By Vijay Jayaraj
In the modern climate debate, emotion and partisan allegiance replace critical thinking to smear carbon dioxide (CO2) as a dangerous pollutant. Well-crafted green advocacies steal the spotlight, while reason languishes in the shadows of medieval-style witch hunts.
The reality, however, is seen in places like the dense tropical forests of Indonesia’s many verdant islands. Among them are Sulawesi, Kalimantan (Borneo) and Sumatra, green jewels in the Southeast Asian archipelago covered by extensive spreads of trees and other vegetation. Yet, they also tell us how a mad rush for “clean technologies” is destroying these ancient wonders of flora and fauna.
The biologically rich forests of these islands are beneficiaries of a long and stable period of global warmth, a climatic benevolence that began with the dawn of the Holocene epoch 11,700 years ago and the end of the last great advance of continental glaciers thousands of feet thick.
Today, sustaining this lush growth, are modestly higher temperatures and increasing atmospheric CO2 – the former the product of natural cycles and the latter the result mainly of industrial emissions of the gas. Both are conducive to the well-being of most living things.
A fundamental building block for photosynthesis, atmospheric CO2 is an aerial fertilizer that promotes plant growth, increasing water-use efficiency and generally enhancing forest life.
The burning of fossil fuels that climate alarmists irrationally demonize, in actuality, enhance the vitality of Indonesia’s green canopy. That is a simple truth supported by data from such sources as NASA satellite records and reams of scientific research.
The real problems for Indonesian forests are environmental assaults from once-rampant illegal logging and a relentless expansion of plantations for palm oil and pulpwood. However, the nation has turned a corner with the enactment of laws in the past 15 years to control deforestation, even as the country’s economy and population grew.
“Deforestation has been declining from six or so years ago, when there were peak rates,” noted Rod Taylor, global director of the forests program at the World Resources Institute. “It’s good news and commendable for Indonesia.”
In Tesso Nilo National Park – once overrun by illegal plantations – roughly 40,000 hectares have been reclaimed and are undergoing reforestation. Births of Sumatran rhinos in Way Kambas in 2022 and 2025 and sightings of tiger cubs in the Leuser Ecosystem represent small ecological victories, as Indonesia continues to work on reversing declines in the populations of Sumatran tigers and elephants over the past two decades.
Meanwhile a challenge has arisen from an unexpected quarter: the nickel boom driven by an obsession with electric vehicles.
The global push for a “green transition” has ignited an unprecedented demand for nickel, a metal that is the backbone of lithium-ion batteries for EVs. While lithium mainly helps move ions in batteries, it’s nickel that drives higher energy density and extends the driving range of EVs.
In a standard EV battery, the 43 kilograms of nickel is the most expensive raw material, costing more than $750. By 2030, global EV sales are projected to top 50 million units per year, with batteries driving more than half of the surge in nickel demand – soaking up over 1.5 million metric tons annually.
Indonesia, sitting on the world’s largest nickel reserves, is the epicenter of an expansion in its mining. In 2023, the nation produced over half of the world’s mined nickel.
Deforestation is no longer driven primarily by palm oil production, but rather by the voracious appetite of the EV supply chain. Over 75,000 hectares of Indonesian forest have already been cleared for nickel mines. Across the nickel belts of Central Sulawesi, Southeast Sulawesi and North Maluku, entire landscapes are being wrecked.
Where rainforests and coastal villages once stood, gargantuan open-pit mines and sprawling industrial parks now dominate. These supply nickel to the world’s leading battery manufacturers.
The future of Indonesia’s magnificent forests now hinges on a critical choice: Whether to continue to chase the illusion of a “clean energy” future at the expense of the real-world devastation required to build it?
The Indonesian government has shown it can protect its forests when the incentives are aligned. But no moratorium can stand against the tsunami of a global commodity rush driven by the climate policies of the world’s wealthiest nations.
Hard-won gains are at risk of being wiped out by an EV industry that arrogantly and falsely claims the environmental moral high ground. The real destroyer is climate policy, not climate change. The public has been told a lie that is no longer tolerable.
This commentary was first published by California Globe on August 4, 2025.
Vijay Jayaraj is a Science and Research Associate at the CO₂ Coalition, Fairfax, Virginia. He holds an M.S. in environmental sciences from the University of East Anglia and a postgraduate degree in energy management from Robert Gordon University, both in the U.K., and a bachelor’s in engineering from Anna University, India.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
“We have to destroy the environment in order to save the planet”.
Let’s see.
Communists liberate poor workers… it really sucks being a worker.
Communists give land to poor peasants… peasants start dying out.
Communists help poor black people… poor black people sink into ghettos with warlords, drugs and rap (when they were all cruelly oppresseded, somehow jazz musicians were self-made celebrities, rather than lapdogs terminally dependent on promotions).
Communists got their hearts bleeding for poor little pets… they kill puppies.
Communists then got their hearts bleeding for trees… trees don’t survive this love and care all that well either.
It seems like there might be some sort of a trend.
In the modern climate debate, emotion and partisan allegiance replace critical thinking to smear carbon dioxide
I would say it goes a lot further than that: In modern debate, emotion and partisan allegiance replace critical thinking to smear any opposition.
That said, Environmentalism, as a form of politics, remains a case of who gets what? Save the whales, bats and birds then install wind turbines etc.
Trees are an important part of London in its parks, commons, assorted allotments (plots for growing veg etc) and green spaces. Our glorious Mayor is an environmental hero with Ulez, exploding electric buses and the like. He was faced with a decision regarding a beautiful avenue of trees…
“In the next few days it is expected that 51 much-loved mature horse chestnut trees on an avenue on Tooting Common will be felled and replaced by Wandsworth Council.
One of his flagship green policies is he wants London to be a National Park Garden City and he also wants to increase the tree canopy by 10%.
If the trees are healthy – and the tree consultant says they are – chopping down mature trees does not fit with that policy.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-41241187
He sat on his hands.
“The second phase will entail the delivery and planting operation of the replacement lime trees.” – Wandsworth Council
Why Lime trees?
For the first few years, prune only to remove damaged or crossing branches, or to even out its shape. Thereafter there should be no need to prune.
Money.
“Tooting Common”.
Nope, not touching that one.
Why would you want to touch it?
Pervy to say the least.
Didn’t Howard Carter discover his tomb in the 1920s?
I’d go a step further than that; now it’s “Kill the whales, bats, birds and chop down the trees if it means we get “renewable energy” (as in wind, solar and ‘biofuels’).”
Consequences be damned. They have become the antithesis of “environmentists.”
“Clean energy” is deliberate deception.
it is NOT “clean,” and provides little energy that is not very useful.
“…global EV sales are projected to top 50 million units per year…”
I don’t think that will happen anytime soon. ICE vehicles are about to see a resurgence!
Depends when the projection is made to although I agree it wont be that soon.
The IEA in their latest report on EVs say they expect sales of EVs in 2025 to exceed 20m worldwide, with China leading the way with 60% of those sales. One in ten cars in China is now electric.They project that sales worldwide will climb to 40% of all cars sold in 2030
IEA ‘Global EV Outlook 2025 (May 2025)
Ironic that the palm oil plantations were also driven by the desire to eliminate the demon gas CO2.
Palm oil was used to create bio-diesel, an allegedly renewable replacement for fossil fuel diesel.
It’s a point lost on dogmatic leftists, but trees are a renewable resource. If you renew them. Timber companies replant after clear cutting forests. Mining companies don’t.
See: Pando, a clonal colony of quaking aspen trees in Utah
I have something similar, but it is only about an acre or two. It is interesting to watch all the little ones come up, but only a few become big trees. The big ones die, and new ones become big. The cycle is relentless.
Very nice Vijay.