Cleaning up emissions in-state increases worldwide emissions by “leaking” manufacturing to poorer developing countries with miniscule environmental regulations.
Published February 12, 2024, at America Out Loud NEWS

Ronald Stein is an engineer, senior policy advisor on energy literacy for the Heartland Institute and CFACT, and co-author of the Pulitzer Prize nominated book “Clean Energy Exploitations.”
In California, Governor Gavin Newsom has been vocal about his commitment to reducing in-state greenhouse gas emissions, but much of his “success” has been accomplished by “leaking” those emissions to offshore locations with miniscule environmental regulations compared to California.
California is probably the most environmentally regulated location on the planet. The state also has the highest poverty rate in the nation, the highest state income tax in the nation, the highest gas taxes in the nation, and record homelessness. The challenges are that:
- The states’ population needs cost effective products in their daily lives.
- The Governor supports manufacturing in poorer developing countries with minimal environmental regulations, i.e. “leakage” of emissions to others to achieve cost effective products for its population.
By “leaking” emissions to other countries, California successfully reduces its in-state emissions, but effectively induces net increases to the world’s emissions!
Newsom’s actions of “leaking” emissions to poorer developing countries violate many sections of the written legal framework of The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and California Global Warming Solutions Act (AB32).
The written legal “green” framework statutes in California that Newsom circumvents are:
- A California statute passed in 1970, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), that was signed into law by then-Governor Ronald Reagan and was the beginning of the State’s “green” movement.
- Then in 2006, the passage of the California Global Warming Solutions Act (AB 32) marked a watershed moment in California’s history. By requiring in law, a sharp reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, California set the stage for its transition to a sustainable, (in-state) low-carbon future.
Of those two voluminous documents, CEQA and AB32, Governor Newsom has chosen just five words from AB32 Section 38562 (4) “reduce toxic air contaminant emissions” as the foundation of his mandates, and his personal emission policy to clean the “air bubble” inside California borders by leaking those emissions to others outside the boundaries of California.
Here are a few sections from AB 32, the California Global Warming Solutions Act that demonstrate the Governor’s actions that increase the “leakage” of emissions to developing countries to clean the “air bubble” around California:
- AB32 section 38564 states: “The state board shall consult with other states, and the federal government, and other nations to identify the most effective strategies and methods to reduce greenhouse gases, manage greenhouse gas control programs, and to facilitate the development of integrated and cost-effective regional, national, and international greenhouse gas reduction programs”.
- A consequence of the renewable electricity (RE) movement is that most of the exotic minerals and metals needed by EV batteries, wind turbine, and solar panels are being mined in developing countries with virtually no environmental laws nor labor laws, thus the exploitation of people of yellow, brown, and black skin, and the environmental degradation to their local landscapes, all “unseen” by California eyes.
- Contrary to the wording in AB32 section 38564 “facilitate the development of integrated and cost-effective regional, national, and international greenhouse gas reduction programs”, government sponsored “SUBSIDIES” are providing financial incentives for those poorer developing countries to CONTINUE their unabated emissions, humanity atrocities to citizens of yellow, brown, and black skin, and environmental degradation to their lands, again “unseen by California eyes!!!!
- AB32 section 38562 (2) states: “Ensure that activities undertaken to comply with the regulations do not disproportionately impact low-income communities.”
- Back in 2021, the Pulitzer Prize nominated book “Clean Energy Exploitations – Helping Citizens Understand the Environmental and Humanity Abuses That Support Clean Energy. The discusses the lack of transparency to the world of the green movement’s impact upon humanity exploitations in the developing countries that are mining for the exotic minerals and metals required to create the batteries needed to store “green energy”. In these developing countries, these mining operations disproportionately impact low-income communities and exploit child labor and are responsible for the most egregious human rights’ violations of vulnerable minority populations. These operations are also directly destroying the planet through environmental degradation.
- One year later in 2022, President Biden provided validation to the books’ message when the Biden administration declared October 4, 2022, that batteries from China may be tainted by child labor, a move that could have upended the electric vehicle industry while giving fresh ammunition to critics of the White House’s bizarre climate policies. However, our government leaders believe that zero emissions at any cost is more important than the environmental and humanity abuses that support “clean” electricity.
- AB32 section 38562 (8) states: “minimize leakage”.
- Newsom, by continually decreasing in-state oil production, Newsom’s emissions policies continue to force California, the 4th largest economy in the world, to be the only state in contiguous America that imports most of its crude oil feedstock to refineries from foreign countries. That dependence, via maritime transportation from foreign nations for the state’s crude oil energy demands, has increased imported crude oil from 5 percent in 1992 to almost 60 percent today of total consumption.
- Since 1995, California’s crude oil demands have been increasing year over year, except for pandemic years. But given that maritime transportation is one of the greatest contributors of GHG emissions, the state continues to “leak” emissions to others outside the California clean air bubble.
- Rather than drill for oil in California or access the oil offshore via “slant drilling” techniques from land, in 2021, imported foreign crude oil approached 300,000 barrels per year. It took 150 Very Large Crude Carriers (VLCCs) oil tankers, each with 2 million barrels of crude oil, which were required to meet the demands of California. Just another example of “leaking” emissions to others just to keep in-state emissions low.
- More to the point, why aren’t we drilling in California? Won’t our drilling practices be more environmentally responsible? And won’t it benefit the environment to not have dozens of oil tankers perpetually belching bunker fuel exhaust off the coast of Long Beach, and that only after they’ve belched their way across the Pacific Ocean?
Is it ethical for the California Governor to blatantly not abide by his own laws and violate his own states’ legal framework to set his personal emissions policies?
His actions have raised concerns among legal experts and environmentalists, as they conflict with the state’s existing legal framework statutes which prioritize the affordability of products over their international environmental impact.
President Joe Biden and California’s Governor Newsom continue to support subsidies to procure products from locations around the world that have minimal environmental regulations, when those subsidies are providing financial incentives to increase worldwide emissions by manufacturing offshore to countries where there are no environmental regulations and emissions are rampant.
I personally thought that President Biden and California Governor Newsom had higher moral and ethical standards that would stop them from financially encouraging developing countries from continuing their exploitation of the poor with yellow, brown, and black skin, and further environmental degradation to the landscapes in those distant developing countries, and uncontrollable emissions “over there” just to support clean air in “our backyards”!
Ambassador for Energy & Infrastructure, Co-author of the Pulitzer Prize nominated book “Clean Energy Exploitations”, policy advisor on energy literacy for The Heartland Institute, and The Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow, and National TV Commentator- Energy & Infrastructure with Rick Amato.
Ronald Stein, P.E. is an engineer, energy consultant, speaker, author of books and articles on energy, environmental policy, and human rights, and Founder of PTS Advance, a California based company.
Ron advocates that energy literacy starts with the knowledge that renewable energy is only intermittent electricity generated from unreliable breezes and sunshine, as wind turbines and solar panels cannot manufacture anything for the 8 billion on this planet.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Great article about a subject that Californians refuse to see. But, we must stop seeing our politicians as moral and ethical – they are not.
Strange that these requirements have been ignored for over 50 years and the public is just now becoming aware of it. However, this appears to be the norm with the Democrats interpretation and enforcement of all laws.
“Leaking emissions” implies somehow inadvertent. This is deliberate advertent willful “exporting”. Great post otherwise.
Some colorful additional CA climate insanity indicia:
California has apparently forgotten that they exist in a world with other, saner, options.
Californicators! They screw up everyone else.
Story Tip:
Climate Change Manifesto
Opinion article by Albert Köhler M.Sc.
The philosopher Paul Feyerabend, born exactly 100 years ago, once remarked about the ‘ democratization of knowledge’: “The more popular an idea, the less people think about it, so the more important it becomes to examine its limits . This is infinitely necessary when it comes to “anthropogenic climate change,” and I would like to show you its obvious limitations in the following pages.
minUscule.
mini-school ….. where climate scientists graduate from !
Like Germany. Heavy manufacturing is deserting, last I heard was a big Aluminium making plant was moving elsewhere, or maybe it was just shutting down… and Audi was moving some production to China and Mexico.
Yes, this will certainly lower emissions, (as well as the value of society) in Germany, but the Increase in emissions from less strict emission controls in developing countries, plus the extra shipping etc involved, will mean an overall increase in emissions… of CO2 (which is not a problem) but also of actual real pollution.
The whole NET-ZERO nonsense will only destroy the countries that try to implement it, and almost certainly increase worldwide CO2 emissions and real pollution.
Can’t some one sue Gavvy?….also known as Giraffe Neck or Piglosi’s Boy.
The recall election failed.
Goodness gracious what are all these deplorable diesel tractors doing clogging up our Green leafy suburbs! How on earth are we supposed to get to brunch on time in the Tesla?
‘I personally thought that President Biden and California Governor Newsom had higher moral and ethical standards that would stop them from financially encouraging developing countries from continuing their exploitation of the poor with yellow, brown, and black skin’
missing the Sarcasm sign….
This is tangential to the main point of the article but Governor Reagan’s ‘California Environmental Quality Act’ was clearly designed to reduce the genuine air pollution problem abundantly apparent at the time, particularly in LA.
The ‘California Global Warming Solutions Act’ has nothing to do with air quality unless CO2 — a colourless odourless gas naturally present in the atmosphere and essential for plant photosynthesis — can be considered a “toxic air contaminant”.
CA also imports over 30% of its’ electricity. Most from fossil fuel generating plants in other states. Add that to the “leaking emissions”.
Intermountain Power Plant is a large coal-fired power plant at Delta, Utah, US. It has an installed capacity of 1,900 MW, is owned by the Intermountain Power Agency, and is operated by the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power.
Dont Forget Navajo 2.25 GW coal plant in NM, was 23% LADWP until it closed in 2019
Newsom is a disgrace.
…to the profession? Ha, well to his profession, perhaps not.
California DOESNT have the nations highest poverty rate
long way behind the actual highest’s: Alabama DC Oklahoma , South Carolina….. even New YorK Florida Missouri
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_and_territories_by_poverty_rate
Counting illegal aliens?
This character is incorrect on both posts(CA taxes & poverty). Not surprising since it also thinks the weather is too warm and we need to DO SOMETHING about it. Wrong about the taxes and poverty in CA. Don’t know whether to attribute it to dishonesty or imbecility. Likely both.
The evidence says differently – I might agree on the emissions claims
Wheres your evidence on the income tax and poverty rates?
US Census Bureau and Tax Foundation. Both on the first page of results when searched.
Your wiki link was for 2020 and 2021. As far as I can see it did not have a cost of living adjustment, or adjustment for the number of illegal aliens,
and COL?
My request to the World: Pray for the USA if Newsom ever becomes president.
California doesnt have the highest income tax rate either – for median household incomes
“Yes, sir! The Titanic’s crew will be happy to deal with those pesky deck chairs, just as soon as we’ve dealt with this little iceberg situation. Perhaps you should visit one of our lovely bars.!”
For Heaven’s sake, the cost of living makes a HUGE difference in relative poverty levels. The Wiki article you cite states that at the bottom, after giving out the federal rates! When you take into account the percentage of overall taxes against income, the rates of homeless and illegal alien populations, and the cost of fuel and housing; California is probably THE most expensive place to live in the US, especially in the ultra Liberal enclaves like San Fransicko, or my ancient high tech homeland; Palo Alto! That’s why it has the highest level of wealth disparity, and all indicators are that the rich will only get richer while the smart working and middle class residents are fleeing the state in droves and spreading the mind viruses they were infected with in childhood! I, personally, got tired of competing with workers who didn’t have my tools, skills or training; but were willing to work for less than half of what I was! That and I was tired of stressing over being pulled over by local law enforcement or ChiPs and having an unfunny version of Mad Max’s entry into the Thunder Dome take place! Now I live somewhere I can open/carry and I only work for those I deem worthy!
Duker –
I am travelling and can’t read your chart on my mobile. I am looking forward to tax-return preparation. Last year, the highest personal income-tax RATE in California was 13.5%, which was reportedly the highest in the US.
My figures are taxes paid on median household income. Doesn’t matter about top rate unless you are part of say the 1%
Tax rates are normally steps. However California property taxes are unbelievably high, which also means a lot of wealthy people live there too
“California doesnt have the highest income tax rate either”
“My figures are taxes paid on median household income. Doesn’t matter about top rate…”
So you were not disputing tax rate, you were disputing taxes on median income. Maybe you should have said that instead?
Plus he is only talking state icome tax, ignoring the many other calif taxes, and the COL in Calif.
2017?
How about something a little more up-to-date and not from Wiki?
Story Tip..
Smoke signals in South Australia.
https://youtu.be/1bKgsWdq9ZY?t=147
PS.. rest of the video is a good laugh , too. ! 🙂
Another story tip
Rowan Atkinson blamed for decline of EV sales in United Kingdom
(2) Mr Bean actor Rowan Atkinson blamed for decline of EV sales in United Kingdom – YouTube
Thanks for that. “Mr Bean” is such an interesting use of an Oxford degree.
His face and its ability, with his uncanny grasp of humour, allowed him to make FAR more money and have far more fun as a comedian than as an electrical engineer. 🙂
Go BlackAdder !! 🙂
We could surely use a new season (generation) of Black Adder where the current bloke is an EV salesman or a Ruinable Energy technician!
Plenty of JOKE material to draw from ! 🙂
Because of its major ports all kalifornika environmental regulations add costs to products transitting the state into the interior of the US. The additional costs are defacto taxation without representation levied on consumers across the country.
Newsom is the epitome of a charlatan
He got elected on his looks and nothing else.
All hat and no cattle
Very similar looks to Truedope, and Macaroon.
Gruesome doesn’t look a thing like Justine’s dad; Fidel! Klaus (Barbie) Schwab does seem to like his WEF Young Leaders to be attractive; it makes the lies go down so much easier!
What is it with the French?
I believe that promising FREE STUFF helped a lot.
California is hardly alone at pulling these stunts since the Canadian provinces of British Columbia and Quebec have their own variations. Both try to publicize their commitments to green economies both domestically and internationally. Meanwhile the former exports huge amounts of coal to Asia, and the latter refuses to allow the extensions of pipelines to it from western Canada. Yet it doesn’t hesitate to import oil from countries like Venezuela and Nigeria, which have far fewer refining regulations than anyplace in Canada. So both are just transferring their emissions overseas one way or another.
I just had the great good fortune of scheduling several lodgings for my once-in-a-lifetime trip to Yosemite National Park. What joy.
They have a gratuity for lodging that you only see if you happen to click on a little question mark icon which says, “Best Available Rate (?)” It’s a bit like the restaurant that automatically deducts your tip so that you don’t have to handle their pens with greasy fingers. The fee amount is buried somewhere in the 13.5 % taxes and fees assessed on the room rate.
I thought I was already doing my part for the park by paying for a park pass, an additional entry fee (started this year) and $272.92 for a room with a couple of beds and a “bath”. I don’t care much about the bath, but the toilet seemed like a good idea. This is nothing, I realize. I asked an agent why the Ahwhannee Hotel charges upwards of $600. “Is it the location?” I asked. “No. It’s the status of the place,” he said. Awhannee is an Indian word that translates loosely as “Sucker”.
That’s why it’s a once in a lifetime trip.
I visited Yosemite National Park in the 1960s. That was a different experience than you describe.
I also visited Lassen Volcanic NP using backpack, bus, and my thumb. 🙂
Another falsehood on this poorly reserched story
300,000 barrels doesnt require even ONE VLCC with 2 mill barrels of oil
The 300,000 is of course incorrect – they didnt read the source properly as units are -millions of barrels. so make that 300 mill barrels
The real problem is the decline in supply from Alaska , alongside depletion of Californias own
It has been mention on prior posts — Mr. Stein needs and editor. His good ideas get garbled.
😉
Sometimes it is me, sometimes it is auto-fill, and sometimes I need an editorr. 🙂
Here’s the thing with people. What they do is more important than what they say. But people, especially the left, also pay more attention to words than actions. As long as progressives say the right things and appear to do something, regardless of the consequences, that’s good enough.
No one ever connects Jerry Brown or Gavin Newsom and their signed legislation benefiting the Brown and Getty Family oil businesses. Although all this information on their total control of imported oil into California is and has been available for years. Why is that?