By Vijay Jayaraj
U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright has signaled a change that could mean the difference between life and death for millions in Africa. Speaking at the “Powering Africa Summit” in Washington, D.C., Wright told leaders of a continent of 1.5 billion people that the Trump administration “has no desire to tell you what to do with your energy system.” This is a departure from the Biden regime, which was aligned with much of the Western climate juggernaut imposing Green New Dealism on developing countries that couldn’t afford it and stood to suffer by it.
“It’s a paternalistic post-colonial attitude that I just can’t stand,” Wright said of the climate evangelism that sought to force others to abandon fossil fuels and adopt largely useless technologies like solar and wind energy.
Africa has languished under paradoxical political and economic pressures: Nations that had built their prosperity on coal, oil and natural gas have spent decades discouraging Africans from tapping their own wealth of fossil fuels. The continent was shackled by a sanctimonious agenda of Western elites who used their financial and geopolitical leverage to press Africans into a campaign against a fabricated climate crisis.
But where is the evidence for this “existential threat”? Global life expectancy has doubled since 1900, hunger rates have plummeted and climate-related deaths have dropped 98% over the past century. Predictions of global overheating are fearmongering resting on pseudoscience, and purported solutions to prevent catastrophe have no hope of working in any case.
So, these climate policies forced upon Africa aren’t environmentalism; it’s eco-imperialism that perpetuates the poverty and deprivation that only sensible energy policy can reverse. Poor education, ill-health and shortened lives would remain the lot of Africans being promised an ecological nirvana.
“If you trace the evolution of energy on the world or on a country, it is the evolution of human possibility, human opportunity, and the quality of life,” said Wright. Exactly.
Repeating his message at the Houston CERAWeek energy conference, Wright noted that millions of people use solid fuels such as wood, straw and animal dung for cooking and heating.
“The indoor air pollution from this activity alone is estimated to kill over two million people annually,” he said. Where, he asked, is the global conference to address this crisis?
Deafening is the silence from the climate establishment, which seeks to block development of natural gas deposits that would eliminate these deaths.
Roughly a billion people worldwide enjoy the comforts of modern life, consuming annually the energy equivalent of 13 barrels of oil per person, Wright said. In Africa, that figure plummets to less than one barrel per capita.
“We wear fancy clothes, mostly made out of hydrocarbons. We travel in motorized transport. The extra lucky of us fly across the world to attend conferences,” he said. Meanwhile, African women walk miles to carry fresh water, wash clothes by hand and forgo education because a lack of electric lighting precludes doing homework at night.
“Beyond the obvious scale and cost problems,” Wright said, “there is simply no physical way that wind, solar, and batteries could replace the myriad uses of natural gas.” The same goes for replacing coal and oil.
Africa sits atop a treasure of energy riches. Nigeria, Angola, Algeria and Libya are oil giants; Mozambique and Tanzania boast world-class gas fields; South Africa and Zimbabwe hold coal reserves that could power entire regions. Yet, much of this wealth is locked up by the arrogance of foreign pressure and the timidity of domestic hesitation.
Wright’s endorsement of fossil fuels is a game-changer. He has thrown open a door that was once bolted shut. His rejection of past impositions and embrace of African energy autonomy is an overdue recognition of realism and opportunity.
Abundant energy is the lifeblood of progress. Without it, Africa remains trapped in a pre-industrial limbo, its people condemned to toil in darkness while the West preaches about an imaginary crisis.
The continent’s leaders must seize this moment with unapologetic resolve. Wright’s words are a challenge for Africans to act decisively.
The African Energy Week conference at Cape Town in September, as Wright noted, will be a critical platform to connect with global investors and accelerate development. From oil rigs in the Gulf of Guinea to coal reserves in the Kalahari basin, the time to build is now. Godspeed, Africa.
This commentary was first published at Daily Caller on March 18, 2025.
Vijay Jayaraj is a Science and Research Associate at the CO2 Coalition, Arlington, Virginia. He holds an M.S. in environmental sciences from the University of East Anglia and a postgraduate degree in energy management from Robert Gordon University, both in the U.K., and a bachelor’s in engineering from Anna University, India.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
About time, lead the way, USA
Europe has been using the Paris COP Agreements to get African countries to install wind and solar systems provided by Europe, but paid for with onerous, long-term loans from European banks, to keep these countries in colonial-style bondage.
Europe was in full swing to do the same thing to the US, to ensure the US would have high energy costs/kWh, and would be not competitive on world markets, and to protect its $10 trillion of investments in the US, and its decades of trade surpluses.
That game plan came to a screeching halt when the idiotic, unpatriotic, illegal, on-autopen Biden regime ended, and Trump took over.
Now, Trump and Co is trying to undo the damage of decades of woke, leftist Democrat malfeasance, waste, fraud and abuse, started and perfected under the woke, okie-dokie Obama regime.
wilpost
I know what has been, and is still happening, but thanks for reminding everyone.
Intermittent power, in a cooling environment causes blackouts, loss of productivity, more people to die, etc, etc.
The COVID vaccine was produced and packaged by the US military, they paid big pharma to use their brands and distribute. According to Robert Kennedy junior. It was similar to smallpox on the blankets stuff, of years gone by.
Always remember the three city states still exist and are very active.
There’s only one recorded case of smallpox-infected blankets being given to natives, and it’s not even clear that it had any effect, since there was already a smallpox outbreak in the area.
https://allthatsinteresting.com/smallpox-blankets
Addition
Here is an updated, partial list of decades of Fraud, Waste, and Abuse in the federal government.
Excerpt From Trump’s Speech to Congress on March 4, 2025
https://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/excerpt-from-trump-s-speech-to-congress-on-march-4-2025
Addition
HIGH COST/kWh OF W/S SYSTEMS FOISTED ONTO A BRAINWASHED PUBLIC
What is generally not known, the more weather-dependent W/S systems, the less efficient the other, traditional generators, as they inefficiently counteract the increasingly larger ups and downs of W/S output. See URL
https://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/fuel-and-co2-reductions-due-to-wind-energy-less-than-claimed
.
W/S systems add great cost to the overall delivery of electricity to users; the more W/S systems, the higher the cost/kWh, as proven by the UK and Germany, with the highest electricity rates in Europe, and near-zero, real-growth GDPs
At about 30% W/S, the entire system hits an increasingly thicker concrete wall, operationally and cost wise.
UK and Germany have hit the wall, more and more hours each day.
The cost of electricity delivered to users increased with each additional W/S/B system
.
Base-load nuclear, gas and coal plants are the only rational way forward, plus the additional CO2 is very beneficial for additional flora and fauna growth and increased crop yields to feed hungry people.
https://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/we-are-in-a-co2-famine
.
Subsidies shift costs from project Owners to ratepayers, taxpayers, government debt:
1) Federal and state tax credits, up to 50% (Community tax credit of 10 percent – Federal tax credit of 30 percent – State tax credit and other incentives of up to 10%);
2) 5-y Accelerated Depreciation write off of the entire project;
3) Loan interest deduction
.
Utilities pay 15 c/kWh, wholesale, after 50% subsidies, for electricity from fixedoffshore wind systems
Utilities pay 18 c/kWh, wholesale, after 50% subsidies, for electricity from floating offshore wind
Utilities pay 12 c/kWh, wholesale, after 50% subsidies, for electricity from larger solar systems
.
Excluded costs, at a future 30% W/S annual penetration on the grid, based on UK and German experience:
– Onshore grid expansion/reinforcement to connect distributed W/S systems, about 2 c/kWh
– A fleet of traditional power plants to quickly counteract W/S variable output, on a less than minute-by-minute basis, 24/7/365, which leads to more Btu/kWh, more CO2/kWh, more cost of about 2 c/kWh
– A fleet of traditional power plants to provide electricity during 1) low-wind periods, 2) high-wind periods, when rotors are locked in place, and 3) low solar periods during mornings, evenings, at night, snow/ice on panels, which leads to more Btu/kWh, more CO2/kWh, more cost of about 2 c/kWh
– Pay W/S system Owners for electricity they could have produced, if not curtailed, about 1 c/kWh
– Importing electricity at high prices, when W/S output is low, 1 c/kWh
– Exporting electricity at low prices, when W/S output is high, 1 c/kWh
– Disassembly on land and at sea, reprocessing and storing at hazardous waste sites, about 2 c/kWh
Some of these values exponentially increase as more W/S systems are added to the grid
.
The economic/financial insanity and environmental damage of it all is off the charts.
No wonder Europe’s near-zero, real-growth economy is in de-growth mode.
That economy has been tied into knots by inane people.
YOUR tax dollars are building these projects so YOU will have much higher electric bills.
Remove YOUR tax dollars using your vote, and none of these projects would be built, and YOUR electric bills would be lower.
I wonder if cannibals like Taco Mel (short for Melvin).
That is a disgusting comment.
Yeah but hands up anyone who has never tried a joke that landed with a thud.
Those raised hands would be the hands of liars.
90% of malaria cases are African. What lefties call ‘traditional biomass’ because those two words are so comfortable but is actually grannies making chuppatties out of cowdung in for the fire, produces three times the global energy than all the panels and windmills on the planet
While this may appear a bit off topic, it relates directly to the issue here. Countries and their people must become responsible. They must not look to and listen to the West expecting handouts from organizations like USAID.
“In South Africa, USAid supported programmes — particularly those funded through the President’s Emergency Plan for Aids Relief (Pepfar) — that prioritised HIV prevention, care, and treatment for transgender individuals. In his State of the Nation Address, President Cyril Ramaphosa expressed concern about the potential effect of the US government’s decision to suspend some of its funding for HIV and TB programmes in Africa. Many of the USAid-sponsored programmes helped to mitigate the inordinately high risk of HIV that LGBTIQ+ people face.” (My emphasis)
Mail and Guardian
Poverty does not cause AIDS. If it did all poor people would die of AIDS. More than 30 years ago the solution was clear. People had to change their sexual behavior. The US and EU have instead helped African countries and especially South Africa to provide expensive medication. This is given to the people who do not want to change their sexual behavior but have their lives prolonged.
In this matter as well as that of climate, Africa must not allow itself to be dictated to by the West. They have plentiful untapped resources. They need to use these properly under the guidance of their skilled citizens. They need to address the problem that these are often forced to seek opportunities in the West because of the corruption, crime and mismanagement of their politicians who are propped up by Western politicians. Countries that accept a sensible approach, adapting to their climatic conditions, will prosper and put pressure on neighbors to follow their example.
I believe the Trump administration is still spending money on aids relief.
That was one of George W. Bush’s projects. He did a lot for people with aids in Africa, and USAID carried this work on, and Trump is also continuing it. At least, that’s the last word I heard about it.
“George Walker Bush (born July 6, 1946) is an American politician and businessman who was the 43rd president of the United States from 2001 to 2009.”
W’s term ended 16 years ago.
Web search shows almost 2M new cases per year in the present.
“World region, Adult HIV prevalenc, New HIV infections, annual
Sub-Saharan Africa 4.9% 1,800,000”
4.9% of a large population having a permanent, deadly disease seems high after 16 years.
Africa had a unique problem that exacerbated its AIDS epidemic, imo. Just as the AIDS epidemic fears were abating here, I read an excellent non-fiction book about outbreaks of Ebola in Africa. It was titled, The Hot Zone, written by Richard Preston, published in 1994. It described people going into local health clinics with AIDS, having symptoms similar to malaria, a very common and widespread disease in Africa. They were given an injection of an anti-malarial drug and sent home. Because of poverty and typical supply shortages, the syringe and needle were rinsed in water to be used for the next injection. That is how ebola was initially spread. Keeping that in mind, what would be the result if the patient had AIDS? Many believe that health clinics were responsible for the high rates of AIDS throughout Africa.
I believe that Bjorn Lomberg, author of the book The Skeptical Environmentalist and the follow-up book Cool It: The Skeptical Environmentalist’s Guide to Global Warming has a lot to say on this issue. If you truly want to help people, you want to increase education, reduce disease and starvation, and most importantly, increase wealth. That’s it. Environmental extremism, and especially Climate alarmism have no place at the table, and actually work against those ideals.
A church that I used to belong to had a special donation project every Christmas, the money was used to pay for wells to be drilled in remote villages in India. The water was usually cleaner than the water found in the nearby rivers and women and children wouldn’t be forced to spend hours every day hauling water from the river to the village.
Other things that you could do is to get with others to subsidize the building/improving of roads, so that remote villages are no longer quite as remote.
Help pay for the building of schools and the hiring of teachers.
If you want to destroy a country, the best way is to just send in free stuff. If you want to help someone, help them build for themselves, the stuff they need to improve their own lives.
The old saying applies:
Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish and you feed him for life.
Well I spend a small fortune on gear, lures, flies and bait, hire boats and guides, and fish every accessible body of water within 100 miles of home at every opportunity, but if I had to feed the family on the fish I caught, we’d all be in need of USAID as well 🙁
“the best way is to just send in free stuff. ”
Or free delivery of inexpensive stuff?
Lomborgs latest book is “Best Things First” – what we should be spending our tax dollars on [hint, its not NetZero]. He measures the “bang for your buck” ie how much benefit for each dollar spent.
Its a good read.
From the article: “But where is the evidence for this “existential threat”?”
Yeah, Where? There is no evidence. Human-caused Climate Change is an evidence-free Crisis.
Every Climate Alarmist should be asked that question. They won’t have an answer because there is no crisis.
They will have an answer, of sorts, based on the alarmist propaganda of storms, heat, wildfires, etc.
I just did a word search on the Summary for Policy Makers [SPM] from the AR6 IPPC report of 2021.
The words “existential” and “crisis” are not found.
/sarc alert: Maybe I should have checked for “we are all gonna die!”, “the oceans are boiling” ?
I like the Secretary of Energy more every time I read one of his speeches.
He gets it! Good choice, Mr. Trump!
millions of people use solid fuels such as wood, straw and animal dung for cooking and heating.
Greens like this because it’s “sustainable”. I remember seeing a documentary where they were marveling at this “innovative” idea.
Funny how out of one side of the mouth comes sustainable and out of the other that CO2 stays in the atmosphere for centuries.
“Innovative”, and I guess “cleaner” than burning nasty natural gas in a modern range or oven, which, of course, is a health hazard…
This is marvelous, as is the short address by DoE Sec’y Wright (transcript accessed by the link provided). Perfect, as far as it goes …
… but just to point to one thing unmentioned* that is easy to overlook:
These things are happening N-O-W, despite considerable & relentless opposing forces:
— the Ethiopian (upper Nile) Grand Renaissance hydroelectric reservoir (planned since the 1950s!) is well on its way toward capacity;
— construction of the petroleum Pipeline from the Lakes Region (Uganda) to the coastal port (Tanzania).
We who are fortunate enough to enjoy the comforts of powered prosperity can expect that our governments & fellow citizens should stop providing aid & comfort to the opponents of these Projects.
Luckily, the new / restored USA Administration seems to understand this instinctively. Amidst all the complaints of confusion / chaos, across these past 60 days, lies a coherent theme: STOP doing all the dumb / counterproductive stuff. Amen & Amen.
(*)referring to (unmentioned in) this list: “Africa sits atop a treasure of energy riches. Nigeria, Angola, Algeria and Libya are oil giants; Mozambique and Tanzania boast world-class gas fields; South Africa and Zimbabwe hold coal reserves that could power entire regions. Yet, much of this wealth is locked up by the arrogance of foreign pressure and the timidity of domestic hesitation.”
Is it possible that the intent is to suppress Africa and prevent it from being an economic competitor?
“none dares call it ‘genocide’ “
That is a tiredly overworked word.
Seems a requirement for being a climate alarmist is an extraordinarily limited vocabulary.
Which explains why they constantly hijack, repurpose, and redefine words.
The Woke, DEI and Settler Colonialism crowd have to redefine words to make their alternate universe work. Genocide no longer requires actual deaths, just intent to cause harm — but not necessarily physical harm. It can be cultural, sociological or psychological.”harm”. The more subtle the better for the true believers since they can then find it everywhere. [Kinda like “Climate Change” – Lol ]
Very nice Vijay. The first thing we have to do is ignore international outfits like the UN. The second thing is to ignore outfits like Greenpeace. If we (US) really want to make a difference we would take a close look at each African nation. We would select the nations most likely to benefit by our help. By that I mean the citizens not the leaders. Those nations considered most free and least corrupt. Approach these nations and offer to assist to develop their own resource with the understanding that their people must remain free and protected from bad people both inside their borders and outside. If their best resource is coal we will send our geologists and miners over and determine where and how to retrieve the coal. The people will be trained and do the work. We will provide engineers and contractors to build the most practical coal power plant. The people will be trained and do the work. We will provide people to lay out power lines and train their people to build them. We will provide people to lay out pipelines to bring fresh water to central locations, we will train the people to do the work. Thanks to the coal we will have power to operate the pumps. To accomplish all of this we will need trucks and machinery, trucks and machinery need fuel. We will determine whether this country has the resources to refine their own fuel if they do we will provide people to determine where to drill, refine and transport the fuel. If not we will help initiate trade deals with their neighbors. The point here is that there is a small need for US government officials but it needs to be purposely limited. It will be the people who actually work in the several fields that will be doing the heavy lifting.
I know most will think this is pie in the sky but consider how beneficial it would be for a nation struggling now to have their own power source, their own fuel source, their own water source and most of all their own trained workers. If we can help them provide their own power and water they are well on their way to a better life. If successful their neighbors would want what they have and the newly trained workers would be in high demand not just in their countries but in neighboring countries.
As for the US I’m sure all of these countries have resources the US would be interested in trading for. It’s a hell of a lot better than throwing billions at despots.
Yeah make carful choices this time.
No more ‘partnering’ with the Robert Mugabes of Africa.
“It’s a paternalistic post-colonial attitude that I just can’t stand,” Wright said of the climate evangelism that sought to force others to abandon fossil fuels and adopt largely useless technologies like solar and wind energy.
Brilliantly put; using the pseudo-intellectual language of leftists to illustrate that the leftists who criticize others for their supposed “racism”, “colonialism”, and “patriarchy” are, in fact, themselves the racists and colonialists; compelling others to adopt their hair-brained philosophies and policies.