No, Rigzone, Extreme Weather Is Not Becoming Increasingly Dangerous for Oil and Gas Companies

From ClimateREALISM

By Linnea Lueken

Offshore production platform, 2019, taken by Linnea Lueken

A recent article at Rigzone, “How Dangerous Is Extreme Weather for Oil and Gas Companies In 2024?” repeats the claim that extreme weather events like hurricanes are becoming worse, and therefore pose a major risk to oil and gas operations especially in the Gulf of Mexico. Offshore oil operations are threatened by hurricanes, but this is not new, it poses a threat every hurricane season. As a result, operators should work on improving weather prediction technologies and response plans, to reduce the risk. This is true regardless of climate change, because hurricanes have not, in fact, become more frequent or severe.

The Rigzone article consist primarily of interviews with a few oilfield “experts,” particularly an economist named Frederick J. Lawrence, who first makes the obvious statement that extreme weather can be a risk factor for oil and gas, and that “preparation and faster response will always be needed in addition to improved standards and resilience.”

Lawrence is the one who makes the claim later in the article that “increased preparations for extreme weather events will remain a top priority given what appears to be an increased frequency and intensity of events according to groups that track weather-related incidents[.]”

Others interviewed, like Alex Stevens from the Institute for Energy Research, sensibly said that “hurricanes have always posed risks to oil and gas companies due to their potential impact on supply chain logistics, infrastructure, and extraction demands.”

“Always” is correct, and in fact there is no evidence that hurricanes or other kinds of extreme weather that impact oil and gas operations are becoming, as Lawrence said, more frequent or intense.

Taking hurricanes as the clearest example, since they pose the most direct and obvious threat yearly to oil and gas operations in the Gulf of Mexico, we can see from available historical data that they are not becoming worse regardless of what “groups that track weather-related incidents” say.

My suspicion is that these “groups” being referred to are those like the World Weather Attribution, which make their living attributing various weather events to climate change. Theirs is an untrustworthy methodology for finding the truth about weather events, because they begin with the assumption that extreme weather events are caused or influenced by climate change, then work backwards to make their models fit and determine the degree to which climate change impacted it. We’ve covered this bad science several times at Climate Realism, like with the flooding in Dubai this past spring, wildfires in Canada last year, and other weather events that made the news.

Hurricanes have not been getting more severe or frequent- not in the Gulf of Mexico, and not worldwide, as Climate Realism has pointed out repeatedly in the past, here, here, and here, for example, and as has definitively established by data cited in Climate at a Glance: Hurricanes and Climate at a Glance: Global Tropical Cyclones.

The most recent global hurricane count, graphed in the figure below by Dr. Ryan Maue, show no increasing trend since the 1980s. If anything, hurricane counts appear to be slightly declining over that period. (See figure below)

global_major_freq

The measurement of the overall energy contained in hurricanes and tropical storms has likewise not displayed an increasing trend since records begin in the 1970s. There is significant annual variability, but no clear trend overall. (See figure below)

It is simply not true that hurricanes that threaten oil and gas operations are becoming more frequent or extreme.

Similarly, extreme heat, which is another weather condition that can threaten oilfield work especially in hot and arid regions like the American Southwest, is not becoming more intense either, as discussed in Climate At A Glance: U.S. Heatwaves.

Extreme cold, which is more dangerous to life, is also not becoming more likely.

That is not to say that it is not a good idea to continue to improve oilfield weather resilience and invest in better weather forecasting and storm tracking technology. But this is a good idea regardless of a trend in any direction when it comes to severe weather, because if one thing is absolutely certain it is that extreme weather will strike eventually and it will cause disruptions for operations.

While thankfully no one suggested in the particular Rigzone article that ceasing the use of fossil fuels is how you can prevent extreme weather, it is not helpful to spread falsehoods about trends in weather extremes.

5 15 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

32 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
August 6, 2024 3:03 am

Oh no, a fossil fuel site like rigzone is also leaving the cult of koch’s climate change denial? Heartland Institute Article to the rescue!

Reply to  MyUsername
August 6, 2024 3:59 am

Oh no, a LUSER with absolutely zero credibility, yapping mindlessly because it can’t argue the data.

abolition man
Reply to  bnice2000
August 6, 2024 4:33 am

One has to wonder if the alarmist NPCs like LUSER haven’t created their very own billionaire trading cards so that they can worship and admire from afar those that really benefit from the Great Green Scam!
It seems that while the former Soviet Union and China were once financiers of GangGreen, our own domestic elites now suck up enough government subsidies to foot the bill! The fat cat oligarchs are growing rather obese, continuing to fleece the sheeple. Shear madness!

Reply to  abolition man
August 6, 2024 5:26 am

Like this?

https://collecttrumpcards.com/

We are projecting again, aren’t we?

Reply to  MyUsername
August 6, 2024 1:46 pm

Joe Biden Art Playing Cards | Zazzle

Cards no longer in circulation.

Reply to  MyUsername
August 6, 2024 5:44 am

Another dead-on arrival statement that as usual avoids the opportunity to make a counterpoint to the article, but that will not happen because you are a warmist/alarmist kook.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Sunsettommy
August 6, 2024 8:11 am

Simplify to: “kook.”
The adjectives do not add anything.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  MyUsername
August 6, 2024 8:10 am

Do not feed the trolls.

Dave Fair
Reply to  MyUsername
August 6, 2024 9:45 am

MUN, why is it you consistently fail to address factual statements (including from the UN IPCC AR6, Roger Pielke, Jr. & etc.) showing that extreme weather events are no more frequent, intense nor of longer duration than they have been over the past 120+ years? Snarky sniping is not a scientific response; you are not a creditable voice for CAGW.

Reply to  Dave Fair
August 6, 2024 10:24 am

you are not a creditable voice for CAGW.

But a typical one.

Michael
Reply to  Dave Fair
August 9, 2024 5:37 am

There are no creditable voices for cagw.

Michael
Reply to  Michael
August 9, 2024 6:29 am

credible

Coeur de Lion
August 6, 2024 3:23 am

I’ve asked this before somewhere but is there available an examination of the survivability of windmills in a hurricane? Given the storms tracking up the east coast of the USA and the recent beach covered in windmill bits (Florida?) I would have thought it would be a matter of public concern.

strativarius
Reply to  Coeur de Lion
August 6, 2024 3:46 am

Or even solar panels and hail storms?

Reply to  strativarius
August 6, 2024 4:59 am

There should be estimations of such damage and the cost to rebuild them- built into the long term cost estimations. No doubt this isn’t done.

Reply to  Coeur de Lion
August 6, 2024 4:57 am

I would think the windmills are designed to withstand wind speeds up to a certain speed. So, what is that speed limit? There must be some general understanding of what’s a reasonable speed limit? But of course, none will survive a tornado.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
August 6, 2024 8:14 am

Reasonable limit?
No.
Safety requires an extreme value analysis. What is the maximum? Then add margin.

Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
August 6, 2024 1:17 pm

OK, so what are the numbers?

Rick C
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
August 6, 2024 5:08 pm

Don’t know about wind turbines but building codes have included wind load design specifications for many decades. Almost all US jurisdiction adopt some version of the International Code Council (ICC) model building codes. They are based on maximum wind speeds from 100 year or longer reoccurrence, terrain, height above ground and maximum gusts. Loads on structures are calculated based on shape and orientation. Depending on use – residential, commercial, emergency response, etc. – safety factors are then applied to the calculated maximum loads ranging from 1.5 to 3 times the anticipated load. In areas where hurricanes are prevalent most codes now require many structures to also be designed to withstand impacts from wind borne debris. Generally costal areas in hurricane prone areas have a base design load of 150 mph or more which produces a load of 58 lb/ft^2. (Wind Load (lb/ft^2) = 0.00256 x Velocity (mph)Squared)

Of course severe storms still create a lot of damage since many older structures were not built to current standards. Also, everything deteriorates with age and becomes weaker and poor quality building practices and lax enforcement contribute to failures. e.g. after hurricane Andrew devastated Homestead, Florida investigators found many cases where use of pneumatic nail guns resulted in entire rows of roof sheathing nails missing the framing.

Reply to  Rick C
August 7, 2024 3:11 am

So I wonder who’ll be responsible for the failed turbine blades? You have the producer of the blades, the installer, government agencies responsible for reviewing plans and installation.

strativarius
August 6, 2024 3:44 am

Rigzone?

[To] Rig: to arrange dishonestly for the result of something,..

Nuff said.

August 6, 2024 4:46 am

I would have guessed that hurricanes pose more of a threat to offshore wind than to oil rigs. But what do I know.

There is a large off shore wind power generation facility in the Moray Firth, Moray West and Moray East. Nine day storms in 1694 and 1413 buried the villages of Culbin and Forvie. The villagers had removed the marram grass fro the dunes but that didn’t create the storms.
Another location is off the coast of East Anglia where the Hurricane of 1703 caused huge amounts of damage.
Any one of those would leave the UK short of electricity for years

Reply to  Ben Vorlich
August 6, 2024 5:00 am

But you should feel good about that- since you’ll no longer be contributing to climate change! /s

Bryan A
Reply to  Ben Vorlich
August 6, 2024 5:36 am

Then there’s the Great Hurricane of 1782 that decimated the Caribbean. Scouring islands, stripping bark from stronger trees, razing entire islands to bare ground and killing more than 24,000

Reply to  Bryan A
August 6, 2024 1:20 pm

And assisting the Americans in their war of independence by taking the Royal Navy out at a crucial time.

abolition man
August 6, 2024 4:52 am

C’mon, Linnea!
There you go confusing the alarmist ostriches with facts and data! Again!
They are much more comfortable with their heads deeply buried in the sands of the corporate media desert! There they can wander blissfully for decades without ever encountering any REALITY! Instead, they let themselves be frightened half out of their minds by weird campfire climate tales!
Apparently, even seemingly intelligent and/or well educated people are easy to hypnotize and brainwash!

Mr Ed
Reply to  abolition man
August 6, 2024 6:37 am

“Apparently, even seemingly intelligent and/or well educated people are easy to hypnotize and brainwash!”

That was in full view yesterday on the stock exchanges around the world…I saw some
examples of the “Green New Deal” climate change ect, I expect to see much more today..

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  abolition man
August 6, 2024 8:15 am

Just flash cash and you capture them.

Sparta Nova 4
August 6, 2024 8:07 am

He was not in a position to say they were wrong, so he said, according to groups that track weather-related incidents.”

Politically astute.

Bob
August 6, 2024 3:09 pm

Very nice.

Editor
August 6, 2024 5:23 pm

As someone who has worked the Gulf of Mexico since 1988, I can unequivocally state that hurricanes suck! Always have, always will… Rita, Katrina and Ike were almost as bad for production as Obama and Biteme.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2022/03/31/the-impending-climate-crisis-in-the-gulf-of-mexico-and-other-biden-frack-ups/

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2020/11/18/2020-hurricane-season-curtailed-over-40-million-bbl-of-gom-oil-production/

comment image