Human Progress excerpted a paywalled article from Bloomberg discussing the fact that major crops are expected to continue to set records in the 2024/2025 crop year. This good news is not unexpected for anyone who understands agronomy and botany or who regularly reads Climate Realism. It reflects the long-term trend for most crops during the period of modest warming and increased atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations. Sadly, Bloomberg’s story ignores the proven and significant role rising CO2 levels are playing in improved crop yields and production.
Human Progress writes:
Compared with a decade ago, the world will harvest in 2024-25 about 10% more wheat, about 15% more corn, nearly 30% more soybeans, and about 10% more rice. Except for corn, all the other three key food commodities will enjoy a record high production.
[T]he US Department of Agriculture said it anticipates American farmers will reap record yields for two key food commodities: on average, 183.1 bushels per acre of corn, and 53.2 bushels per acre of soybeans…
Two decades ago, US corn farmers were harvesting about 150 bushels per acre; in the mid-1980s, the number was closer to 110 bushels.
This good news further confirms what Climate Realism has long pointed out. Modestly warmer weather and higher CO2 levels are good for plants in general, leading to a net greening of the earth and boosting yields and production of crops. In fact, the most recent data from the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) show that globally the yield and production of cereal crops (the crop segment that makes up the majority of the calorie intake each day, often referred to as staple foods, rice, wheat, rye, oats, barley, millet, and maize, for example), have increased dramatically over the recent period slight warming. Between 1990 and 2022, the most recent year for which the FAO has data:
- Cereal yields have increased nearly 52 percent, with the most recent record for yield set in 2022; and
- Cereal production grew by approximately 57 percent. (see the chart, below)
Unfortunately, Bloomberg downplays or ignores entirely the role warming and rising CO2 have played in record crop yields and production, attributing the record setting crop production to expanded irrigation and better technologies like improved combines and tractors. Although improved technologies and wider access to them has undoubtedly contributed to the increase in crop production, research thoroughly demonstrates that so to have CO2 increases. Indeed, higher CO2 levels may have been the most significant factor driving crop increases in recent decades.
As has been discussed in more than 200 articles on Climate Realism, what is true of global cereal production, is true for most crops, like fruits, legumes, tubers, and vegetables, in most countries around the world. Yields have set records repeatedly during the recent period of climate change, food security has increased, and hunger and malnutrition have fallen.
Agronomy and Botany explain why crop production and yields have increased amidst global warming, and the same sciences explain why the world should likely expect crop production gains to continue. Modest warming has brought slightly higher rainfall totals, and a modestly longer growing season with fewer crop-killing late-season frosts. In addition, crops are benefitting from higher carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere, which any greenhouse operator will tell you is plant fertilizer, contributing to plants growing larger, faster, and using water more efficiently.
Thousands of real-world field and greenhouse experiments summarized at CO2 Science document the beneficial effect on higher CO2 concentrations on plant growth and crop production. Even NASA has acknowledged this point, writing:
Studies have shown that higher concentrations of atmospheric carbon dioxide affect crops in two important ways: they boost crop yields by increasing the rate of photosynthesis, which spurs growth, and they reduce the amount of water crops lose through transpiration. Plants transpire through their leaves, which contain tiny pores called stomata that open and collect carbon dioxide molecules for photosynthesis. During that process they release water vapor. As carbon dioxide concentrations increase, the pores don’t open as wide, resulting in lower levels of transpiration by plants and thus increased water-use efficiency.
Specifically, research cited in the journal Environmental Economics and Policy Studies found:
[S]atellite-based studies have yielded compelling evidence of stronger general growth effects than were anticipated in the 1990s. Zhu et al (2016) published a comprehensive study on greening and human activity from 1982 to 2009. The ratio of land areas that became greener, as opposed to browner, was approximately 9 to 1. The increase in atmospheric CO2 was just under 15% over the interval but was found to be responsible for approximately 70% of the observed greening, followed by the deposition of airborne nitrogen compounds (9%) from the combustion of coal and deflation of nitrate-containing agricultural fertilizers, lengthening growing seasons (8%), and land cover changes (4%), mainly reforestation of regions such as southeastern North America.
It is refreshing to see a major media outlet, like Bloomberg, publish some good news about crop production amid the near constant drum beat of false “climate change induced crop failure” stories put out by the mainstream media. One can only speculate why its writers ignored the firmly established roles that modest warming and more CO2 have played over the decades and continue to play in the increase in food production.

H. Sterling Burnett, Ph.D., is the Director of the Arthur B. Robinson Center on Climate and Environmental Policy and the managing editor of Environment & Climate News. In addition to directing The Heartland Institute’s Arthur B. Robinson Center on Climate and Environmental Policy, Burett puts Environment & Climate News together, is the editor of Heartland’s Climate Change Weekly email, and the host of the Environment & Climate News Podcast.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

The CAGW crowd can’t even get the sign of effects right.
Record crops?
The horror! The horror!
Furthermore….. It was CO2 what done it !!
(with a bit of help from chemical fertilisers, herbicides etc etc)
The U.S. coast is in an unprecedented hurricane drought – why this is terrifying – The Washington Post August 4th 2016
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
no hurricanes in bad too
Personally, I don’t mind if a few cows (or yeast cells for that matter) get between me and my cereals, if you know what I mean.
One should try to share the food chain.
Cereals are OK to eat directly (got to have bread for my burger) but there is ONLY one way to eat kale: Feed it to a cow and eat beef!
Not holding my breath while waiting for the BBC to report this.
This can’t possibly be true. (Wink, wink.) We’ve been told for nearly half a century that things are bad and getting worse, especially climate, and we’re all doomed to suffer, if not starve outright.
Surely the graph has been falsified. The well-fed people I see everywhere are surely wearing padding underneath their clothes. (Wink, wink.)
Alert, people. Sacrifice all your worldly comforts while there’s still time! Then the weather will surely be better 100 years from now. (Wink, wink.)
You left out the Nudge, nudge…
Say no more
And all brought to you , using fossil fuels ! 🙂
Three cheers for fossil fuels.. helping feed the world, in every way.
Good news isn’t good news to those who make their living selling bad news.
To turn an ancient saying on its head: “Good news is no news”.
Bad news is good news – good news is no news – no news is bad news
Thoughts 2009-2017: If the next election goes the other way, will mass market stand up comedy get funny again?
will mass market stand up comedy get funny again?
That would be great, but I’m not betting on it.
For what it is worth, Washington State is expecting a “robust” apple crop in 2024.
Cosmic Crisp (there is a Wikipedia page) is a recent and growing verity. Most people
have never seen a high-density orchard. Go here: 47.230315, -119.939426 . . .
in Google Earth Pro, use Street View and look to the west.
Of course the leftist media will not report any positive benefits of rising CO2.
This is why I have always believed that ultimately, contrary to what some of the skeptics believe, the truth, at least the gist of the truth, will in the end win out.
Ordinary people who know next to nothing of science can still look around and directly experience that the planet is doing fine. It’s the people who run things who need fixing.
Just curious. Are the quantities of corn used in producing biofuels included in the crop yield data? If not that could explain why the corn numbers are not as exciting.
Actually the corn numbers are amazing. From 110 to 183 bushel / acre is a 66% increase in yield in 40 years.
World/Population Google: 7.317 billion (2014)
World Population Clock: 8.2 Billion People (LIVE, 2024)
((8.2B-7.3B)/7.3B)*100% = 12%
Quick math check of opening paragraph = PASS
Thanks for being plausible, so many articles in other places fail basic math.
Very nice Sterling, good work.
According to top World Climate Scientists, these record crops will create massive starvation :
indeed. they will eventually rot and emit CO2 that will boil the oceans, create atmospheric rivers, mass flooding, droughts and thus, famine throughout the planet.
I keep hearing about the “record drought” here in western canada, like no other apparently. Yet somehow we are facing bumper crops of all sorts.
Historic drought is an amazing thing.
I’m busy writing a contribution to a master’s course on sustainable and regerative coffee farming, and I’ve just reached the part where I teach about the effects of elevated CO2 on coffee, both arabica (highland) and robusta (lowland) coffee.
There are groups of agricultural scientists mostly in Brazil and Portugal (including at Embrapa, the Brazilian national agricultural research organization) who for many years have been conducting research on the effects of increasing CO2 concentration on coffee, typically about 40% over ambient (more or less the same proportion as the increase since 1750).
The physiology of coffee is complex (to say the least), but summarizing a large body of research, due to elevated CO2 coffee bean yields increased by 15%, water use decreased, and the coffee plants were more resiliant to drought periods and higher temperatures (a few degrees). These effects were mainly due to an increase in the rate of photosynthesis and enhanced water used efficiency amongst many other effects. It turns out that coffee is very responsive to elevated CO2. These scientists are regularly getting their papers published in the mainstream scientific press.
A final note about corn (maize). It responds much less to elevated atmospheric CO2 concentrations because it has a different, more efficient method of capturing CO2 from the air (called C4 photosynthesis) compared to coffee, wheat, rice, potatoes, etc. (which possess C3 photosynthesis, which works better at cooler temperatures, lower light levels and rainy weather). This is why maize (and sugar cane and sorghum) yields haven’t increased in response to increasing CO2 in the air.
> This is why maize (and sugar cane and sorghum) yields haven’t increased in response to increasing CO2 in the air.
I don’t know sugar cane except it is dirty/nasty/destructive. Corn however has been selected for particular qualities for a century plus. While “yield” may seem to have plateaued it is more a case of being optimized. Same yield with fewer inputs. Same yield with more efficient field management from tilling, planting, survival to coincident maturity, and fewer resources to leftovers.
My eldest does tomatoes. One holy grail characteristic is all the fruit maturing at the same time. This is an amazing advance commercially. Not only does it make mechanical one pass harvesting possible but potentially adds an extra growing season.
And don’t worry about the future. My eldest with degrees in Botany and Agronomy assures me advanced hybridization research is already extant to address changes in most any environmental factors such as heat, humidity, growing season, precipitation.