No Country for Climate Hawks

By Danielle Franz

Once perched atop the climate movement’s moral high ground, the self-anointed “climate hawks” are now watching their influence dwindle, and nowhere is that retreat more visible than in California. Long the epicenter of progressive climate ambition, the Golden State is now backpedaling. Democrats who once championed aggressive environmental mandates are hitting pause, reworking regulations, and distancing themselves from policies that have driven up energy and housing costs. A post-2024 reality check has swept the party: climate may still poll well in theory, but not when it collides with affordability.

This shift isn’t isolated. It’s emblematic of the climate hawks’ broader failure — a movement that moralized, catastrophized, and sacrificed working-class livelihoods on the altar of performative virtue. And it didn’t stop with workers. Families were expected to absorb the fallout — higher costs, fewer opportunities, and a more uncertain future — all in the name of climate dogma. For years, these activists dominated environmental discourse by demanding ideological purity. They mistook loud rhetoric for leadership, performance for policy, and apocalyptic forecasts for political strategy.

Thankfully, as The Breakthrough Institute’s Alex Trembath has long forecast, the era of the climate hawk is over. And the climate will be better off for it. As former allies begin to walk away, it’s clear their crowning achievement was turning climate into a culture war they were never equipped to win.

At the heart of this shift is a growing movement that doesn’t treat energy as a sin, but as a tool of national strength. It’s a philosophy that values building over banning, which means restoring industrial capacity, modernizing infrastructure, and investing in the American worker. It rejects the scarcity mindset that tells people they must give up comfort, reliability, or opportunity in the name of climate – so that the next generation doesn’t grow up fearing collapse, but growing into a culture of confidence, responsibility, and renewal. 

Instead, it insists that the way forward is to invest in the backbone of our economy, empower the working class, and bring energy production home. It recognizes the answer to environmental challenges isn’t less; it’s more. More energy. More innovation. More freedom to solve problems creatively. Instead of forcing society to shrink and sacrifice, we ask how we can grow smarter. Recognizing that climate strategy must also serve the interests of the people, national security, and long-term prosperity, it’s a vision rooted in hope for the future, not austerity.

And there’s a policy consensus emerging. Clean energy systems need to be affordable and reliable. Rather than relying on long-term subsidies or regulations, domestic policy should be structured to encourage the innovation, commercialization, and deployment of cheaper and cleaner energy resources. This way, American resources and technology can expand energy at home and dominate global markets, while also reducing emissions. Likewise, policy should prioritize climate adaptation. We should empower communities with the tools and flexibility to manage their forests, embrace regenerative agriculture, and resourcefully steward their ecosystems as the climate changes. Our environmental approach should be grounded in the American family and national interest at the center of the conversation.

What’s replacing the hawks isn’t apathy. It’s realism. A new generation is emerging – leaders who are less interested in preaching and more interested in producing. They view climate not as a moral crusade, but as a challenge of engineering, economics, and national renewal. They understand that the future won’t be built through degrowth or doomerism, but through innovation, adaptation, and strategic investment in America’s strengths.

This isn’t about utopian dreams or global pledges. It’s about reindustrializing the nation, repowering the grid, and grounding environmental goals to serve the American people. That’s how you build lasting support – and get real results.

The climate hawks are facing extinction. And in their absence, something stronger is finally taking flight.

Danielle Franz is the CEO of the American Conservation Coalition (ACC), the largest conservative grassroots environmental organization in the country. Follow her on X @DanielleBFranz.

This article was originally published by RealClearEnergy and made available via RealClearWire.

4.9 25 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

85 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
antigtiff
July 29, 2025 6:09 am

I recommend Kerry move to Tuvalu….no, wait, Tuvalu is being zonked by climate change.

strativarius
Reply to  antigtiff
July 29, 2025 6:57 am

All the more reason, nay, 57 reasons…

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  strativarius
July 29, 2025 7:33 am

I see what you did there. 🙂

He should also be required to wear a mask, on pain of death, for the rest of his unnatural life.

Reply to  Jeff Alberts
July 29, 2025 7:46 am

And he’ll have to sacrifice those $1,000 haircuts!

Scissor
Reply to  Jeff Alberts
July 29, 2025 9:15 am

Sometimes those masks aren’t suffocating enough.

ResourceGuy
Reply to  antigtiff
July 29, 2025 12:36 pm

Kerry would buy up a large portion of Tuvalu for all his needs and drive up costs for the locals in the process.

Reply to  antigtiff
July 29, 2025 3:41 pm

NOT TUVALU.

Australia has set up an annual ballot in Tuvalu for Australia citizenship offered to 280 people this year out of the 3,000 or so who applied. It will be an annual ballot. Kerry could buy his way from Tuvalu to Australia under the scheme.

July 29, 2025 6:24 am

Democrats who once championed aggressive environmental mandates are hitting pause, reworking regulations, and distancing themselves from policies that have driven up energy and housing costs.

_____________________________________________________________________________

Huh?

        NY State Mandates All New Buildings Under 7 Stories
               Must Be All-Electric Starting 1 Jan 2026

Link to Hot Air

KevinM
Reply to  Steve Case
July 29, 2025 9:46 am

Subsidy for 8 story buildings?
Really though, if “new buildings” excludes “single-family houses”, how many are built per year in NY State? I’ve been having bad luck with Google this morning but I’m guessing the number of structures that count as “new buildings” in NY must be small. N<100?

(Editorial edit: Google is getting good enough at not providing the info I’m clearly looking for that I suspect it has opened a door for competition in the larger search market)

Reply to  Steve Case
July 29, 2025 10:51 am

The EPA will soon issue an announcement rescinding the 2009 CO2 Endangerment Finding. You should check the Federal Register at:
https://www.federalregister.gov/public-inspection/current. From the home page, page down to the panel “Regular Filling Agencies” and then scroll down and click on “Environmental Protection Agency” to check for any new announcements. Once an announcement is placed in the Federal Register, the pubic has 45 days to review and submit comments to the EPA.

You should bookmark this website and check it everyday or so.

Reply to  Steve Case
July 30, 2025 4:06 am

In fairness, she was discussing California. SS Commandant Hochul has yet to be expelled from Office in NY.

Bruce Cobb
July 29, 2025 6:31 am

“Clean energy systems need to be affordable and reliable.” First of all, the whole concept of so-called “clean energy” is total nonsense. It is meaningless. Secondly, what the anti-fossil fuel cabal calls “clean energy”, by which they mean wind and solar are neither affordable or reliable, nor will they ever be.

strativarius
Reply to  Bruce Cobb
July 29, 2025 6:56 am

Clean energy?

Can you name one source that is clean? I can’t.

Reply to  strativarius
July 29, 2025 7:48 am

If we’re going to live comfortable, modern lifestyles, the planet will have to suffer somewhat. Most of us understand that- some think the planet must be preserved virgin like. 🙂

strativarius
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
July 29, 2025 9:18 am

Those of us who still have an independent and functioning mind.

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
July 29, 2025 11:16 am

Mother Nature ravages the planet with wildfires, floods, hurricanes, tornadoes, droughts, ice storms, hail, heat waves, cold waves, earthquakes, swarms of locusts, rain storms, dust storms, etc.

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
July 30, 2025 4:13 am

The planet won’t “suffer” at all. People wailing about “the planet” are really just worried about themselves.

And concerns about *actual* pollution in the US are needless in the US. Actual pollution issues were dealt with decades ago and outdoor air in US cities is cleaner than the air inside people’s homes.

Reply to  strativarius
July 29, 2025 11:01 am

I can: It is called Hydropower! I live in BC and 95% of the electricity is generated by the hydro dams. However, for the last several years, there has been a drought in the north of the province and electricity production has been reduced. BC Hydro spent 500 million dollars buying imported electricity last year.

Reply to  Harold Pierce
July 29, 2025 11:59 am

Do you have fanatics there calling for the end of the dams?

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
July 29, 2025 2:31 pm

Nope. Most of the big dams are in the remote northeast Peace River region, which is too far away for the city slicker protesters.

The BC Hydro charge for 1kWh for Tier 1 is $0.1172 and for Tier 2, $0.1408. Since the Canadian dollars is worth only ca. 72 cents, this would be cheap electricity for Americans.

In BC, there are no dams on Fraser and Stikine rivers, the last wild large rivers on the west coast of NA for all the species of salmon.

Go to You Tube and call up Site C Dam. This the largest earthen-filled dam ever built. It cost 12 billion dollars and took 10 years to build.

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
July 29, 2025 5:14 pm

Nope. The price for 1 kWh for Tier 1 is $0.1172 and for Tier 2 is $0.1408. Since Canadian dollar is worth only ca. 72 cents, this would be cheap electricity for Americans.

Most of the big dams are in Peace River region and are too far away for any protestors. There are no dams on the Fraser and Stikine rivers which are the last large wild rivers on the west coast for the many species of salmon.

Go to YouTube and call up Site C Dam. This the largest earthen-filled dam in the world. It cost 12 billion and it took 10 years to build.

Reply to  Harold Pierce
July 29, 2025 5:26 pm

I don’t know why comment editor posted my comment twice.

Reply to  Harold Pierce
July 30, 2025 12:07 am

It was a good comment ??

I’m off to YouTube right now ……..

Reply to  Harold Pierce
July 30, 2025 4:19 am

Not arguing with the power production itself being “clean,” but you needed a whole lot of concrete and steel to build the dams, and areas upstream were flooded when the river flows were halted. So plenty of mining and smelting, etc. to get the hydro up and running. It’s not like hydroelectric has zero environmental impact.

Plus, of course, like any energy source actually capable of producing the energy we need, the Eco-Nazis are “against it.” 🙄

MarkW
Reply to  Bruce Cobb
July 29, 2025 7:09 am

Clean energy is affordable and reliable. So long as you stick to coal and gas.
Wind and solar will never be either.

Quilter52
Reply to  Bruce Cobb
July 29, 2025 5:33 pm

And they aren’t clean either whether in their initial production or when they have to be disposed of after supposedly 20 years. Good luck with 20 years from a turbine. 10-12 years seems to be the best they are doing around here anyway.

strativarius
July 29, 2025 6:55 am

It was going well until…

And the climate will be better off for it. “

You sound just like them when you say that. Not good.

Does Kerry need an interpreter?

Reply to  strativarius
July 30, 2025 7:47 am

There’s more “sounding like them,” too.

More freedom to solve problems creatively.

Problems?! WHAT “problems?!” A warming of the climate compared with the Little Ice Age is *NOT* a ” problem,” it is 100% GOOD NEWS. If humanity “contributes” in any measurable way to that, we should not be flogging ourselves as if we have done something “bad,” but rather dislocating our shoulders patting ourselves on the back.

Instead of forcing society to shrink and sacrifice, we ask how we can grow smarter.

We can grow just like we have grown, except with reasonable controls to avoid ACTUAL pollution (hint: THIS DOES NOT include so-called “greenhouse gases”).

Recognizing that climate strategy must also serve the interests of the people, national security, and long-term prosperity, it’s a vision rooted in hope for the future, not austerity.

We require no “climate strategy,” since we don’t have any demonstrated, measurable effect on “climate,” nor any control over the “climate.”

Rather than relying on long-term subsidies or regulations, domestic policy should be structured to encourage the innovation, commercialization, and deployment of cheaper and cleaner energy resources. This way, American resources and technology can expand energy at home and dominate global markets, while also reducing emissions.

No, domestic policy should be focused not on so-called “clean energy” (especially since that is code in Eco-Nazi ears for worse-than-useless wind and solar), but energy that works and provides what is needed, ON DEMAND.

And “emissions” (of so-called “greenhouse gases”) DO NOT MATTER. There is NO EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE that “emissions” of so-called “greenhouse gases” drive the Earth’s temperature. To the contrary, there is empirical evidence that indicates that they have no effect whatsoever. See the full-blown GLACIATION that occurred 450mya with TEN TIMES today’s atmospheric CO2 levels.

And A WARMER CLIMATE IS BETTER anyway, THERE IS NO CRISIS that will be caused by warming, NOR ARE WE GOING TO STOP IT.

A new generation is emerging – leaders who are less interested in preaching and more interested in producing. They view climate not as a moral crusade, but as a challenge of engineering, economics, and national renewal.

If the “new generation” is still thinking of “climate” as a “challenge,” they aren’t shedding the mass stupidity yet.

WE DON’T CONTROL THE CLIMATE.

WE NEVER WILL.

Bruce Cobb
July 29, 2025 7:06 am

You have to hand it to them. The Climate Industrial Complex along with its career and rent-seeking Climate Liars, grifters and assorted carpetbaggers have had a good run. They managed to set science and humanity back decades, costing $trillions, and lowering living standards worldwide. They deserve a good round of applause before exiting stage left. Bravo. Good job.

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  Bruce Cobb
July 29, 2025 7:36 am

I think it’s a mistake to think they are done.

Reply to  Jeff Alberts
July 29, 2025 7:50 am

It can’t continue if the public is sick of it- and it is.

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
July 29, 2025 8:35 am

There is no “the public” that is wholly sick of it. There are many very vocal people who will shout it from the rooftops as long as they live.

Reply to  Jeff Alberts
July 29, 2025 8:22 am
Reply to  Bruce Cobb
July 29, 2025 7:49 am

Hollywood should make a movie about the collapse of the climate cult- but it won’t of course. So, we’ll let AI do it. 🙂

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Bruce Cobb
July 29, 2025 8:01 am

This piece of sarcasm rates a +1Trillion upvote.

ResourceGuy
Reply to  Bruce Cobb
July 29, 2025 12:17 pm

Nice post, I think you beat me to it on some of those labels.

Reply to  Bruce Cobb
July 30, 2025 8:37 am

They deserve no applause, only derision and shame.

Sarcasm noted, but the idiots who have fed, watered and profited from this perversion of science are the scum of the Earth.

We should have listened to Eisenhower. He predicted just such an outcome before I was born.

C_Miner
July 29, 2025 7:39 am

STORY TIP https://www.foxnews.com/media/epa-chief-zeldin-delivers-dagger-to-the-heart-of-obamas-climate-change-agenda-on-ruthless-podcast

Huge if true. Directly related to this story and the cult of catastrophic climate change.

Reply to  C_Miner
July 29, 2025 7:55 am

Excellent! I await Zeldin’s speech. Notice he mentioned Wokeachusetts as having started it all. Being here, I’m going to rub his speech into the faces of all the climate cultists here- I know them all, in government and enviro groups. Here, the enviros have used it to try to stop all forestry work- to save the planet- and I’ve been a forester for 50 years, so obviously I detest all of them.

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
July 29, 2025 11:25 am

Where does Wokeachusetts get lumber? Is it imported from Canada?

Reply to  Harold Pierce
July 29, 2025 12:11 pm

From lots of places- some from here, some from VT, NH and Maine, otherwise mostly Canada, I believe- though I never got involved with importing or exporting wood. I mostly marked a stand for cutting, put it out to bid, mostly sold to the high bidder- and didn’t care where it went- or how the local lumber yards got their wood. The procurement foresters had that job. I used to get into the details years ago by reading a magazine, “The Northern Logger” covering the midwest and northeast. An excellent magazine that’s written by and for people that work in the wood products industry. It’s at https://www.northernlogger.com/product/northern-logger-and-timber-processor-magazine/

The articles there were nothing like the BS published by forestry academics or burro-crats. They were and I presume still are reality based.

Reply to  Harold Pierce
July 30, 2025 8:44 am

Yes but it’s OK to cut the trees down elsewhere and haul it across the continent to Taxachussetts behind diesel engines.

Eco-Nazi logic at work…

Reply to  C_Miner
July 29, 2025 7:59 am

Why on earth do these Foxnews people not come right out with the fact that CO2 is not only not a pollutant but is essential to life, at present levels of ppm is currently at the lower end of the safety scale and is almost at saturation level with respect to having any warming effect?
( See recent Lintzen-Happer paper. )

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  Oldseadog
July 29, 2025 8:36 am

Lindzen.

Reply to  Jeff Alberts
July 29, 2025 12:57 pm

… and here is the link to the paper:
https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.07392

Net Zero Averted Temperature Increase
R. Lindzen, W. Happer, W. A. van Wijngaarden
Using feedback-free estimates of the warming by increased atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) and observed rates of increase, we estimate that if the United States (U.S.) eliminated net CO2 emissions by the year 2050, this would avert a warming of 0.0084 C (0.015 F), which is below our ability to accurately measure. If the entire world forced net zero CO2 emissions by the year 2050, a warming of only 0.070 C (0.13 F) would be averted. If one assumes that the warming is a factor of 4 larger because of positive feedbacks, as asserted by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the warming averted by a net zero U.S. policy would still be very small, 0.034 C (0.061 F). For worldwide net zero emissions by 2050 and the 4-times larger IPCC climate sensitivity, the averted warming would be 0.28 C (0.50 F).

Reply to  Johanus
July 30, 2025 12:20 am

Do the climate crackpots even know that they’re taking the p!ss, using the bogus “positive” feedbacks?

Reply to  philincalifornia
July 30, 2025 10:17 am

Where were the “positive feedbacks” when Earth had a full-blown GLACIATION with TEN TIMES today’s atmospheric CO2 levels?

Observations TRUMP theory (or hypothesis, in this case).

Reply to  Jeff Alberts
July 29, 2025 1:05 pm

Yes, apologies, I blame chronometric disfunction.

aka Old Age.

John Hultquist
Reply to  Oldseadog
July 29, 2025 8:44 am

I’m happy with the “Foxnews people” reporting the news, not attempting to make news.
By Lintzen you meant Richard S. Lindzen.

KevinM
Reply to  Oldseadog
July 29, 2025 9:58 am

“Why on earth …” – Strange demographic situation. Their viewers trend older and skeptical of certain bits needed to simplify the argument.

Google was all over this one:
“The median age of a Fox News viewer is typically around 68 years old.

KevinM
Reply to  KevinM
July 29, 2025 10:02 am

Point being… a meaningful number of politically conservative USA viewers born in the 1950s don’t relish stories of old Earth.

Reply to  Oldseadog
July 29, 2025 11:42 am

The CO2 saturation level is 300 ppmv in the air which occurred in ca. 1920. For more info see:
https://arixv.org/pdf/2004.00708v1 or
https://arivx.org/abs/2004.0078
The title of the paper is “The Saturation of the Infrared Absorption by Carbon Dioxide in the Atmosphere” by Dieter Schildknecht.

Reply to  Oldseadog
July 29, 2025 12:10 pm

Shown in the chart (See below) are plots of temperatures at the Furnace Creek weather station in Death Valley from 1922 to 2001. In 1922, the concentration of CO2 in dry air was ca. 303 ppmv
(0.59 g CO2/cu. m.), and by 2001, it had increased to ca. 371 ppmv (0.73 g CO2/cu. m.), but there was no increase in surface air temperature. The reason is that adding more CO2 above the saturation level does result in any additional heating of the air.

The chart was obtained from the late John Daly’s website: “Still Waiting For Greenhouse” available at http://www.john.daly.com.
From the home page, page down to the end and click on: “Station Temperature Data”. On the “World Map”, click on a region or country to temperature data from the weather station located there. John Daly found over 200 weather stations that showed no warming up to 22002. Be sure to check the charts for Oz. The chart for Adelaide shows a cooling from 1857 to 1999.

PS: If you click on the chart, it will expand and become clear. Click on the “X” in the circle to return to comment text.

death-vy
Reply to  Oldseadog
July 29, 2025 12:22 pm

Link to the Happer-Lindzen paper?

Reply to  Harold Pierce
July 30, 2025 12:25 am

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/381319117_Net_Zero_Averted_Temperature_Increase

There’s more than one, but I think this is the top of the pyramid – 2024

KevinM
Reply to  C_Miner
July 29, 2025 9:55 am

Link starts with
“Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin will rescind the Obama administration’s endangerment finding declaration in the “largest deregulatory action in the history of America,” he announced Tuesday on the “Ruthless” podcast.”

I’ll add that podcast to my iphone. Hopefully the next government won’t penalize me for listening.

Reply to  KevinM
July 29, 2025 12:29 pm

Can I get the podcast with my computer?

July 29, 2025 7:44 am

“A post-2024 reality check has swept the party: climate may still poll well in theory, but not when it collides with affordability.”

No reality check yet in Wokeachusetts! The climate cult still thrives here. I think it’ll be the last place on Earth to give it up- even later than the UK and Australia.

KevinM
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
July 29, 2025 10:08 am

I remember watching the 1984 election as a Massachusetts kid and how only us and Minnesota voted Mondale over Reagan. It happened. I was there to watch it live on 4, 5 and 7 of an old non-cable TV with clicky dials. Now the Internet tells me I’m misremembering and that Massachusetts went Reagan over Mondale. How weird. I might have invented a memory? I need a non-partisan search engine to ground myself.

(Oh, the original intention was to reply, hah nothing new there. You voted in Mondale after all)

Reply to  KevinM
July 29, 2025 12:03 pm

Mass. hated Regan as much as it now hates Trump. The state was the only one, I think, to vote for the Democrat Dukakis in a different election, the former governor of the state!

Reply to  KevinM
July 29, 2025 12:47 pm

Reagan won 49 States in this election, including Massachusetts.

He lost Mondale’s home State of Minnesota, but he only lost Minnesota by about 1,500 votes.

It was a landslide election of Epic proportions! 🙂

KevinM
Reply to  Tom Abbott
July 29, 2025 3:53 pm

Whew thanks. I thought my brain had been scrambled by Internet overdose.Strange, Google buried what we both seem to remember.

This is the danger of Internet, AI, all forms of centralized knowledge search. THe truthis in the eye of the owners.

Giving_Cat
July 29, 2025 7:46 am

Climate hawks being torn to shreds by the wind machines of their own construction.

Reply to  Giving_Cat
July 29, 2025 7:56 am

OK, somebody who knows how to use AI, prompt it to make a short video clip of just what you said.

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
July 29, 2025 8:33 am

No video, but there’s this one:
comment image

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
July 29, 2025 8:40 am

I gave it a quick try with Grok, but all it would show is a worried woman (funny how it came up with a woman from “climate hawks”), with wind turbines in the background.

Reply to  Jeff Alberts
July 29, 2025 11:51 am

One of these days, when I start playing around with AI, I think it’s going to be my next addiction. 🙂

mleskovarsocalrrcom
July 29, 2025 8:00 am

While we’re celebrating the denouement of AGW they’re (the One World Government cabal) are busy planning the next boogeyman. The fix is more than just killing Climate Change. It’s Marxism we need to neutralize.

Reply to  mleskovarsocalrrcom
July 29, 2025 11:52 am

The battle with Marxism will be eternal, but at least we might soon seen the end of the Climate cult.

Marty
July 29, 2025 8:13 am

Last night on television I saw a commercial for some coalition that wants to stop artificial intelligence. Looks like they see the global warming religion slowly coming to an end and they are testing for a new cause.

Reply to  Marty
July 30, 2025 10:23 am

If that’s what they want to fight, I’m fine with that.

I can live without Automated Idiocy.

I can’t live WITH “climate policies.”

strativarius
July 29, 2025 9:05 am

Bad news for climate numpties…

Is Trump right about Sadiq Khan?
Yes: 97%
No: 2%
Don’t know: 1%
https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/2088189/poll-donald-trump-sadiq-khan-london-mayor

Why is it always 97%?

JTraynor
July 29, 2025 10:04 am

Newsom wants to be President. He knows he has mucked up the works in California. He’s moderating in the hopes no one remembers what he did and would likely thrust upon everyone else if given the chance. He wants to keep his seat at the kool kids table after all.

Reply to  JTraynor
July 30, 2025 12:30 am

He’s behind Buttigeig apparently, but don’t tell his wife.

ResourceGuy
July 29, 2025 10:49 am

The massive money spring dried up.

ResourceGuy
July 29, 2025 10:54 am

The greatest ($$$$) science policy scam in human history has been forced off the main road and back to the smaller Dem strongholds of THC licenses and craft brew joints.

KevinM
Reply to  ResourceGuy
July 30, 2025 10:03 am

THC licenses and craft brew joints ARE on the main road in 2025, They might be considered “old news” in Dem strongholds.

July 29, 2025 1:00 pm

Who is that masked man in the lead-in photo of the above article?

I have a vague recollection that he once pushed out some sort of nonsense about climate change for the US government in power at the time.

But it was probably just a really bad dream.

Reply to  ToldYouSo
July 30, 2025 12:40 am

That nincompoop was almost elected President. How do the democrats still cling on to any credibility? Gore, him – Lurch, the Alzheimers poster-boy dude and Kalamity Harris. Who votes for these cretins ??

July 29, 2025 4:49 pm

Democrats who once championed aggressive environmental mandates are hitting pause, reworking regulations, and distancing themselves from policies that have driven up energy and housing costs.”

These would be the same people who would claim to have the answers to the problems they created.

They, plus the ‘experts’ they relied upon, should never again be given a public office nor used as consultants to government

Bob
July 29, 2025 5:31 pm

Very nice and encouraging.

Quilter52
July 29, 2025 5:36 pm

I hope this is correct but here in Australia we are being lectured to save the world by a UN Official with no actual relevant qualifications other than being a minster in a government in Granada. He is linking up with our Energy idiot, oops sorry, Minister, Chris Bowen to double down on everything despite the withdrawal of interest in offshore wind and green hydrogen now that the subsidies are not enough to hand a windfall gain to the companies supposedly producing them. Instead, we are running power lines over the top of our best food producing farmland, with heavy fines for any farmer refusing to allow the contractors building the lines access to the land the farmers thought they owned. Our Energy Idiot does not seem to understand that food is also a necessity of life.

Frank Kabloona
July 29, 2025 9:31 pm

I hope, as a brilliant comic with large eyes said tonight, that nobody’s spiking the football before they hit the home run. Happy as I was about the EPA’s move, I dared to look at how folks were taking it over in the NYT comments section: 100% screeching that the end is nigh. And at WSJ, it was about 50/50, as that publication staggers further away from reason. Let’s not forget, as ideologues double down in the U.K., Brussels, the UN and Australia, that 2026 could stall all momentum here and that 2028 could reverse most everything achieved (with any luck, after I’ve sold the oil and coal stocks I bought in November!). Today was fun, but tomorrow sanity must continue to be sold to those who aren’t busy pulling out their purple hair.

Uzi1
July 30, 2025 5:26 am

GW/CC was unleashed on western countries as a means to subjugate their populations to a world government. A globalist wrecking machine to destroy their economies and cultures. “Fighting CC” includes phasing out oil, gas and coal; borderless countries coupled with unrestrained human migration and total reliance on renewables. All under the UN banner; a corrupt system that is pure poison to all democracies! The doom sayers have always been wrong but under the cloak of “science”, a sympathetic press and a duped government they lasted far too long. Never forget the fight is against you and me, not climate change.

July 30, 2025 5:53 am

That was a good look for Lurch. The less of his face the better!

Verified by MonsterInsights