By Vijay Jayaraj
European colonialism that methodically extracted wealth from Africa until the system’s collapse in the last century has been replaced by a climate colonialism that stifles the economic development that the Dark Continent desperately needs.
A highly political climate industrial complex enables Western governments and international bodies like the United Nations to exert soft power over poorer countries’ energy policies. Advancing a so-called green agenda in the name of saving humanity from a fabricated climate emergency and offering seemingly irresistible handouts of money and technology, the colonists insist on replacing fossil fuels with unreliable and expensive wind and solar energy.
Yet, the relatively high mortality and morbidity of Africans – among the world’s poorest – can only be relieved by the energy of irrationally demonized coal, oil and natural gas. This artificially induced energy gap is the difference between life and death, hope and despair. It’s a pernicious intrusion in energy markets that shortens lifespans, snuffs out newborn cries and erects barriers to progress.
Energy Poverty in Africa
In 2024, it is unconscionable that over 600 million Africans still lack access to electricity. In sub-Saharan Africa, only 28% of healthcare facilities have reliable electricity. More than 900 million people cook with traditional biomass like wood and animal dung, inhaling toxic fumes that claim over 600,000 African lives each year. Clean water remains a luxury for vast swaths of the population.
As has been shown in parts of Asia, these problems can be alleviated over time with robust investment in fossil fuels. Coal and natural gas can provide affordable and reliable electricity, and natural gas can immediately reduce deaths from the pollution of dirty cooking fuels.
Consider that a single electric car charging overnight in Europe consumes as much power as an entire African village uses in a week. Such stark disparities are not mere numbers. They represent battle lines in the daily struggle for survival of Africa’s impoverished.
In this light – or rather, darkness –nations find themselves ensnared in a global madness, their potential extinguished like fire without oxygen, smothered by the very lack of what’s needed to fuel their ascent.
Foreign-funded anti-fossil fuel activism, cloaked in the language of climate alarmism, blocks pathways to development that Western nations themselves traversed in their journey to prosperity.
The Shifting Tides of Development Funding
For decades, international financial institutions and Western donors viewed energy access as a cornerstone of African development. Many of these projects leveraged Africa’s abundant fossil fuel resources. But things have changed.
The African Development Bank announced in 2019 that it would no longer finance coal projects. In 2021, it went further and placed severe restrictions on oil and gas investments. The World Bank followed suit.
Now, even domestic efforts of Africans to rejuvenate their oil and gas sector are being opposed by paid activists from Europe. There was heavy opposition to the Africa Energy Week event in South Africa, with European-funded protesters appearing at the African Energy Chamber’s Johannesburg offices.
“Some of the protesters … from the poorest townships didn’t even know why they were there, having been promised only $5 and a meal for their participation,” said NJ Ayuk, the Chamber’s executive chairman. “Africans deserve better than to be used for foreign agendas.
“Unfortunately, climate panic and fearmongering are alive and well, and the target is Africa. The way we see it, the world’s green agenda ignores Africa—or at least, it dismisses our unique needs, priorities and challenges,” says Ayuk.
Africa’s Growth Should Be Nurtured, Not Disrupted
As they hinder African development to purportedly save the planet, Western activists are increasing the continent’s vulnerability to nature’s elements. It is a well-established fact that wealthier societies are far more resilient to environmental shocks and natural disasters like drought and pestilence.
The challenges facing Africa are immense but not insurmountable. The right policies and investments can achieve universal energy access, drive economic growth, and build prosperous societies.
But all this will remain out of reach as long as “green” policies continue to obstruct sensible energy development. An ill-informed and myopic crusade threatens to entomb African aspirations in the very darkness the crusaders claim to be dispelling.
Echoing across both sunbaked lands and misty forests is the question of whether Africans will be permitted to flick the switch of progress or be confined to the shadows of others’ destructive obsession.
As a leader of the resistance to the new colonialism, Mr. Ayuk says, “Africans must produce every drop of hydrocarbons we can find to better lives of its people and meet global energy security needs.”
He is quite right.
This commentary was first published at The Washington Times on October 17, 2024.
Vijay Jayaraj is a Science and Research Associate at the CO2 Coalition, Arlington, Virginia. He holds an M.S. in environmental sciences from the University of East Anglia and a postgraduate degree in energy management from Robert Gordon University, both in the U.K., and a bachelor’s in engineering from Anna University, India.
On the issue of “Green” energy, the left’s treatment of the world’s poor paints them as the hypocrites they surely are.
I can only wonder- what if the colonialism didn’t collapse? Wouldn’t the colonial powers have invested in their colonies? A thriving colony is good for an empire. The Romans knew that. Eventually colonialism would have to end- but if lasted longer???
Look at India. The British understood it.
They built the railroads and gave a diverse population a common language- and ties to a great nation.
Even though they couldn’t pronounce Ghandi.
The British hardly gained any wealth from their empire. What they did do for the countries they colonised was implement a system of government and justice system that was far more humane than the warring tribes they found. Of course they weren’t by any means perfect – the episode in South Africa is evidence of that. And the colonies didn’t collapse – in most cases there was an agreed transition to self government. For some reason most of these countries remained in the Commonwealth.
Twenty-some years ago, I saw a report of irrigation in Republic of Mali northeast of Bamako. Two students from a local college had gone with a church group. They had photos of abandoned projects that were no longer functional. I think the French left in 1960. I don’t see the history of that. There is too much new stuff to sift through.
Africa need “Black” energy (aka coal, oil, gas) although technically, only coal is black.
Most crude oils are black.
Dark brown. Very dark. But they do appear black.
Still hydrocarbons have carbon and carbon is black so there is that.
And there are varieties of coal that are brown. So there is that, too.
Looks like someone got jumpscared by the RMI report:
https://rmi.org/insight/powering-up-the-global-south/
Sent into fits of laughter at their incompetent propaganda, you mean.
The fact is that you CANNOT build a reliable economy using unreliable energy.
That is, of course, the whole aim, isn’t it.
The climate scammers and CO2-haters cannot allow under-developed countries to develop.
Which one of those “enlightened” members of the
ClubCabal Of Rome was it who proclaimed that –“giving under developed countries cheap fossil fueled power would be like giving a loaded machine gun to a monkey”?
Sort of.
I believe it was Ehrlich himself who said something to the effect of “giving the people cheap energy is like giving an idiot child a machinegun.”
From your link:
“One-fifth of the Global South, from Brazil to Morocco and Namibia, from Bangladesh to Egypt and Vietnam, has already overtaken the Global North in terms of the share of solar and wind in electricity generation, or the share of electricity in final energy.”
The only country cited relevant to the above article is Namibia where only 50% of the population have access to any electricity and only 48% have access to clean fuels for cooking (Our World in Data).
Annual electricity generation per cap: Namibia 526kWh, Italy 4460kWh, US 12325kWh (OWiD).
Since ~2016 the share of electricity from solar in Namibia has leaped from 6% to 37% in 2023 concurrent with a fall in per capita electricity generation and consumption together with a fall in the GDP per cap adjusted by purchasing power (PPP) from ~13000 USD to ~ 11500 USD (Trading Economics).
87% of capital expenditures in 2023 and have now achieved 9% of its electricity, for the whole global south.
Very nice Vijay.
From the article: “ It’s a pernicious intrusion in energy markets that shortens lifespans, snuffs out newborn cries…”
One can wonder about motives considering the parallel restrictions placed on DDT.
“11. Population control advocates blamed DDT for increasing third world population. In the 1960s, World Health Organization authorities believed there was no alternative to the overpopulation problem but to assure than (sic) up to 40 percent of the children in poor nations would die of malaria. As an official of the Agency for International Development stated, “Rather dead than alive and riotously reproducing.” [Desowitz, RS. 1992. Malaria Capers, W.W. Norton & Company]”–Hat tip to Steve Milloy at Junkscience.com
Quote is someone talking about John. What did John say?
I want to thank this website for published so many Vijay articles. Hs work, along with the articles by Anthony Watts, are consistently goo. I can’t recall one article by these two authors that did not make the daily recommended reading list at my Honest Climate Science and Energy
I venture to say “good”, not ‘goo’. Reading what one writes prior to posting is a ‘good’ thing.
Careful Richard.
Maybe if Anthony and Vijay are alerted that their articles are being purloined for publication at your website, they’ll start using pseudonyms.
You forgot to mention the great contributions from Linnea, Eric, Charles R, Larry H, Sterling B, Paul H, and particularly Pierre and Kenneth from NTZ. !
I’m sure there are others who have made great contributions.
You are not one of them.
You’re starting to type like Mosher.
Correct on current climate colonialism but wrong about the past. Wealth was not systematically removed because there was no wealth without our skills and our demand for resources that otherwise had no value.
They should all have become wealthy after we departed but they messed up.
They who?
We who?
Indigenes.
Colonialists.
Those Indigenes and Colonialists are all dead.
The problems in Africa go far beyond energy, and have little to do these days with long ago colonialism. Endemic corruption. Institutionalized incompetency (think Nigeria, South Africa). Recurrent famine, in part from overpopulation compared to agricultural Somalia, Ethiopia, Sudan). Recurrent disease (not just malaria post DDT). Inadequate infrastructure. These all interlock, so compound each other.
The comparisons to, say, modern India are stark.
Also, endemic superstition.
Great point. I made a presentation to Botswana Oil last year who have a plan to develop liquid fuels from their abundant coal reserves.
Unfortunately, they are also trying to comply with climate scam CO2 emission goals which make this technology impractical. E.G. Carbon credits or offsets or other costly nonsense.
The situation will not improve as long as Africa allows western neo-colonialists in green clothes to stop its development.
It does drive them towards China.
I’ve spent a bit of time in East Africa and had the honor and pleasure of traveling there
with the late Dr Paul Farmer who devoted his life to helping the people there
and others in similar situations around the world. Dr Paul and I had a conversation
one night about what was needed to lift these people up and the first thing he
said was defeating malaria. The children are unable to obtain an education because
of being infected with malaria prevents them from going to school. He said it would
start there.
The malaria transmission story and its cures are more western lies to subjugate Africa.
Believed by nearly everyone despite flimsy evidence, even people on this site.
usmalaria.com
I read many years ago that sickle cell was good at preventing malaria infection.
its called the Dark Continent because they don’t have the electricity to turn on the lights …
A priority for African people should be to supply them with non-toxic cooking devices and fuels.
How many millions there are still dying every year from smoke asphyxiation / lung disease from indoor un-vented cooking fires fueled by stuff such as cattle dung?
Where is the data rather than just unsupported claims?
A lack of clean cooking contributes to 3.7 million premature deaths annually, with women and children most at risk.
Poor indoor air quality is a leading cause of premature death worldwide.
In Africa alone, women and children account for 60% of early deaths related to smoke inhalation and indoor air pollution.
This is primarily the result of basic cooking practices that lead to respiratory complications and cardiovascular diseases.
https://www.iea.org/reports/a-vision-for-clean-cooking-access-for-all/executive-summary
Answer: 3.11 million deaths from indoor air pollution: as mentioned, mostly women & children burning wood, crop residue, charcoal & dried cow dung, to cook, heat and light their homes. [2021 data]
And to save you time here is the link to a chart:
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/number-of-deaths-by-risk-factor
Also
https://ourworldindata.org/energy-access
https://ourworldindata.org/indoor-air-pollution
The climate alarmists’ keeping these people energy poor by restricting access to invesrtment capital (to build reliable energy plants) is immoral and shameful. And it’s a problem NOW, not a computer driven prediction that might occur decades in the future.
I see this kind of claim frequently but do not recall even one single statement of backstop for it. On what is it based, something like the oh so well documented PM2.5 scriptures?
see my response to your earlier comment
How much of the corruption and other aspects of poor government are funded and manipulated by foreign NGOs and foreign political organizations because the corruption allows these foreign entities to greatly profit through resource plundering?
You mean like Russia sending in proxies to steal gold?
Or China raping the environment mining cobalt with children slaves?
Stuff like that?
You can find numbers of annual deaths from cooking over open fire of: 3.1, 3.4, or 3.7 million depending on the source. To most of us these are just numbers. Let me put these numbers into prospective. That is more deaths every year than from all the natural disasters combined in this century. An other perspective: That is about the same number of deaths you would get if a 747 with 380 passengers crashed every hour of the year.
The USA, Australia, Canada haven’t done too bad considering they were at one time U.K. colonies.
Valid point. Add India to the list. Probably more, but time is limited.
European colonialism that methodically extracted wealth from Africa until the system’s collapse in the last century
What wealth was extracted exactly? The majority of European colonisation of Africa took place after the legal end to international slavery and during the latter part of the 1800s and early 1900s. This would have been when European nations were already more wealthy than they had ever been as a consequence of burning coal and oil to produce vast amounts of energy and power. Also, the ‘system’ didn’t collapse but was rolled back due to more ‘enlightened’ sentiments and also because colonies were expensive to run. Getting cheap mahogany or cocoa or any other commodity may have made previous empires wealthy but those kind of economies became irrelevant with the advent of steam engines and all the other means of power that followed.
In addition the enslavement of white Europeans and black Africans by the Islamic states in the North ended with colonialism.
And…