all recipients of social benefits are scammers. There are scammers every where- some very big corporations (especially in the military industrial complex), labor union scammers, scammers in many “high” professions such as the law and medicine. Over compensated scammers in bureaucracies. I’ve often said, perhaps one difference between the poor and the wealthy is that the wealthy have great scams. I’m cynical about society at large and cynical about religions. Oh, almost forgot- lot’s of scammers in the renewable industry complex.

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
December 16, 2025 1:36 pm

The biggest scammers are in Kiev.
The truth is coming out slowly
Zelensky and Co-conspirators will be implicated within a month, at most

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
December 16, 2025 1:44 pm

Actually, she was interviewed and gave her succinct rationale for doing what she had done. It is a brilliant, hard-hitting summary.

I agree amoral behavior is rampant among members of Congress.
and everyone they come in contact with becomes tainted, or already is tainted.

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
December 17, 2025 9:07 am

SNAP/EBT recipients grew from 18 million at the start of autopen Biden, and when he left it was 42 million. “folks caught onto the gimme, gimme hustle”

Biden is having trouble raising cash for his mausoleum.

Reply to  wilpost
December 17, 2025 9:11 am

Mausoleum? Maybe he could be stuffed (when the time comes) and put into a museum of antiques. 🙂

Joe Crawford
Reply to  wilpost
December 16, 2025 12:13 pm

Sounds like one of my neighbors several years back. She had one kid she named ‘Budget.’ The other one she wouldn’t teach how to talk until he was around 5 hoping to get him declared retarded. Shame… both turned out ‘gifted’ and were placed in advanced classes when they finally got to school.

Reply to  Joe Crawford
December 16, 2025 1:40 pm

Sheer amoral behavior, by low-class people, who emulate the amoral behavior of rich, such as people like Epstein and Co.

If the leaders are openly corrupt, society will be in poor shape, dysfunctional
Pocahontas has amassed over $100 million serving Big Pharma
AOC, from a poor Puerto Rican background, has amassed just $30 million

Reply to  wilpost
December 17, 2025 9:13 am

Politicians shouldn’t be able to make a penny while in office. At least they should have enough decency to put it off until they’re out of office.

Reply to  wilpost
December 16, 2025 6:57 pm

True Norwegian Story

A Pakistani male, 32 years old, dressed in fancy, traditional, Pakistani garb, as if he is an important person, walks several paces in front of his 24 year-old wife, who pushes a baby carriage with 2 children, with 2 on each side holding on, a total of 6 children.
 
He has to attend Norwegian classes to receive a signature from the teacher to continue to receive free housing, free food, free healthcare, and a free allowance for incidentals, etc. 

He has to go for interviews for jobs, but he has no education, no experience. He gets a signature from the employer to continue to receive subsidies.

He came as a “refuge” to Norway, at 22 years old, did not speak a word of Norwegian, married a Pakistani bride, 14 years old, brought in from Pakistan by the Norwegian government. She was pregnant a few weeks after the wedding and produce 6 kids in 10 years. Each child receives a government allowance.

Norway is rich, has a $2 trillion pension fund, invested in world equities for 5 million people, of which 500,000 are “refugees”. The Norwegian government rakes off a percentage of the total each year.
 
The Norwegian government brings in “refuges” to satisfy Brussels, which means Norway can trade in the EU as if a member, and well-off Norwegians can have vacation houses in Spain, Italy, Turkey, Greece, etc., but it also means Germans (WWII invaders) can have vacation houses in Norway.

Prior to Brussels arrangement, no foreigner was allowed to own real estate in Norway. Luckily, my wife, a Norwegian and US Citizen, had inherited a house on the Oslo Fjord from her father.

NOTE: My sister in law was a teacher.
When she retired she taught Norwegian to “immigrants”
Only a few of them wanted to learn.
The rest was there merely to obtain the teacher’s signature that they had attended, so subsidies would not be interrupted.
A total sham, she thought.
After a few years she gave up and tended to her beautiful herb garden.

December 16, 2025 4:59 am

I asked Google about the use of woody biomass in Norway and got:

Woody biomass contributes a very small percentage to Norway’s electricity generation, which is overwhelmingly dominated by hydropower (around 90%), but it’s a more significant source for overall energy and heating, primarily as firewood and in the forest industry, making up roughly 9-10% of stationary energy use, with potential for growth. 

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
December 16, 2025 1:51 pm

It is used for mostly home heating, not for making electricity

Reply to  wilpost
December 17, 2025 5:20 am

Yes, of course, it says so- but, it’s a major contributor to that nations’ energy. They do also have cogen woody biomass in Norway and Sweden and Finland. They do a great job of managing their forests- not so great in America. Some states here won’t even allow woody biomass facilities. I think you’re the guy who hates them and argues against them, right?

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
December 17, 2025 5:57 am

You better look up wood co-gen in Norway.
You will find it is just a few percent of total primary energy, especially after ground source heat pumps became mandatory for old and new buildings.

The big house of my brother in law is well over 100 years old, but has been highly insulated and sealed over the years. He is an engineer and has a whole house ground source system. So do all his neighbors. It is the law!

My wife used to live in such a house and remembers the big tiled wood stoves that were on 24/7

Reply to  wilpost
December 17, 2025 9:08 am

Whatever amount it is- it all helps- and it could be more and would be more if they (the state governments) weren’t into cutting back on their carbon footprint. That’s certainly true here in New England. The forests are loaded with “junk wood” that could be used in cogen biomass burners. There are a few still, despite hatred by the state governments- but could be much more. Burlington, VT has a big one that heats the downtown buildings. And, with such a market for “junk wood”, the wood industry can improve the forests.

December 16, 2025 5:35 am

“…Norwegian households, accustomed to decades of low energy prices from abundant hydropower, have been adversely affected by flexible pricing contracts that link their electricity costs to the high prices of European markets…”

I have never understood this. It would seem to be a trivial exercise to tax or set the rate on the interconnectors so as to be able to subsidize or at least eliminate any pricing impact on the local grid. Lower Europe needs the power when wind is low and needs the energy sink when wind is high. Charge them in both directions to the benefit of the local consumers.

My guess is that the contractual terms were set before the wing folly started creating so much pricing volatility. Should be trivial to renegotiate the terms when current agreements expire.

Reply to  Fraizer
December 16, 2025 1:52 pm

You do not understand how Brussels makes rules that screw Norwegians, “because they can afford it”.

Reply to  wilpost
December 17, 2025 9:09 am

Norway isn’t in the EU so can’t Norway resist being screwed?

ResourceGuy
December 16, 2025 7:38 am

I once told an investment manager from Scotland that they could become an oil state like Norway. That was back when Scotland was considering a split off from the UK. Oh well

December 16, 2025 8:16 am

EXPENSIVE FLOATING OFFSHORE WINDMILLS IN SUPER-RICH NORWAY 
https://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/floating-offshore-wind-in-norway
By Willem Post
.
Equinor, a Norwegian company, put in operation, 11 Hywind, floating offshore wind turbines, each 8 MW, for a total of 88 MW, in the North Sea. The wind turbines are supplied by Siemens, a German company
Production will be about 88 x 8766 x 0.5, claimed lifetime capacity factor = 385,704 MWh/y, which is about 35% of the electricity used by 2 nearby Norwegian oil rigs, which cost at least $1.0 billion each.
On an annual basis, the existing diesel and gas-turbine generators on the rigs, designed to provide 100% of the rigs electricity requirements, 24/7/365, will provide only 65%, i.e., the wind turbines have 100% back up.
The generators will counteract the up/down output of the wind turbines, on a less-than-minute-by-minute basis, 24/7/365
The generators will provide almost all the electricity during low-wind periods, and 100% during high-wind periods, when rotors are feathered and locked.
.
The capital cost of the entire project was about 8 billion Norwegian Kroner, or about $730 million, as of August 2023, when all 11 units were placed in operation, or $730 million/88 MW = $8,300/kW. See URL
That cost was much higher than the estimated 5 billion NOK in 2019, i.e., 60% higher
The project is located about 70 miles from Norway, which means minimal transport costs of the entire supply to the erection sites
.
The project produces electricity at about 42 c/kWh, no subsidies, at about 21 c/kWh, with 50% subsidies 
Subsidies shift costs from project Owners to ratepayers, taxpayers, government debt
In Norway, all work associated with oil rigs is very expensive.
Three shifts of workers are on the rigs for 6 weeks, work 60 h/week, and get 6 weeks off with pay, and are paid well over $150,000/y, plus benefits.
.
If Norwegian units were used in Maine, the production costs would be even higher in Maine, because of the additional cost of transport of almost the entire supply, including specialized ships and cranes, across the Atlantic Ocean, plus
A high voltage cable would be hanging from each unit, until it reaches bottom, say about 200 to 500 feet. 
The cables would need some type of flexible support system
The cables would be combined into several cables to run horizontally to shore, for at least 25 to 30 miles, to several onshore substations, to the New England high voltage grid.
https://www.offshore-mag.com/regional-reports/north-sea-europe/article/14195647/floating-wind-turbines-to-power-north-sea-gullfaks-snorre-platforms
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Floating_wind_turbine

Reply to  wilpost
December 16, 2025 8:17 am

UK, GERMANY, ETC., USING NORWAY RESERVOIR HYDRO PLANTS AS A BATTERY SYSTEM  
https://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/uk-germany-etc-using-norway-reservoir-hydro-plants-as-a-battery
By Willem Post
.
Norway gets 90% of electricity from reservoir hydro plants and 10% from west coast windmills.
Because of long distances, there is little connection between the north and south grid.
Any draw by the UK during W/S underproduction affects the south grid.
.
The grid is pumped by generators to a voltage with 50-cycle electromagnetic waves which travel at near the speed of light. Electrons do not travel. They just vibrate at 50 Hz
.
Any UK underproduction, resulting in voltage drops, is immediately sensed about 800 miles away, and compensated for, by automatically opening the water valves to hydro turbines in Norway.
.
A few years ago, during a W/S lull, Norway oversupplied Germany and the UK, which resulted in much higher wholesale prices in the south grid, too low water levels in reservoirs, rationing, aka blackouts/brownouts, and lots of Norwegians with mandated EVs and mandated heat pumps being very angry.
.
This time the W/S lull happened again, and, just like that, the Rightist party coalition was out, because it lost a party. The leftist Labor party formed a new coalition government with a new Cabinet, which may, or may not, remedy the situation; Stoltenberg, formerly of NATO, became finance minister.
Never-the-less INSTANT DEMOCRACY.
.
Norway should have tariffs
Low tariff, on top of low wholesale price, on in-coming electricity
Very high tariff, on top of high wholesale price, on out-going electricity.

Reply to  wilpost
December 16, 2025 8:31 am

Germany Scales Back Offshore Wind Auctions After Latest Flop
By Tsvetana Paraskova
 
Germany moved to reduce the capacity it will auction in its offshore wind tender in 2026, following the flop in the latest auction without a single bid made.

comment image

The German Parliament approved legislation narrowing the capacity in the 2026 tender to 2.5 GW to 5 GW, compared with an earlier plan of 6 GW to 10 GW in August.

The August offshore wind auction, without government subsidies, failed to attract a single bid, alarming the local offshore wind sector, which is calling for a fundamental redesign of Germany’s renewable energy auctions.

The Federal Network Agency’s auction for 10.1 GW offshore wind in the German part of the North Sea ended with no investor submitting a bid for any of the two proposed sites, the Federal Association for Offshore Wind Energy, BWO, said.

The auction flop signals that offshore wind developers are wary of taking on riskier, zero-subsidy, projects amid rising costs and supply chain issues.

In response to the failure in the August auction, Germany’s ruling coalition proposed reduced capacity up for grabs, and the proposal was approved by Parliament in a package also aimed at speeding up permitting and other approvals for offshore wind projects and power grid upgrades.

“Offshore wind is facing a difficult market environment, both internationally and in Germany,” the Economy Ministry said in a statement by Bloomberg

Surging costs and tight supply chains deter offshore wind expansion, the ministry noted.
Germany is expanding onshore wind installations but offshore wind capacity additions are nowhere near its targets.

Days before the flop in the August auction, German industry associations said that offshore wind installations had stagnated in the first half of 2025.

For offshore wind to reach the ambitious government targets of boosting capacity to 70 GW by 2045, policy makers need to fundamentally revise the tenders and ensure additional revenue and planning security, and lots more subsidies, the German wind energy association, Bundesverband WindEnergie (BWE), and several other wind sector groups said.

Reply to  wilpost
December 16, 2025 9:07 am

If we used wind, we would be dependent on Europe
If we used solar, we would be dependent on China

We would be screwed up and down and sideways with high cost/kWh energy
We would be totally uncompetitive on domestic and world markets
No energy dominance ever!!

EUROPE AIMS TO WEAKEN THE US WITH EXPENSIVE OFFSHORE WINDMILLS THAT PRODUCE EXPENSIVE, LOW-QUALITY ELECTRICITY  
https://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/europe-attempts-to-entangle-us-with-expensive-offshore-windmills
By Willem Post
.
Net zero by 2050 Euro elites tried to weaken the US, with help of the unpatriotic, leftist Biden clique, into going down the black hole of 30,000 MW by 2030 of expensive, highly-subsidized, weather-dependent, grid-disturbing offshore windmill systems, which would need expensive, highly subsidized, short-lived, battery systems for grid support.
.
Offshore wind full cost of electricity FCOE = 30 c/kWh + 11 c/kWh = 41 c/kWh, no subsidies
Offshore wind full cost of electricity FCOE = 15 c/kWh + 11 c/kWh = 26 c/kWh, 50% subsidies
The 11 c/kWh is for various measures required by wind and solar. Power plant to landfill cost basis. 
This compares with 7 c/kWh + 3 c/kWh = 10 c/kWh from existing gas, coal, nuclear, large reservoir hydro plants.
.
Such expensive W/S electricity would have made the US even less competitive in world markets.
Any US tariffs on the European supply of wind systems would greatly increase their turnkey capital costs/MW and their electricity costs/ kWh.
.
Almost the entire supply of the wind projects would be: 
1) designed and made in Europe, 
2) then transported across the Atlantic Ocean by European specialized ships, 
3) then unloaded at new, taxpayer-financed, $500-million storage/pre-assembly/staging/barge-loading areas, 
4) then barged to European specialized erection ships for erection of the windmill systems. 
5) The financing would be mostly by European pension funds, that pay benefits to European retirees.

Hundreds of people in each seashore state would have jobs during the erection phase
The other erection jobs would be by specialized European people, mostly on cranes and ships
Hundreds of people in each seashore state would have long-term O&M jobs, using mostly European spare parts, during the 20-y electricity production phase.
.
Conglomerates owned by Euro elites would finance, build, erect, own and operate almost all of the 30,000 MW of offshore windmills, providing work for many thousands of European workers for decades, and multi-$billion profits each year.
.
That Euro offshore wind ruse did not work out, because Trump was elected.
Trump-hating, Euro elites are furious. Projects are being cancelled. The European windmill industry is in shambles, with multi-$billion annual losses, lay-offs and tens of $billions of stranded costs.
.
Trump spared the US from the W/S evils inflicted by the leftist, woke Democrat cabal, that used an autopen for Biden signatures, and bypassed on-the-beach/in-the-basement Biden, an increasingly dysfunctional Marionette.
.
Trump declared a National Energy Emergency, and put W/S/B systems at the bottom of the list, and suspended their licenses to put their rushed, glossy environmental impact statements, EIS, under proper scrutiny.
.
Euro elites used the IPCC-invented, “CO2-is-evil” hoax, based on its own “science”. 
These elites used: 
.
1) the foghorn of government-subsidized Corporate Media to propagate scare-mongering slogans and brainwash the people, 
2) censorship to suppress free thinking on town hall forums, 
3) election interference, as in Moldova and Georgia, 
4) ostracizing /marginalizing major political parties to produce desired outcomes, as in Germany. 
.
Wall Street elites saw an opportunity for tax shelters for its elite clients. 
Woke politicians/bureaucrats were “cut-in” on $juicy deals to pass subsidies, favorable rules and regulations, and impose government mandates.
Euro elites wanted the US to deliver electricity to users at very high c/kWh, to preserve Europe’s extremely advantageous trade balance with the US.
 https://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/international-trade-is-a-dog-eat-dog-business

Denis
December 16, 2025 8:19 am

Nearly all of Norway’s electricity is from hydro, somewhere around 95%, hence is cheap and the reason many EVs are used there.

Reply to  Denis
December 16, 2025 9:05 am

I lived in Norway for 3 years.

Retail electricity, such as for households and EVs and heat pumps is very high in price/kWh, because of all the bullshit surcharges.

Reply to  wilpost
December 16, 2025 1:56 pm

The c/kWh you see in statistics do not include the bullshit charges.

The same is done in the US.

In Vermont, we have all sorts of bullshit surcharges that add at least 4 to 5 c/kWh

Reply to  Denis
December 16, 2025 1:59 pm

See my above comments.

December 16, 2025 9:14 am

One could say that Norway has common sense AND is able to afford the hypocriticality at the top. Norway leads in oil-gas development in the Arctic whether others follow or not. Good for them.
The US will follow sooner or later

Bob
December 16, 2025 5:27 pm

The Europeans need to wake up, the first thing they have to do is scrap the European Union. There is no reason they can’t cooperate without the EU. Then each country needs to have a come to Jesus moment with their leadership.

Reply to  Bob
December 16, 2025 10:44 pm

Talking bollox.
You forget Germany and France were founder members and made most of the rules.
Eastern Europe would never have been able to modernise without the EU struct funding.
Have you ever been to Poland recently??
It doesn’t even resemble the pile of ex-soviet crap it was when they joined the EU.
The EU has its faults but just look at the pile of steaming excrement the British have to cope with post Brexit….a crap-shoot based entirely on Johnson’s lies.
If they were to have to vote again it would never reach even 30%

Reply to  pigs_in_space
December 17, 2025 6:09 am

The EU is war-mongering even worse than NATO.
Both should be eliminated asap.
Each nation would be able to reclaim its sovereignty and its indigenous culture.

The UK got out, because it had too little of a voice, but when it was out, it found the US was not going to give the UK an easy ride, plus the UK started to import useless Muslim people, from countries that keep no records so no one could be vetted. Germany and France did the same

All three are in major do do, no longer worthy, reliable NATO allies