500-year-old Transylvanian diaries show how the Little Ice Age completely changed life and death in the region
Tapping into ‘society’s archive’, researchers have examined written sources from the 16th century that chronicle famine, excessive flooding, and plagues in what today is Romania
From Frontiers in Science and the University of Oradea:
Glaciers, sediments, and pollen can be used to reconstruct the climate of the past. Beyond ‘nature’s archive,’, other sources, such as diaries, travel notes, parish or monastery registers, and other written documents – known at the ‘society’s archive’ – contain reports and observations about local climates in bygone centuries.
In contrast, the second half of the century was characterized by heavy rainfall and floods, particularly in the 1590s.
The western parts of the European continent cooled significantly when in the 16th century a period known as the ‘Little Ice Age’ intensified. During the second half of the century, temperatures dropped by 0.5°C. In Transylvania, however, hot weather was recorded much more frequently than cold weather during the 16th century. “This makes us believe that the Little Ice Age could have manifested itself later in this part of Europe,” said Caciora. Later writings, in which more cold waves and severe winters are mentioned, support this thesis.
Delayed ice age
The sources tell of a particularly hot and dry first half of the century. “One compelling passage comes from a historical document describing the summer of 1540. ‘The springs dried up, and the rivers dwindled to mere trickles. Livestock fell in the fields, and the air was thick with despair as the people gathered in processions, praying for rain,’” said Caciora. “This vivid account underscores the emotional and spiritual dimensions of living through climatic extremes.”
In contrast, the second half of the century was characterized by heavy rainfall and floods, particularly in the 1590s. Compared to the western parts of the European continent, which cooled significantly when in the 16th century a period known as the ‘Little Ice Age’, intensified. During the second half of the century, temperatures dropped by 0.5°C.
In Transylvania, however, hot weather was recorded much more frequently than cold weather during the 16th century. “This makes us believe that the Little Ice Age could have manifested itself later in this part of Europe,” said Caciora. Later writings, in which more cold waves and severe winters are mentioned, support this thesis.
Climate catastrophes
Such weather variations often resulted in catastrophes, related directly or indirectly to the climate. These included 30 years during which the Black Death ravaged the land, 23 years or famine, and nine years during which locust invasions were recorded.
However tragic, weather extremes and resulting calamities could have driven changes in settlement patterns, the researchers said. “Towns might have adopted flood-resistant infrastructure or migrated to more favorable areas. The challenges might also have spurred technological innovations, such as improved irrigation systems or storage facilities,” Caciora explained.
The human element
“Chronicles and diaries reveal how people perceived, responded to, and were impacted by these events,” Caciora continued.

Despite the insights it provides, the study faces several limitations, the researchers pointed out. Few people were literate, reports are often subjective, or only true on local scales. In addition, the records are fragmented. For example, the researchers were not able to include any records about 15 years of the 16th century, either because no records existed, or they were too contradictory for inclusion.
Nevertheless, these writings not only provide a glimpse into how people in the past might have lived, but are also relevant for modern climate resilience strategies, particularly in understanding the socio-economic consequences of extreme weather events and their role in shaping human history. “Studying climate records from the society’s archive is as crucial as analyzing natural proxies,” Caciora explained. “It provides a human-centric perspective on past climatic events.”
Journal
Frontiers in Climate DOI 10.3389/fclim.2024.1507143
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
But His Holiness, Blessed Michael Mann, clearly established there was no such thing as The Little Ice Age, and dealt with that vile
heresy for all eternity!
Warming out of an apparently natural cold epoch is hardly a sign of imminent catastrophe. Despite the claims of catastrophists.
The question none of the alarmists answer is: Would you prefer that the Earth had been cooling since the 1700s? Would that be better for any life on the planet?
Being misanthropes, the Green Blob
prefers famine, war, and plague.
Forgot conquest-had to be somebody causing trouble…
michael mann? who the hell is michael mann? I am waiting for the Blesses Nick Stokes.
“Glaciers, sediments, and pollen can be used to reconstruct the climate of the past.”
Well, kind of. About as accurate as putting on a blindfold, turning around three times, and throwing a dart at a dart board 20 feet away.
Actually, no. I did a pollen analysis in Grad school of a glacially buried conifer forest and I could tell quite a bit about what was happening locally. If I never see a winged conifer pollen ever again-it would be too soon. Fun with peroxides and acids-oh my, such fun late nite at the soils lab.
If you weren’t there at the time the conifers were buried in the glacier, how do you know if what you found was correct?
You weren’t there at the time, so how do you know ash from Mount Vesuvius buried Pompeii and Herculaneum ?
I didn’t witness you writing your comments …
Therefore, I don’t know if you are a real person or an ‘AI bot’ programmed by a stupid person.
Judging by your comments, I’ll go with the latter.
“You weren’t there at the time, so how do you know ash from Mount Vesuvius buried Pompeii and Herculaneum ?”
Hmm, because there were other people who witnessed and documented it. And the bodies encased in ash would be a clue. Proxies might give you a vague idea of conditions, but that’s about it.
Proxies aren’t all that useful and the worst are tree rings- so beloved by Mickey Mann.
Which non conifer species leave conifer pollen?
Oh, I don’t know-maybe because I was working towards a real education? Building a data base, doing research, finding clues-you know-THINKING?
George T., sorry about those late nights in the lab.
There is quite a bit to be learned from pollens, burned woods, sediment layers (varves), buried trees, and fossils. These things can show the sort of environment that existed. Pollen from Sweetbay magnolia says something different than pollen from Noble Fir. A friend of mine is one who does sediment cores from lakes. She can tell quite a lot about the long term environments surrounding a lake. I’ll share your comment with her.
[Note: I think it is silly to equate climate with an average temperature.]
I’m envious of your friend; I can’t imagine how much fun a whole lake or even a long dead and buried glacial pond would be. What people don’t realize is that, unlike diamonds, pollen really is forever!
Climate science is bogus, therefore all science is bogus. /sarc
That’s not what I said. Do you think averaging tenuous results from multiple proxies of differing temporal resolutions gives you anything meaningful?
Isn’t that exactly what Michael Mann did?
Yes it is. Along with grossly overweighting one proxy that gave the “right” answer. But apparently some folks here don’t like me pointing that out.
Mr. Alberts: Well, some folks seem to wring some information from proxies, but I agree with you that the info derived is pretty uncertain. I noticed this- the study seemed to include proxy data that counters the CliSci narrative! Mr. Mann would know what to do, call that stuff “non-conforming” and preserve the narrative!!
Few people here have any confidence in temperature proxies, especially tree rings. You must be confused, thinking you’re in some other forum.
Now do thermometers of different types in different enclosures in different places and/or places that have changed significantly over time.
One of the changes identify back in the Inconvenient days is that the boxes once were painted with white wash and that changed to latex paint with an estimated error of +1.5C (an increase).
There are many more changes that may or may not have affected readings.
Some of the proxies are more informative than others. Still the error margins are large.
We were taught back in the 1960s that tree rings could tell you yearly temperatures experienced by the trees. That was in error.
Tree rings tell you how the tree grew and the factors include water, temperature, sunshine, CO2, soil nutrients, and fire. Without other data to correlate the tree rings, just going with average width or a different selection is more or less as you described.
Plus not only are there many factors involved, the tree rings vary in width depending on which location the sample is taken from. So does that mean the “climate” varied by which side of the tree you look at?!
Agreed. “or a different selection” covered that.
Is this another climate myth because how could the Little Ice Age have possibly occurred in the 1st place when human activities involving widespread consumption of fossil fuels weren’t taking place at the time? Nor were they happening 12,000 years ago when much of the Northern Hemisphere was covered by extensive and massive ice sheets; yet somehow they gradually melted away by themselves. So is it possible that the planet’s climate is really affected by forces beyond human control or does such an assertion label me as a climate denier?
To your last sentence: Yes and Yes.
The Ice Ages were due to Milankovitch cycles. Go to Wikipedia to learn about these.
Allegedly…
Hypothetically.
So maybe we should study how to keep these cycles constant so that their variations won’t affect climate. Then we won’t have to worry about carbon emissions and various green initiatives that don’t have any positive effects after all.
As we all know, Wikipedia lies, a lot.
You must remember Atlantis. Their CO2 emissions caused the ice sheets to melt.
/s
Great idea! Can’t believe no body has thought of it before! We’ll call it History!
Not catchy enough, and sounds like schoolwork. How about “Bad Weather Matters”?
I know, I know, I’m not very good at that human-hating stuff ……
“Compared to the western parts of the European continent, which cooled significantly when in the 16th century a period known as the ‘Little Ice Age’, intensified. During the second half of the century, temperatures dropped by 0.5°C.
In Transylvania, however, hot weather was recorded much more frequently than cold weather during the 16th century”
In other words the little ice age was regional effect and was localised in both time and space.
I was under the impression that there was evidence from other areas in both hemispheres that suggests the event was widespread.
“In other words the little ice age was regional effect and was localised in both time and space.”
Pretty much the same as so-called “global warming” now.
Hardly:
Unless by “localised” you mean just to this planet.
I see a multitude of different shades and different areas. That is not global. That is localized.
By the way, I just love your burning earth colors.
A lot of that 2.0 2.5 red had almost zero population in the mid nineteenth century. And a lot fewer weather stations. Antarctica is cut off…cuz nobody there….Yet the North Atlantic where many sailing ships were amongst the first to take daily measurements of air and water temperatures for the captains log…shows 0.5 degree cooling. Suggests this chart is dubious at best.
Yep, some places are a lot warmer, while other places are noticeably cooler. Got, it, that’s climate.
It was not regional, but it affected different regions at different times. E.g Scotland in the 1690s when a quarter of the population died from famine and disease, e.g. Finland in the 1740s and 1750s when a third of the population died, e.g. France in the 1780s, when the price of bread was one of the driving forces behind the French Revolution, due to bad weather and poor harvests. E.g Greenland in the 1400s, when the Norse settlers either died, went back to Iceland, or moved in with the Inuit (who have been traditionally receptive to fresh input to the gene pool).
Last night a little miracle happened on the BBC1 TV channel. The MWP and the little ice age were mentioned in a question for the University Challenge. Must have slipped past the censors, or a member of staff saw a chance to slip it into the narrative.
I can’t believe you still watch the BBC…
“Keep your friends close, but keep your enemies closer”.
Is there any written evidence from those on the Mayflower in 1620 as to the climatic conditions they met in America?
I know they encountered a severe storm during the crossing.
Then there are the Spanish, Portuguese and British “expeditions” in the 16th century.
Years ago I read accounts of Colonial weather-Winters,actually- and they spoke of severe cold and snowfall…but I have no way to identify the accounts. They were comments made in context with warfare with the Iroquois nation in the howling wilderness of what is now NY state. I think…too many years have passed.
I think there was a voyager in the 1600s called Thunberg who claimed to have sighted a layer of CO2 over the Spanish Main.
So they had extreme weather then without man’s CO2? That’s impossible. Science says that it is man’s CO2 that is making the weather today crazy. Therefore, those anecdotal accounts must all be false. Because “Science”.
“Scientists” told us the global cooling (1970s) was going to make the weather “more extreme.”
Then they told us the global warming was going to make the weather “more extreme.”
Apparently, around the end of the Second World War (1945), the “climate” was *perfect,* and any departure from 1945’s “climate” will make the weather “more extreme.”
Earth’s climate began in 1860 when “records began” so anything prior is irrelevant and easily disproven anyway by Dr Michael Mann.
“Climate events”?
Weather events.
THANK YOU! I’m so sick of the use of their propaganda terms by those attempting to speak against it!
THERE ARE NO “CLIMATE EVENTS,” OR “CLIMATE DISASTERS.” Just WEATHER.
Sometimes the weather is good, and other times it is bad.
That looks like a painting by my (dutch) countryman Jeroen Bosch.
This report just out of Transylvania…
Vampires thrive in colder weather.
As temperatures drop blood thickens and thicker blood nourishes Vampires better than thin warmer blood. As the climate warms blood supplies will thin in response and Vampires will become malnourished and die off as a result.
We gotta stop global warming and save those suckers
OUCH!
This article is kinda personal to me because Transylvania was part of Hungary in the middle ages and the historical sources mentioned were mostly in Hungarian including the one shown here. My paternal family came from Transylvania.
So, are you saying that you are a vampire? Just askin…