From the University of Texas at Austin and the “What could possibly go wrong?” department comes this inanity that reminds me of how well the evacuation of New Orleans went in 2005 with Hurricane Katrina. I’m amazed anyone actually spent any time and money on this. Thanks to Charles for the graphic depicting my vision of the process. – Anthony
Escape from hurricanes with driverless cars
Supercomputers aid simulations to help carless populations in Houston evacuation scenario
When a hurricane strikes, the most vulnerable are not always able to get out in time. UT Austin scientists are using supercomputers at the Texas Advanced Computing (TACC) to study how shared autonomous vehicles (SAVs) can get people who do not have their own car into shelters out of harm’s way.
“A key finding of our study is that if you need to size this system for a certain evacuation period, then you’re going to want one shared vehicle for every 14 evacuees along the very long coastline between Galveston and Houston,” said Kara Kockelman, a professor of transportation engineering in the Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering at UT Austin. She co-authored the study, published in the journal Transportation Planning and Technology (June 2024).
The idea is to use shared autonomous vehicles, akin to the robotaxis of companies like Cruise and Waymo, to bring carless populations to bus stations that can then transport them to hurricane shelters further inland of Houston.
“That can be difficult to do in these low density, more rural environments to do in less than a couple of hours,” Kockelman added. The areas at high risk for evacuation include Brazoria, Chambers, Galveston, Harris, and Liberty counties. The study focuses on the thousands of people who can be stranded, such as those listed in Medicare databases who don’t have cars or access to a ride.
An estimated 900,000 people will receive orders to evacuate when a Category 5 hurricane strikes—about 12.4 percent of the Houston area’s total population. The engineers estimated that the background traffic is about 50 percent of the normal traffic load. The rest of the population is assumed to remain in place.
The evacuees will travel across Houston’s complex network of roads; 36,124 links spread across 5,217 areas, known as traffic analysis zones. Out of these, 1,035 zones are in areas highly likely to be hit by strong hurricanes.

Kockelman was awarded allocations for her traffic simulations with SAVs on TACC’s Frontera supercomputer, the fastest supercomputer on a U.S. university campus and funded by the National Science Foundation.
“This work is impossible without supercomputers,” added Kockelman. “We’re tracking individual persons and individual vehicles every few seconds over 24 hours or days of actual traffic as it evolves from morning to evening and overnight.”
The traffic decisions in the simulations account for how bad traffic is, picking the best routes, and prioritizing pick-ups to minimize the time that it takes to clear evacuees.
The engineers used the (SUMO) Simulation of Urban Mobility traffic simulation software to assess traffic congestion and network capacities. They modeled pre-disaster evacuation scenarios with a lead time of several days before hurricane landfall.
“SUMO models the daily activities of everyone living in the region,” said Kentaro Mori, a UT Austin PhD student supervised by Kockelman. “There’s a lot of complexity that adds to the computational cost. Without TACC, we wouldn’t be able to run the many scenarios that we need to truly answer these important research questions and make the best policy recommendations.”
The team started the simulations with 200 robotaxis expanding out to 1,200—they also tried different sized cars.
“At the end of the day the 5-seater cars were the nimblest,” Kockelman said. “These vehicles accelerate more quickly into traffic compared to the larger vehicles.” What’s more, the simulations showed diminishing returns on a fleet larger than 200.
This study was a pioneering effort that provides suggestive data of a viable alternative mode of transportation for hurricane evacuees without access to private vehicles. While the results are not being directly used for hurricane applications yet, the engineers did consult with evacuation leaders for Texas in forming the study. The authors anticipate SAVs playing a bigger role in evacuations, as companies like Waymo broaden their ridership; and operations make improvements through methods such as smart repositioning of idle vehicles, optimal dynamic ride sharing matching, enhanced path finding algorithms, and more.
Kockelman added that the traffic simulations could apply to other cities and different disaster evacuation scenarios, such as wildfires on the west coast.
“The ability to simulate in detail and allow for uncertainty and heterogeneity in the population was never feasible before with the way people make decisions or how traffic unfolds second-by-second level,” Kockelman said. “That richness comes alive with the use of TACC systems. We’re fortunate that we’re here at UT Austin and able to harness that ability.”
The study, “Leveraging shared autonomous vehicles for vulnerable populations during pre-disaster evacuation,” was published June 2024 in the journal Transportation Planning and Technology. The study authors are Jooyong Lee of the Department of Urban & Transportation Engineering, Kyonggi University, Suwon, South Korea; and Kara M. Kockelman of Transportation Engineering, Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
We know from past experience that this will NOT be the case. There is always a large portion of the population outside of evacuation zones who are still going to flee the area and add to the traffic congestion. I have this vision of autonomous vehicles transporting people the wrong way INTO the danger zone.
And that is BEFORE the real panic sets in.
Haha. Never in the history of Texas so many words were devoted to so much nonsense.
Did they allow for the recharging of all those driverless EVs?
“SUMO models the daily activities of everyone living in the region,” said Kentaro Mori, a UT Austin PhD student supervised by Kockelman. “There’s a lot of complexity that adds to the computational cost. Without TACC, we wouldn’t be able to run the many scenarios that we need to truly answer these important research questions and make the best policy recommendations.”
Will Mori be willing to take responsibility for the ‘best policy recommendations’ if they are implemented?
‘Answer these important research questions’
Only important to his PhD thesis—not in the real world.
“The meaning of this degree is that the recipient of instruction is examined for the last time in his life, and is pronounced completely full. After this, no new ideas can be imparted to him.”
— Stephen Leacock
No one in academia takes ‘responsibility’ for anything.
Academia is the root of all evil.
“scientists are using supercomputers”
Looks like the same work could be done as well in VBA in a 1990’s Excel sheet.
But then who’d buy supercomputers?
Gets to the core issue, and answer’s AW’s “amazed anyone actually spent any time and money on this“: What task do you give entry-level supercomputer users to train them what supercomputers are for?
Supercomputers are a 1950’s idea pop-culturized by scifi writers like Asimov (died 1992). What engineers though of as a supercomputer in the 1950’s is a $10 solar calculator today. I remember when people cared deeply how many kilobytes of whatever memory they had in their huge desktop computers, and even then, despite floppy disks and command lines, most of the power was used for user experience, not calculating anything.
ref: “Mauchly and Eckert began building UNIVAC I in 1948 and a contract for the machine was signed by the Census Bureau on March 31, 1951, and a dedication ceremony was held in June of that year. UNIVAC I was soon used to tabulate part of the 1950 population census and the entire 1954 economic census.”
All the real work in that 1950 census and also in the 2024 traffic study is data collection. One smart guy at a working off-the-shef computer can probably do the rest quickly.
People who don’t want to wait 10 years for the results?
Dozens of super computers over half a century and still waiting for an accurate weather model. I guess we have to wait another 10 years and add a few more supercomputers.
And don’t get me started on nuclear fusion, which was only 10 years away 50 years ago.
People who like getting lots of stupid results quicker.
Perhaps they could try several dozen models and average the results…
… and pretend it was accurate and had some relevance to reality.
Why would they care? They’ve looked and looked for 40 years and still can’t observe any tropical tropospherical hotspots which all the non super computers all claimed would be there.
Now they use supercomputers to not find them much faster?
“ the daily activities of everyone living in” Houston Texas?! Yeah, definitely that info is accessible, well defined and trustworthy.
And amenable to analysis.
I don’t care how amenable they is, I ain’t tellin’ ’em my daily activities.
Mike in Houston
You do. 24/7
Just follow their mobile phones. All the information is there. Than you have the smart meter info number plate cameras etc etc.
On a more serious note, we are currently in an intellectual analog of the Uncanny Valley in terms of competence and technological assistance.
30 years ago, old fashioned taxi dispatchers who were familiar with every block of a city, including construction, difficulties, quirks, driveability etc. would have been able to perform this organizational task far better and faster, whether dispatching humans or automated vehicles, which of course didn’t exist back then.
People with that level knowledge and competence have almost completely disappeared, and an even a smaller percentage are employed, so we now have humans, many of whom cannot even read maps using technology for dispatching emergency services and automated apps dispatching transportation services and doing it reasonably well.
Technology is generally compensating for the loss of human competence.
It won’t be very long before the Uncanny Valley is traversed and automated dispatch would perform better, although any attempt to model this currently is silly.
AI will have to be flexible on the fly for the unexpected including but not limited to:
And so many others.
The intricate battle plans given to section commanders for the WW2 D-Day landings at the beaches of Normandy ran to several hundred pages.
When they hit the beaches, all plans went out the window, replaced by just one spontaneous one –
“GET OFF THE BEACH!”
“the best laid plans gai oft astray”, or something…
Gang aft agley
And just a few unanticipated glitches will clog up the whole system and bring it all crashing, not even A.I. will untangle the knot.
Rotter got to another basic issue. The model evaluated what was possible if everyone knew and cared ho the model worked. The programmer’s quoted words steered far clear of human behavior.
CTM,
Person delays while taking selfies.
…..
Another factor, people behave less rationally in crises. Behaviour modelled in some assumed circumstances might not apply to the real event. Echoes of coupled non-linear chaotic systems that IPCC said to have modelling challenges.
Geoff S
Oh but once everyone is nestled in their 15-minute cities and nobody but the commissars have a private car (to get to their private jet), things will be so much simpler. Nobody will be allowed to leave their assigned sector without permission, and their exact location will be known at all times. The high social score proles will be evacuated first. The lowest may not be evacuated at all. Any disorder will be dealt with by the drone terminators.
The exact location of your mobile phone is already known at all times. And so is the exact location of every new car.
2.5 Person to be picked up weighs 460 pounds (208 kg)
….system grinds to halt.
After the glorious revolution, after imagining what can be, unburdened by what has been, all pretense of a need for autonomous vehicles will have been dropped, memory-holed, and long forgotten, Dan.
The buses that transport low social score proles to the fields will be used to transport the high score proles away from danger. Maybe. If the local cadres bother, and the depopulation quotas have been met already.
Probably the most efficient approach is just to have the proles shelter in place, then cart off the dead to the composting field and the injured to the MAID van, then to the composting field, and finally get to work cleaning up the rubble.
It will be explained that Trump’s climate inaction and his army of climate deniers is to blame during the Two-Minutes Hate, which lasts for twenty minutes most days. But if you think about it, there is great significance to the passage of time…
First of all, Cat 5? How often has that happened?
Their models have been so superb when it comes to projected hurricane frequency, location and intensity already. Can you say Beryl? UT is wasting your money on this
Just looked it up. The entire state of Texas has never been hit by a Cat 5.
Nice work, Rud!
Apparently not everything is bigger in Texas.
Yes it is.
I was in Texas for a few days with my ex wife.
She said she was disappointed at the myth and hype … not bigger in Texas.
Just for reference, Florida has been hit by 3–1935 Labor Day in the Keys, Andrew 1992 at Homestead, and Michael 2018 in the Panhandle.
The work of the supercomputer programmer is keeping the supercomputer busy. So much power. So few applications.
There are more than enough applications. What’s your problem with supercomputers? Be happy with your 1990s vba excel sheet and let others be. 😀
Too much carbon emissions
Too much plastic
Too much electricity
Too much air-con
Too much GIGO
They must be good at crypto mining.
Fortunately where I live is not susceptible to hurricanes, but even if it were, the last thing I’d want to do is get in a car I can’t control.
No worries there PD, we only get to travel to a neighboring sector once a month, if you maintain a clean social credit score of course. If you want to go ten sectors away, you’ll need to bank your autonomous vehicle credits for 10 months and not accidentally misgender someone.
1 yellow school bus takes the place of at least 20 of these driveless EV’s … why not use the supercomputer to map routes for buses to take to maximize passengers and minimize missed folks … they could ID locations to pre-position buses so that drivers could jump in at start of the route … enough with the EV nonsense … could even have a scout car run ahead of bus and check on missing passengers … known route, known pick-up point , expected passengers …
We could do something like this in everyday life situations and call it….public transport. And we could use electric buses, or maybe even trams. It may even reduce pollution and congestion in cities, and enable more people to get around. 😀
Public transport has a use as an added mode of transport.
But NEVER as the only mode.
Trains are useful for mass transport from suburbs to high density city centres, but very limited for other purposes.
Can be useful for the infirmed and the otherwise hopelessly limited cases like you, living in the middle of 15 minute ghetto cities.
What REALLY enables more people to “get around” is private transport.
Cars, motorbikes etc etc provide that FREEDOM of movement
btw… the highest transport pollution measured in the UK is in and around train stations.
People like you and me will be in the forced labor camp or the Soylent Green factory, more likely. Fifty demerits for your double-plus ungood thoughtcrime. Freedom is slavery.
Yes, comrade commissar lusername. But only double-plus good thinkers like you will be allowed out of the 15-minute gulag.
Public transport is great as long as you’re going where it wants to go
And the electric bus isn’t on fire
I just watched a video discussing Operation Market Garden during World War Two. One of the reasons given for its failure was too many working parts. By that they meant the success of Market Garden depended on many different operations being completed successfully on time for any of the operations to succeed. This evacuation plan would seem to suffer the same problem.
Kind of like the Japanese plan for Midway. Lots of moving parts.
It might have worked if the US did exactly what they were expected to do.
There was also pretty poor intelligence information about that Panzer Division near the sixth bridge. But the officers brought their dinner clothes and golf clubs.
Yes sir.
If only Houston was a “15 minute city”!
Everybody could just walk out.
(They’d all be safe as long as they can walk faster than the hurricane!)
That was the case with Harvey. It sat off the coast and rained (35 inches at my house). At the rate it was drifting northeast, I could have walked to Beaumont and beaten it.
Did they use the actual data from Houston’s evacuation plan that was used for Hurricane Rita in 2005 ?
That was a disaster: my father-in-law sat on I-45 for > 15 hours trying to go North [started from Tidwell Rd – well north of the 610-Loop!] then finally gave up and returned home to [safely] ride the storm out. Multiple cars running out gas, bathroom breaks on the roadside, people driving erratically, etc. — all in bad weather. This was well before EVs & driverless cars ; what could go wrong adding them to mix? lol..
Run the simulation again with only electric cars and busses at half charge. Let me know how it works out.
Did they model the outcome on no electricity?
Having driven in Houston, I doubt that any robot car could get through the city in any kind of weather emergency.
New Orleans during Katrina was an example of a plan like this one.
About 30-40% of the city had no cars. The city had planned to use city school busses for evacuation, but nobody told their drivers not to evacuate, so they did, quickly.
With no drivers, all but the one bus stolen by a 13 y.o. kid to haul his block to Houston flooded in the yard, saving no one.
Private vehicles, paper maps, good information about conditions, and self preparedness are the way that some people will be saved.
As far as implementation goes, whether a good or bad idea, the funds to do it will be in the same hands that did such a good job of securing New Orleans’ dams, levees, drainage canals and other protections against massive flooding if a hurricane might strike, i.e. diverted to other causes and bank accounts.
And for all the effort put in the computer program will get three of four “guesses” wrong. That is the problem with predictions which play with numbers without knowing, accounting for and programming into a model a recognisable model of a human thought pattern (which doesn’t currently exist and probably never will in computer terms)..
New Orleans is severely handicapped in that there are four roads out from New Orleans.
That includes all of the back road outlets too.
I suppose if you are desperate, you could use the railroad trestle to Slidell.
A 2nd major issue is that all but one of those routes are at sea level, exposed to open water,
The route that is reasonably safe is I10 west, which is relatively high over the water, above the treeline in general.
Hurricane Katrina struck from the South with it’s NE quadrant of strong winds cut off passage East.
Many that fled to Gulfport learned that it wasn’t a safe location.
Hurricane Andrew hit to the West of NOLA, I10 West was not a safe drive during Andrew.
If you are going to get out, you have to do it days beforehand.
Houston doesn’t have that severe a problem with exits from town.
Still, if you plan to stop at a hotel/motel miles down the road you choose, it will likely be fully booked. Places hundreds of miles away will be booked.
Again, if you are going to evacuate, do it early!
They chose to live there. They can choose to live elsewhere.