A seasoned energy executive with deep experience in oil and gas, geothermal, nuclear, and solar is nominated to run the Department of Energy. One would think that he’d be met with overwhelming bipartisan support.
One would be wrong.
Chris Wright, the CEO of Liberty Energy, was nominated in November by incoming President Donald Trump to be his Secretary of Energy. Since, he has faced undue opposition from green groups and Democrats alike. Pouncing on comments Mr. Wright made about the framing of climate change, these individuals have spared no smear tactic in their campaign to undercut Mr. Wright’s undeniable qualifications.
Yet, in stark contrast to critical headlines, Mr. Wright has repeatedly stated that we are experiencing increased global temperatures and that carbon emissions contribute to that. In fact, at my organization’s national conference in 2023, Mr. Wright discussed his lifelong environmentalism and how it informs the work he does to this day. The difference between his approach and that of his detractors, however, is that Mr. Wright is not willing to sacrifice human prosperity or quality of life for the sake of reducing emissions. As he sees it, energy poverty is one of the world’s most urgent problems and, rather than sacrificing that for environmental protection, we should balance the two. He’s right. We need more energy, not less.
Young people agree, demonstrated by a strong uptick in the popularity of reliable nuclear energy among younger generations, for example. In fact, it was primarily young people who campaigned to keep Diablo Canyon, California’s last remaining nuclear reactor, operational last year. In 2024 polling from my organization, 68% of young conservatives said they would favor a climate plan that balances both environmental and economic concerns.
Donald Trump was elected on this pro-energy dominance platform and the American people expect his administration to deliver on it. While climate activists often clamor to shut down oil and gas, the reality is that we need secure and reliable energy to power our lives, protect our homeland, and compete on the global stage with the likes of China. Oil and gas demand is going up, not down, and rather than fist-bumping Saudi royalty or loosening sanctions on murderous regimes, we should be unleashing it right here at home with the highest environmental standards and lowest emissions in the world. As an avid outdoorsman, Chris Wright understands that better than anyone.
But it doesn’t just stop there. America should be dominant in oil and gas, yes, but it should also lead the world in up-and-coming energy technologies. That’s the role of the Department of Energy. From batteries to critical minerals to nuclear plants to solar panels, China currently beats the U.S. in almost every new energy supply chain. Rather than letting the Chinese Communist Party control these supply chains, and the nearly $4 trillion market they represent, the U.S. should be out-building, out-innovating, and out-competing the rest of the world. This is an energy abundance platform – one of energy addition, not of energy subtraction.
Chris Wright also understands that. Through his work at Liberty Energy, and on the board of companies like Oklo, which is building next-generation nuclear reactors, Mr. Wright has embraced an all-of-the-above abundance approach, rather than picking winners and losers like Germany or California. As he puts it in his LinkedIn bio: “I don’t care where energy comes, as long as it is secure, reliable, affordable and betters human lives.” He understands that bottom-up innovation and free enterprise are the means to unlock long-term sustainability and prosperity, not big-government mandates or ideological agendas. He also understands that artificial government barriers, like years of permitting delays caused by red tape, are the biggest obstacle to energy abundance and environmental progress.
We need an Energy Secretary who will unleash this American energy abundance while also ensuring environmental progress. In his role at the department, Mr. Wright will have the ability to re-establish a true all-of-the-above energy vision, and technologies like nuclear fusion, advanced geothermal, and carbon capture and storage will be unleashed alongside oil and gas. With the National Laboratories under his jurisdiction at DoE, the possibilities of American energy innovation are limitless.
With global energy demand increasing at unprecedented rates, we need more energy, period. There’s no doubt in my mind that under Mr. Wright’s leadership, the Department of Energy will expand this commonsense approach across the country, paving the way for an affordable, abundant, and environmentally responsible energy future. Don’t cave to the naysayers and alarmists — the Senate should move swiftly to confirm Chris Wright’s nomination and unleash the power of American innovation for years to come.
Chris Barnard is the president of the American Conservation Coalition (ACC). Follow him on X @ChrisBarnardDL
This article was originally published by RealClearEnergy and made available via RealClearWire.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
BS article
Wright has not even been approved for the job and we are already hearing how great he will be
Conservative propaganda.
It sounds like you won’t be voting for him.
Then again, you won’t be voting, some would say that was a good thing.
He will be approved.
And he will do a very good job of enhancing the USA’s energy.
Conservative reality. !
reality is left
The left doesn’t know what reality is…
They live in a la-la-land full of mythical unicorns.
No no, he meant “reality HAS left” when the left is in charge.
Of course, this “naturally smarter European” Can’t figure out how to capitalize and punctuate.
I assume he will NOT be unleashing any CO2 sequestration schemes
He might be one of 47 elect’s least worst picks. He knows the upstream oil biz well enough to get out of it, both personally and as the head of Liberty Energy. Personally, as Sec Energy. Business wise by getting Liberty out of oilfield services and into “Turnkey Power Solutions”.
Fraccing service is the canary in the Hubbert’s curve coal mine. It’s dying as quickly as the current fleet is wearing out, starting with Liberty’s “clean” equipment. The hands are wandering back to construction, hot tub sales, whatever.
Liberty can’t stay busy enough to stay afloat, and will try and morph into something else. Chris is wisely, jumping ship.
Your comment indicates… the fact you seem very against him…
…. shows he is an absolutely wonderful pick. 🙂
Thanks for the confirmation. 🙂
Nope. I’m ok with it. But he will be a ghost pick, and will last not long. Before he’s jetted, he needs to push for a final resting place for long term nuc waste storage. Granholm apparently did not follow thru on her RFP to the states for this.
Nuke waste can be used in newest gen reactors.
“and will last not long.”
Which tarot cards do you use ?
It’s not hard, in his last term 35% of his appointments didn’t last one year, he had the highest turnover rate of appointees since Reagan.
Yet he still did orders of magnitude better than Biden and his “men can get pregnant” admin.
Actually, my last guess might not have been thoughtful. DOE is not that big a part of the 2025 regressive agenda. Chris might be allowed to do some good work, as long as he doesn’t get in the way. DOE has relatively little to do with ES&H, the it and gas value chain, etc., compared to the DoI.
Reprocessing disposes of nuclear waste, which is why the anti-human types are so opposed to it.
Nope. It reduces storage requirements, but does not eliminate them.
From AI:
Reprocessing nuclear waste does not eliminate all storage requirements; while it can reduce the volume of high-level waste needing disposal, it still produces radioactive waste that needs to be safely stored in a geologic repository or other long-term storage facility, meaning storage is still necessary even after reprocessing.
Key points about reprocessing and storage:
Reduced volume:
Reprocessing can extract usable materials from spent fuel, reducing the amount of high-level waste that needs to be disposed of in a repository.
New waste forms:
However, reprocessing also creates new waste streams with different characteristics, which may require specialized storage methods.
Still requires disposal:
Even with reprocessing, the remaining radioactive waste still needs to be safely disposed of in a long-term storage facility.
And:
https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/nuclear-fuel-cycle/nuclear-waste/storage-and-disposal-of-radioactive-waste
“Deep geological disposal is widely agreed to be the best solution for final disposal of the most radioactive waste produced.”
FYI, you might be surprised to know that I believe that we DO need long term storage, no matter what. Reprocess over and over, and you’ll still have a Trumpian YUGE requirement, just from what is now being “temporarily” stored in the back 40 of almost all currently operating and shut in plants. And if/when we get it, the added risk from more waste is negligible. Maybe Chris, after jumping from the sinking ship of US upstream hydrocarbon extraction, will do what Granholm could/would not.
thats all they spew
Written by @ChrisBarnardDL who tells us Energy vision includes “carbon capture”
Wright is an All of The Above BS artist. Maybe that is just to get approved. If so, then he is also a liar.
All of the above includes wind, solar, carbon capture, hydrogen, etc. All bad ideas. It is the new propaganda phrase of lukewarmers.
The current grids are already all of the above. If you are for all of the above, then you are not for stopping the alternate energy waste of money.
Richard, Chris is not in favor of mandates and subsidies for wind and solar. If they can stand on their on in a competitive market, so be it. The problem for them is they can’t. Chris is not a BS artist and he is not a liar.
Your negative attitude is not helpful.
“carbon capture and storage”
Now there’s a pointless waste of time and money !
__
“opposition from green groups and Democrats”
Ahhh.. so he is pretty much on the right track .. over the target.. taking flack !!
__
“and that carbon emissions contribute to that”
Well, NO, they don’t. !
Or Flak.
or that.. ! 🙂
OR Flac (file) 🙂
*.flac, so I heard.
Wouldn’t do any damage, so…
The “energy efficiency”AKA climate change section should be eliminated, and all the employees of that section RIFed or transferred to the Aleutians.
_______________________________________________________________________________
“…carbon capture and storage will be unleashed alongside oil and gas.”
Yeah! that’s the ticket let’s push CO2 sequestration down our collective throats.
Who is Chris Barnard [page not found] and why does WUWT continue to suck up
to these authors who refer to carbon instead of CO2? Repeating your enemy’s
propaganda is a really stupid idea.
eg.. “carbon emissions”... NO !
Soot is well controlled from all coal fired power stations, and any that does get out precipitates very quickly because it is a solid.
It does not effect atmospheric temperatures.
Carbon — You are loved!! And the progressive loony left want ‘inclusion’, but want to exclude ‘carbon’ from everyone! ha!! Well not me, the war on ‘carbon’ is racist! I’ll stand with carbon all the way!!! Particular carbon dioxide, the more the better!
Hey Yanks, who’s ready to get schooled by a naturally smarter European?
Let us know if you find one.
Europeans who have all but destroyed their electricity supply system and with it their once great industrial estate… farmed it all off to China and India…
Yep.. real smart…. Not !
Remind me what Trump said about the problems of being dependent on gas from Russia 😉
Buy yourself a vowel.
If we Europeans are so “smart”, how come we have no native industry anymore (exported to China/regulated out of existence), can’t provide for our own energy (dependent on imports from around the world because we refuse to use our own resources), and play stupid power games with our neighbors leading to war on our doorstep ?
Too many obedient and zealous Europeons, not enough wise ones.
“Europeons” Nice!
Add to the fact of letting unelected bureaucrats ruling their countries.