From NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT
By Paul Homewood
Helene has been declared as the most powerful hurricane to hit Florida’s Big Bend region.
But what about the unnamed 1896 hurricane, which demolished Cedar Keys?

This image shows the devastation caused by the Great Hurricane of 1896 that struck the Gulf and Atlantic coasts of Florida. With its 2,200-kilometer coastline, Florida is the U.S. state most vulnerable to these storms. More than 450 recorded tropical storms and hurricanes have reached its shores since European exploration began. The hurricane of September 1896 destroyed most of the residential area of the town of Cedar Key on the upper west coast of the Florida peninsula, killing dozens of residents and destroying most of Cedar Key’s industries. Before making landfall, the storm and its tidal surge overwhelmed more than 100 sponging boats, killing untold numbers of crewmen. The hurricane then crossed the peninsula, leaving a wide swath of destruction until it reached the Atlantic coast at Fernandina, before heading north to Virginia. This image shows survivors, both white and black, in Fernandina, standing atop mounds of rubble, still seemingly shocked by the destruction
https://www.loc.gov/item/2021669942
By any standards the 1896 Cedar Keys hurricane was a monster. This is Wikipedia’s summary:
The 1896 Cedar Keys hurricane was a powerful and destructive tropical cyclone that devastated much of the East Coast of the United States, starting with Florida‘s Cedar Keys, near the end of September 1896. The storm’s rapid movement allowed it to maintain much of its intensity after landfall and cause significant damage over a broad area; as a result, it became one of the costliest United States hurricanes at the time. The fourth tropical cyclone of the 1896 Atlantic hurricane season, it formed by September 22, likely from a tropical wave, before crossing the Caribbean Sea just south of the Greater Antilles. It entered the Gulf of Mexico as the equivalent of a major hurricane on the Saffir–Simpson scale, and struck the Cedar Keys—an offshore island chain that includes the island and city of Cedar Key—early on the morning of September 29 with winds of 125 mph . The area was inundated by a devastating 10.5 ft storm surge that undermined buildings, washed out the connecting railroad to the mainland, and submerged the smaller, outlying islands, where 31 people were killed. Strong winds also destroyed many of the red cedar trees that played an important role in the economy of the region. No hurricane would hit this region of Florida with a similar strength until 2023.
The cyclone continued inland over the Suwannee River valley, causing widespread destruction in dozens of communities across interior northern Florida; in the hardest-hit settlements, intense winds left few trees or buildings standing. The hurricane razed 5,000 sq mi (13,000 km2) of dense pine forests in northern Florida, crippling the turpentine industry. Crops and livestock were destroyed, and thousands of individuals were left homeless. The storm killed at least 70 people in mainland Florida, while inflicting approximately $3 million (equivalent to $110 million in 2023) in property damage across the state. Speeding north, the hurricane ravaged southeastern Georgia and the Sea Islands. In Savannah, a 45-minute onslaught of fierce winds unroofed thousands of structures. Parks, cemeteries, and streets in the city were littered with fallen trees, and the Savannah River saw dozens of wrecked boats. At least 37 people in Georgia died. Strong winds and high tides battered southeastern South Carolina, ruining rice crops and peeling off roofs. The storm then tracked through mostly rural sectors of North Carolina and did significant wind damage in the Raleigh–Durham area.
Although the hurricane was weakening and transitioning into an extratropical cyclone late on September 29, its rapid forward movement contributed to high wind velocities across parts of the Mid-Atlantic states, with gusts approaching 100 mph (160 km/h). Additionally, torrential rains fell west of the storm’s track. In Virginia, cities and agricultural districts alike suffered extensive damage. Flash flooding in the Shenandoah Valley culminated in the failure of an earthen dam upstream from Staunton, unleashing a torrent of water that swept houses from their foundations and ravaged the town’s commercial district. In Washington, D.C., thousands of trees were uprooted or snapped, communications were severed, and localized streaks of violent gusts damaged many public and private buildings. The White House grounds were left in disarray. High tides in the Chesapeake Bay triggered flooding in coastal cities. In Pennsylvania, flooding rains and powerful wind gusts produced widespread destruction. Railroads in western parts of the state were plagued by washouts and landslides, while in southeastern areas, hundreds of barns were destroyed. The storm demolished a 5,390 ft (1,640 m) bridge over the Susquehanna River, while the Gettysburg Battlefield lost hundreds of trees, a few of which struck and damaged historical monuments. Strong winds extended as far east as Long Island. Heavy rainfall reached west into Ohio, and the hurricane’s extratropical remnants wrought havoc on shipping in the Great Lakes. The storm caused at least 202 deaths and wrought more than $9.6 million (equivalent to $352 million in 2023) in damage.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1896_Cedar_Keys_hurricane
Just as with Helene, Cedar Keys rapidly intensified over the Gulf, and then proceeded to cause massive devastation inland, through Georgia, the Carolinas, and up to New York. There were 115 deaths and 12000 left homeless in Florida alone. Cedar Keys was hit by a 10.5 ft storm surge, bigger than anything recorded during Helene. Nearby Yankeetown had an even bigger surge of over 12ft.
Unsurprisingly most of the Cedar Keys’ residential area and industry was destroyed. Helene by contrast left nothing like this sort of damage, something that cannot simply be explained away by more robust buildings.
Georgia also bore the brunt of the storm, with damage to plantations and rice crops, widespread destruction of homes and the complete clearing of dense pine forests east of Folkston. The storm was still wreaking havoc when it reached Virginia, and produced what still stands as the most severe windstorm in Richmond’s history.
Catastrophic flooding followed the storm on its pathway north, even as far as Ohio.
In total there were reckoned to be 202 fatalities.
Yet despite all of this, the 1896 hurricane was only rated as Cat 3, with winds of 125 mph. Remember that Helene supposedly had winds of 140 mph.
So how did the authorities arrive at their estimate of 125mph? Remember that in those days anemometers were useless for measuring hurricane speeds winds, even if you actually had one at the exact centre of the storm. Below is the Hurricane Research Division’s record of how they arrived at their conclusions. I have highlighted the part relevant to landfall:
https://web.archive.org/web/20110604063810/http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/hurdat/metadata_master.html
Hardly scientific!
The analysis by Partagas, which is referred to and which the latest analysis is based on can be read here, and is no better, mainly referring to newspaper reports.
Nowhere in any of their or the HRD analysis is there any mention of actual recordings of wind speed or central pressure. Hardly surprising, given that all happened in 1896.
Yet we are expected believe that Helene, with considerably less damage, both in Florida and inland, was a much stronger storm.
Sorry, I just don’t believe it.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.




Exxon must tell the truth.
There should be something equivalent to the Enhanced Fujita scale applied to historic hurricanes, estimating wind speed from damage on the ground.
I have previously made similar comments here after several “major” hurricanes.
The damage shown in the pics from the modern monster hurricanes is always less than than shown from less powerful historical storms.
I am somewhat looking a building damage, but building codes change. You also must get past the storm surge damage on buildings and just evaluate wind speed damage to structures.
However, the clearest examples are looking at the TREES! I have seen several photos that were supposedly right at landfall and the common deciduous trees still have their leaves.
Further, is there a scale for palm tree damage? I know they survive by bending, but surely at some level of high wind speed then X% of palm trees would snap or have their fronds denuded?
Yet again, no buoys or weather stations in the path reported anything like 140 MPH sustained winds. I saw reports of GUSTS to 108, 95, and 98, but nothing on sustained winds. I know the buoys are shorter than the 10 meter standard, but still, those numbers are not even close.
We cannot engage in actual scientific debate if the people presenting the data are cooking the books, and right now I do not trust the entrenched federal bureaucracy as far as I can throw them.
Storm surge, as well as wind damage is an important matrix. It is important, as in to note that Helene and the 1896 storm produced very similar surge. However the article missed three larger hurricanes that hit the same area. One with a 20′ storm surge. Five major hurricanes in 6 years (1842 to 1848) hitting close to the same area as Helena.
October 4, 1842 – A 955 mbar major hurricane which makes landfall on northwestern Florida produces a 20-foot (6 m) storm surge at Cedar Key. Strong winds result in severe damage in Tallahassee,October 11, 1846 – The Great Havana Hurricane of 1846 passes near Key West with an estimated pressure of 902 mbar (hPa) and winds of possibly Category 5 status,[39] damaging or destroying all but 6 of the houses in the city. 50 are killed,[40] and damage amounts to $200,000 (1846 USD, $4.8 million 2008 USD). It is estimated it struck mainland Florida near Cedar Key,[41] producing severe flooding and strong winds.[6]
September 25, 1848 – The Great Gale of 1848 strikes near Tampa as a major hurricane with an estimated pressure of 948 mbar.[6] Considered one of the most significant hurricanes in the Tampa area, the 15 foot (4.6 m) storm surge from the hurricane destroyed much of Tampa and nearby Fort Brooke.[42]
October 11, 1848 – A major hurricane hits northwestern Florida, causing additional damage to the severe hurricane a few weeks before.[43]
Who knows what these storms would be recorded at with todays methods, 24 7 monitoring, questionable formulas to project surface winds from disparate heights. And so yes, storm surge and wind damage to similar structures are a better method to compare. There is no reason ground based anemometers could not be placed where the eye wall is likely to pass. Oh, I think stripped and broken palm trees are indications of cat 5 on the Stradford Simpson scale, assuming no tornadoes in that location.
Thanks for the history lesson.
We need to study history when it comes to weather in order to put things in perspective, especially nowadays, because Climate Alarmists distort weather history at every turn as a means to promote their human-caused climate change narrative.
It is good to compare strom surge damage as well as wind damage. For instance the 1896 storm had very similar storm surge.
Yet the article missed five previous major hurricanes that all hist within 6 years, one with a 20 foot storm surge in the same area.
October 4, 1842 – A 955 mbar major hurricane which makes landfall on northwestern Florida produces a 20-foot (6 m) storm surge at Cedar Key. Strong winds result in severe damage in Tallahassee,
October 11, 1846 – The Great Havana Hurricane of 1846 passes near Key West with an estimated pressure of 902 mbar (hPa) and winds of possibly Category 5 status,[39] damaging or destroying all but 6 of the houses in the city. 50 are killed,[40] and damage amounts to $200,000 (1846 USD, $4.8 million 2008 USD). It is estimated it struck mainland Florida near Cedar Key,[41] producing severe flooding and strong winds.[6]
September 25, 1848 – The Great Gale of 1848 strikes near Tampa as a major hurricane with an estimated pressure of 948 mbar.[6] Considered one of the most significant hurricanes in the Tampa area, the 15 foot (4.6 m) storm surge from the hurricane destroyed much of Tampa and nearby Fort Brooke.[42]
October 11, 1848 – A major hurricane hits northwestern Florida, causing additional damage to the severe hurricane a few weeks before.[
It is good to compare strom surge damage as well as wind damage. For instance the 1896 storm had very similar storm surge.
Yet the article missed five previous major hurricanes that all hist within 6 years, one with a 20 foot storm surge in the same area.
October 4, 1842 – A 955 major hurricane which makes landfall on northwestern Florida produces a 20-foot (6 m) storm surge at Cedar Key. Strong winds result in severe damage in
October 11, 1846 – The Great Havana Hurricane of 1846 passes near Key West with an estimated pressure of 902 mbar (hPa) and winds of possibly Cat 5 status, damaging or destroying all but 6 of the houses in the city. 50 are killed, and damage amounts to $200,000 (1846 USD, $4.8 million 2008 USD). It is estimated it struck mainland Florida near Cedar Key producing severe flooding and strong winds.
September 25, 1848 – The Great Gale of 1848 strikes near Tampa as a major hurricane with an estimated pressure of 948 mbar. Considered one of the most significant hurricanes in the Tampa area, the 15 foot (4.6 m) storm surge from the hurricane destroyed much of Tampa and nearby Fort Brooke
October 11, 1848 – A major hurricane hits northwestern Florida, causing additional damage to the severe hurricane a few weeks before.
It is good to compare strom surge damage as well as wind damage. For instance the 1896 storm had very similar storm surge.
Yet the article missed five previous major hurricanes that all hist within 6 years, one with a 20 foot storm surge in the same area.
October 4, 1842 – A 955 major hurricane which makes landfall on northwestern Florida produces a 20-foot (6 m) storm surge at Cedar Key. Strong winds result in severe damage in
October 11, 1846 – The Great Havana Hurricane of 1846 passes near Key West with an estimated pressure of 902 mbar (hPa) and winds of possibly Cat 5 status, damaging or destroying all but 6 of the houses in the city. 50 are killed, and damage amounts to $200,000 (1846 USD, $4.8 million 2008 USD). It is estimated it struck mainland Florida near Cedar Key producing severe flooding and strong winds.
September 25, 1848 – The Great Gale of 1848 strikes near Tampa as a major hurricane with an estimated pressure of 948 mbar. Considered one of the most significant hurricanes in the Tampa area, the 15 foot (4.6 m) storm surge from the hurricane destroyed much of Tampa and nearby Fort Brooke
October 11, 1848 – A major hurricane hits northwestern Florida, causing additional damage to the severe hurricane a few weeks before.
It would be interesting to guess what these 1800s storms would register with todays 24 7 monitoring and controversial adjustments to the surface from elevation, and controversial method of obtaining sustained wind speed. Certainly they would have been rated far higher then they were.
Dang, I copied my intial reply, and it dissapeared more then once. I thought to many links and removed the irrelevant ones from wik. And it posted. Then ther disappeared ones returned. Feel free to delete the duplicates.
“We cannot engage in actual scientific debate if the people presenting the data are cooking the books”
That’s exactly where we are where it concerns Human-caused Climate Change. Our “officials” are cooking the books in order to promote their Alarmist Climate Change Agenda.
I heard a Fox Weather forecaster saying “historic” again when referring to Hurricane Helene. Fox Weather says *historic* a LOT. I’m not sure they know what historic means.
Now a Fox Weather forecaster is describing the damage from Hurricane Helene as the hurricane showing its “wrath”, as if Hurricane Helene is angry at the United States and that’s the reason for the damage.
Do these people ever listen to the words they say?
The great bore of 2024…
There was tremendous damage, mostly from flooding and the storm surge arriving with a high tide.
1896, arguably Australia’s hottest recorded year during the Federation Drought, arguably Australia’s worst recorded drought.
Extreme heat in 1896: Panic stricken people fled the outback on special trains as hundreds die.
Link
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federation_Drought
Dry conditions gradually became established during the late 1890s and several dry areas joined together to create the end result of a drought covering more than half the continent.
After Federation in 1901, the record dry spell culminated in 1902.
So it was just as warm in Australia in the recent past as it is today.
No unprecedented warming in Australia since the beginning of the CO2-phobia.
Apparently, the CO2 phobes don’t understand the current situation, otherwise, they wouldn’t be CO2 phobes.
Tony Heller’s view of the climate of 1895/1896.
The Climate Crisis Of 1896 Tony Heller
Thanks for the link, John. I love the way Tony Heller goes back in time (in this case 1896) to look at the extreme meteorological events of the past.
Whenever today’s climate alarmists associate an extreme meteorological event of the present day with the so-called “climate crisis” and the current CO2 levels in the atmosphere, we usually see them looking at the event in isolation and are making little or no attempt to put the event in proper historical perspective. If they do that at all, they cherry pick their data starting dates in a way that serves the alarmist narrative. One must not undermine their activist agenda built on the foundations of the alarmist narrative.
Thus, to put today’s extreme weather in historical perspective is religious heresy and though crime. One must have blind unquestioning faith in the alarmist narrative — it is not about the climate at all.
“Thus, to put today’s extreme weather in historical perspective is religious heresy and thought crime.”
That’s because weather history debunks Human-caused Climate Change.
Climate Alarmists claim CO2 is causing us to experience unprecedented weather phenomenon today, but if you look at weather history, you will find that the weather was just as bad or worse in the past when CO2 was not an issue and was not considered to be driving the weather.
So bad weather can happen regardless of the level of CO2 in the atmosphere. Storms in the past were just as strong or stronger with less CO2 in the air.
Climate Alarmists don’t want us to study or recite weather history for this reason.
It’s interesting to read all these historical accounts of extreme weather in 1896, the year Svante Arrhenius wrote his article about how CO2 buildup in the atmosphere would cause global warming.
Incidentally, Arrhenius had predicted that doubling the CO2 concentration from 300 to 600 ppm would cause a warming of nearly 5 degrees Celsius. By 1909, global average temperatures had dropped by about 0.4 C from the levels of 1896.
The mainstream media has become so useless I can’t believe anything they say good or bad. They are a disgrace.
Mainstream media lies are a danger to our society and our personal freedoms.
People cannot govern themselves properly if they are lied to all the time by authority figures, and that is the situation today.
These lies have given us the Biden-Harris administration, the worst, most destructive, and most dangerous administration in U.S. history.
If it was unnamed then it couldn’t have been worse than “Helene”. Right?
And how about the Galveston, Texas hurricane of 1900? Didn’t it kill between 7000 and 12,000 people and cause such widespread structural damage that the city never recovered and economic development moved inland to Houston? It’s worth noting that the climate alarmists choose to downplay or ignore storms like these because fossil fuel use could have had only a minuscule effect upon the weather of the time. Yet such a devastating storm still managed to develop.
Surface winds of 125 mph. Helene had winds of 140 mph at 5000 ft. Surface winds much lower.
Your conclusion is correct “I do not believe it [was a category 4 storm]”. The attached is the report from a hurricane hunter aircraft about an hour before landfall, and it delivers a reported surface wind speed of 105 to 106 mph. A mere Category 2 storm. The NHC reported flight level (at 10,000 feet above mean sea level) winds as being CAT4 but the metric is for surface wind speed, sustained, not instantaneous.
Likewise Reed Trimmer, the infamous storm chaser was in the eyewall filming and at no time were the winds he observed CAT4 strength. (135 mph winds hitting any vehicle broadside will flip it over like a child throwing a plastic toy across the room)
Wind speeds vary all the time with tropical storms. NOAA reported max sustained winds of 140 mph at actual landfall, which is Category 4. Hurricane hunter aircraft are not the final word on measured storm strength since they move around and may not precisely fly over the maximum sustained speeds in the eyewall at the moment that a storm makes landfall. A few miles difference in location can make a helluva lot of difference in measured wind speeds, and an hour’s time is a long time for additional strengthening for a storm that was rapidly intensifying.
Windspeed measurements from aircraft are just a data point. From that and many more data points wind speeds at differing altitudes, horizontal locations, and times must be estimated.
See the following summary of the methodology NOAA uses:
https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/aboutwindprofile.shtml
Sorry, but this is an ignorant post, not deserving of WUWT.
Buildings and infrastructure are vastly more hurricane resistant today than they were 128 years ago. In the late 19th century there was no such thing as “hurricane resistant design”. Buildings in Florida at that time were mostly wood frame, no steel reinforced concrete block as standard today, no shutters or hurricane-resistant impact glass or doors, and no attention given to connections between the roof – the part of any building most subject to wind induced pressures (due to “lift”) – and the vertical walls of a building.
Geez, all you have to do is look at photos from Hurricane Ian (I witnessed it first hand) in Fort Myers Beach – all of the older structures dating back before modern hurricane standards were utterly destroyed by storm surge, while virtually all of the buildings erected since late 1990s when the Florida Building Code revisions were implemented suffered nothing but superficial storm damage, even with the 15-ft storm surge
There was also little advance warning of any hurricane in 1896, no systematic evacuations of coastal populations, and no models to predict where the storm would go, how strong it would be, and how large it would be. Or which side of the eyewall would make landfall in a given area.
Look, if you want to take issue with how the wind speeds were determined for the 1896 hurricane (estimated and not measured), fine, have at it. Minimum eye barometric pressure is the best gage of peak eyewall wind speeds, but measurements of such were few and far between … and say nothing of how big the storm eyewall was and how fast it was moving (for a fast moving storm the speed of movement makes a huge difference between being on the dangerous semi-circle or the other side of the storm).
But all that is essentially irrelevant anyway, because storm surge is vastly more dangerous – literally unsurvivable – than any hurricane force winds. Storm surge is only partly a function of peak wind speeds, as it is extremely dependent upon the direction of winds relative to the landforms, the speed of the storm, which side of the storm, as well as normal tides and currents.
The building standards, warnings, and information about impending cyclone landfalls today are comprehensive and accurate. Believe them.