Real Public Health Threats vs. Climate Hysteria

By Gregory Wrightstone

Relying on human ingenuity to coexist with a changing climate – either warmer or cooler – and tending to long-recognized public health threats are the best ways to ensure the well-being of the planet and its inhabitants, according to an Australian physician and expert in climate and public health.

“The ingenuity of Homo sapiens at adapting to climate has permitted people to populate almost the entire globe from the freezing Arctic to the steamy tropics, notes Dr. D. Weston Allen, lead author of a paper supporting a proposed repeal of a federal designation of carbon dioxide (CO2) as a pollutant. “If we stick to doing what we do best – adaptation – we will continue to thrive.”

Citing nearly 400 references, the paper was filed as a formal comment by the CO2 Coalition, Fairfax, Virginia, with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in support of its proposal to rescind the regulation known as the Endangerment Finding.

Dr. Allen says that civilizations did well in past eras of relative warmth during Minoan and Roman times and the Medieval Warm Period. And, he says, cool periods often brought suffering, the most recent being the Little Ice Age, which experienced “frequent widespread crop failures, mass starvation, disease and depopulation.”

“The Black Death of 1346-1353 wiped out 30%-60% of Europe’s population and up to 200 million people across Eurasia,” he writes.

However, natural change in the climate and industrialization that spread in the 1800s and accelerated in the 20th century fostered unprecedented prosperity and health.

“Global rewarming since the 18th century, associated with increasing prosperity, better housing, sanitation, food and water supplies, has greatly benefited human health and wealth,” says Dr. Allen. “Deaths from typhoid and tuberculosis declined dramatically during pre-antibiotic 20th century warming (1910-1945). Mortality from all causes fell as temperatures rose. From a billion people in 1800, the global population doubled by 1927, doubled again to 4 billion in 1974 and again to 8 billion in 2022.”

Fuels for new technologies and industry – first coal then oil and natural gas as well – made modern living possible.

“By cheaply and reliably powering industry, mechanizing agriculture and transport, fossil fuels helped to end slavery and emancipate women and children, propelled urbanization, sewerage, safe water supplies, electricity, heating and cooling,” the paper says. “They also facilitated better hospitals and health care.”

In places where fossil fuels are available and affordable, people live longer, healthier lives. Access to electricity enables disease surveillance, vaccination drives, and reliable transport for medicines and doctors. Africa, Asia, and South America — regions once ravaged by cholera, malaria, and famine — now see falling death rates and rising lifespans.

In 1968, biologist Paul Ehrlich published “The Population Bomb,” warning of mass starvation in the 1970s, recalls Dr. Allen. However, global famines declined rather than increased.

“Prophesies are in the province of religion, not science,” counsels Dr. Allen.

The warm climate and carbon dioxide-enriched air have boosted agriculture and expanded habitable zones. Crop yields soared, aided by higher atmospheric CO2 (the same gas vilified in climate debates) and the fertilizers, pesticides and modern equipment dependent on fossil fuels. Between 1980 and 2003, as CO2 concentrations rose by 11%, global food output leapt by 63%.

Although activists claim that warming will spread tropical diseases into temperate zones, malaria, once widespread in Europe and North America, declined because of public health measures such as draining swamps, spraying insecticides and increasing medical treatment.

An oft-ignored fact is that cold weather is far deadlier than heat. Globally, cold kills many times more people than heat despite fearmongering about warming. Also, contrary to hyperbolic headlines, data for the last 100 years show that deaths from extreme weather have dropped by 90%.

When policymakers focus exclusively on carbon dioxide and hypothetical climate harms, populations are denied the tools to manage real threats: infectious disease, hunger, dirty water, unsafe housing.

“It is vital that governments focus on real pollutants, not imagined ones, and that they avoid using climate change as a scapegoat for failure to implement sound public health policies and proven preventive measures,” writes Dr. Allen. “Misguided climate action can be worse than unmitigated climate change.”

This commentary was first published by Washington Examiner on October 25, 2025.

Gregory Wrightstone, executive director of the CO2 Coalition, Arlington, Virginia, is the author of “Inconvenient Facts: The Science That Al Gore Doesn’t Want You to Know” and “A Very Convenient Warming: How modest warming and more CO2 are benefiting humanity.

5 13 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

11 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Tom Halla
October 27, 2025 2:17 pm

A fair amount of this is asceticism as a virtue—best exhibited by others. It is not wanting peasant scum to have anything nice. Peasants should know their place, and accept that status.

October 27, 2025 3:11 pm

As I keep saying, until the MSM report papers like this fairly the general public are in the dark regarding the debate about whether CO2 has any effect on the temperature of our planet and just believe what “the government” tells them.

SxyxS
Reply to  Oldseadog
October 27, 2025 3:58 pm

The effect of co2 was so small, at least until the 70ies , that
” the world will be 4 degrees colder for the global mean temperature by 1990, and 11 degrees colder in the year 2000″
Kenneth Watt

He also predicted the end of oil by the year 2000 and that nitrogen built up will make farmland unusable,
and his colleague Peter Gunter knew that,except for the west, a global famine will occure in 2000.

Armageddons love those round numbers.

SxyxS
October 27, 2025 3:40 pm

It should have been added that there was a massive population increase in Europe and China since the start of the MWP and a significant decrease after the MWP ended.
(too much energy is hardly a problem, the lack of it usually is ).

Another thing worth mentioning is the strange behavioral pattern of the undisputed world record holder in world end prophecies Paul Ehrlich.
The former Ice Age Prophet turned global warming zealot did something scientifically impossible:
He switched back and forth between Overpopulation, end of humanity by a blue dust cloud,the end of civilization, 4 billion people to perish in the 80ies,then again forced mass sterilization and adding sterilants to food and water.

Why do you need plans for mass sterilization for a species that will be wiped out in the meantime by several different events you predicted?
It’s like a doctor hiring a hitman for a terminally ill patient.
You only need this when you know that all your predictions are BS and that your patient is in great shape.

The Population Bomb is the blueprint for all modern fearmongering.
Wether the current great narrative is ice age,famines or warming.
It is about propagating constant fear.
It is no coincidence that his book was released right after the creation of the Club of Rome (just as Klaus Schwabs “Great Reset” was released shortly after the Plandemic start)and that it’s agenda needs a permanent global threat/common enemy to “unite humanity”.
It is also no coincidence that the 1st earth day was established just a bit later complemented by a NYT article the very next day that “man must stop pollution … to save the race from extinction” and Paul Ehrlichs prediction that 4 billion people will die in ” the great die- off “.

And it is also strange that Chinas start of its one child policy coincides with the boom of its economy as result of normalised relationships with the USA and economic reforms.
Prosperity in Exchange for birth control.

Bob
October 27, 2025 7:39 pm

Very nice.

Laws of Nature
October 27, 2025 8:04 pm

If someone isnt happy whith their current average temperature, cant they simply move a few hundred miles north or south to change their environment!?

Leon de Boer
Reply to  Laws of Nature
October 28, 2025 3:48 am

RC airconditioner generally does the job.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Leon de Boer
October 28, 2025 6:28 am

It was better until freon was abolished.

Seems the ozone hole has a mind of its own and freon had little or nothing to do with it.
Models again.

George Thompson
Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
October 28, 2025 11:55 am

Sigh-so very true…”experts” again.

October 28, 2025 1:06 am

All the focus on CO2 has sucked up all the oxygen in the room. There’s little to no attention being paid to true environmental issues, such as river pollution (https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/uk-water-pollution-sewage-rivers-e-coli-b2743189.html) and plastic dumping, especially in South East Asia (https://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution).

Even if you think CO2 is a problem, wouldn’t you rather have a 4 degree warmer climate and clean rivers and oceans to cool off in, than a 1.5 degree cooler climate and polluted rivers and oceans?

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  PariahDog
October 28, 2025 1:13 pm

Please do not be logical. You must be alarmist! /sarc