It’s a fact that humans are increasing the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. But does it follow, as we’re constantly told, that this increasing of CO2 is poisoning the planet? What if the opposite is actually the case? This week’s guest, CO2 Coalition Executive Director Gregory Wrightstone, is going to explain why it’s not true that more CO2=Bad.
On Episode #139 of The Climate Realism Show, The Heartland Institute’s H. Sterling Burnett, Jim Lakely, and Wrightstone will also cover some of the “Crazy Climate News of the Week.” An op-ed in The New York Times says climate change should make you rethink home ownership. Remember when an iceberg off Antarctica in 2017 was supposed to freak you out? Well, never mind. And the World Economic Forum says you should wash your clothes less to save the planet. They suggest washing jeans once a month and pajamas just once a week. Is there any aspect of our lives that the climate scolds will ignore? Apparently not.
Join us LIVE at 1 p.m. ET so you can leave your questions and comments for the show in the chat.
This show will be archived in WUWT Climate TV, a collection of over six hundred videos, featuring new interviews and analysis, and covering dozens of media sources discussing, debating and analyzing the latest in climate science, climate politics, and energy policy, including topics concerning temperature, sea level, polar bears, ocean acidification, extreme weather, censorship, wild fires, and more.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
It’s ironic that the climatistas are so fearful of any change to the climate- assuming it’ll be catastrophic. It used to be that those who are fearful of change would be called ultra conservative. Another example of how he meaning of left and right have switched. The GOP seems more concerned about the working class than the Dems. This switch is such that the Republicans are now the reds!
I remember an election when there were just 3 networks; ABC, NBC and CBS.
They all used different color schemes to portray election results. One used, as I recall, green and yellow, one used two different colors that I don’t remember, but one used red and blue.
The one that used red and blue had “red” for the Democrats and “blue” for the Republicans!
That quickly switched fairly quickly for the next election cycle.
(I suppose “red” for the Democrats at a time when saying “Red China” was the norm and “red” for other Communist countries hit too close to home.) 😎
CO2 Is Good For You. Warmer Is Better. Fight The Ice.