By Vijay Jayaraj
Growing up in the sun-scorched plains of Southern India, where summer temperatures often flirt with 104 degrees Fahrenheit, I learned early that extreme heat is not an anomaly but a seasonal reality to be expected. Yet, all of us confront the metaphorical heat of relentless rhetoric from climate alarmists who insist our planet is overheating beyond the point of salvaging.
In Bengaluru (formerly Bangalore), the city I now call home, climate narratives often echo global hysteria. Headlines scream of “record-breaking heat” and “unlivable cities,” yet the data – raw, unfiltered and grounded in reality – tell a different story, one that challenges the hyperbole regularly sweeping over the public.
On average, a Bengaluru March experiences 17 days where temperatures reach or exceed 93 degrees. This year has been no different. We recorded exactly 17 days of 93 degrees or above in March – right on par with the 15-year average. Far from the apocalyptic predictions of endless heatwaves, this summer has been, in a word, normal.
Over the past 15 years, from 2010 to 2024, temperature records for the months of February through May show us that there is no summer crisis. The entire summer of 2018, for instance, had only 23 days above 93 degrees, whereas 2023 had 30 days. In contrast, 2016 had 76 days. Does this indicate an existential crisis? Or does it simply affirm that climate fluctuates? It is the latter.
Climate Alarmism: A Manufactured Crisis?
It is not just temperatures. The broader climate narrative is laced with outlandish predictions that fail to materialize. The “end of snow” prophecy, the vanishing of Arctic ice by 2013, and the frequent claims of “hottest year ever” – all have proven misleading at best, deceptive at worst.
Consider rainfall patterns in India, which have a major influence on the livelihood of 1.3 billion people. There is a significant year-to-year variability in precipitation, which is typical of India because of the unpredictable nature of monsoons.
The average annual rainfall between 2000 and 2023 shows us that there is no crisis. The early 2000s experienced several significantly wet years, with 2003 recording nearly 49 inches of precipitation. From the mid-2000s to the early 2010s, there was a notable decline in rainfall, with 2009 being especially arid. The latter segment of the dataset, spanning from 2019 to 2022, indicates a duration of consistently elevated rainfall levels.
There is no discernible linear trend of increasing or decreasing precipitation throughout the period. The data reveal fluctuations between wetter and drier years. This variability underscores the intricate nature of India’s monsoon system and its susceptibility to diverse climatic factors.
Now, imagine asking the city’s 14 million residents to relinquish their ambitions for an uninterrupted power supply based on coal as a fuel in favor of unreliable “green” technologies such as wind turbines to address a fabricated climate crisis.
Sadly, such requests are made by activists and media outlets that peddle worst-case scenarios as inevitabilities, ignoring historical weather records and honest science. The result? A public psyche primed to view every warm day as a portent of apocalypse.
Individuals are not only subjected to feelings of guilt regarding the supposed degradation of the Earth’s climate, but they are also deceived into thinking that erratic wind and daytime solar energy can supply baseload electricity required by their urban and industrial centers.
The truth is summers are hot, particularly in the middle latitudes of my city. And there is nothing the climate industrial complex can, or should, do about it.
This commentary was first published at California Globe on April 21, 2025.
Vijay Jayaraj is a Science and Research Associate at the CO2 Coalition, Arlington, Virginia. He holds an M.S. in environmental sciences from the University of East Anglia and a postgraduate degree in energy management from Robert Gordon University, both in the U.K., and a bachelor’s in engineering from Anna University, India.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
I still remember when it was just “Global Warming”. Remember Al Gore and his scissor lift clown show? Ah, the good old days!
I’m waiting for the fat lady to sing.
She’s warming up her pipes now.
“supposed degradation”
In the context of a planet 4.5 billion years old with an ever changing climate what do they mean by climate degredation? Destroying or spoiling makes no sense unless, of course, you are attempting to achieve a state of stasis where nothing changes. Hence the absurd notion of fighting climate change.
2018
“The British government needs to be on a “war footing” to tackle climate change, ex-Labour leader Ed Miliband has said.” – BBC
2019
“The UK must throw as much effort into stopping climate change as was deployed in defeating the Nazis, Theresa May is told today […] prime minister is told to put the country “on a war footing” and end “climate appeasement” to avert disaster, by a new cross-party group of politicians including Labour’s Ed Miliband and the Greens’ Caroline Lucas. – The Independent
2020
“The UK is not on track to meet the fourth and fifth carbon budgets and we have not published our strengthened plans to cut carbon emissions, as we need to do as the hosts of COP26. Breakthroughs this week from China and the EU show other countries are getting on with the fight against climate change.” – Ed Miliband
2021
The UK is at the centre of the battle against the climate crisis in 2021, as host of the crucial Cop26 United Nations conference in Glasgow. – The Independent
2022
It is cheaper to save the planet than destroy it. – Ed Miliband
2023
We should match the ambition of President Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act and stop moaning about it. – Ed Miliband
https://labourlist.org/2023/03/consistent-and-clear-climate-leadership-milibands-speech-to-the-green-alliance/
2024
(Thank you, Emma [Pinchbeck] for that incredibly kind introduction)
My message today is we will take on the blockers, the delayers, the obstructionists, because the clean energy sprint is the economic justice, energy security and national security fight of our time. – Ed Miliband
https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/energy-uk-conference-2024-keynote-speech-by-by-ed-miliband
2025
Ed Miliband has said the government will “double down” on its environmental agenda and accused those against the move to net zero of “making up nonsense and lies”.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/czjn0pn830ko
It’s entirely blind faith. As the energy secretary stated in 2024: Climate change is no longer a future threat but a present-day reality. A reality that has been crafted for maximum government involvement in even the mundane and the petty.
The climate has and will always change. Someone tell Ed for god’s sake. Maybe teach him the meaning of the song “Mad Dogs And Englishmen” by Noel Coward.
“It seems such a shame
When the English claim the Earth
That they give rise to such hilarity and mirth”
https://genius.com/Noel-coward-mad-dogs-and-englishmen-lyrics
Ed recently came back from a trip to China and India and said words to the effect that they fully agreed with him.
Apparently the Chinese forgot, somehow, to mention that they approved 66.7GW of new coal fired capacity in 2024 and started construction of 94.5GW during the year equivalent to 93% of global coal plant construction starts during 2024.
Meanwhile coal provided 74% of of India’s electricity in 2024 and it’s thermal capacity is expected to grow from 218GW to 283GW by 2032.
Or perhaps Ed, being Ed, just could not understand what they were saying.
2022
It is cheaper to save the planet than destroy it. – Ed Miliband
***************
It is my understanding that the major nuclear powers (U.S., China, Russia) collectively have enough nuclear bombs to destroy human civilization and perhaps all of life on this Earth. I suggest to Ed and all of his believers that fears of a nuclear war are far more realistic than that of some CO2-induced climate calamity.
I also suggest that Ed has his priorities in life badly misarranged.
“It is cheaper to save the planet than destroy it. – Ed Miliband”
He is spending one heck of a load of money destroying the UK
So … how do we convince the rest of the world (the part that doesn’t read Watts Up … ) that we live in a Global Normal world, not a Global Warming world? Maybe public service ads during football (both US and world wide varieties) games?
As things are, and I confess it didn’t take long to figure out, it always comes back to controlling communication…
Vijay at UEA you were forged in the crucible of climate alarmism and probably were a contemporary of “no more snow” Viner. Did any other alumni land up in the skeptic camp. And please tell me as I am an Aberdonian whether RGU were a woe alarmist organisation
Ok, once again, for the college educated. Climate changes, constantly. Humans are not causing it to change and can not stop it from changing. Get over yourselves, you are not that important to anything or one.
Just imagine the shrieking and screeching by the alarmists if the twenty-six high temperature records set in 26 of the 50 states of America during the decade of the 1930’s were to be equaled this decade of the 2020’s.
The summer black-outs due to AC load would leave many seniors in the retirement villages with heat stroke.
I can’t even imagine, hot weather in India? It boggles the mind!
So there are a lot of Climate Alarmists in India, even with a pro-coal government? Indian media is distorting the truth about the benign gas, CO2?
India and most other nations are lucky. They will get to see the Net Zero failure of the UK and Germany and a few other places, and will see the futility of following that Nut Zero path, and will go to Plan B: continuing to use coal, oil and natural gas to power their societies.
I think India and other countries in SE Asia have “Plan B” as their Plan A already
That’s what I thought, too.
I guess the Indian Media is an outliar.
The Climate Syndicate has been using scare tactics to emotionalize people into submission.
I submit for consideration that the same tactics be employed to counter that evil.
I suggest all of these policies and regulations that are wreaking havoc on peoples lives be presented as
Economic SLAVERY.
“You will have nothing and you will be happy” is nothing less than that.
If it rains too much, it is climate change alarm time.
If it rains to little, it is climate change alarm time.
How are we to keep things at the exact average? We cannot regulate the temperature in our climate controlled living rooms better than +/- 2F.
People do not like change. The psychosis being inflicted on them panders to that translating dislike into paranoia.
What could possibly go wrong?
This won’t happen because the climate is the hook. The goal is to end fossil fuels. The endgame is fascist global governance.
Found this chart of Bangalore temperatures..
How has the population density and size changed since 1960 ?
What condition are the weather stations in ?
It looks like the 1930’s in Bangalore were just as warm as the temperatures today.
Just like all the other original, regional temperature records.
No Hockey Stick “hotter and hotter and hotter” temperature profile in Bangalore (or anywhere else).
Decided to do a quick search to answer my own question re Bangalore population
From less than a million in 1950 to probably around 14 million now,..
That is some serious urban expansion !!
Very nice Vijay, excellent article.
In addition to the points that Vijay Jayaraj makes, we should ask ourselves if killer heat waves and an overall warming planet are such a threat to survival why are the most populous areas of the world located in warmer climates. In the US, the largest states are California, Texas and Florida, not Maine, North Dakota and Alaska. Shouldn’t people be making pre-emptive moves to places where excessive heat is less of a threat? Likewise in Canada where the most underpopulated and coldest regions are Yukon, the Northwest Territory and Labrador. So why aren’t people flooding into them? Nor have I heard any reports or Europeans and Asians migrating in waves to Scandinavia and Siberia. In other words, the only ones worried about increasing global heat are the ones standing to profit from climate alarmism. The overwhelming majority takes heat waves and cold snaps as part of living where they are.
But, but, but the “millions of climate refugees….”
“… our most vulnerable…”
Do I need the /s marking?
“From the mid-2000s to the early 2010s, there was a notable decline in rainfall, with 2009 being especially arid.”
2005 to 2012 was a negative North Atlantic Oscillation regime, that’s a low indirect solar forcing signal.
2003 and 2018 were positive NAO summers, with heatwaves and aridity in western Europe. 2003 and 2018 were discretely solar driven heat events, the same type as in 1976, 1949. and 1934:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vQemMt_PNwwBKNOS7GSP7gbWDmcDBJ80UJzkqDIQ75_Sctjn89VoM5MIYHQWHkpn88cMQXkKjXznM-u/pub